Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

CarbonNet: How Computer Vision Plays a Role in Climate Change? Application: Learning Geomechanics from Subsurface Geometry of CCS to Mitigate Global Warming

Published 9 Mar 2024 in cs.CV and cs.AI | (2403.06025v3)

Abstract: We introduce a new approach using computer vision to predict the land surface displacement from subsurface geometry images for Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS). CCS has been proved to be a key component for a carbon neutral society. However, scientists see there are challenges along the way including the high computational cost due to the large model scale and limitations to generalize a pre-trained model with complex physics. We tackle those challenges by training models directly from the subsurface geometry images. The goal is to understand the respons of land surface displacement due to carbon injection and utilize our trained models to inform decision making in CCS projects. We implement multiple models (CNN, ResNet, and ResNetUNet) for static mechanics problem, which is a image prediction problem. Next, we use the LSTM and transformer for transient mechanics scenario, which is a video prediction problem. It shows ResNetUNet outperforms the others thanks to its architecture in static mechanics problem, and LSTM shows comparable performance to transformer in transient problem. This report proceeds by outlining our dataset in detail followed by model descriptions in method section. Result and discussion state the key learning, observations, and conclusion with future work rounds out the paper.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (34)
  1. A coupled reservoir simulation-geomechanical modelling study of the co2 injection-induced ground surface uplift observed at krechba, in salah. Energy Procedia, 37:3719–3726, 1 2013.
  2. The fenics project version 1.5. Archive of Numerical Software, 3(100), 2015.
  3. Klaus-Jürgen Bathe. Finite element method. Wiley encyclopedia of computer science and engineering, pages 1–12, 2007.
  4. Yared W Bekele. Deep learning for one-dimensional consolidation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.11689, 2020.
  5. Yoshua Bengio. Practical recommendations for gradient-based training of deep architectures. In Neural networks: Tricks of the trade, pages 437–478. Springer, 2012.
  6. Stefan Braun. Lstm benchmarks for deep learning frameworks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.01818, 2018.
  7. Financial time series forecasting model based on ceemdan and lstm. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 519:127–139, 2019.
  8. Deep learning segmentation of hyperautofluorescent fleck lesions in stargardt disease. Scientific Reports, 10(1):1–13, 2020.
  9. Geochemical and geomechanical alteration of siliciclastic reservoir rock by supercritical co2-saturated brine formed during geological carbon sequestration. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 88:251–260, 9 2019.
  10. K Ho-Le. Finite element mesh generation methods: a review and classification. Computer-aided design, 20(1):27–38, 1988.
  11. Laboratory characterisation of shale properties. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 88:107–124, 2012.
  12. On large-batch training for deep learning: Generalization gap and sharp minima. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.04836, 2016.
  13. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
  14. Coupled multiphase thermo-hydro-mechanical analysis of supercritical co2 injection: Benchmark for the in salah surface uplift problem. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 51:394–408, 8 2016.
  15. Application of a health, safety, and environmental screening and ranking framework to the shenhua ccs project. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 17:504–514, 2013.
  16. Cptr: Full transformer network for image captioning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.10804, 2021.
  17. A composite neural network that learns from multi-fidelity data: Application to function approximation and inverse pde problems. Journal of Computational Physics, 401:109020, 1 2020.
  18. Stress field prediction in cantilevered structures using convolutional neural networks. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 20(1):011002, 2020.
  19. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, pages 234–241. Springer, 2015.
  20. Time series forecasting of petroleum production using deep lstm recurrent networks. Neurocomputing, 323:203–213, 2019.
  21. Moses Soh. Learning cnn-lstm architectures for image caption generation. Dept. Comput. Sci., Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA, USA, Tech. Rep, 2016.
  22. Jennie C Stephens. Growing interest in carbon capture and storage (ccs) for climate change mitigation. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 2(2):4–13, 2006.
  23. A computational model for coupled multiphysics processes of co2 sequestration in fractured porous media. Advances in Water Resources, 59:238–255, 9 2013.
  24. Phrase-based image caption generator with hierarchical lstm network. Neurocomputing, 333:86–100, 2019.
  25. Deep-learning-based coupled flow-geomechanics surrogate model for co22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT sequestration. 5 2021.
  26. A deep-learning-based surrogate model for data assimilation in dynamic subsurface flow problems. Journal of Computational Physics, 413:109456, 7 2020.
  27. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
  28. Attention is all you need. In I. Guyon, U. Von Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 30. Curran Associates, Inc., 2017.
  29. Coupled hydromechanical modeling of co2 sequestration in deep saline aquifers. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 4:910–919, 12 2010.
  30. Towards a predictor for co2 plume migration using deep neural networks. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 105:103223, 2 2021.
  31. Physics constrained learning for data-driven inverse modeling from sparse observations. 2 2020.
  32. A comparison of transformer and lstm encoder decoder models for asr. In 2019 IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop (ASRU), pages 8–15. IEEE, 2019.
  33. Physics-informed semantic inpainting: Application to geostatistical modeling. Journal of Computational Physics, 419:109676, 10 2020.
  34. D-unet: a dimension-fusion u shape network for chronic stroke lesion segmentation. IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics, 18(3):940–950, 2019.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (3)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.