Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Foundation for the ΔSCF Approach in Density Functional Theory

Published 7 Mar 2024 in physics.chem-ph and cond-mat.other | (2403.04604v1)

Abstract: We extend ground-state density-functional theory to excited states and provide the theoretical formulation for the widely used $\Delta SCF$ method for calculating excited-state energies and densities. As the electron density alone is insufficient to characterize excited states, we formulate excited-state theory using the defining variables of a noninteracting reference system, namely (1) the excitation quantum number $n_{s}$ and the potential $w_{s}(\mathbf{r})$ (excited-state potential-functional theory, $n$PFT), (2) the noninteracting wavefunction $\Phi$ ($\Phi$-functional theory, $\Phi$FT), or (3) the noninteracting one-electron reduced density matrix $\gamma_{s}(\mathbf{r},\mathbf{r}')$ (density-matrix-functional theory, $\gamma_{s}$FT). We show the equivalence of these three sets of variables and their corresponding energy functionals. Importantly, the ground and excited-state exchange-correlation energy use the \textit{same} universal functional, regardless of whether $\left(n_{s},w_{s}(\boldsymbol{r})\right)$, $\Phi$, or $\gamma_{s}(\mathbf{r},\mathbf{r}')$ is selected as the fundamental descriptor of the system. We derive the excited-state (generalized) Kohn-Sham equations. The minimum of all three functionals is the ground-state energy and, for ground states, they are all equivalent to the Hohenberg-Kohn-Sham method. The other stationary points of the functionals provide the excited-state energies and electron densities, establishing the foundation for the $\Delta SCF$ method.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (67)
  1. P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Inhomogeneous electron gas, Phys.Rev. 136, B864 (1964).
  2. W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects, Phys.Rev. 140, A1133 (1965).
  3. S. M. Valone, A One-to-One Mapping Between One-Particle Densities and Some Normal-Particle Ensembles, Journal of Chemical Physics 73, 4653 (1980).
  4. E. H. Lieb, Density functionals for coulomb systems, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 24, 243 (1983).
  5. E. H. Lieb, Density functionals for coulomb systems, NATO ASI Series, Series B 123, 31 (1985).
  6. PW. Ayers, Axiomatic formulations of the Hohenberg-Kohn functional, Physical Review a 73, 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.012513 (2006).
  7. U. Von Barth and L. Hedin, A local exchange-correlation potential for the spin polarized case i, J. Phys. C 5, 1629 (1972).
  8. O. Gunnarsson and B. I. Lundqvist, Exchange and correlation in atoms, molecules and solids by the spin-density-functional formalism, Physical Review B 13, 4274 (1976).
  9. J. P. Perdew and A. Zunger, Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems, Physical Review B 23, 5048 (1981).
  10. A. Gorling, Symmetry in density-functional theory, Physical Review A 47, 2783 (1993).
  11. A. K. Theophilou, Density functional theory for excited states and special symmetries, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 61, 333 (1997).
  12. A. K. Theophilou, Rigorous formulation of a kohn and sham theory for states with special symmetries, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 69, 461 (1998), 0020-7608.
  13. R. Gaudoin and K. Burke, Lack of hohenberg-kohn theorem for excited states, Physical Review Letters 93, 173001 (2004).
  14. P. Samal and M. K. Harbola, Exploring foundations of time-independent density functional theory for excited states, Journal of Physics B 39, 4065 (2006).
  15. P. Samal, M. K. Harbola, and A. Holas, Density-to-potential map in time-independent excited-state density-functional theory, Chemical Physics Letters 419, 217 (2006).
  16. A. Gorling, Density-functional theory for excited states, Physical Review A 54, 3912 (1996), 1050-2947.
  17. A. Gorling, Density-functional theory beyond the hohenberg-kohn theorem, Physical Review A 59, 3359 (1999).
  18. A. Gorling, Proper treatment of symmetries and excited states in a computationally tractable kohn-sham method, Physical Review Letters 85, 4229 (2000).
  19. P. W. Ayers and M. Levy, Time-independent (static) density-functional theories for pure excited states: Extensions and unification, Physical Review A 80, 012508 (2009), 1050-2947.
