Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Search for charged-lepton-flavour violating $μτqt$ interactions in top-quark production and decay in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}= 13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

Published 11 Mar 2024 in hep-ex | (2403.06742v2)

Abstract: A search for charged-lepton-flavour violating $\mu\tau qt$ ($q=u,c$) interactions is presented, considering both top-quark production and decay. The data analysed correspond to 140 $\textrm{fb}{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}= $13 TeV recorded with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. The analysis targets events containing two muons with the same electric charge, a hadronically decaying $\tau$-lepton and at least one jet, with exactly one $b$-tagged jet, produced by a $\mu\tau qt$ interaction. Agreement with the Standard Model expectation within $1.6\sigma$ is observed, and limits are set at the 95% CL on the charged-lepton-flavour violation branching ratio of $\mathcal{B}(t \to \mu\tau q) < 8.7 \times 10{-7}$. An Effective Field Theory interpretation is performed yielding 95% CL limits on Wilson coefficients, dependent on the flavour of the associated light quark and the Lorentz structure of the coupling. These range from $|c_{\mathsf{lequ}}{3(2313)}| / \Lambda{2} < 0.10\textrm{ TeV}{-2}$ for $\mu\tau ut$ to $|c_{\mathsf{ lequ}}{1(2323)}| / \Lambda{2} < 1.8\textrm{ TeV}{-2}$ for $\mu\tau ct$. An additional interpretation is performed for scalar leptoquark production inducing charged lepton flavour violation, with fixed inter-generational couplings. Upper limits on leptoquark coupling strengths are set at the 95% CL, ranging from $\lambda{\textrm{LQ}} = $1.3 to $\lambda{\textrm{LQ}} = $3.7 for leptoquark masses between 0.5 and 2.0 TeV.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (146)
  1. Ziro Maki, Masami Nakagawa and Shoichi Sakata “Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles” In Prog. Theor. Phys. 28, 1962, pp. 870–880 DOI: 10.1143/PTP.28.870
  2. B. Pontecorvo “Neutrino Experiments and the Problem of Conservation of Leptonic Charge” In Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 53, 1967, pp. 1717–1725
  3. Super-Kamiokande Collaboration “Evidence for Oscillation of Atmospheric Neutrinos” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 American Physical Society, 1998, pp. 1562–1567 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1562
  4. SNO Collaboration “Measurement of the Rate of νe+d→p+p+e−→subscript𝜈𝑒𝑑𝑝𝑝superscript𝑒{\nu}_{e}+\mathit{d}\rightarrow\mathit{p}+\mathit{p}+{\mathit{e}}^{-}italic_ν start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_d → italic_p + italic_p + italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Interactions Produced by B8superscript𝐵8{}^{8}Bstart_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 8 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_B Solar Neutrinos at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 American Physical Society, 2001, pp. 071301 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.071301
  5. SNO Collaboration “Direct Evidence for Neutrino Flavor Transformation from Neutral-Current Interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 American Physical Society, 2002, pp. 011301 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.011301
  6. “Charged lepton flavour violation: An experimental and theoretical introduction” In Riv. Nuovo Cim. 41.2, 2018, pp. 1 DOI: 10.1393/ncr/i2018-10144-0
  7. “Physics of leptoquarks in precision experiments and at particle colliders” In Phys. Rept. 641, 2016, pp. 1–68 DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2016.06.001
  8. “Correlation between RD(∗)subscript𝑅superscript𝐷∗{R}_{D^{\left(\ast\right)}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ∗ ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and top quark FCNC decays in leptoquark models” In JHEP 07, 2019, pp. 025 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2019)025
  9. “Unity of All Elementary-Particle Forces” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 1974, pp. 438–441 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.32.438
  10. Howard Georgi “The State of the Art—Gauge Theories” In PARTICLES AND FIELDS — 1974: Proceedings of the Williamsburg Meeting of APS/DPF 23, 1975, pp. 575–582 DOI: 10.1063/1.2947450
  11. “Unified interactions of leptons and hadrons” In Annals Phys. 93, 1975, pp. 193–266 DOI: 10.1016/0003-4916(75)90211-0
