Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Handling Open Research Data within the Max Planck Society -- Looking Closer at the Year 2020

Published 28 Feb 2024 in cs.DL | (2402.18182v1)

Abstract: This paper analyses the practice of publishing research data within the Max Planck Society in the year 2020. The central finding of the study is that up to 40\% of the empirical text publications had research data available. The aggregation of the available data is predominantly analysed. There are differences between the sections of the Max Planck Society but they are not as great as one might expect. In the case of the journals, it is also apparent that a data policy can increase the availability of data related to textual publications. Finally, we found that the statement on data availability "upon (reasonable) request" does not work.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (80)
  1. Allianz der deutschen Wissenschaftsorganisationen “Principles for the Handling of Research Data”, 2010 DOI: 10.2312/ALLIANZOA.035
  2. Melissa Assel and Andrew J. Vickers “Statistical code for clinical research papers in a high-impact specialist medical journal” In Annals of internal medicine 168.11, 2018, pp. 832–833 DOI: 10.7326/M17-2863
  3. “Empfehlungen zur gesicherten Aufbewahrung und Bereitstellung digitaler Forschungsprimärdaten”, 2009 URL: https://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/foerderung/programme/lis/ua_inf_empfehlungen_200901.pdf
  4. Theodora Bloom, Emma Ganley and Margaret Winker “Data Access for the Open Access Literature: PLOS’s Data Policy” In PLOS Biology 12.2, 2014, pp. e1001797 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001797
  5. John Borghi “Identifying the who, what, and (sometimes) where of research data sharing at an academic institution”, 2021 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4737831
  6. John A. Borghi and Ana E. Gulick “Data management and sharing: Practices and perceptions of psychology researchers” In PLOS ONE 16.5, 2021, pp. e0252047 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252047
  7. “The citation advantage of linking publications to research data” In PLOS ONE 15.4, 2020, pp. e0230416 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230416
  8. “Investigating the Effectiveness of the Open Data Badge Policy at Psychological Science Through Computational Reproducibility”, 2022 DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/729qt
  9. Dylanne Dearborn, Steve Marks and Leanne Trimble “The Changing Influence of Journal Data Sharing Policies on Local RDM Practices” In International Journal of Digital Curation 12.2, 2018, pp. 376–389 DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v12i2.583
  10. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft “Richtlinien zum Umgang mit Forschungsdaten in der Biodiversitätsforschung”, 2015 URL: https://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/foerderung/antragstellung/forschungsdaten/richtlinien_forschungsdaten_biodiversitaetsforschung.pdf
  11. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft “Code of Conduct”, 2019 URL: https://wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de/en/code-of-conduct/
  12. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft “Nationale Forschungsdateninfrastruktur Statistische Übersicht zu den Förderentscheidungen in der ersten Ausschreibungsrunde”, 2020 URL: https://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/foerderung/programme/nfdi/20200626_nfdi_foerderentscheidungen.pdf
  13. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft “Nationale Forschungsdateninfrastruktur Statistische Übersichten zum Antragseingang (Zweite Ausschreibungsrunde, September 2020)”, 2020 URL: https://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/foerderung/programme/nfdi/nfdi_auswertung_2020.pdf
  14. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft “Open Science as Part of Research Culture. Positioning of the German Research Foundation”, 2022 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7194537
  15. Eva Katharina Donner “Research data management systems and the organization of universities and research institutes: A systematic literature review” In Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 2022, pp. 096100062110702 DOI: 10.1177/09610006211070282
