Source Confusion from Neutron Star Binaries in Ground-Based Gravitational Wave Detectors is Minimal
Abstract: Upgrades beyond the current second generation of ground-based gravitational wave detectors will allow them to observe tens of thousands neutron star and black hole binaries. Given the typical minute-to-hour duration of neutron star signals in the detector frequency band, a number of them will overlap in the time-frequency plane resulting in a nonzero cross-correlation. We examine source confusion arising from overlapping signals whose time-frequency tracks cross. Adopting the median observed merger rate of $100$ Gpc${-3}$yr${-1}$, each neutron star binary signal overlaps with an average of 42(4)[0.5] other signals when observed from 2(5)[10] Hz. The vast majority of overlaps occur at low frequencies where the inspiral evolution is slow: 91% of time-frequency overlaps occur in band below 5 Hz. The combined effect of overlapping signals does not satisfy the central limit theorem and source confusion cannot be treated as stationary, Gaussian noise: on average 0.91(0.17)[0.05] signals are present in a single adaptive time-frequency bin centered at 2(5)[10] Hz. We quantify source confusion under a realistic neutron star binary population and find that parameter uncertainty typically increases by less than 1% unless there are overlapping signals whose detector-frame chirp mass difference is $\lesssim 0.01 M_{\odot}$ and the overlap frequency is $\gtrsim$ 40 Hz. Out of $1\times106$ simulated signals, 0.14% fall within this region of detector-frame chirp mass differences, but their overlap frequencies are typically lower than 40 Hz. Source confusion for ground-based detectors, where events overlap instantaneously is significantly milder than the equivalent LISA problem, where many classes of events overlap for the lifetime of the mission.
- R. X. Adhikari et al. (LIGO), A cryogenic silicon interferometer for gravitational-wave detection, Class. Quant. Grav. 37, 165003 (2020), arXiv:2001.11173 [astro-ph.IM] .
- D. Reitze et al., Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 035 (2019), arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM] .
- S. Hild et al., Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories, Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 094013 (2011), arXiv:1012.0908 [gr-qc] .
- C. Cutler and J. Harms, BBO and the neutron-star-binary subtraction problem, Phys. Rev. D 73, 042001 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0511092 .
- P. Amaro-Seoane et al., Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1702.00786 (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM] .
- D. Hils, P. L. Bender, and R. F. Webbink, Gravitational Radiation from the Galaxy, Astrophys. J.  360, 75 (1990).
- T. Robson and N. Cornish, Impact of galactic foreground characterization on a global analysis for the LISA gravitational wave observatory, Class. Quant. Grav. 34, 244002 (2017), arXiv:1705.09421 [gr-qc] .
- J. Crowder and N. J. Cornish, LISA source confusion, Phys. Rev. D 70, 082004 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0404129 .
- E. Racine and C. Cutler, Gaussianity of LISA’s confusion backgrounds, Phys. Rev. D 76, 124033 (2007), arXiv:0708.4242 [gr-qc] .
- T. Regimbau and S. A. Hughes, Gravitational-wave confusion background from cosmological compact binaries: Implications for future terrestrial detectors, Phys. Rev. D 79, 062002 (2009), arXiv:0901.2958 [gr-qc] .
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW170817: Implications for the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background from Compact Binary Coalescences, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 091101 (2018), arXiv:1710.05837 [gr-qc] .
- P. Relton and V. Raymond, Parameter estimation bias from overlapping binary black hole events in second generation interferometers, Phys. Rev. D 104, 084039 (2021), arXiv:2103.16225 [gr-qc] .
- T. Regimbau et al., A Mock Data Challenge for the Einstein Gravitational-Wave Telescope, Phys. Rev. D 86, 122001 (2012), arXiv:1201.3563 [gr-qc] .
- S. Wu and A. H. Nitz, Mock data study for next-generation ground-based detectors: The performance loss of matched filtering due to correlated confusion noise, Phys. Rev. D 107, 063022 (2023), arXiv:2209.03135 [astro-ph.IM] .
- A. L. Miller, N. Singh, and C. Palomba, Enabling multi-messenger astronomy with continuous gravitational waves: early warning and sky localization of binary neutron stars in Einstein Telescope, arXiv eprints (2023), arXiv:2309.15808 [astro-ph.IM] .
- Y. Himemoto, A. Nishizawa, and A. Taruya, Impacts of overlapping gravitational-wave signals on the parameter estimation: Toward the search for cosmological backgrounds, Phys. Rev. D 104, 044010 (2021), arXiv:2103.14816 [gr-qc] .
