Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Intruder band mixing in an ab initio description of 12Be

Published 20 Feb 2024 in nucl-th | (2402.12606v1)

Abstract: The spectrum of 12Be exhibits exotic features, e.g., an intruder ground state and shape coexistence, normally associated with the breakdown of a shell closure. While previous phenomenological treatments indicated the ground state has substantial contributions from intruder configurations, it is only with advances in computational abilities and improved interactions that this intruder mixing is observed in ab initio no-core shell model (NCSM) predictions. In this work, we extract electromagnetic observables and symmetry decompositions from the NCSM wave functions to demonstrate that the low-lying positive parity spectrum can be explained in terms of mixing of rotational bands with very different intrinsic structure coexisting within the low-lying spectrum. These observed bands exhibit an approximate SU(3) symmetry and are qualitatively consistent with Elliott model predictions.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (53)
  1. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2017.07.015.
  2. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.032502.
  3. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.122501.
  4. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(03)00341-1.
  5. doi:doi:10.1016/j.nnclphysa.2004.04.
  6. doi:doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.08.053.
  7. doi:10.1142/S0218301308011100.
  8. doi:doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.02.039.
  9. doi:doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.11.025.
  10. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.83.057304.
  11. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.142501.
  12. doi:doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2011.11.010.
  13. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.88.044619.
  14. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.03.004.
  15. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.99.064610.
  16. doi:doi:10.1088/1742-6596/445/1/012035.
  17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.56.847.
  18. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.69.041302.
  19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.60.064323.
  20. doi:doi:10.1088/0954-3899/34/12/015.
  21. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.12.014.
  22. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.53.708.
  23. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.66.011303.
  24. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.85.014302.
  25. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.77.054313.
  26. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.68.014319.
  27. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2010.02.002.
  28. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.91.014310.
  29. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.182502.
  30. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.100.064616.
  31. doi:10.1143/PTPS.142.205.
  32. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.09.059.
  33. doi:10.1109/TPDS.2016.2630699.
  34. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.08.006.
  35. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.83.1467.
  36. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2008.05.001.
  37. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.37.2170.
  38. doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(99)00143-8.
  39. doi:10.1098/rspa.1958.0072. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/100416
  40. doi:10.1098/rspa.1958.0101. URL https://www.jstor.org/stable/100297
  41. doi:10.1098/rspa.1963.0071. URL https://www.jstor.org/stable/2414388
  42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.252501.
  43. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.102505.
  44. doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00112-0.
  45. doi:10.1088/1361-6471/abdd8e.
  46. doi:https://doi.org/10.55318/bgjp.2022.49.1.057.
  47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/6721.
  48. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abddaf.
  49. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0103-6_2.
  50. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.63.014318.
  51. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.91.034313.
  52. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.95.024303.
  53. doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ab9d38.
Citations (3)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.