Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Neural Network Diffusion

Published 20 Feb 2024 in cs.LG and cs.CV | (2402.13144v3)

Abstract: Diffusion models have achieved remarkable success in image and video generation. In this work, we demonstrate that diffusion models can also \textit{generate high-performing neural network parameters}. Our approach is simple, utilizing an autoencoder and a diffusion model. The autoencoder extracts latent representations of a subset of the trained neural network parameters. Next, a diffusion model is trained to synthesize these latent representations from random noise. This model then generates new representations, which are passed through the autoencoder's decoder to produce new subsets of high-performing network parameters. Across various architectures and datasets, our approach consistently generates models with comparable or improved performance over trained networks, with minimal additional cost. Notably, we empirically find that the generated models are not memorizing the trained ones. Our results encourage more exploration into the versatile use of diffusion models. Our code is available \href{https://github.com/NUS-HPC-AI-Lab/Neural-Network-Diffusion}{here}.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (67)
  1. Analytic-DPM: an analytic estimate of the optimal reverse variance in diffusion probabilistic models. In ICLR, 2022. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=0xiJLKH-ufZ.
  2. Weight uncertainty in neural network. In ICML. PMLR, 2015.
  3. Food-101–mining discriminative components with random forests. In ECCV. Springer, 2014.
  4. Bottou, L. et al. Stochastic gradient learning in neural networks. Proceedings of Neuro-Nımes, 91(8), 1991.
  5. Large scale gan training for high fidelity natural image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.11096, 2018a.
  6. SMASH: One-shot model architecture search through hypernetworks. In ICLR, 2018b. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=rydeCEhs-.
  7. Language models are few-shot learners. NeurIPS, 33, 2020.
  8. An analysis of single-layer networks in unsupervised feature learning. In Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics. JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings, 2011.
  9. An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods. Cambridge university press, 2000.
  10. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In CVPR. Ieee, 2009.
  11. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805, 2018.
  12. Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis. NeurIPS, 34, 2021.
  13. Nice: Non-linear independent components estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.8516, 2014.
  14. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929, 2020.
  15. Hyperdiffusion: Generating implicit neural fields with weight-space diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.17015, 2023.
  16. Score-based diffusion models as principled priors for inverse imaging. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.11751, 2023.
  17. Dropout as a bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning. In ICML. PMLR, 2016.
  18. Graves, A. Practical variational inference for neural networks. NeurIPS, 24, 2011.
  19. Hypernetworks. In ICLR, 2017. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=rkpACe1lx.
  20. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In CVPR, 2016.
  21. Momentum contrast for unsupervised visual representation learning. In CVPR, 2020.
  22. Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners. In CVPR, 2022.
  23. Prompt-to-prompt image editing with cross-attention control. In ICLR, 2023. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=_CDixzkzeyb.
  24. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. NeurIPS, 33, 2020.
  25. Imagen video: High definition video generation with diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02303, 2022.
  26. Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks. In CVPR, 2017.
  27. Jarzynski, C. Equilibrium free-energy differences from nonequilibrium measurements: A master-equation approach. Physical Review E, 56(5), 1997.
  28. Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114, 2013.
  29. Variational dropout and the local reparameterization trick. NeurIPS, 28, 2015.
  30. Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images. 2009.
  31. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. NeurIPS, 25, 2012.
  32. Neural network ensembles, cross validation, and active learning. NeurIPS, 7, 1994.
  33. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 86(11), 1998.
  34. Your diffusion model is secretly a zero-shot classifier. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.16203, 2023.
  35. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part V 13, pp.  740–755. Springer, 2014.
  36. A convnet for the 2020s. In CVPR, 2022.
  37. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp.  3431–3440, 2015.
  38. DPM-solver: A fast ODE solver for diffusion probabilistic model sampling in around 10 steps. In Oh, A. H., Agarwal, A., Belgrave, D., and Cho, K. (eds.), NeurIPS, 2022. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=2uAaGwlP_V.
  39. Network information criterion-determining the number of hidden units for an artificial neural network model. IEEE transactions on neural networks, 5(6), 1994.
  40. Neal, R. M. Bayesian learning for neural networks, volume 118. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
  41. Glide: Towards photorealistic image generation and editing with text-guided diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.10741, 2021.
  42. Automated flower classification over a large number of classes. In 2008 Sixth Indian conference on computer vision, graphics & image processing. IEEE, 2008.
  43. Cats and dogs. In CVPR. IEEE, 2012.
  44. Scalable diffusion models with transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.09748, 2022.
  45. Learning to learn with generative models of neural network checkpoints, 2023. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=JXkz3zm8gJ.
  46. Hierarchical text-conditional image generation with clip latents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06125, 1(2), 2022.
  47. Generating diverse high-fidelity images with vq-vae-2. NeurIPS, 32, 2019.
  48. Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 28, 2015.
  49. Variational inference with normalizing flows. In ICML. PMLR, 2015.
  50. Stochastic backpropagation and approximate inference in deep generative models. In ICML. PMLR, 2014.
  51. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In CVPR, 2022.
  52. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, Proceedings, Part III 18, pp.  234–241. Springer, 2015.
  53. Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding. NeurIPS, 35, 2022.
  54. Feed forward neural networks with random weights. In ICPR. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1992.
  55. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556, 2014.
  56. Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics. In ICML. PMLR, 2015.
  57. Chaos in random neural networks. Physical review letters, 61(3), 1988.
  58. Denoising diffusion implicit models. In ICLR, 2021. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=St1giarCHLP.
  59. Generative modeling by estimating gradients of the data distribution. NeurIPS, 32, 2019.
  60. Fcos: A simple and strong anchor-free object detector. IEEE T-PAMI, 44(4):1922–1933, 2020.
  61. Visualizing data using t-sne. JMLR, 9(11), 2008.
  62. Bayesian learning via stochastic gradient langevin dynamics. In ICML, 2011.
  63. Wightman, R. Pytorch image models. https://github.com/rwightman/pytorch-image-models, 2019.
  64. Wong, E. Stochastic neural networks. Algorithmica, 6(1-6), 1991.
  65. Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference time. In ICML, pp.  23965–23998. PMLR, 2022.
  66. Metadiff: Meta-learning with conditional diffusion for few-shot learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.16424, 2023.
  67. Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks. In ICCV, 2017.
Citations (8)

