Mechanically Designing Protected Superconducting Qubits
Abstract: Significant progress is required in the engineering of large, interacting quantum systems in order to realize the promises of gate-model quantum computing. Designing such systems is challenging, as the dynamics of continuous variable quantum systems are generally unintuitive, and brute-force numerical solutions are difficult to impossible in more than a few dimensions. In this work, I draw analogies between modern superconducting qubits and mechanical mass-spring systems in attempt to gain a simple intuition for what makes each design special. In particular, I analyze superconducting qubits that are inherently protected from noise, and connect this protection to features of the corresponding mechanical system. The hope is that intuition gained from analyzing these systems mechanically will allow for intuitive design of useful superconducting circuits in the future.
- “New Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment Using a One-Electron Quantum Cyclotron” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 American Physical Society, 2006, pp. 030801 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.030801
- C.E. Shannon “A mathematical theory of communication” In The Bell System Technical Journal 27.3, 1948, pp. 379–423 DOI: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
- Richard P Feynman “Simulating physics with computers” In International journal of theoretical physics 21.6/7 World Scientific, 1982, pp. 467–488
- Michael A. Nielsen and Isaac L. Chuang “Quantum Computation and Quantum Information” Cambridge University Press, 2000
- Peter W. Shor “Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer” In SIAM Journal on Computing 26.5 Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics (SIAM), 1997, pp. 1484–1509 DOI: 10.1137/s0097539795293172
- A.R. Calderbank and Peter W. Shor “Good quantum error-correcting codes exist” In Physical Review A 54.2 American Physical Society (APS), 1996, pp. 1098–1105 DOI: 10.1103/physreva.54.1098
- “Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation” In Physical Review A 86.3 American Physical Society (APS), 2012 DOI: 10.1103/physreva.86.032324
- “A long-lived Zeeman trapped-ion qubit” In Applied Physics B 122.10 Springer ScienceBusiness Media LLC, 2016 DOI: 10.1007/s00340-016-6527-4
- “Introduction to quantum electromagnetic circuits” In International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications 45.7, 2017, pp. 897–934 DOI: 10.1002/cta.2359
- Guido Burkard “Circuit theory for decoherence in superconducting charge qubits” In Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 71.14, 2005, pp. 1–8 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.144511
- Alexander Shnirman, Gerd Schön and Ziv Hermon “Quantum Manipulations of Small Josephson Junctions” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 American Physical Society, 1997, pp. 2371–2374 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.2371
- Peter Brooks, Alexei Kitaev and John Preskill “Protected gates for superconducting qubits” In Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 87.5, 2013 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.052306
- “Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box” In Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 76.4, 2007, pp. 1–21 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.042319
- “Fluxonium: Single Cooper-Pair Circuit Free of Charge Offsets” In Science 326.5949 American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2009, pp. 113–116 DOI: 10.1126/science.1175552
- “Millisecond coherence in a superconducting qubit”, 2021 arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.08578
- “Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor” In Nature 574.7779 Springer US, 2019, pp. 505–510 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5
- “Possible realization of an ideal quantum computer in Josephson junction array” In Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 66.22, 2002, pp. 1–8 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.224503
- Alexei Kitaev “Protected qubit based on a superconducting current mirror”, 2006, pp. 1–6 arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0609441
- “Coherence properties of the 0-π𝜋\piitalic_π qubit” In New Journal of Physics 20.4, 2018, pp. 1–21 DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/aab7cd
- “Understanding degenerate ground states of a protected quantum circuit in the presence of disorder” In Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 90.9, 2014, pp. 1–12 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.094518
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.