Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Dielectric Loss due to Charged-Defect Acoustic Phonon Emission

Published 27 Feb 2024 in quant-ph and cond-mat.mtrl-sci | (2402.17291v1)

Abstract: The coherence times of state-of-the-art superconducting qubits are limited by bulk dielectric loss, yet the microscopic mechanism leading to this loss is unclear. Here we propose that the experimentally observed loss can be attributed to the presence of charged defects that enable the absorption of electromagnetic radiation by the emission of acoustic phonons. Our explicit derivation of the absorption coefficient for this mechanism allows us to derive a loss tangent of $7.2 \times 10{-9}$ for Al$_2$O$_3$, in good agreement with recent high-precision measurements [A. P. Read et al., Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 034064 (2023)]. We also find that for temperatures well below ~0.2 K, the loss should be independent of temperature, also in agreement with observations. Our investigations show that the loss per defect depends mainly on properties of the host material, and a high-throughput search suggests that diamond, cubic BN, AlN, and SiC are optimal in this respect.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (19)
  1. C. Müller, J. H. Cole, and J. Lisenfeld, Rep. Prog. Phys. 82, 124501 (2019).
  2. V. Gurevich and A. Tagantsev, Adv. Phys. 40, 719 (1991).
  3. A. M. Stoneham, Theory of Defects in Solids: Electronic Structure of Defects in Insulators and Semiconductors, Monographs on the Physics and Chemistry of Materials (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1975).
  4. B. M. Garin, Fiz. Tverd. Tela 32, 3314 (1990).
  5. M. Lax and E. Burstein, Phys. Rev. 97, 39 (1955).
  6. D. Y. Smith and D. L. Dexter, in Progress in Optics, Vol. 10, edited by E. Wolf (Elsevier, 1972) pp. 165–228.
  7. H. A. Lorentz, The Theory of Electrons and Its Applications to the Phenomena of Light and Radiant Heat (Leipzig : B.G. Teubner ; New York : G.E. Stechert, 1916).
  8. L. Onsager, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 58, 1486 (1936).
  9. E. Cockayne, Phys. Rev. B 75, 094103 (2007).
  10. X. Gonze and C. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 55, 10355 (1997).
  11. P. G. Dawber and R. J. Elliott, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 273, 222 (1962).
  12. P. G. Dawber and R. J. Elliott, Proc. Phys. Soc. 81, 453 (1963).
  13. R. Shelby, J. Fontanella, and C. Andeen, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 41, 69 (1980).
  14. A. Alexandrovski, R. K. Route, and M. M. Fejer, Absorption Studies in Sapphire, LIGO Internal Document LIGO-G010152-00-Z (2001).
  15. D. Prot and C. Monty, Philos. Mag. A 73, 899 (1996).
  16. M. Choi, A. Janotti, and C. G. Van de Walle, J. Appl. Phys. 113, 044501 (2013).
  17. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
  18. J. P. Perdew, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 28, 497 (1985).
  19. Á. Morales-García, R. Valero, and F. Illas, J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 18862 (2017).
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.