Summary

  • The paper presents neural network diffusion (p-diff) as a novel method that uses latent diffusion to generate network parameters matching or surpassing SGD-trained models.
  • It leverages an autoencoder to extract latent representations of parameters and a diffusion model to synthesize new parameter sets from random noise.
  • Experimental results demonstrate that p-diff produces diverse, high-performing models across multiple datasets, highlighting scalability and efficiency in neural network training.

Exploring Neural Network Diffusion for Generating High-Performing Model Parameters

Introduction to Neural Network Diffusion

The exploration of diffusion models for image and video generation has led to substantial advancements in the quality of generated content. However, the potential of diffusion models extends beyond visual generation tasks. This paper introduces a novel approach leveraging diffusion models for the generation of high-performing neural network parameters. Named neural network diffusion (p-diff), this method employs an autoencoder alongside a standard latent diffusion model to synthesize high-quality parameters for neural networks, demonstrating comparable or even superior performance to models trained via conventional stochastic gradient descent (SGD).

Methodology

The neural network diffusion process is anchored on a straightforward yet effective architecture involving an autoencoder and a latent diffusion model. The methodology revolves around two core processes:

  1. Parameter Autoencoder: The purpose is to capture and encode the distribution of neural network parameters into latent representations. Parameters from models trained using SGD are fed into the autoencoder, which extracts their latent representations.
  2. Parameter Generation: A standard latent diffusion model is trained to synthesize novel latent representations from random noise. These new representations are decoded to yield new sets of parameters, expanding the capacity for neural network performance without direct memorization of training samples.

This novel framework pushes the boundary of utilizing diffusion models, transcending traditional applications and venturing into parameter space exploration.

Experimental Results and Analysis

Through rigorous experimentation across various datasets and network architectures, the proposed method consistently delivers results that either match or exceed the benchmarks set by models trained through conventional means. Such findings underline the efficacy and generality of the p-diff approach, showcasing notable achievements in the following areas:

  • Performance across Datasets: The method exhibits strong performance across a broad spectrum of datasets, underlining its versatility.
  • Diversity in Generated Models: A notable distinction of the generated models from their original counterparts points to the method's capacity for novelty, not merely replication.

Ablation studies enlighten further insights into the method's characteristics, including the scalability with respect to the number of training models and the robustness introduced by noise augmentation. Additionally, extending the approach to synthesize entire model parameters showcases the method's adaptability and potential applicability to a wider array of neural network architectures.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

This work elucidates a promising avenue for employing diffusion models in generating neural network parameters, highlighting a paradigm shift in model training and optimization methodologies. The ability to generate high-performing models efficiently from random noise, without the explicit requirement for extensive training data, introduces a compelling narrative for future research in AI and machine learning. Furthermore, the exploration into large-scale architecture parameter generation and the understanding of parameter patterns contribute deeply to the theoretical foundation of diffusion models in neural networks.

Conclusion and Future Directions

The groundbreaking application of neural network diffusion for parameter generation opens exciting prospects for deep learning and AI research. The demonstrated success heralds a potential new era in neural network training paradigms, where diffusion models play a critical role. As the community continues to unravel the capabilities and limitations of such approaches, future developments might well include addressing the constraints identified, such as memory requirements for large architectures and the efficiency of structural designs.

The journey of exploring diffusion models in the field of neural network parameters is just beginning. The implications of this research are profound, not only in advancing our understanding of diffusion models but also in paving new pathways for model optimization and generation techniques. As we venture forward, it's clear that the intersection of diffusion processes and neural network parameter synthesis holds untapped potential, waiting to be explored.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 30 tweets with 166 likes about this paper.

HackerNews

  1. Neural Network Diffusion (222 points, 86 comments) 

Reddit