Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Low Overhead Qutrit Magic State Distillation

Published 10 Mar 2024 in quant-ph | (2403.06228v3)

Abstract: We show that using qutrits rather than qubits leads to a substantial reduction in the overhead cost associated with an approach to fault-tolerant quantum computing known as magic state distillation. We construct a family of $[[9m-k, k, 2]]_3$ triorthogonal qutrit error-correcting codes for any positive integers $m$ and $k$ with $k \leq 3m-2$ that are suitable for magic state distillation. In magic state distillation, the number of ancillae required to produce a magic state with target error rate $\epsilon$ is $O(\log\gamma \epsilon{-1})$, where the yield parameter $\gamma$ characterizes the overhead cost. For $k=3m-2$, our codes have $\gamma = \log_2 (2+\frac{6}{3 m-2})$, which tends to $1$ as $m \to \infty$. Moreover, the $[[20,7,2]]_3$ qutrit code that arises from our construction when $m=3$ already has a yield parameter of $1.51$ which outperforms all known qubit triorthogonal codes of size less than a few hundred qubits.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (38)
  1. “Universal quantum computation with ideal Clifford gates and noisy ancillas”. Phys. Rev. A 71, 022316 (2005).
  2. E. Knill. “Fault-tolerant postselected quantum computation: Schemes” (2004). arXiv:quant-ph/0402171.
  3. “Quantum computation with realistic magic-state factories”. Phys. Rev. A 95, 032338 (2017).
  4. “Magic-state distillation with low overhead”. Phys. Rev. A 86, 052329 (2012).
  5. “Distillation with sublogarithmic overhead”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 050504 (2018).
  6. Cody Jones. “Multilevel distillation of magic states for quantum computing”. Phys. Rev. A 87, 042305 (2013).
  7. “Magic state distillation with low space overhead and optimal asymptotic input count”. Quantum 1, 31 (2017).
  8. “Codes and Protocols for Distilling T𝑇Titalic_T, controlled-S𝑆Sitalic_S, and Toffoli Gates”. Quantum 2, 71 (2018).
  9. “Classification of small triorthogonal codes”. Phys. Rev. A 106, 012437 (2022).
  10. “Qutrit magic state distillation”. New J. Phys. 14, 063006 (2012).
  11. “Magic-state distillation in all prime dimensions using quantum reed-muller codes”. Phys. Rev. X 2, 041021 (2012).
  12. “Contextuality supplies the ‘magic’ for quantum computation”. Nature 510, 351–355 (2014).
  13. Earl T. Campbell. “Enhanced fault-tolerant quantum computing in d𝑑ditalic_d-level systems”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 230501 (2014).
  14. “Qutrit magic state distillation tight in some directions”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 030501 (2015).
  15. “Modelling microtubules in the brain as n-qudit quantum Hopfield network and beyond”. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 45, 41–54 (2016).
  16. “From n-qubit multi-particle quantum teleportation modelling to n-qudit contextuality based quantum teleportation and beyond”. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 46, 414–435 (2017).
  17. “Towards low overhead magic state distillation”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 070507 (2019).
  18. Shiroman Prakash. “Magic state distillation with the ternary Golay code”. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 476, 20200187 (2020). arXiv:2003.02717.
  19. “Qudit versions of the qubit π/8𝜋8\pi/8italic_π / 8 gate”. Phys. Rev. A 86, 022316 (2012).
  20. Wim van Dam and Mark Howard. “Noise thresholds for higher-dimensional systems using the discrete Wigner function”. Phys. Rev. A 83, 032310 (2011).
  21. “Normal form for single-qutrit Clifford+T𝑇{T}italic_T operators and synthesis of single-qutrit gates”. Phys. Rev. A 98, 032304 (2018).
  22. “Canonical forms for single-qutrit Clifford+T𝑇{T}italic_T operators”. Annals of Physics 406, 54–70 (2019).
  23. “Diagonal gates in the Clifford hierarchy”. Phys. Rev. A 95, 012329 (2017).
  24. “Synthesis and arithmetic of single qutrit circuits” (2024). arXiv:2311.08696.
  25. “Qutrit and ququint magic states”. Phys. Rev. A 102, 042409 (2020).
  26. “Negative quasi-probability as a resource for quantum computation”. New J. Phys. 14, 113011 (2012).
  27. “The resource theory of stabilizer quantum computation”. New J. Phys. 16, 013009 (2014).
  28. “Contextual bound states for qudit magic state distillation”. Phys. Rev. A 101, 010303 (2020).
  29. “Manipulating biphotonic qutrits”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 060504 (2008).
  30. “Control and tomography of a three level superconducting artificial atom”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 223601 (2010).
  31. “Characterization of multilevel dynamics and decoherence in a high-anharmonicity capacitively shunted flux circuit” (2021).
  32. “Characterization of control in a superconducting qutrit using randomized benchmarking” (2021).
  33. “A universal qudit quantum processor with trapped ions”. Nature Phys. 18, 1053–1057 (2022). arXiv:2109.06903.
  34. Noah Goss et al. “High-fidelity qutrit entangling gates for superconducting circuits”. Nature Commun. 13, 7481 (2022). arXiv:2206.07216.
  35. “Complete unitary qutrit control in ultracold atoms”. Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 034089 (2023).
  36. “Extending the computational reach of a superconducting qutrit processor” (2023). arXiv:2305.16507.
  37. “Efficient two-qutrit gates in superconducting circuits using parametric coupling” (2023). arXiv:2309.05766.
  38. “The Magma algebra system I: The user language”. Journal of Symbolic Computation 24, 235–265 (1997).
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 1 like about this paper.