Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Precise test of lepton flavour universality in $W$-boson decays into muons and electrons in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector

Published 4 Mar 2024 in hep-ex | (2403.02133v2)

Abstract: The ratio of branching ratios of the $W$ boson to muons and electrons, $R{\mu/e}_W=B(W\rightarrow \mu\nu)/B(W\rightarrow e\nu)$, has been measured using 140 fb${-1}$ of $pp$ collision data at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV collected with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, probing the universality of lepton couplings. The ratio is obtained from measurements of the $t\bar{t}$ production cross-section in the $ee$, $e\mu$ and $\mu\mu$ dilepton final states. To reduce systematic uncertainties, it is normalised by the square root of the corresponding ratio $R{\mu\mu/ee}_Z$ for the $Z$ boson measured in inclusive $Z\rightarrow ee$ and $Z\rightarrow\mu\mu$ events. By using the precise value of $R{\mu\mu/ee}_Z$ determined from $e+e-$ colliders, the ratio $R{\mu/e}_W$ is determined to be $R{\mu/e}_W = 0.9995 \pm 0.0022 \pm 0.0036 \pm 0.0014$. The three uncertainties correspond to data statistics, experimental systematics and the external measurement of $R{\mu\mu/ee}_Z$, giving a total uncertainty of 0.0045, and confirming the Standard Model assumption of lepton flavour universality in $W$-boson decays at the 0.5% level.

Authors (1)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (84)
  1. Antonio Pich “Precision Tau Physics” In Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 75, 2014, pp. 41–85 DOI: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2013.11.002
  2. BaBar Collaboration “Evidence for an excess of B¯→D(*)⁢τ−⁢ν¯τ→¯𝐵superscript𝐷superscript𝜏subscript¯𝜈𝜏\bar{B}\to D^{(*)}\tau^{-}\bar{\nu}_{\tau}over¯ start_ARG italic_B end_ARG → italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( * ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT decays” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 2012, pp. 101802 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.101802
  3. Belle Collaboration “Measurement of the branching ratio of B¯→D(∗)⁢τ−⁢ν¯τ→¯𝐵superscript𝐷∗superscript𝜏subscript¯𝜈𝜏\bar{B}\to D^{(\ast)}\tau^{-}\bar{\nu}_{\tau}over¯ start_ARG italic_B end_ARG → italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ∗ ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT relative to B¯→D(∗)⁢ℓ−⁢ν¯ℓ→¯𝐵superscript𝐷∗superscriptℓsubscript¯𝜈ℓ\bar{B}\to D^{(\ast)}\ell^{-}\bar{\nu}_{\ell}over¯ start_ARG italic_B end_ARG → italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ∗ ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ℓ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ℓ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT decays with hadronic tagging at Belle” In Phys. Rev. D 92.7, 2015, pp. 072014 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.072014
  4. Belle Collaboration “Measurement of the τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ lepton polarization and R⁢(D*)𝑅superscript𝐷R(D^{*})italic_R ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) in the decay B¯→D*⁢τ−⁢ν¯τ→¯𝐵superscript𝐷superscript𝜏subscript¯𝜈𝜏\bar{B}\rightarrow D^{*}\tau^{-}\bar{\nu}_{\tau}over¯ start_ARG italic_B end_ARG → italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with one-prong hadronic τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ decays at Belle” In Phys. Rev. D 97.1, 2018, pp. 012004 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.012004
  5. Belle II Collaboration “A test of lepton flavor universality with a measurement of R⁢(D*)𝑅superscript𝐷R(D^{*})italic_R ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) using hadronic B𝐵Bitalic_B tagging at the Belle II experiment”, 2024 arXiv:2401.02840 [hep-ex]
  6. LHCb Collaboration “Measurement of the ratios of branching fractions ℛ⁢(D*)ℛsuperscript𝐷\mathcal{R}(D^{*})caligraphic_R ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) and ℛ⁢(D0)ℛsuperscript𝐷0\mathcal{R}(D^{0})caligraphic_R ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT )” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 2023, pp. 111802 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.111802
  7. LHCb Collaboration “Test of lepton flavor universality using B0→D*−⁢τ+⁢ντ→superscript𝐵0superscript𝐷absentsuperscript𝜏subscript𝜈𝜏B^{0}\to D^{*-}\tau^{+}\nu_{\tau}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT decays with hadronic τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ channels” In Phys. Rev. D 108.1, 2023, pp. 012018 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.012018
  8. LHCb Collaboration “Test of lepton universality in b→s⁢ℓ+⁢ℓ−→𝑏𝑠superscriptℓsuperscriptℓb\rightarrow s\ell^{+}\ell^{-}italic_b → italic_s roman_ℓ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ℓ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT decays” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 131.5, 2023, pp. 051803 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.051803
  9. CMS Collaboration “Precision measurement of the W𝑊Witalic_W boson decay branching fractions in proton–proton collisions at s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV” In Phys. Rev. D 105, 2022, pp. 072008 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.072008
  10. ATLAS Collaboration “Precision measurement and interpretation of inclusive W+superscript𝑊W^{+}italic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, W−superscript𝑊W^{-}italic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and Z/γ*𝑍superscript𝛾Z/\gamma^{*}italic_Z / italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT production cross sections with the ATLAS detector” In Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 2017, pp. 367 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4911-9
