Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Competitive Facility Location under Random Utilities and Routing Constraints

Published 7 Mar 2024 in cs.AI | (2403.04264v2)

Abstract: In this paper, we study a facility location problem within a competitive market context, where customer demand is predicted by a random utility choice model. Unlike prior research, which primarily focuses on simple constraints such as a cardinality constraint on the number of selected locations, we introduce routing constraints that necessitate the selection of locations in a manner that guarantees the existence of a tour visiting all chosen locations while adhering to a specified tour length upper bound. Such routing constraints find crucial applications in various real-world scenarios. The problem at hand features a non-linear objective function, resulting from the utilization of random utilities, together with complex routing constraints, making it computationally challenging. To tackle this problem, we explore three types of valid cuts, namely, outer-approximation and submodular cuts to handle the nonlinear objective function, as well as sub-tour elimination cuts to address the complex routing constraints. These lead to the development of two exact solution methods: a nested cutting plane and nested branch-and-cut algorithms, where these valid cuts are iteratively added to a master problem through two nested loops. We also prove that our nested cutting plane method always converges to optimality after a finite number of iterations. Furthermore, we develop a local search-based metaheuristic tailored for solving large-scale instances and show its pros and cons compared to exact methods. Extensive experiments are conducted on problem instances of varying sizes, demonstrating that our approach excels in terms of solution quality and computation time when compared to other baseline approaches.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (18)
  1. Ben-Akiva M (1973) The structure of travel demand models. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.
  2. Benati S, Hansen P (2002) The maximum capture problem with random utilities: Problem formulation and algorithms. European Journal of Operational Research 143(3):518–530.
  3. Croes GA (1958) A method for solving traveling-salesman problems. Operations Research 6(6):791–812.
  4. Duran MA, Grossmann IE (1986) An outer-approximation algorithm for a class of mixed-integer nonlinear programs. Mathematical Programming 36:307–339.
  5. Fosgerau M, Bierlaire M (2009) Discrete choice models with multiplicative error terms. Transportation Research Part B 43(5):494–505.
  6. Haase K (2009) Discrete location planning, URL http://hdl.handle.net/2123/19420.
  7. Haase K, Müller S (2014) A comparison of linear reformulations for multinomial logit choice probabilities in facility location models. European Journal of Operational Research 232(3):689–691.
  8. Laporte G, Martín IR (2007) Locating a cycle in a transportation or a telecommunications network. Networks 50(1):92–108.
  9. Li HL (1994) A global approach for general 0–1 fractional programming. European Journal of Operational Research 73(3):590–596.
  10. Ljubić I, Moreno E (2018) Outer approximation and submodular cuts for maximum capture facility location problems with random utilities. European Journal of Operational Research 266(1):46–56.
  11. Mai T, Lodi A (2020) A multicut outer-approximation approach for competitive facility location under random utilities. European Journal of Operational Research 284(3):874–881.
  12. McFadden D (1978) Modeling the choice of residential location. Spatial Interaction Theory and Residential Location, 75–96 (Amsterdam: North-Holland).
  13. McFadden D (2001) Economic choices. American Economic Review 351–378.
  14. McFadden D, Train K (2000) Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of applied Econometrics 447–470.
  15. Meyer F, Glock K (2022) Kinematic orienteering problem with time-optimal trajectories for multirotor uavs. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 7(4):11402–11409.
  16. Train K (2003) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge University Press).
  17. Tsiogkas N, Lane DM (2018) Dcop: Dubins correlated orienteering problem optimizing sensing missions of a nonholonomic vehicle under budget constraints. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 3(4):2926–2933.
  18. Vovsha P, Bekhor S (1998) Link-nested logit model of route choice Overcoming route overlapping problem. Transportation Research Record 1645:133–142.
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.