  16. Natalie C. Ebner, Michaela Riediger and Ulman Lindenberger “FACES - A database of facial expressions in young, middle-aged, and older women and men: Development and validation” In Behavior Research Methods 42.1, 2010, pp. 351–362 DOI: 10.3758/BRM.42.1.351
  17. “Data sharing practices in open access mode: a study of the willingness to share data in different disciplines” In Information Research: An international electronic journal 27.2, 2022 DOI: 10.47989/irpaper932
  18. “The Rise of GitHub in Scholarly Publications”, 2022 DOI: 10.48550/ARXIV.2208.04895
  19. European Commission “H2020 Programme: Guidelines on FAIR Data Management in Horizon 2020”, 2016 URL: https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_en.pdf
  20. European Commission “Open Research Data (ORD) - the uptake in Horizon 2020 - Data Europa EU”, 2018 URL: https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/open-research-data-the-uptake-of-the-pilot-in-the-first-calls-of-horizon-2020
  21. European Commission “Turning FAIR into reality - Final Report and Action Plan from the European Commission Expert Group on FAIR Data”, 2018 DOI: 10.2777/1524
  22. European Commission “Cost-benefit analysis for FAIR research data - Cost of not having FAIR research data”, 2019 DOI: doi/10.2777/02999
  23. European Commission “Monitoring the open access policy of Horizon 2020: final report”, 2021 DOI: 10.2777/268348
  24. European Research Council “Guidelines on: Implementation of Open Access to Scientific Publications and Research Data: In projects supported by the European Research Council under Horizon 2020”, 2017 URL: https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/hi/oa-pilot/h2020-hi-erc-oa-guide_en.pdf
  25. “’Yes, I comply!’: Motivations and Practices around Research Data Management and Reuse across Scientific Fields” In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4.CSCW2, 2020, pp. 141:1–141:26 DOI: 10.1145/3415212
  26. “Indikatoren für Open Science: Report des Helmholtz Open Science Forum”, 2021 DOI: 10.48440/os.helmholtz.024
  27. Michael Franke “Forschungsdaten-Policies in der MPG”, 2020 URL: https://info-bib.mpg.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/2020.Franke.pdf
  28. “Positionspapier ”Research data at your fingertips” der Arbeitsgruppe Forschungsdaten”, 2015 DOI: 10.2312/allianzfd.001
  29. Mirko Gabelica, Ružica Bojčić and Livia Puljak “Many researchers were not compliant with their published data sharing statement: a mixed-methods study” In Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 150, 2022, pp. 33–41 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.05.019
  30. “Open research data: A case study into institutional and infrastructural arrangements to stimulate open research data sharing and reuse” In Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 2022, pp. 09610006221101200 DOI: 10.1177/09610006221101200
  31. “Why don’t we share data and code? Perceived barriers and benefits to public archiving practices” In Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 289.1987, 2022, pp. 20221113 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1113
  32. “Ten Simple Rules for the Care and Feeding of Scientific Data” In PLOS Computational Biology 10.4, 2014, pp. e1003542 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003542
  33. Yves Vincent Grossmann “Participation by Max Planck Members at the National Data Infrastructure” In RDM Information Platform for Max Planck Researcher, 2021 URL: https://rdm.mpdl.mpg.de/2021/07/16/participation-by-max-planck-members-at-the-national-data-infrastructure/
  34. Yves Vincent Grossmann “Research Data within the New Rules of Conduct for Good Scientific Practice by the Max Planck Society” In RDM Information Platform for Max Planck Researcher, 2021 URL: https://rdm.mpdl.mpg.de/2022/12/12/rules-of-conduct-for-good-scientific-practice-by-the-mpg/
  35. Yves Vincent Grossmann “The European Open Science Cloud: A Very Short Summery” In RDM Information Platform for Max Planck Researcher, 2021 URL: https://rdm.mpdl.mpg.de/2021/10/04/the-european-open-science-cloud-a-very-short-summery/
  36. Helmholtz Open Science Office “Empfehlungen für Richtlinien der Helmholtz-Zentren zum Umgang mit Forschungsdaten”, 2019 DOI: 10.2312/os.helmholtz.002
  37. Helmholtz Open Science Office “Helmholtz Open Science Policy”, 2022 URL: https://os.helmholtz.de/open-science-in-helmholtz/open-science-policy/