  11. LHCb Collaboration “Measurement of forward W→e⁢ν→𝑊𝑒𝜈W\to e\nuitalic_W → italic_e italic_ν production in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=8𝑠8\sqrt{s}=8\,square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 8TeV” In JHEP 10, 2016, pp. 030 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2016)030
  12. S. Schael “Electroweak measurements in electron-positron collisions at W𝑊Witalic_W-boson-pair energies at LEP” In Phys. Rept. 532, 2013, pp. 119–244 DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2013.07.004
  13. Particle Data Group “Review of Particle Physics” In PTEP 2022, 2022, pp. 083C01 DOI: 10.1093/ptep/ptac097
  14. S. Schael “Precision electroweak measurements on the Z𝑍Zitalic_Z resonance” In Phys. Rept. 427, 2006, pp. 257–454 DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2005.12.006
  15. ATLAS Collaboration “The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider” In JINST 3, 2008, pp. S08003 DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08003
  16. B. Abbott “Production and integration of the ATLAS Insertable B-Layer” In JINST 13, 2018, pp. T05008 DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/13/05/T05008
  17. ATLAS Collaboration “ATLAS Insertable B-Layer: Technical Design Report”, 2010 URL: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1291633
  18. ATLAS Collaboration “Luminosity determination in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC” In Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 2023, pp. 982 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11747-w
  19. ATLAS Collaboration “ATLAS data quality operations and performance for 2015–2018 data-taking” In JINST 15, 2020, pp. P04003 DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/15/04/P04003
  20. ATLAS Collaboration “Performance of electron and photon triggers in ATLAS during LHC Run 2” In Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 2020, pp. 47 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7500-2
  21. ATLAS Collaboration “Performance of the ATLAS muon triggers in Run 2” In JINST 15, 2020, pp. P09015 DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/15/09/p09015
  22. ATLAS Collaboration “The ATLAS Simulation Infrastructure” In Eur. Phys. J. C 70, 2010, pp. 823 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1429-9
  23. S. Agostinelli “GEANT4—A simulation toolkit” In Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506, 2003, pp. 250 DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8
  24. ATLAS Collaboration “The simulation principle and performance of the ATLAS fast calorimeter simulation FastCaloSim”, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2010-013, 2010 URL: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1300517
  25. Torbjorn Sjöstrand, Stephen Mrenna and Peter Skands “A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1” In Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 2008, pp. 852 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2008.01.036
  26. ATLAS Collaboration “The Pythia 8 A3 tune description of ATLAS minimum bias and inelastic measurements incorporating the Donnachie–Landshoff diffractive model”, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-017, 2016 URL: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2206965
  27. ATLAS Collaboration “The ATLAS Collaboration Software and Firmware”, ATL-SOFT-PUB-2021-001, 2021 URL: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2767187
  28. ATLAS Collaboration “Electron and photon performance measurements with the ATLAS detector using the 2015–2017 LHC proton–proton collision data” In JINST 14, 2019, pp. P12006 DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/14/12/P12006
  29. ATLAS Collaboration “Studies of the muon momentum calibration and performance of the ATLAS detector with p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV” In Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 2023, pp. 686 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11584-x
  30. ATLAS Collaboration “Jet energy scale and resolution measured in proton–proton collisions at s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector” In Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 2021, pp. 689 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09402-3
  31. ATLAS Collaboration “Electron and photon efficiencies in LHC Run 2 with the ATLAS experiment”, 2023 arXiv:2308.13362 [hep-ex]
  32. ATLAS Collaboration “Muon reconstruction and identification efficiency in ATLAS using the full Run 2 p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collision data set at s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV” In Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 2021, pp. 578 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09233-2
  33. ATLAS Collaboration “ATLAS b𝑏bitalic_b-jet identification performance and efficiency measurement with t⁢t¯𝑡¯𝑡t\bar{t}italic_t over¯ start_ARG italic_t end_ARG events in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV” In Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 2019, pp. 970 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7450-8
  34. Paolo Nason “A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms” In JHEP 11, 2004, pp. 040 DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040
