Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Lowest-lying ${\frac{1}{2}}^-$ and ${\frac{3}{2}}^-$ $Λ_{Q}$ resonances: from the strange to the bottom sectors

Published 20 Feb 2024 in hep-ph | (2402.12726v1)

Abstract: We present a detailed study of the lowest-lying ${\frac{1}{2}}-$ and ${\frac{3}{2}}-$ $\Lambda_{Q}$ resonances both in the heavy quark (bottom and charm) and the strange sectors. We have paid special attention to the interplay between the constituent quark-model and chiral baryon-meson degrees of freedom, which are coupled using a unitarized scheme consistent with leading-order heavy quark symmetries. We show that the $\Lambda_b(5912)$ [$JP=1/2-$], $\Lambda_b(5920)$ [$JP=3/2-$] and the $\Lambda_c(2625)$ [$JP=3/2-$], and the $\Lambda(1520)$ [$JP=3/2-$] admitting larger breaking corrections, are heavy-quark spin-flavor siblings. They can be seen as dressed quark-model states with $\Sigma_{Q}{(*)}\pi$ molecular components of the order of 30\%. The ${JP=\frac{1}{2}}-$ $\Lambda_c(2595)$ has, however, a higher molecular probability of at least $50$\%, and even values greater than 70\% can be easily accommodated. This is because it is located almost on top of the threshold of the $\Sigma_c\pi$ pair, which largely influences its properties. Although the light degrees of freedom in this resonance would be coupled to spin-parity $1-$ as in the $\Lambda_b(5912)$, $\Lambda_b(5920)$ and $\Lambda_c(2625)$, the $\Lambda_c(2595)$ should not be considered as a heavy-quark spin-flavor partner of the former ones. We also show that the $\Lambda(1405)$ chiral two-pole pattern does not have analogs in the $\frac{1}{2}-$ charmed and bottomed sectors, because the $ND{(*)}$ and $N\overline{B}{}{(*)} $ channels do not play for heavy quarks the decisive role that the $N \overline{K}$ does in the strange sector, and the notable influence of the bare quark-model states for the charm and bottom resonances. Finally, we predict the existence of two $\Lambda_b(6070)$ and two $\Lambda_c(2765)$ heavy-quark spin and flavor sibling odd parity states.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (158)
  1. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.1130.
  2. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.45.R2188.
  3. arXiv:hep-ph/9306320, doi:10.1016/0370-1573(94)90091-4.
  4. doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac097.
  5. arXiv:1210.3485, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.87.035202.
  6. doi:10.1103/physrevd.34.2809.
  7. arXiv:0711.2492, doi:10.1142/S0217751X08041219.
  8. arXiv:0705.2957, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.11.037.
  9. arXiv:hep-ph/0703257, doi:10.1088/0954-3899/34/5/014.
  10. arXiv:0804.1575, doi:10.1016/j.aop.2008.05.003.
  11. arXiv:1510.01067, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.114029.
  12. arXiv:1205.3452, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.172003.
  13. arXiv:2002.05112, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2020)136.
  14. arXiv:2001.06533, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135345.
  15. arXiv:1308.1760, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.071101.
  16. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.3331.
  17. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(95)01458-6.
  18. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(97)00503-0.
  19. arXiv:1105.5995, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.012003.
  20. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)90423-N.
  21. arXiv:1609.01085, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.014023.
  22. arXiv:1704.00464, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.114018.
  23. arXiv:nucl-th/9505043, doi:10.1016/0375-9474(95)00362-5.
  24. arXiv:nucl-th/9711022, doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00170-5.
  25. arXiv:hep-ph/0011146, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00078-8.
  26. arXiv:hep-ph/0210311, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.67.076009.
  27. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(84)90242-2.
  28. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90492-4.
  29. arXiv:hep-ph/9502366, doi:10.1088/0034-4885/58/6/001.
  30. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2526.
  31. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)90109-J.
  32. arXiv:hep-ph/9301276, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.47.4883.
  33. arXiv:hep-ph/9604416, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.56.3057.
  34. arXiv:hep-ph/9701389, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.55.5613.
  35. arXiv:hep-ph/9803242, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3452.
  36. arXiv:hep-ph/9702314, doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(97)00160-7.
  37. arXiv:nucl-th/9807035, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00461-X.
  38. arXiv:hep-ph/9804209, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.074001.
  39. arXiv:hep-ph/9809337, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.074023.
  40. arXiv:hep-ph/9907469, doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(00)00321-3.
  41. arXiv:hep-ph/0008034, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.63.076001.
  42. arXiv:hep-ph/0006043, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00761-9.
  43. arXiv:hep-ph/0109077, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.036002.
  44. arXiv:hep-ph/0109056, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.054009.
  45. arXiv:nucl-th/0105042, doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(01)01312-4.
  46. arXiv:hep-ph/0104307, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.116008.
  47. arXiv:nucl-th/0212026, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.68.018201.
  48. arXiv:nucl-th/0305101, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.01.066.
  49. arXiv:nucl-th/0307039, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.11.009.
  50. arXiv:nucl-th/0303062, doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(03)01598-7.
  51. arXiv:nucl-th/0305100, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2003.11.073.
  52. arXiv:nucl-th/0407025, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.01.006.
  53. arXiv:hep-ph/0505239, doi:10.1140/epja/i2005-10079-1.
  54. arXiv:hep-ph/0503273, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.014002.
  55. arXiv:0712.2763, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.056006.
  56. arXiv:0711.3536, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.034001.
