Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

The role of gap junctions and clustered connectivity in emergent synchronisation patterns of inhibitory neuronal networks

Published 22 Feb 2024 in q-bio.NC | (2402.14592v3)

Abstract: Inhibitory interneurons, ubiquitous in the central nervous system, form networks connected through both chemical synapses and gap junctions. These networks are essential for regulating the activity of principal neurons, especially by inducing temporally patterned dynamic states. We aim to understand the dynamic mechanisms for synchronisation in networks of electrically and chemically coupled interneurons. We use the exact mean-field reduction to derive a neural mass model for both homogeneous and clustered networks. We first analyse a single population of neurons to understand how the two couplings interact with one another. We demonstrate that the network transitions from an asynchronous to a synchronous regime either by increasing the strength of the gap junction connectivity or the strength of the background input current. Conversely, the strength of inhibitory synapses affects the population firing rate, suggesting that electrical and chemical coupling strengths act as complementary mechanisms by which networks can tune synchronous oscillatory behavior. In line with previous work, we confirm that the depolarizing spikelet is crucial for the emergence of synchrony. Furthermore, find that the fast frequency component of the spikelet ensures robustness to heterogeneity. Next, inspired by the existence of multiple interconnected interneuron subtypes in the cerebellum, we analyse networks consisting of two clusters of cell types defined by differing chemical versus electrical coupling strengths. We show that breaking the electrical and chemical coupling symmetry between these clusters induces bistability, so that a transient external input can switch the network between synchronous and asynchronous firing. Together, our results shows the variety of cell-intrinsic and network properties that contribute to synchronisation of interneuronal networks with multiple types of coupling.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (25)
  1. M. Galarreta and S. Hestrin, Electrical synapses between gaba-releasing interneurons, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2, 425 (2001).
  2. J. Kim and G. Augustine, Molecular layer interneurons: Key elements of cerebellar network computation and behavior, Neuroscience 462 (2020).
  3. A. Holzbecher and R. Kempter, Interneuronal gap junctions increase synchrony and robustness of hippocampal ripple oscillations, European Journal of Neuroscience 10.1101/311662 (2018).
  4. M. Bartos, I. Vida, and P. Jonas, Synaptic mechanisms of synchronized gamma oscillations in inhibitory interneuron networks, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8, 45 (2007).
  5. A. Hoehne, M. H. McFadden, and D. A. DiGregorio, Feed-forward recruitment of electrical synapses enhances synchronous spiking in the mouse cerebellar cortex, eLife 9, e57344 (2020).
  6. B. W. Connors, Synchrony and so much more: Diverse roles for electrical synapses in neural circuits, Developmental Neurobiology 77, 610 (2017).
  7. T. Lewis and J. Rinzel, Dynamics of spiking neurons connected by both inhibitory and electrical coupling, Journal of Computational Neuroscience 14, 283 (2003).
  8. C. C. Chow and N. Kopell, Dynamics of Spiking Neurons with Electrical Coupling, Neural Computation 12, 1643 (2000).
  9. S. Ostojic, N. Brunel, and V. Hakim, Synchronization properties of networks of electrically coupled neurons in the presence of noise and heterogeneities, Journal of Computational Neuroscience 26, 369 (2008).
  10. B. Pfeuty, Inhibition potentiates the synchronizing action of electrical synapses, Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 1, 10.3389/neuro.10.008.2007 (2007).
  11. W. Mittmann, U. Koch, and M. Häusser, Feed-forward inhibition shapes the spike output of cerebellar purkinje cells, The Journal of Physiology 563, 369 (2005).
  12. A. L. Person and I. M. Raman, Purkinje neuron synchrony elicits time-locked spiking in the cerebellar nuclei, Nature 481, 502 (2012).
  13. E. Montbrió, D. Pazó, and A. Roxin, Macroscopic description for networks of spiking neurons, Physical Review X 5, 021028 (2015).
  14. F. Devalle, A. Roxin, and E. Montbrió, Firing rate equations require a spike synchrony mechanism to correctly describe fast oscillations in inhibitory networks, PLOS Computational Biology 13, 1 (2017).
  15. E. Montbrió and D. Pazó, Exact mean-field theory explains the dual role of electrical synapses in collective synchronization, Physical Review Letters 125, 248101 (2020).
  16. E. Ott and T. M. Antonsen, Low dimensional behavior of large systems of globally coupled oscillators, Chaos 18, 037113 (2008).
  17. P. Alcami and A. Marty, Estimating functional connectivity in an electrically coupled interneuron network, PNAS 110, 10.1073/pnas.1310983110 (2013).
  18. K. Shimizu and M. Stopfer, Gap junctions, Current Biology 23, R1026 (2013).
  19. N. A. Cayco-Gajic and R. A. Silver, Re-evaluating circuit mechanisms underlying pattern separation, Neuron 101, 584 (2019).
  20. P. Clusella and E. Montbrió, Exact low-dimensional description for fast neural oscillations with low firing rates, Physical Review E 109, 014229 (2024).
  21. R. Gast, H. Schmidt, and T. R. Knösche, A mean-field description of bursting dynamics in spiking neural networks with short-term adaptation, Neural Computation 32, 1615 (2020).
  22. L. Chen and S. A. Campbell, Exact mean-field models for spiking neural networks with adaptation, Journal of Computational Neuroscience 50, 445 (2022).
  23. E. Izhikevich, Simple model of spiking neurons, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 14, 1569 (2003).
  24. I. C. Guerreiro, M. D. Volo, and B. Gutkin, A new generation of reduction methods for networks of neurons with complex dynamic phenotypes, arXiv  (2023).
  25. R. Gast, S. A. Solla, and A. Kennedy, Neural heterogeneity controls computations in spiking neural networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121, e2311885121 (2024).

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 3 tweets with 6 likes about this paper.