  20. M. Levy and A. Nagy, Excited-state koopmans theorem for ensembles, Physical Review A 59, 1687 (1999a).
  21. M. Levy and A. Nagy, Variational density-functional theory for an individual excited state, Physical Review Letters 83, 4361 (1999b).
  22. A. Nagy and M. Levy, Variational density-functional theory for degenerate excited states, Physical Review A 63, 052502 (2001).
  23. A. Nagy, M. Levy, and P. W. Ayers, Time-independent theory for a single excited state, in Chemical reactivity theory: A density functional view, edited by P. K. Chattaraj (Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, 2009) p. 121.
  24. M. K. Harbola and P. Samal, Time-independent excited-state density functional theory: study of 1s(2)2p(3)(s-4) and 1s(2)2p(3)(d-2) states of the boron isoelectronic series up to ne5+, Journal of Physics B-Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics 42, 015003 (2009), 0953-4075.
  25. A. K. Theophilou, Energy density functional formalism for excited-states, Journal of Physics C 12, 5419 (1979).
  26. E. K. U. Gross, L. N. Oliveira, and W. Kohn, Rayleigh-ritz variational principle for ensembles of fractionally occupied states, Physical Review A , 2805 (1988), journal APR 15 N0593 PHYS REV A NOT IN FILE.
  27. L. N. Oliveira, E. K. U. Gross, and W. Kohn, Density-functional theory for ensembles of fractionally occupied states .2. application to the he atom, Physical Review A 37, 2821 (1988).
  28. L. N. Oliveira, E. K. U. Gross, and W. Kohn, Ensemble-density functional theory for excited-states, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry S24, 707 (1990).
  29. A. K. Theophilou and N. I. Gidopoulos, Density-functional theory for excited-states, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 56, 333 (1995).
  30. O. Franck and E. Fromager, Generalised adiabatic connection in ensemble density-functional theory for excited states: example of the h-2 molecule, Molecular Physics 112, 1684 (2014).
  31. M. Filatov, Spin-restricted ensemble-referenced kohn–sham method: basic principles and application to strongly correlated ground and excited states of molecules, WIREs Computational Molecular Science 5, 146 (2015).
  32. K. Deur and E. Fromager, Ground and excited energy levels can be extracted exactly from a single ensemble density-functional theory calculation, The Journal of Chemical Physics 150, 094106 (2019).
  33. E. Fromager, Individual Correlations in Ensemble Density Functional Theory: State- and Density-Driven Decompositions without Additional Kohn-Sham Systems, Physical Review Letters 124, 243001 (2020).
  34. A. Klein and R. M. Dreizler, Extension of kohn-sham theory to excited states by means of an off-diagonal density array, Journal of Physics A 35, 2685 (2002).
  35. Y. Lu and J. Gao, Fundamental variable and density representation in multistate dft for excited states, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 18, 7403 (2022a), doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00859.
  36. Y. Lu and J. Gao, Multistate density functional theory of excited states, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 13, 7762 (2022b), doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c02088.
  37. E. Runge and E. K. U. Gross, Density-functional theory for time-dependent systems, Physical Review Letters 52, 997 (1984).
  38. E. K. U. Gross and W. Kohn, Local density-functional theory of frequency-dependent linear response, Physical Review Letters 55, 2850 (1985).
  39. M. E. Casida and D. P. Chong, Time-dependent density functional response theory for molecules, in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods. Part1. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995) pp. 155–192.
  40. M. E. Casida, Time-dependent density-functional theory for molecules and molecular solids, Journal of Molecular Structure-Theochem 914, 3 (2009), 0166-1280.
  41. Y. Yang, E. R. Davidson, and W. Yang, Nature of ground and electronic excited states of higher acenes, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, E5098 (2016), doi: 10.1073/pnas.1606021113.
  42. R. van Leeuwen, Mapping from densities to potentials in time-dependent density-functional theory, Physical Review Letters 82, 3863 (1999).
