Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Fault-tolerant structures for measurement-based quantum computation on a network

Published 29 Feb 2024 in quant-ph | (2402.19323v2)

Abstract: In this work, we introduce a method to construct fault-tolerant measurement-based quantum computation (MBQC) architectures and numerically estimate their performance over various types of networks. A possible application of such a paradigm is distributed quantum computation, where separate computing nodes work together on a fault-tolerant computation through entanglement. We gauge error thresholds of the architectures with an efficient stabilizer simulator to investigate the resilience against both circuit-level and network noise. We show that, for both monolithic (i.e., non-distributed) and distributed implementations, an architecture based on the diamond lattice may outperform the conventional cubic lattice. Moreover, the high erasure thresholds of non-cubic lattices may be exploited further in a distributed context, as their performance may be boosted through entanglement distillation by trading in entanglement success rates against erasure errors during the error-decoding process. These results highlight the significance of lattice geometry in the design of fault-tolerant measurement-based quantum computing on a network, emphasizing the potential for constructing robust and scalable distributed quantum computers.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (19)
  1. K. Fujii, Quantum Computation with Topological Codes: From Qubit to Topological Fault-Tolerance, SpringerBriefs in Mathematical Physics, Vol. 8 (Springer, Singapore, 2015).
  2. R. Raussendorf, J. Harrington, and K. Goyal, A fault-tolerant one-way quantum computer, Annals of Physics 321, 2242 (2006).
  3. S. D. Barrett and T. M. Stace, Fault tolerant quantum computation with very high threshold for loss errors, Physical Review Letters 105, 200502 (2010).
  4. N. Nickerson and H. Bombín, Measurement Based Fault Tolerance beyond Foliation, arXiv:1810.09621 [quant-ph] .
  5. N. Delfosse and N. H. Nickerson, Almost-linear time decoding algorithm for topological codes, Quantum 5, 595 (2021).
  6. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, 2000).
  7. H. J. Briegel and R. Raussendorf, Persistent entanglement in arrays of interacting particles, Physical Review Letters 86, 910 (2001).
  8. M. Newman, L. A. de Castro, and K. R. Brown, Generating fault-tolerant cluster states from crystal structures, Quantum 4, 295 (2020).
  9. D. E. Browne and T. Rudolph, Resource-efficient linear optical quantum computation, Physical Review Letters 95, 010501 (2005).
  10. W. P. Grice, Arbitrarily complete Bell-state measurement using only linear optical elements, Physical Review A 84, 042331 (2011).
  11. F. Ewert and P. van Loock, 3/4-efficient Bell measurement with passive linear optics and unentangled ancillae, Physical Review Letters 113, 140403 (2014).
  12. N. Delfosse and G. Zémor, Linear-time maximum likelihood decoding of surface codes over the quantum erasure channel, Physical Review Research 2, 033042 (2020).
  13. D. König, Graphok es matrixok, Matematikai és Fizikai Lapok 38, 116 (1931).
  14. N. H. Nickerson, Y. Li, and S. C. Benjamin, Topological quantum computing with a very noisy network and local error rates approaching one percent, Nature Communications 4, 1756 (2013).
  15. N. H. Nickerson, J. F. Fitzsimons, and S. C. Benjamin, Freely scalable quantum technologies using cells of 5-to-50 qubits with very lossy and noisy photonic links, Physical Review X 4, 041041 (2014).
  16. C. Gidney, M. Newman, and M. McEwen, Benchmarking the planar honeycomb code, Quantum 6, 813 (2022).
  17. S. J. Chung, T. Hahn, and W. E. Klee, Nomenclature and generation of three-periodic nets: The vector method, Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations of Crystallography 40, 42 (1984).
  18. S. Aaronson and D. Gottesman, Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits, Physical Review A 70, 052328 (2004).
  19. C. Wang, J. Harrington, and J. Preskill, Confinement-Higgs transition in a disordered gauge theory and the accuracy threshold for quantum memory, Annals of Physics 303, 31 (2003).

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.