Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Source Confusion from Neutron Star Binaries in Ground-Based Gravitational Wave Detectors is Minimal

Published 9 Feb 2024 in gr-qc, astro-ph.HE, and astro-ph.IM | (2402.06836v2)

Abstract: Upgrades beyond the current second generation of ground-based gravitational wave detectors will allow them to observe tens of thousands neutron star and black hole binaries. Given the typical minute-to-hour duration of neutron star signals in the detector frequency band, a number of them will overlap in the time-frequency plane resulting in a nonzero cross-correlation. We examine source confusion arising from overlapping signals whose time-frequency tracks cross. Adopting the median observed merger rate of $100$ Gpc${-3}$yr${-1}$, each neutron star binary signal overlaps with an average of 42(4)[0.5] other signals when observed from 2(5)[10] Hz. The vast majority of overlaps occur at low frequencies where the inspiral evolution is slow: 91% of time-frequency overlaps occur in band below 5 Hz. The combined effect of overlapping signals does not satisfy the central limit theorem and source confusion cannot be treated as stationary, Gaussian noise: on average 0.91(0.17)[0.05] signals are present in a single adaptive time-frequency bin centered at 2(5)[10] Hz. We quantify source confusion under a realistic neutron star binary population and find that parameter uncertainty typically increases by less than 1% unless there are overlapping signals whose detector-frame chirp mass difference is $\lesssim 0.01 M_{\odot}$ and the overlap frequency is $\gtrsim$ 40 Hz. Out of $1\times106$ simulated signals, 0.14% fall within this region of detector-frame chirp mass differences, but their overlap frequencies are typically lower than 40 Hz. Source confusion for ground-based detectors, where events overlap instantaneously is significantly milder than the equivalent LISA problem, where many classes of events overlap for the lifetime of the mission.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (41)
  1. R. X. Adhikari et al. (LIGO), A cryogenic silicon interferometer for gravitational-wave detection, Class. Quant. Grav. 37, 165003 (2020), arXiv:2001.11173 [astro-ph.IM] .
  2. D. Reitze et al., Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 035 (2019), arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM] .
  3. S. Hild et al., Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories, Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 094013 (2011), arXiv:1012.0908 [gr-qc] .
  4. C. Cutler and J. Harms, BBO and the neutron-star-binary subtraction problem, Phys. Rev. D 73, 042001 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0511092 .
  5. P. Amaro-Seoane et al., Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1702.00786 (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM] .
  6. D. Hils, P. L. Bender, and R. F. Webbink, Gravitational Radiation from the Galaxy, Astrophys. J.  360, 75 (1990).
  7. T. Robson and N. Cornish, Impact of galactic foreground characterization on a global analysis for the LISA gravitational wave observatory, Class. Quant. Grav. 34, 244002 (2017), arXiv:1705.09421 [gr-qc] .
  8. J. Crowder and N. J. Cornish, LISA source confusion, Phys. Rev. D 70, 082004 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0404129 .
  9. E. Racine and C. Cutler, Gaussianity of LISA’s confusion backgrounds, Phys. Rev. D 76, 124033 (2007), arXiv:0708.4242 [gr-qc] .
  10. T. Regimbau and S. A. Hughes, Gravitational-wave confusion background from cosmological compact binaries: Implications for future terrestrial detectors, Phys. Rev. D 79, 062002 (2009), arXiv:0901.2958 [gr-qc] .
  11. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW170817: Implications for the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background from Compact Binary Coalescences, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 091101 (2018), arXiv:1710.05837 [gr-qc] .
  12. P. Relton and V. Raymond, Parameter estimation bias from overlapping binary black hole events in second generation interferometers, Phys. Rev. D 104, 084039 (2021), arXiv:2103.16225 [gr-qc] .
  13. T. Regimbau et al., A Mock Data Challenge for the Einstein Gravitational-Wave Telescope, Phys. Rev. D 86, 122001 (2012), arXiv:1201.3563 [gr-qc] .
  14. S. Wu and A. H. Nitz, Mock data study for next-generation ground-based detectors: The performance loss of matched filtering due to correlated confusion noise, Phys. Rev. D 107, 063022 (2023), arXiv:2209.03135 [astro-ph.IM] .
  15. A. L. Miller, N. Singh, and C. Palomba, Enabling multi-messenger astronomy with continuous gravitational waves: early warning and sky localization of binary neutron stars in Einstein Telescope, arXiv eprints  (2023), arXiv:2309.15808 [astro-ph.IM] .
  16. Y. Himemoto, A. Nishizawa, and A. Taruya, Impacts of overlapping gravitational-wave signals on the parameter estimation: Toward the search for cosmological backgrounds, Phys. Rev. D 104, 044010 (2021), arXiv:2103.14816 [gr-qc] .
