Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Catalytic enhancement in the performance of the microscopic two-stroke heat engine

Published 16 Feb 2024 in quant-ph | (2402.10384v2)

Abstract: We consider a model of heat engine operating in the microscopic regime: the two-stroke engine. It produces work and exchanges heat in two discrete strokes that are separated in time. The working body of the engine consists of two $d$-level systems initialized in thermal states at two distinct temperatures. Additionally, an auxiliary non-equilibrium system called catalyst may be incorporated with the working body of the engine, provided the state of the catalyst remains unchanged after the completion of a thermodynamic cycle. This ensures that the work produced by the engine arises solely from the temperature difference. Upon establishing the rigorous thermodynamic framework, we characterize two-fold improvement stemming from the inclusion of a catalyst. Firstly, we prove that in the non-catalytic scenario, the optimal efficiency of the two-stroke heat engine with a working body composed of two-level systems is given by the Otto efficiency, which can be surpassed by incorporating a catalyst with the working body. Secondly, we show that incorporating a catalyst allows the engine to operate in frequency and temperature regimes that are not accessible for non-catalytic two-stroke engines. We conclude with general conjecture about advantage brought by catalyst: including the catalyst with the working body always allows to improve efficiency over the non-catalytic scenario for any microscopic two-stroke heat engines. We prove the conjecture for two-stroke engines when the working body is composed of two $d$-level systems initialized in thermal states at two distinct temperatures, as long as the final joint state leading to optimal efficiency in the non-catalytic scenario is not product, or at least one of the $d$-level system is not thermal.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (34)
  1. N. Shiraishi and T. Sagawa, Quantum thermodynamics of correlated-catalytic state conversion at small scale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 150502 (2021).
  2. H. Wilming, Entropy and reversible catalysis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 260402 (2021).
  3. P. Lipka-Bartosik, H. Wilming, and N. H. Y. Ng, Catalysis in quantum information theory, arXiv:2306.00798  (2023).
  4. I. Henao and R. Uzdin, Catalytic leverage of correlations and mitigation of dissipation in information erasure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 020403 (2023).
  5. I. Henao and R. Uzdin, Catalytic transformations with finite-size environments: applications to cooling and thermometry, Quantum 5, 547 (2021).
  6. C. Sparaciari, D. Jennings, and J. Oppenheim, Energetic instability of passive states in thermodynamics, Nature Communications 8, 1895 (2017).
  7. N. F. Ramsey, Thermodynamics and statistical mechanics at negative absolute temperatures, Phys. Rev. 103, 20 (1956).
  8. H. E. D. Scovil and E. O. Schulz-DuBois, Three-level masers as heat engines, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2, 262 (1959).
  9. J. E. Geusic, E. O. Schulz-DuBios, and H. E. D. Scovil, Quantum equivalent of the carnot cycle, Phys. Rev. 156, 343 (1967).
  10. R. Kosloff, A quantum mechanical open system as a model of a heat engine, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 10.1063/1.446862 (1984).
  11. R. Kosloff and A. Levy, Quantum heat engines and refrigerators: Continuous devices, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 65, 365 (2014a), pMID: 24689798, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-040513-103724 .
  12. M. O. Scully, Quantum afterburner: Improving the efficiency of an ideal heat engine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 050602 (2002).
  13. N. Linden, S. Popescu, and P. Skrzypczyk, How small can thermal machines be? the smallest possible refrigerator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 130401 (2010a).
  14. A. E. Allahverdyan, R. Balian, and T. M. Nieuwenhuizen, Maximal work extraction from finite quantum systems, Europhysics Letters (EPL) 67, 565 (2004).
  15. D. Segal and A. Nitzan, Molecular heat pump, Phys. Rev. E 73, 026109 (2006).
  16. M. J. Henrich, G. Mahler, and M. Michel, Driven spin systems as quantum thermodynamic machines: Fundamental limits, Phys. Rev. E 75, 051118 (2007).
  17. N. Linden, S. Popescu, and P. Skrzypczyk, The smallest possible heat engines, arXiv:1010.6029  (2010b).
  18. N. M. Myers, O. Abah, and S. Deffner, Quantum thermodynamic devices: From theoretical proposals to experimental reality, AVS Quantum Science 4, 027101 (2022), https://pubs.aip.org/avs/aqs/article-pdf/doi/10.1116/5.0083192/16494008/027101_1_online.pdf .
  19. W. Pusz and S. L. Woronowicz, Passive states and kms states for general quantum systems, Comm. Math. Phys. 58, 273 (1978).
  20. R. Alicki, The quantum open system as a model of the heat engine, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 12, L103 (1979).
  21. P. C. W. Davies, Thermodynamics of black holes, Reports on Progress in Physics 41, 1313 (1978).
  22. M. Horodecki and J. Oppenheim, Fundamental limitations for quantum and nanoscale thermodynamics, Nat. Commun. 4, 2059 (2013).
  23. P. Skrzypczyk, A. J. Short, and S. Popescu, Work extraction and thermodynamics for individual quantum systems, Nat. Commun. 5, 4185 (2014).
  24. V. Blickle and C. Bechinger, Realization of a micrometre-sized stochastic heat engine, Nature Physics 8, 143 (2011).
  25. A. E. Allahverdyan, K. Hovhannisyan, and G. Mahler, Optimal refrigerator, Phys. Rev. E 81, 051129 (2010).
  26. M. T. Mitchison, Quantum thermal absorption machines: refrigerators, engines and clocks, Contemporary Physics 60, 164 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1080/00107514.2019.1631555 .
  27. M. P. Woods, N. H. Y. Ng, and S. Wehner, The maximum efficiency of nano heat engines depends on more than temperature, Quantum 3, 177 (2019).
  28. R. Kosloff and A. Levy, Quantum heat engines and refrigerators: Continuous devices, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 65, 365 (2014b).
  29. S. Popescu, Maximally efficient quantum thermal machines: The basic principles, arXiv:1009.2536  (2010).
  30. M. Łobejko, P. Mazurek, and M. Horodecki, Thermodynamics of Minimal Coupling Quantum Heat Engines, Quantum 4, 375 (2020).
  31. W. Niedenzu, M. Huber, and E. Boukobza, Concepts of work in autonomous quantum heat engines, Quantum 3, 195 (2019).
  32. K. Ptaszyński, Non-markovian thermal operations boosting the performance of quantum heat engines, Phys. Rev. E 106, 014114 (2022).
  33. J. Czartowski, A. de Oliveira Junior, and K. Korzekwa, Thermal recall: Memory-assisted markovian thermal processes, PRX Quantum 4, 040304 (2023).
  34. C. S. Yu, B. Q. Guo, and T. Liu, Quantum self-contained refrigerator in terms of the cavity quantum electrodynamics in the weak internal-coupling regime, Opt. Express 27, 6863 (2019).
Citations (3)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 1 like about this paper.