Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Quantum dynamics of semiconductor quantum dot Josephson junctions

Published 15 Feb 2024 in cond-mat.mes-hall, cond-mat.supr-con, and quant-ph | (2402.10330v2)

Abstract: Josephson junctions constructed from superconductor-semiconductor-superconductor heterostructures have been used to realize a variety of voltage-tunable superconducting quantum devices, including qubits and parametric amplifiers. To date theoretical descriptions of these systems have been restricted to small quantum fluctuations of the junction phase, making them inapplicable to many experiments. In this work we relax this, employing a path-integral formulation where the phase quantum dynamics is obtained self-consistently from an underlying many-body formalism. Our method recovers previously-known results for small phase fluctuations, and predicts new effects outside of that limit: (i) system capacitances undergo a gate-voltage-dependent renormalization; and (ii) an additional charge offset appears for asymmetric junctions. Our main results can be summarized in terms of a single-particle Hamiltonian, which can be directly compared to that of an ordinary Josephson junction. This more general theory could be a first step towards designing new quantum devices that go qualitatively beyond voltage-tunable variants of previously-known circuits.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (10)
  1. C. W. J. Beenakker and H. van Houten, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 3056 (1991).
  2. M. H. Devoret, “Quantum fluctuations in electrical circuits,” in Quantum Fluctuations: Les Houches Session LXIII, June 27 to July 28 1995, edited by E. G. S. Reynaud and J. Zinn-Justin (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1997) pp. 351–386.
  3. A. I. Larkin and Y. N. Ovchinnikov, Phys. Rev. B 28, 6281 (1983).
  4. T. Vakhtel and B. Van Heck, Phys. Rev. B 107, 195405 (2023).
  5. P. Coleman, Introduction to Many-Body Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015).
  6. A. Altland and B. Simons, Condensed Matter Field Theory, Second Edition, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010).
  7. A. V. Rozhkov and D. P. Arovas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2788 (1999).
  8. V. Meden, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 31, 163001 (2019).
  9. For Γi≪Δ2−ϵg2much-less-thansubscriptΓ𝑖superscriptΔ2superscriptsubscriptitalic-ϵ𝑔2\Gamma_{i}\ll\sqrt{\Delta^{2}-\epsilon_{g}^{2}}roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ square-root start_ARG roman_Δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG, ζ=Δ2−ϵg2+Γ⁢ϵg2Δ2−ϵg2+𝒪⁢(sin2⁡ϕ2⁢Γi2Δ2−ϵg2)𝜁superscriptΔ2superscriptsubscriptitalic-ϵ𝑔2Γsuperscriptsubscriptitalic-ϵ𝑔2superscriptΔ2superscriptsubscriptitalic-ϵ𝑔2𝒪superscript2italic-ϕ2superscriptsubscriptΓ𝑖2superscriptΔ2superscriptsubscriptitalic-ϵ𝑔2\zeta=\sqrt{\Delta^{2}-\epsilon_{g}^{2}}+\Gamma\frac{\epsilon_{g}^{2}}{\Delta^% {2}-\epsilon_{g}^{2}}+\mathcal{O}\left(\sin^{2}\frac{\phi}{2}\frac{\Gamma_{i}^% {2}}{\Delta^{2}-\epsilon_{g}^{2}}\right)italic_ζ = square-root start_ARG roman_Δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + roman_Γ divide start_ARG italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + caligraphic_O ( roman_sin start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_ϕ end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG divide start_ARG roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) depends weakly on the phase.
  10. A more rigorous definition of EJ,effsubscript𝐸𝐽effE_{J,\text{eff}}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J , eff end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with exact continuum contributions does not alter this result.
Citations (1)

Summary

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We're still in the process of identifying open problems mentioned in this paper. Please check back in a few minutes.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 34 likes about this paper.