Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Phase transition to turbulence via moving fronts

Published 13 Feb 2024 in physics.flu-dyn | (2402.08829v3)

Abstract: Directed percolation (DP), a universality class of continuous phase transitions, has recently been established as a possible route to turbulence in subcritical wall-bounded flows. In canonical straight pipe or planar flows, the transition occurs via discrete large-scale turbulent structures, known as puffs in pipe flow or bands in planar flows, which either self-replicate or laminarize. However, these processes might not be universal to all subcritical shear flows. Here, we design a numerical experiment that eliminates discrete structures in plane Couette flow and show that it follows a different, simpler transition scenario: turbulence proliferates via expanding fronts and decays via spontaneous creation of laminar zones. We map this phase transition onto a stochastic one-variable system. The level of turbulent fluctuations dictates whether moving-front transition is discontinuous, or continuous and within the DP universality class, with profound implications for other hydrodynamic systems.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (25)
  1. Y. Pomeau, Physica D 23, 3 (1986).
  2. P. Grassberger, in Nonlinear Phenomena in Chemical Dynamics (Springer, 1981) p. 262.
  3. H.-K. Janssen, Z. Phys. B 42, 151 (1981).
  4. F. Waleffe, Phys. Fluids 9, 883 (1997).
  5. D. Barkley and L. S. Tuckerman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 014502 (2005).
  6. D. Coles and C. van Atta, AIAA Journal 4, 1969 (1966).
  7. I. J. Wygnanski and F. Champagne, J. Fluid Mech. 59, 281 (1973).
  8. D. Barkley and L. S. Tuckerman, J. Fluid Mech. 576, 109 (2007).
  9. Y. Duguet and P. Schlatter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 034502 (2013).
  10. M. Couliou and R. Monchaux, Phys. Fluids 27, 034101 (2015).
  11. C. W. van Doorne and J. Westerweel, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 367, 489 (2009).
  12. D. Barkley, Phys. Rev. E 84, 016309 (2011a).
  13. D. Barkley, J. Fluid Mech. 803, P1 (2016).
  14. S. J. Benavides and D. Barkley, arXiv:2309.12879  (2023).
  15. D. Barkley, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 318, 032001 (2011b).
  16. J. Gibson, F. Reetz, S. Azimi, A. Ferraro, T. Kreilos, H. Schrobsdorff, M. Farano, A. Yesil, S. Schütz, M. Culpo,  and T. Schneider, “Channelflow 2.0,”  (2019), manuscript in preparation, see channelflow.ch.
  17. Y. Pomeau, Comptes Rendus Mécanique 343, 210 (2015).
  18. M. A. Munoz, Phys. Rev. E 57, 1377 (1998).
  19. M. A. Munoz and R. Pastor-Satorras, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 204101 (2003).
  20. M. A. Munoz, arXiv:cond-mat/0303650  (2003).
  21. J. F. Gibson, Channelflow: A Spectral Navier-Stokes Simulator in C++, Tech. Rep. (University of New Hampshire, 2012) see Channelflow.org.
  22. J. Jiménez and A. Pinelli, J. Fluid Mech. 389, 335 (1999).
  23. J. Jimenez, arXiv:2202.09814  (2022).
  24. W. Van Saarloos, Physics Reports 386, 29 (2003).
  25. H. Hinrichsen, Advances in Physics 49, 815 (2000).
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.