  57. arXiv:0712.1613, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.77.035204.
  58. arXiv:0801.2871, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.152001.
  59. arXiv:0803.2550, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.78.025203.
  60. arXiv:0801.4929, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.252002.
  61. arXiv:1001.5237, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.054035.
  62. arXiv:1005.0956, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.016007.
  63. arXiv:1012.2233, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.02.008.
  64. arXiv:1107.3247, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.096002.
  65. arXiv:1104.4474, doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2011.07.002.
  66. arXiv:1201.6549, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2012.01.029.
  67. arXiv:1411.7884, doi:10.1140/epja/i2015-15030-3.
  68. arXiv:1407.3750, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.114020.
  69. arXiv:1510.00653, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.09.001.
  70. arXiv:1602.08852, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.04.013.
  71. arXiv:2209.02471, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.071902.
  72. arXiv:hep-ph/0309292, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.102001.
  73. arXiv:hep-ph/0610397, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.242002.
  74. arXiv:hep-ph/0605059, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.036004.
  75. arXiv:0712.3347, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.056010.
  76. arXiv:0804.1210, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.05.014.
  77. arXiv:0811.1941, doi:10.1140/epja/i2008-10689-y.
  78. arXiv:0904.4344, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.045023.
  79. arXiv:0904.4590, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.08.021.
  80. arXiv:2209.06230, doi:10.1051/epjconf/202227107005.
  81. arXiv:1109.6716, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.112001.
  82. arXiv:1301.4318, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.074504.
  83. arXiv:1411.3402, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.132002.
  84. arXiv:1607.05856, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.014506.
  85. arXiv:1609.01889, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.114518.
  86. arXiv:1512.05831, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.079901.
  87. arXiv:2010.01270, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136473.
  88. arXiv:hep-ph/9605342, doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(96)00027-0.
  89. arXiv:1409.3133, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.014036.
  90. arXiv:1603.06316, doi:10.1088/0253-6102/65/5/593.
  91. arXiv:1603.09230, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.04.033.
  92. arXiv:nucl-th/0404064, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.70.025203.
  93. arXiv:hep-ph/0507071, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.08.022.
  94. arXiv:hep-ph/0607257, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.74.065201.
  95. arXiv:hep-ph/0601249, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.07.004.
  96. arXiv:0907.5316, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.80.055206.
  97. arXiv:0807.2969, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.054004.
  98. arXiv:1202.2239, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.114032.
  99. arXiv:hep-ph/0505233, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.034025.
  100. arXiv:1104.2737, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.056017.
  101. arXiv:1907.05747, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.014018.
  102. arXiv:1210.4755, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.034032.
  103. arXiv:1302.6938, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.074034.
  104. arXiv:1712.00327, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5597-3.
  105. arXiv:1703.04639, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.182001.
  106. arXiv:1911.06089, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7568-8.
  107. arXiv:1805.09418, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.072002.
  108. arXiv:1712.03612, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5720-5.
  109. arXiv:1402.5293, doi:10.1140/epja/i2015-15016-1.
  110. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.1215.
  111. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(88)90019-1.
  112. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(88)90090-7.
  113. arXiv:1304.5368, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.056012.
  114. arXiv:1710.04231, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.094035.
  115. arXiv:1711.10623, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2018.03.008.
  116. arXiv:1803.03268, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.094022.
  117. arXiv:1811.11738, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6665-z.
  118. arXiv:1903.11911, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6929-7.
  119. arXiv:1001.0369, doi:10.1140/epja/i2010-10929-7.
  120. arXiv:1606.03239, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4413-1.
  121. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90331-I.
  122. arXiv:hep-ph/9711257, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.57.5620.
  123. arXiv:hep-ph/0105148, doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(01)01202-7.
  124. arXiv:nucl-th/0503030, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.72.035201.
  125. arXiv:2103.08775, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.094516.
  126. arXiv:2105.09330, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.016027.
  127. arXiv:2207.10529, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.055039.
  128. arXiv:2107.13140, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.054511.
  129. arXiv:1611.07334, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.014015.
  130. arXiv:1801.08367, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2018)155.
  131. arXiv:1807.11300, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.053003.
  132. arXiv:2207.02109, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.114020.
  133. arXiv:1612.07782, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4735-7.
  134. arXiv:1805.07104, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6176-3.
  135. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.130.776.
  136. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.137.B672.
  137. arXiv:0911.4407, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.014029.
  138. arXiv:1506.04235, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.034011.
  139. arXiv:2203.04864, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10695-1.
  140. arXiv:2201.04414, doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00753-3.
  141. arXiv:2205.08470, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.106.015205.
  142. arXiv:hep-ex/0010080, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4479.
  143. arXiv:1910.03318, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.094032.
  144. arXiv:1908.04622, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.114035.
  145. arXiv:1908.00223, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.054013.
  146. arXiv:1907.13598, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.152001.
  147. arXiv:1105.0583, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.014025.
  148. arXiv:0905.0402, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.014003.
  149. arXiv:1111.6241, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.011501.
  150. arXiv:1210.5431, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.076006.
  151. arXiv:1305.4487, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.10.056.
  152. arXiv:1303.6608, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.054007.
  153. arXiv:1205.6606, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.034003.
  154. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)91598-H.
  155. arXiv:1610.06727, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.02.036.
  156. arXiv:1712.07957, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.094018.
  157. arXiv:hep-ph/0610217, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.014017.
  158. arXiv:2307.11631, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.L111502.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 1 like about this paper.