  12. Stephen M. Barr “A new symmetry breaking pattern for SO(10) and proton decay” In Phys. Lett. B 112, 1982, pp. 219–222 DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(82)90966-2
  13. A. De Rújula, H. Georgi and S.L. Glashow “Flavor Goniometry by Proton Decay” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1980, pp. 413 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.413
  14. J.-P. Derendinger, Jihn E. Kim and Dimitri V. Nanopoulos “Anti-Su(5)” In Phys. Lett. B 139, 1984, pp. 170–176 DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(84)91238-3
  15. “Supersymmetric flipped SU(5) revitalized” In Phys. Lett. B 194, 1987, pp. 231–235 DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(87)90533-8
  16. Lawrence J. Hall and Mahiko Suzuki “Explicit R-parity breaking in supersymmetric models” In Nucl. Phys. B 231, 1984, pp. 419–444 DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(84)90513-3
  17. Sally Dawson “R-parity breaking in supersymmetric theories” In Nucl. Phys. B 261, 1985, pp. 297–318 DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(85)90577-2
  18. “R-parity violation and unification” In Phys. Lett. B 406, 1997, pp. 321–327 DOI: 10.1016/S0370-2693(97)00702-8
  19. Csaba Csáki, Yuval Grossman and Ben Heidenreich “Minimal flavor violation supersymmetry: A natural theory for R-parity violation” In Phys. Rev. D 85, 2012, pp. 095009 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.095009
  20. Borut Bajc and Luca Di Luzio “R-parity violation in SU(5)” In JHEP 07, 2015, pp. 123 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2015)123
  21. “Signatures for technicolor” In Phys. Rev. D 34, 1986, pp. 1547 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.34.1547
  22. “Technicolour” In Phys. Rept. 74, 1981, pp. 277 DOI: 10.1016/0370-1573(81)90173-3
  23. Howard Georgi and Sheldon L. Glashow “Unextended Hypercolor and Unification” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1981, pp. 1511 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.1511
  24. BaBar Collaboration “Evidence for an excess of B¯→D(*)⁢τ−⁢ν¯τ→¯𝐵superscript𝐷superscript𝜏subscript¯𝜈𝜏\bar{B}\to D^{(*)}\tau^{-}\bar{\nu}_{\tau}over¯ start_ARG italic_B end_ARG → italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( * ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT decays” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 2012, pp. 101802 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.101802
  25. BaBar Collaboration “Measurement of an Excess of B¯→D(*)⁢τ−⁢ν¯τ→¯𝐵superscript𝐷superscript𝜏subscript¯𝜈𝜏\bar{B}\to D^{(*)}\tau^{-}\bar{\nu}_{\tau}over¯ start_ARG italic_B end_ARG → italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( * ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Decays and Implications for Charged Higgs Bosons” In Phys. Rev. D 88.7, 2013, pp. 072012 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.072012
  26. Belle Collaboration “Measurement of the branching ratio of B¯→D(∗)⁢τ−⁢ν¯τ→¯𝐵superscript𝐷∗superscript𝜏subscript¯𝜈𝜏\bar{B}\to D^{(\ast)}\tau^{-}\bar{\nu}_{\tau}over¯ start_ARG italic_B end_ARG → italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ∗ ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT relative to B¯→D(∗)⁢ℓ−⁢ν¯ℓ→¯𝐵superscript𝐷∗superscriptℓsubscript¯𝜈ℓ\bar{B}\to D^{(\ast)}\ell^{-}\bar{\nu}_{\ell}over¯ start_ARG italic_B end_ARG → italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ∗ ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ℓ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ℓ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT decays with hadronic tagging at Belle” In Phys. Rev. D 92.7, 2015, pp. 072014 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.072014
  27. Belle Collaboration “Measurement of the τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ lepton polarization and R⁢(D*)𝑅superscript𝐷R(D^{*})italic_R ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) in the decay B¯→D*⁢τ−⁢ν¯τ→¯𝐵superscript𝐷superscript𝜏subscript¯𝜈𝜏\bar{B}\to D^{*}\tau^{-}\bar{\nu}_{\tau}over¯ start_ARG italic_B end_ARG → italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 118.21, 2017, pp. 211801 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.211801