  38. Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft “Empfehlungen zur Implementierung von Leit- und Richtlinien zum Umgang mit Forschungssoftware an den Helmholtz-Zentren. Positionspapier”, 2019, pp. 91 KB DOI: 10.2312/OS.HELMHOLTZ.008
  39. “Management von Forschungsdaten - eine zentrale strategische Herausforderung für Hochschulleitungen”, 2014 URL: https://www.hrk.de/positionen/beschluss/detail/management-von-forschungsdaten-eine-zentrale-strategische-herausforderung-fuer-hochschulleitungen/
  40. Amelia S.C. Hood and William J. Sutherland “The data-index: An author-level metric that values impactful data and incentivizes data sharing” In Ecology and Evolution 11.21, 2021, pp. 14344–14350 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8126
  41. “Data Sharing in Psychology: A Survey on Barriers and Preconditions:” In Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 1.1, 2018, pp. 70–85 DOI: 10.1177/2515245917751886
  42. “Developing a Research Data Policy Framework for All Journals and Publishers” In Data Science Journal 19.1, 2020, pp. 5 DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2020-005
  43. Matthew Hutson “Taking the pain out of data sharing” In Nature 610.7930, 2022 DOI: 10.1038/d41586-022-03133-5
  44. “Semi-automated extraction of information on open datasets mentioned in articles”, 2022 DOI: 10.17504/protocols.io.q26g74p39gwz/v1
  45. Institut Pasteur “Politique de gestion et partage des données de la recherche et codes logiciels”, 2021 DOI: 10.25490/A97F-EGYK
  46. “subugoe/oa2020cadata: Publisher-level data for internal review” Zenodo, 2019 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3519004
  47. “Surveying research data-sharing practices in US social sciences: a knowledge infrastructure-inspired conceptual framework” In Online Information Review, 2022 DOI: 10.1108/OIR-03-2020-0079
  48. Kommission Zukunft der Informationsinfrastruktur “Gesamtkonzept für die Informationsinfrastruktur in Deutschland – Empfehlungen der Kommission Zukunft der Informationsinfrastruktur im Auftrag der Gemeinsamen Wissenschaftskonferenz des Bundes und der Länder”, 2011, pp. 254 URL: https://www.hof.uni-halle.de/web/dateien/KII_Gesamtkonzept_2011.pdf
  49. Hubert Laitko “Das Harnack-Prinzip als institutionelles Markenzeichen: Faktisches und Symbolisches” In ”Dem Anwenden muss das Erkennen vorausgehen”: Auf dem Weg zu einer Geschichte der Kaiser-Wilhelm-/Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, MPRL – Proceedings, 2015 DOI: 10.34663/9783945561010-04
  50. Sabina Leonelli “Global Data Quality Assessment and the Situated Nature of “Best” Research Practices in Biology” In Data Science Journal 16.0, 2017, pp. 32 DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2017-032
  51. “GO FAIR und GO CHANGE: Chancen für das deutsche Wissenschaftssystem” In Praxishandbuch Forschungsdatenmanagement, 2021, pp. 215–238 DOI: 10.1515/9783110657807-013
  52. “Open Data Practices among Users of Primary Biodiversity Data” In BioScience 71.11, 2021, pp. 1128–1147 DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biab072
  53. Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods “FDM-Policy” The policy is only available internally at the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods. It can be requested from the local library., 2018
  54. Max Planck Society “Berliner Erklärung”, 2003 URL: https://openaccess.mpg.de/Berliner-Erklaerung
  55. Max Planck Society “Regeln zur Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis”, 2009 URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20220531145138/https://www.mpg.de/199493/regelnWissPraxis.pdf
  56. Max Planck Society “Jahresbericht der Max Planck Gesellschaft 2020”, 2021 URL: https://www.mpg.de/17035587/jahresbericht-2020.pdf
  57. Max Planck Society “Verhaltensregeln für gute wissenschaftliche Praxis – Umgang mit wissenschaftlichem Fehlverhalten”, 2022 URL: https://www.mpg.de/199493/regelnWissPraxis.pdf
  58. Luke A. McGuinness and Athena L. Sheppard “A descriptive analysis of the data availability statements accompanying medRxiv preprints and a comparison with their published counterparts” In PLOS ONE 16.5, 2021, pp. e0250887 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250887
  59. “Open Research Data: SNSF monitoring report 2017-2018”, 2020 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3618123
