Strategies and trade-offs for controllability and memory time of ultra-high-quality microwave cavities in circuit QED
Abstract: Three-dimensional microwave cavity resonators have been shown to reach lifetimes of the order of a second by maximizing the cavity volume relative to its surface, using better materials, and improving surface treatments. Such cavities represent an ideal platform for quantum computing with bosonic qubits, but their efficient control remains an outstanding problem since the large mode volume results in inefficient coupling to nonlinear elements used for their control. Moreover, this coupling induces additional cavity decay via the inverse Purcell effect which can easily destroy the advantage of a long intrinsic lifetime. Here, we discuss conditions on, and protocols for, efficient utilization of these ultra-high-quality microwave cavities as memories for conventional superconducting qubits. We show that, surprisingly, efficient write and read operations with ultra-high-quality cavities does not require similar quality factors for the qubits and other nonlinear elements used to control them. Through a combination of analytical and numerical calculations, we demonstrate that efficient coupling to cavities with second-scale lifetime is possible with state-of-the-art transmon and SNAIL devices and outline a route towards controlling cavities with even higher quality factors. Our work explores a potentially viable roadmap towards using ultra-high-quality microwave cavity resonators for storing and processing information encoded in bosonic qubits.
- J. M. Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Haroche, Manipulating quantum entanglement with atoms and photons in a cavity, Reviews of Modern Physics 73, 565 (2001).
- S. Haroche, Nobel lecture: Controlling photons in a box and exploring the quantum to classical boundary, Reviews of Modern Physics 85, 1083 (2013).
- S. M. Girvin, Introduction to quantum error correction and fault tolerance (2021), arXiv:2111.08894 [quant-ph] .
- D. Gottesman, A. Kitaev, and J. Preskill, Encoding a qubit in an oscillator, Physical Review A 64, 012310 (2001).
- A. L. Grimsmo and S. Puri, Quantum error correction with the Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill code, PRX Quantum 2, 020101 (2021).
- B. Royer, S. Singh, and S. M. Girvin, Stabilization of finite-energy Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill states, Physical Review Letters 125, 260509 (2020).
- A. L. Grimsmo, J. Combes, and B. Q. Baragiola, Quantum computing with rotation-symmetric bosonic codes, Physical Review X 10, 011058 (2020).
- M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Reviews of Modern Physics 86, 1391 (2014).
- M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, 2000).
- W. K. Wootters, Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits, Physical Review Letters 80, 2245 (1998).
- A. G. Fowler, S. J. Devitt, and L. C. L. Hollenberg, Implementation of Shor’s Algorithm on a Linear Nearest Neighbour Qubit Array, Quantum Information & Computation 4, 237 (2004).
- W.-L. Ma, S.-S. Li, and L. Jiang, Algebraic structure of path-independent quantum control, Physical Review Research 4, 023102 (2022).
- M. Boissonneault, J. Gambetta, and A. Blais, Dispersive regime of circuit QED: Photon-dependent qubit dephasing and relaxation rates, Physical Review A 79, 013819 (2009).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.