- A. Antonelli, O. Burke, and J. R. Gair, Noisy neighbours: inference biases from overlapping gravitational-wave signals, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 507, 5069 (2021), arXiv:2104.01897 [gr-qc] .
- T. B. Littenberg and N. J. Cornish, Prototype global analysis of LISA data with multiple source types, Phys. Rev. D 107, 063004 (2023), arXiv:2301.03673 [gr-qc] .
- R. Smith et al., Bayesian Inference for Gravitational Waves from Binary Neutron Star Mergers in Third Generation Observatories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 081102 (2021), arXiv:2103.12274 [gr-qc] .
- H. Zhong, R. Ormiston, and V. Mandic, Detecting cosmological gravitational waves background after removal of compact binary coalescences in future gravitational wave detectors, arXiv eprints (2022), arXiv:2209.11877 [gr-qc] .
- Cosmic explorer noise curves, https://dcc.cosmicexplorer.org/CE-T2000017/public (2022), accessed: 2023-09-20.
- A. W. Steiner, M. Hempel, and T. Fischer, Core-collapse supernova equations of state based on neutron star observations, Astrophys. J. 774, 17 (2013), arXiv:1207.2184 [astro-ph.SR] .
- P. Madau and M. Dickinson, Cosmic star-formation history, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 52, 415 (2014).
- T. Regimbau et al., MDC_Generation (2022).
- S. Sachdev, T. Regimbau, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Subtracting compact binary foreground sources to reveal primordial gravitational-wave backgrounds, Phys. Rev. D 102, 024051 (2020), arXiv:2002.05365 [gr-qc] .
- S. Borhanian and B. Sathyaprakash, Listening to the universe with next generation ground-based gravitational-wave detectors (2022), arXiv:2202.11048 [gr-qc] .
- Q. Hu and J. Veitch, Accumulating Errors in Tests of General Relativity with Gravitational Waves: Overlapping Signals and Inaccurate Waveforms, Astrophys. J. 945, 103 (2023), arXiv:2210.04769 [gr-qc] .
- D. Gabor, Theory of communication. part 1: The analysis of information, Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers - Part III: Radio and Communication Engineering 93, 429 (1946).
- M. Isi and W. M. Farr, Analyzing black-hole ringdowns, arXiv eprints (2021), arXiv:2107.05609 [gr-qc] .
- M. Vallisneri, Use and abuse of the Fisher information matrix in the assessment of gravitational-wave parameter-estimation prospects, Phys. Rev. D 77, 042001 (2008), arXiv:gr-qc/0703086 .
- L. Reali, A. Maselli, and E. Berti, The impact of compact binary confusion noise on tests of fundamental physics with next-generation gravitational-wave detectors, arXiv eprints (2023), arXiv:2307.01264 [gr-qc] .
- C. Plunkett, S. Hourihane, and K. Chatziioannou, Concurrent estimation of noise and compact-binary signal parameters in gravitational-wave data, Phys. Rev. D 106, 104021 (2022), arXiv:2208.02291 [gr-qc] .
- A. Sharma and J. Harms, Searching for cosmological gravitational-wave backgrounds with third-generation detectors in the presence of an astrophysical foreground, Phys. Rev. D 102, 063009 (2020), arXiv:2006.16116 [gr-qc] .
- J. D. Hunter, Matplotlib: A 2d graphics environment, Computing In Science & Engineering 9, 90 (2007).
- Astropy Collaboration, The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package, Astronomical J. 156, 123 (2018), arXiv:1801.02634 [astro-ph.IM] .
- N. Cornish, private communication (2023).
- C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag, Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers (McGraw-Hill, 1978).
- P. Ajith, Addressing the spin question in gravitational-wave searches: Waveform templates for inspiralling compact binaries with nonprecessing spins, Physical Review D 84, 084037 (2011), publisher: American Physical Society.
- S. Borhanian, GWBENCH: a novel Fisher information package for gravitational-wave benchmarking, Classical and Quantum Gravity 38, 175014 (2021), publisher: IOP Publishing.
- P. Jaranowski, A. Krolak, and B. F. Schutz, Data analysis of gravitational-wave signals from spinning neutron stars: The signal and its detection, Physical Review D 58, 063001 (1998), publisher: American Physical Society.
- T.-T. Lu and S.-H. Shiou, Inverses of 2 × 2 block matrices, Computers & Mathematics with Applications 43, 119 (2002).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.