  60. Vladislav Nachev, Jan Taubitz and Nico Riedel “Charité Dashboard on Responsible Research” QUEST Center, 2023 URL: https://github.com/quest-bih/dashboard
  61. “Aktuelle Entwicklung und Herausforderungen im Forschungsdatenmanagement in Deutschland” In Aktuelle Entwicklung und Herausforderungen im De Gruyter Saur, 2021, pp. 537–556 DOI: 10.1515/9783110657807-029
  62. OECD “OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding”, 2007 DOI: 10.1787/9789264034020-en-fr
  63. “’Data Policies’ im Spannungsfeld zwischen Empfehlung und Verpflichtung” In Handbuch Forschungsdatenmanagement, 2011, pp. 49–62 URL: https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-fhpotsdam/frontdoor/index/index/docId/195
  64. Clémence Pinel, Barbara Prainsack and Christopher McKevitt “Caring for data: Value creation in a data-intensive research laboratory” In Social Studies of Science 50.2, 2020, pp. 175–197 DOI: 10.1177/0306312720906567
  65. Laia Pujol Priego, Jonathan Wareham and Angelo Kenneth S. Romasanta “The puzzle of sharing scientific data” In Industry and Innovation 29.2, 2022, pp. 219–250 DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2022.2033178
  66. Niamh Quigley, Janice Chan and Julie Clift “The role of Australian institutional repositories in sharing academic research: Research report”, 2022 DOI: 10.25917/S5A6-R623
  67. Rat für Informationsinfrastrukturen “Föderierte Dateninfrastrukturen für die wissenschaftliche Nutzung”, 2023 URL: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:101:1-2023021709
  68. “Data-sharing practices in publications funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research: a descriptive analysis” In Canadian Medical Association Open Access Journal 9.4, 2021, pp. E980–E987 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20200303
  69. Antti Mikael Rousi “Using current research information systems to investigate data acquisition and data sharing practices of computer scientists” In Journal of Librarianship and Information Science SAGE Publications, 2022, pp. 096100062210930 DOI: 10.1177/09610006221093049
  70. Lena Simon “Datenmanagement in der Abteilung Biomaterialien”, 2020 URL: https://info-bib.mpg.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/BT43-Simon.pdf
  71. “Data sharing practices and data availability upon request differ across scientific disciplines” In Scientific Data 8.1, 2021, pp. 192 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-021-00981-0
  72. “Changes in Data Sharing and Data Reuse Practices and Perceptions among Scientists Worldwide” In PLOS ONE 10.8, 2015, pp. e0134826 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134826
  73. Jennifer L. Thoegersen and Pia Borlund “Researcher attitudes toward data sharing in public data repositories: a meta-evaluation of studies on researcher data sharing” In Journal of Documentation, 2022 DOI: 10.1108/JD-01-2021-0015
  74. “Making FAIR Easy with FAIR Tools: From Creolization to Convergence” In Data Intelligence 2.1-2, 2019, pp. 87–95 DOI: 10.1162/dint˙a˙00031
  75. “Where Do Early Career Researchers Stand on Open Science Practices? A Survey Within the Max Planck Society” In Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics 5, 2021, pp. 586992 DOI: 10.3389/frma.2020.586992
  76. Jelte M. Wicherts, Marjan Bakker and Dylan Molenaar “Willingness to share research data is related to the strength of the evidence and the quality of reporting of statistical results” In PloS One 6.11, 2011, pp. e26828 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026828
  77. “The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship” In Scientific Data 3.1, 2016, pp. 160018 DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
  78. Wissenschaftsrat “Empfehlungen zur Weiterentwicklung der wissenschaftlichen Informationsinfrastrukturen in Deutschland bis 2020”, 2012, pp. 90 URL: https://www.wissenschaftsrat.de/download/archiv/2359-12.pdf
  79. “FAIR Practices in Europe” In Data Intelligence 2.1-2, 2019, pp. 257–263 DOI: 10.1162/dint˙a˙00048
  80. “A Review of Open Research Data Policies and Practices in China” In Data Science Journal 20.1, 2021, pp. 3 DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2021-003

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 11 likes about this paper.

Sign Up for Free