  35. Stefano Frixione, Paolo Nason and Carlo Oleari “Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method” In JHEP 11, 2007, pp. 070 DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070
  36. “A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX” In JHEP 06, 2010, pp. 043 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043
  37. Stefano Frixione, Giovanni Ridolfi and Paolo Nason “A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction” In JHEP 09, 2007, pp. 126 DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/126
  38. NNPDF Collaboration “Parton distributions for the LHC run II” In JHEP 04, 2015, pp. 040 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2015)040
  39. NNPDF Collaboration “Parton distributions with LHC data” In Nucl. Phys. B 867, 2013, pp. 244 DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2012.10.003
  40. ATLAS Collaboration “ATLAS Pythia 8 tunes to 7⁢TeV7TeV7\leavevmode\nobreak\ \text{TeV}7 TeV data”, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-021, 2014 URL: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1966419
  41. ATLAS Collaboration “Studies on top-quark Monte Carlo modelling for Top2016”, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-020, 2016 URL: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2216168
  42. “The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations” In JHEP 07, 2014, pp. 079 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079
  43. M. Bähr “Herwig++ physics and manual” In Eur. Phys. J. C 58, 2008, pp. 639–707 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0798-9
  44. Johannes Bellm “Herwig 7.1 Release Note”, 2017 arXiv:1705.06919 [hep-ph]
  45. ATLAS Collaboration “Study of top-quark pair modelling and uncertainties using ATLAS measurements at s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV”, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2020-023, 2020 URL: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2730443
  46. “Electroweak model and constraints on new physics, in Review of Particle Physics” In Review of Particle Physics 2022, 2022, pp. 083C01 DOI: 10.1093/ptep/ptac097
  47. D.J. Lange “The EvtGen particle decay simulation package” In Proceedings, 7th International Conference on B physics at hadron machines (BEAUTY 2000) 462, 2001, pp. 152 DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00089-4
  48. M. Czakon, P. Fiedler and A. Mitov “Total Top-Quark Pair-Production Cross Section at Hadron Colliders Through 𝒪⁢(αS4)𝒪superscriptsubscript𝛼𝑆4\mathcal{O}(\alpha_{S}^{4})caligraphic_O ( italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT )” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 2013, pp. 252004 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.252004
  49. “Top++: A program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders” In Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2014, pp. 2930 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2014.06.021
  50. ATLAS Collaboration “Measurement of the t⁢t¯𝑡¯𝑡t\bar{t}italic_t over¯ start_ARG italic_t end_ARG production cross-section and lepton differential distributions in e⁢μ𝑒𝜇e\muitalic_e italic_μ dilepton events from p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector” In Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 2020, pp. 528 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7907-9
  51. Emanuele Re “Single-top Wt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method” In Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 2011, pp. 1547 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1547-z
  52. “Isolating Wt production at the LHC” In JHEP 11, 2009, pp. 074 DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2009/11/074
  53. “Higher-order corrections for t⁢W𝑡𝑊tWitalic_t italic_W production at high-energy hadron colliders” In JHEP 05, 2021, pp. 278 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP05(2021)278
  54. Enrico Bothmann “Event generation with Sherpa 2.2” In SciPost Phys. 7.3, 2019, pp. 034 DOI: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.7.3.034
  55. “Comix, a new matrix element generator” In JHEP 12, 2008, pp. 039 DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/12/039
  56. “OpenLoops 2” In Eur. Phys. J. C 79.10, 2019, pp. 866 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7306-2
  57. “A parton shower algorithm based on Catani–Seymour dipole factorisation” In JHEP 03, 2008, pp. 038 DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/03/038
  58. “A critical appraisal of NLO+PS matching methods” In JHEP 09, 2012, pp. 049 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP09(2012)049
  59. “QCD Matrix Elements + Parton Showers” In JHEP 11, 2001, pp. 063 DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/11/063
  60. “QCD matrix elements + parton showers. The NLO case” In JHEP 04, 2013, pp. 027 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2013)027
  61. “QCD matrix elements and truncated showers” In JHEP 05, 2009, pp. 053 DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2009/05/053
  62. “High-precision QCD at hadron colliders: Electroweak gauge boson rapidity distributions at next-to-next-to leading order” In Phys. Rev. D 69, 2004, pp. 094008 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.094008
  63. “NLO vector-boson production matched with shower in POWHEG” In JHEP 07, 2008, pp. 060 DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/07/060