  43. R. Van Leeuwen, Key concepts in time-dependent density-functional theory, International Journal of Modern Physics B 15, 1969 (2001).
  44. J. C. Slater, The self-consistent field for molecules and solids: Quantum theory of molecules and solids, vol. 4 (1974).
  45. J. C. Slater and J. H. Wood, Statistical exchange and the total energy of a crystal, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 5, 3 (1970).
  46. T. Ziegler, A. Rauk, and E. J. Baerends, On the calculation of multiplet energies by the hartree-fock-slater method, Theoretica chimica acta 43, 261 (1977).
  47. R. O. Jones and O. Gunnarsson, The density functional formalism, its applications and prospects, Reviews of Modern Physics 61, 689 (1989), rMP.
  48. C.-L. Cheng, Q. Wu, and T. Van Voorhis, Rydberg energies using excited state density functional theory, The Journal of Chemical Physics 129, 124112 (2008).
  49. A. T. B. Gilbert, N. A. Besley, and P. M. W. Gill, Self-consistent field calculations of excited states using the maximum overlap method (mom), The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 112, 13164 (2008), doi: 10.1021/jp801738f.
  50. I. Seidu, M. Krykunov, and T. Ziegler, Applications of time-dependent and time-independent density functional theory to rydberg transitions, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 119, 5107 (2015), doi: 10.1021/jp5082802.
  51. G. M. J. Barca, A. T. B. Gilbert, and P. M. W. Gill, Excitation number: Characterizing multiply excited states, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 14, 9 (2018a), doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00963.
  52. G. M. J. Barca, A. T. B. Gilbert, and P. M. W. Gill, Simple models for difficult electronic excitations, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 14, 1501 (2018b), doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00994.
  53. D. Hait and M. Head-Gordon, Highly accurate prediction of core spectra of molecules at density functional theory cost: Attaining sub-electronvolt error from a restricted open-shell kohn–sham approach, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 11, 775 (2020), doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03661.
  54. C. Kumar and S. Luber, Robust Delta scf calculations with direct energy functional minimization methods and step for molecules and materials, The Journal of Chemical Physics 156, 154104 (2022).
  55. J. P. Perdew and M. Levy, Extrema of the density functional for the energy: excited states from the ground-state theory, Physical Review B 31, 6264 (1985).
  56. E. Vandaele, M. Mališ, and S. Luber, The ΔΔ\Deltaroman_Δscf method for non-adiabatic dynamics of systems in the liquid phase, The Journal of Chemical Physics 156, 130901 (2022).
  57. J. M. Herbert, Chapter 3 - density-functional theory for electronic excited states, in Theoretical and Computational Photochemistry, edited by C. García-Iriepa and M. Marazzi (Elsevier, 2023) pp. 69–118.
  58. W. T. Yang, P. W. Ayers, and Q. Wu, Potential functionals: Dual to density functionals and solution to the upsilon-representability problem, Physical Review Letters 92, 146404 (2004).
  59. D. C. Langreth and J. P. Perdew, Exchange-correlation energy ofa metallic surface: Wave-vector analysis, Physical Review B 15, 2884 (1977).
  60. J. Harris, Adiabatic-connection approach to Kohn-Sham theory, Physical Review A 29, 1648 (1984).
  61. W. Yang, Generalized adiabatic connection in density functional theory, Journal of Chemical Physics 109, 10107 (1998).
  62. J. Harris and R. O. Jones, The surface energy of a bounded electron gas, J.Phys.F 4, 1170 (1974).
  63. R. T. Sharp and G. K. Horton, A variational approach to the unipotential many-electron problem, Physical Review 90, 317 (1953).
  64. J. D. Talman and W. F. Shadwick, Optimized effective atomic central potential, Physical Review A 14, 36 (1976).
  65. R. G. Parr and W. Yang, Density-Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules (Oxford UP, New York, 1989).
  66. A. J. Cohen, P. Mori-Sanchez, and W. T. Yang, Fractional charge perspective on the band gap in density-functional theory, Physical Review B 77, 115123 (2008).
  67. T. Kowalczyk, S. R. Yost, and T. V. Voorhis, Assessment of the ΔΔ\Deltaroman_Δscf density functional theory approach for electronic excitations in organic dyes, The Journal of Chemical Physics 134, 054128 (2011).

