Geometric Slosh-Free Tracking for Robotic Manipulators
Abstract: This work focuses on the agile transportation of liquids with robotic manipulators. In contrast to existing methods that are either computationally heavy, system/container specific or dependant on a singularity-prone pendulum model, we present a real-time slosh-free tracking technique. This method solely requires the reference trajectory and the robot's kinematic constraints to output kinematically feasible joint space commands. The crucial element underlying this approach consists on mimicking the end-effector's motion through a virtual quadrotor, which is inherently slosh-free and differentially flat, thereby allowing us to calculate a slosh-free reference orientation. Through the utilization of a cascaded proportional-derivative (PD) controller, this slosh-free reference is transformed into task space acceleration commands, which, following the resolution of a Quadratic Program (QP) based on Resolved Acceleration Control (RAC), are translated into a feasible joint configuration. The validity of the proposed approach is demonstrated by simulated and real-world experiments on a 7 DoF Franka Emika Panda robot. Code: https://github.com/jonarriza96/gsft Video: https://youtu.be/4kitqYVS9n8
- H. Abramson, “Dynamic behavior of liquids in moving containers with applications to propellants in space vehicle fuel tanks,” in Technical Report, vol. 36, no. 1, 1966, pp. 44–67.
- S. a. d. Wiesche, “Computational slosh dynamics: theory and industrial application,” Computational mechanics, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 374–387, 2003.
- M. Müller, D. Charypar, and M. Gross, “Particle-based fluid simulation for interactive applications,” in Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics symposium on Computer animation. Citeseer, 2003, pp. 154–159.
- M. H. Djavareshkian and M. Khalili, “Simulation of sloshing with the volume of fluid method,” Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 299–308, 2006.
- Z. Pan and D. Manocha, “Motion planning for fluid manipulation using simplified dynamics,” in 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2016, pp. 4224–4231.
- J. Ichnowski, Y. Avigal, Y. Liu, and K. Goldberg, “Gomp-fit: Grasp-optimized motion planning for fast inertial transport,” in 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2022, pp. 5255–5261.
- Y. Kuriyama, K. Yano, and M. Hamaguchi, “Trajectory planning for meal assist robot considering spilling avoidance,” in 2008 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications. IEEE, 2008, pp. 1220–1225.
- J. Hartz, “Adaptive pouring of liquids with a robotic arm,” 2018.
- L. Rozo, P. Jiménez, and C. Torras, “Force-based robot learning of pouring skills using parametric hidden markov models,” in 9th International Workshop on Robot Motion and Control, 2013, pp. 227–232.
- M. Grundelius and B. Bernhardsson, “Motion control of open containers with slosh constraints,” IFAC Proceedings Volumes, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 6142–6147, 1999.
- A. Aboel-Hassan, M. Arafa, and A. Nassef, “Design and optimization of input shapers for liquid slosh suppression,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 320, no. 1-2, pp. 1–15, 2009.
- B. Pridgen, K. Bai, and W. Singhose, “Shaping container motion for multimode and robust slosh suppression,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 440–448, 2013.
- A. Y. S. Wan, Y. D. Soong, E. Foo, W. L. E. Wong, and W. S. M. Lau, “Waiter robots conveying drinks,” Technologies, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 44, 2020.
- K. Yano, S. Higashikawa, and K. Terashima, “Liquid container transfer control on 3d transfer path by hybrid shaped approach,” in Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (CCA’01)(Cat. No. 01CH37204). IEEE, 2001, pp. 1168–1173.
- M. W. Decker, “Active acceleration compensation for transport of delicate objects,” Ph.D. dissertation, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2000.
- A. X. Dang and I. Ebert-Uphoff, “Active acceleration compensation for transport vehicles carrying delicate objects,” IEEE transactions on robotics, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 830–839, 2004.
- J. Han, “A study on the coffee spilling phenomena in the low impulse regime,” Achievements in the Life Sciences, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 87–101, 2016.
- H. Guang, S. Bazzi, D. Sternad, and N. Hogan, “Dynamic primitives in human manipulation of non-rigid objects,” in 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2019, pp. 3783–3789.
- L. Biagiotti, D. Chiaravalli, L. Moriello, and C. Melchiorri, “A plug-in feed-forward control for sloshing suppression in robotic teleoperation tasks,” in 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2018, pp. 5855–5860.
- R. I. C. Muchacho, R. Laha, L. F. Figueredo, and S. Haddadin, “A solution to slosh-free robot trajectory optimization,” in 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2022, pp. 223–230.
- T. Lee, M. Leok, and N. H. McClamroch, “Global formulations of lagrangian and hamiltonian dynamics on manifolds,” Springer, vol. 13, p. 31, 2017.
- D. Mellinger and V. Kumar, “Minimum snap trajectory generation and control for quadrotors,” in 2011 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. IEEE, 2011, pp. 2520–2525.
- J. Luh, M. Walker, and R. Paul, “Resolved-acceleration control of mechanical manipulators,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 468–474, 1980.
- J. Haviland and P. Corke, “Manipulator differential kinematics: Part i: Kinematics, velocity, and applications,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, pp. 2–12, 2023.
- T. Lee, M. Leok, and N. H. McClamroch, “Geometric tracking control of a quadrotor uav on se (3),” in 49th IEEE conference on decision and control (CDC). IEEE, 2010, pp. 5420–5425.
- J. Haviland and P. Corke, “A purely-reactive manipulability-maximising motion controller,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.11901, 2020.
- S. Haddadin, S. Parusel, L. Johannsmeier, S. Golz, S. Gabl, F. Walch, M. Sabaghian, C. Jähne, L. Hausperger, and S. Haddadin, “The franka emika robot: A reference platform for robotics research and education,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 46–64, 2022.
- P. Corke and J. Haviland, “Not your grandmother’s toolbox–the robotics toolbox reinvented for python,” in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2021, pp. 11 357–11 363.
- D. Goldfarb and A. Idnani, “A numerically stable dual method for solving strictly convex quadratic programs,” Mathematical programming, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–33, 1983.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.