  17. A. Antonelli, O. Burke, and J. R. Gair, Noisy neighbours: inference biases from overlapping gravitational-wave signals, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 507, 5069 (2021), arXiv:2104.01897 [gr-qc] .
  18. T. B. Littenberg and N. J. Cornish, Prototype global analysis of LISA data with multiple source types, Phys. Rev. D 107, 063004 (2023), arXiv:2301.03673 [gr-qc] .
  19. R. Smith et al., Bayesian Inference for Gravitational Waves from Binary Neutron Star Mergers in Third Generation Observatories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 081102 (2021), arXiv:2103.12274 [gr-qc] .
  20. H. Zhong, R. Ormiston, and V. Mandic, Detecting cosmological gravitational waves background after removal of compact binary coalescences in future gravitational wave detectors, arXiv eprints  (2022), arXiv:2209.11877 [gr-qc] .
  21. Cosmic explorer noise curves, https://dcc.cosmicexplorer.org/CE-T2000017/public (2022), accessed: 2023-09-20.
  22. A. W. Steiner, M. Hempel, and T. Fischer, Core-collapse supernova equations of state based on neutron star observations, Astrophys. J. 774, 17 (2013), arXiv:1207.2184 [astro-ph.SR] .
  23. P. Madau and M. Dickinson, Cosmic star-formation history, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 52, 415 (2014).
  24. T. Regimbau et al., MDC_Generation (2022).
  25. S. Sachdev, T. Regimbau, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Subtracting compact binary foreground sources to reveal primordial gravitational-wave backgrounds, Phys. Rev. D 102, 024051 (2020), arXiv:2002.05365 [gr-qc] .
  26. S. Borhanian and B. Sathyaprakash, Listening to the universe with next generation ground-based gravitational-wave detectors (2022), arXiv:2202.11048 [gr-qc] .
  27. Q. Hu and J. Veitch, Accumulating Errors in Tests of General Relativity with Gravitational Waves: Overlapping Signals and Inaccurate Waveforms, Astrophys. J. 945, 103 (2023), arXiv:2210.04769 [gr-qc] .
  28. D. Gabor, Theory of communication. part 1: The analysis of information, Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers - Part III: Radio and Communication Engineering 93, 429 (1946).
  29. M. Isi and W. M. Farr, Analyzing black-hole ringdowns, arXiv eprints  (2021), arXiv:2107.05609 [gr-qc] .
  30. M. Vallisneri, Use and abuse of the Fisher information matrix in the assessment of gravitational-wave parameter-estimation prospects, Phys. Rev. D 77, 042001 (2008), arXiv:gr-qc/0703086 .
  31. L. Reali, A. Maselli, and E. Berti, The impact of compact binary confusion noise on tests of fundamental physics with next-generation gravitational-wave detectors, arXiv eprints  (2023), arXiv:2307.01264 [gr-qc] .
  32. C. Plunkett, S. Hourihane, and K. Chatziioannou, Concurrent estimation of noise and compact-binary signal parameters in gravitational-wave data, Phys. Rev. D 106, 104021 (2022), arXiv:2208.02291 [gr-qc] .
  33. A. Sharma and J. Harms, Searching for cosmological gravitational-wave backgrounds with third-generation detectors in the presence of an astrophysical foreground, Phys. Rev. D 102, 063009 (2020), arXiv:2006.16116 [gr-qc] .
  34. J. D. Hunter, Matplotlib: A 2d graphics environment, Computing In Science & Engineering 9, 90 (2007).
  35. Astropy Collaboration, The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package, Astronomical J. 156, 123 (2018), arXiv:1801.02634 [astro-ph.IM] .
  36. N. Cornish, private communication (2023).
  37. C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag, Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers (McGraw-Hill, 1978).
  38. P. Ajith, Addressing the spin question in gravitational-wave searches: Waveform templates for inspiralling compact binaries with nonprecessing spins, Physical Review D 84, 084037 (2011), publisher: American Physical Society.
  39. S. Borhanian, GWBENCH: a novel Fisher information package for gravitational-wave benchmarking, Classical and Quantum Gravity 38, 175014 (2021), publisher: IOP Publishing.
  40. P. Jaranowski, A. Krolak, and B. F. Schutz, Data analysis of gravitational-wave signals from spinning neutron stars: The signal and its detection, Physical Review D 58, 063001 (1998), publisher: American Physical Society.
  41. T.-T. Lu and S.-H. Shiou, Inverses of 2 × 2 block matrices, Computers & Mathematics with Applications 43, 119 (2002).
Citations (4)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.