Summary

  • The paper establishes a rigorous framework that extends traditional DFT to excited states using the ΔSCF approach.
  • It introduces new functional theories utilizing potential, wavefunction, and density-matrix variables to map excited-state energies to a noninteracting reference system.
  • The framework bridges empirical insights with ab initio methods, paving the way for improved exchange-correlation functionals and more accurate excited-state predictions.

Review of "Foundation for the ΔSCF\Delta SCF Approach in Density Functional Theory"

The paper by Weitao Yang and Paul W. Ayers provides an extensive theoretical underpinning for the Δ\DeltaSCF method within Density Functional Theory (DFT), a computational quantum mechanical modeling method used to investigate the electronic structure of many-body systems, particularly in the context of excited states. Traditionally, density-functional theory (DFT) has focused on ground-state properties as dictated by the Hohenberg-Kohn theorems, which rely on the electron density because it uniquely determines the ground-state energy. However, Yang and Ayers address the challenge of extending DFT principles to describe excited states, a domain that lacks an equivalent Hohenberg-Kohn theorem for such states due to the complexities in determining excited-state densities across different systems.

Key Contributions and Methodology

A significant portion of the paper is dedicated to establishing the theoretical foundation for extending DFT to excited states via the Δ\DeltaSCF approach, a method wherein excited-state properties are determined by populating higher-energy non-ground-state orbitals. Traditional approaches have struggled with this due to the insufficient information from electron density alone to fully capture the characteristics of excited states. The method involves several innovative theoretical frameworks:

  1. Potential-functional Theory (nPFT):
    • This approach introduces the potential ws(r)w_s(\mathbf{r}) and an excitation quantum number nsn_s as new variables substituting the traditional dependency on electron density alone. This change allows for the description of excited states by forming a one-to-one mapping with the corresponding noninteracting reference system.
  2. Wavefunction-functional Theory (Φ\PhiFT) and Density-matrix-functional Theory (γs\gamma_sFT):
    • These frameworks operate on the premise that excited-state energies can be expressed as functionals of either the noninteracting wavefunction Φ\Phi or the one-electron reduced density matrix γs(r,r)\gamma_{s}(\mathbf{r},\mathbf{r}'). The functional formulation implies stationarity principles that are crucial for determining excited-state energies accurately.
  3. Adiabatic Connection Pathway:
    • The paper also elucidates the adiabatic connection method, which transitions between interacting and noninteracting systems, ensuring that the excited-state densities in interacting and noninteracting frameworks match.

Implications and Potential Applications

The authors' findings solidify the theoretical basis for applying the Δ\DeltaSCF method to excited states, which previously relied on empirical observations of functional performance. Their rigorous formulation shows equivalence in energy functionals across different theoretical descriptions, potentially guiding future advancements in excited-state calculations. Moreover, this framework allows the use of existing exchange-correlation functionals developed for ground states within excited-state calculations, thereby broadening the functional capabilities of DFT.

Theoretical and Practical Impacts

In terms of theoretical advancement, Yang and Ayers’ work might accelerate developments in addressing symmetry and degeneracy concerns present in excited-state calculations. Practically, the generalized Kohn-Sham approach, as discussed, could be exploited to improve existing software implementations of DFT that target excited states, enhancing predictions in photochemical processes, materials science, and beyond.

Future Prospects

Looking forward, this foundational framework could stimulate more robust development of exchange-correlation functionals specifically designed for simultaneous ground and excited states consideration. Such advancements will facilitate more accurate and widespread adoption of the Δ\DeltaSCF method in various fields of quantum chemistry and condensed matter physics.

In conclusion, Yang and Ayers have contributed a pivotal theoretical refinement to DFT, potentially transforming how excited states are computed. This development underpins both current practices and future explorations in computational methods, aiming to bridge gaps between theoretical constraints and practical applicability.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We found no open problems mentioned in this paper.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 3 tweets with 190 likes about this paper.