  64. ATLAS Collaboration “Measurement of the Z/γ*𝑍superscript𝛾Z/\gamma^{*}italic_Z / italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT boson transverse momentum distribution in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=7⁢TeV𝑠7TeV\sqrt{s}=7\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector” In JHEP 09, 2014, pp. 145 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP09(2014)145
  65. Hung-Liang Lai “New parton distributions for collider physics” In Phys. Rev. D 82, 2010, pp. 074024 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.074024
  66. “FEWZ 2.0: A code for hadronic Z production at next-to-next-to-leading order” In Comput. Phys. Commun. 182, 2011, pp. 2388–2403 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2011.06.008
  67. Matteo Cacciari, Gavin P. Salam and Gregory Soyez “The anti-ktsubscript𝑘𝑡k_{t}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT jet clustering algorithm” In JHEP 04, 2008, pp. 063 DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063
  68. Matteo Cacciari, Gavin P. Salam and Gregory Soyez “FastJet user manual” In Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2012, pp. 1896 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2
  69. ATLAS Collaboration “Jet reconstruction and performance using particle flow with the ATLAS Detector” In Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 2017, pp. 466 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5031-2
  70. ATLAS Collaboration “Performance of pile-up mitigation techniques for jets in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=8⁢TeV𝑠8TeV\sqrt{s}=8\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 8 TeV using the ATLAS detector” In Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 2016, pp. 581 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4395-z
  71. ATLAS Collaboration “ATLAS flavour-tagging algorithms for the LHC Run 2 p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collision dataset” In Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 2023, pp. 681 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11699-1
  72. ATLAS Collaboration “Measurements of top-quark pair differential cross-sections in the lepton+jets channel in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV using the ATLAS detector” In JHEP 11, 2017, pp. 191 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP11(2017)191
  73. Michal Czakon, David Heymes and Alexander Mitov “High-Precision Differential Predictions for Top-Quark Pairs at the LHC” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 116.8, 2016, pp. 082003 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.082003
  74. ATLAS Collaboration “Measurement of the t⁢t¯𝑡¯𝑡t\bar{t}italic_t over¯ start_ARG italic_t end_ARG production cross-section in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=5.02⁢TeV𝑠5.02TeV\sqrt{s}=5.02\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector” In JHEP 06, 2023, pp. 138 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP06(2023)138
  75. ATLAS Collaboration “Test of the universality of τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ and μ𝜇\muitalic_μ lepton couplings in W𝑊Witalic_W-boson decays with the ATLAS detector” In Nature Phys. 17, 2021, pp. 813–818 DOI: 10.1038/s41567-021-01236-w
  76. “PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II” In J. Phys. G 43, 2016, pp. 023001 DOI: 10.1088/0954-3899/43/2/023001
  77. Johannes Bellm “Herwig 7.0/Herwig++ 3.0 release note” In Eur. Phys. J. C 76.4, 2016, pp. 196 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4018-8
  78. ATLAS Collaboration “Measurement of the c𝑐citalic_c-jet mistagging efficiency in t⁢t¯𝑡¯𝑡t\bar{t}italic_t over¯ start_ARG italic_t end_ARG events using p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collision data at s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV collected with the ATLAS detector” In Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 2022, pp. 95 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09843-w
  79. ATLAS Collaboration “Calibration of the light-flavour jet mistagging efficiency of the b𝑏bitalic_b-tagging algorithms with Z𝑍Zitalic_Z+jets events using 139⁢fb−1139superscriptfb1139\,\text{fb}^{-1}139 fb start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT of ATLAS proton–proton collision data at s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV” In Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 2023, pp. 728 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11736-z
  80. G. Avoni “The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS” In JINST 13.07, 2018, pp. P07017 DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/13/07/P07017
  81. ATLAS Collaboration “Inclusive and differential cross-sections for dilepton t⁢t¯𝑡¯𝑡t\bar{t}italic_t over¯ start_ARG italic_t end_ARG production measured in s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions with the ATLAS detector” In JHEP 07, 2023, pp. 141 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2023)141
  82. ATLAS Collaboration “Measurements of top-quark pair to Z𝑍Zitalic_Z-boson cross-section ratios at s=13,8,7⁢TeV𝑠1387TeV\sqrt{s}=13,8,7\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 , 8 , 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector” In JHEP 02, 2017, pp. 117 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP02(2017)117
  83. ATLAS Collaboration “ATLAS Computing Acknowledgements”, ATL-SOFT-PUB-2023-001, 2023 URL: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2869272
  84. ATLAS Collaboration, 2012 URL: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1451888

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 1 like about this paper.