  28. Belle Collaboration “Measurement of the τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ lepton polarization and R⁢(D*)𝑅superscript𝐷R(D^{*})italic_R ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) in the decay B¯→D*⁢τ−⁢ν¯τ→¯𝐵superscript𝐷superscript𝜏subscript¯𝜈𝜏\bar{B}\rightarrow D^{*}\tau^{-}\bar{\nu}_{\tau}over¯ start_ARG italic_B end_ARG → italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with one-prong hadronic τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ decays at Belle” In Phys. Rev. D 97.1, 2018, pp. 012004 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.012004
  29. Belle Collaboration “Measurement of ℛ⁢(D)ℛ𝐷\mathcal{R}(D)caligraphic_R ( italic_D ) and ℛ⁢(D*)ℛsuperscript𝐷\mathcal{R}(D^{*})caligraphic_R ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) with a semileptonic tagging method” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 124.16, 2020, pp. 161803 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.161803
  30. LHCb Collaboration “Measurement of the ratios of branching fractions ℛ⁢(D*)ℛsuperscript𝐷\mathcal{R}(D^{*})caligraphic_R ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) and ℛ⁢(D0)ℛsuperscript𝐷0\mathcal{R}(D^{0})caligraphic_R ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT )” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 2023, pp. 111802 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.111802
  31. LHCb Collaboration “Test of lepton flavor universality using B0→D*−⁢τ+⁢ντ→superscript𝐵0superscript𝐷absentsuperscript𝜏subscript𝜈𝜏{B}^{0}\rightarrow{D}^{*-}{\tau}^{+}{\nu}_{\tau}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT decays with hadronic τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ channels” In Phys. Rev. D 108.1, 2023, pp. 012018 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.012018
  32. Belle-II Collaboration “A test of lepton flavor universality with a measurement of R⁢(D*)𝑅superscript𝐷R(D^{*})italic_R ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) using hadronic B𝐵Bitalic_B tagging at the Belle II experiment”, 2024 arXiv:2401.02840 [hep-ex]
  33. HFLAV Collaboration “Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ-lepton properties as of 2021” In Phys. Rev. D 107.5, 2023, pp. 052008 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.052008
  34. Mikael Chala, Jose Santiago and Michael Spannowsky “Constraining four-fermion operators using rare top decays” In JHEP 04, 2019, pp. 014 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2019)014
  35. CMS Collaboration “Search for charged-lepton flavor violation in the production and decay of top quarks using trilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at s𝑠\sqrt{s}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV”, 2023 arXiv:2312.03199 [hep-ex]
  36. “Lepton flavour violating top decays at the LHC” In Eur. Phys. J. C 75.9, 2015, pp. 450 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3649-5
  37. “The leptoquark Hunter’s guide: large coupling” In JHEP 01, 2019, pp. 132 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2019)132
  38. “Dimension-six terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian” In JHEP 10, 2010, pp. 085 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2010)085
  39. Gauthier Durieux, Fabio Maltoni and Cen Zhang “Global approach to top-quark flavor-changing interactions” In Phys. Rev. D 91.7, 2015, pp. 074017 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.074017
  40. ATLAS Collaboration “Search for flavour-changing neutral current top-quark decays t→q⁢Z→𝑡𝑞𝑍t\rightarrow qZitalic_t → italic_q italic_Z in proton–proton collisions at s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector” In JHEP 07, 2018, pp. 176 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2018)176
  41. ATLAS Collaboration “Search for leptoquarks decaying into the bτ𝜏\tauitalic_τ final state in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector” In JHEP 10, 2023, pp. 001 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2023)001
  42. CMS Collaboration “Search for a third-generation leptoquark coupled to a τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ lepton and a b𝑏bitalic_b quark through single, pair, and nonresonant production in proton–proton collisions at s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV”, 2023 arXiv:2308.07826 [hep-ex]
  43. “Nonresonant leptoquark with multigeneration couplings for μ⁢μ⁢j⁢j𝜇𝜇𝑗𝑗\mu\mu jjitalic_μ italic_μ italic_j italic_j and μ⁢ν⁢j⁢j𝜇𝜈𝑗𝑗\mu\nu jjitalic_μ italic_ν italic_j italic_j at the LHC” In Phys. Rev. D 99.9, 2019, pp. 095004 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.095004
  44. Luca Di Luzio, Admir Greljo and Marco Nardecchia “Gauge leptoquark as the origin of B-physics anomalies” In Phys. Rev. D 96.11, 2017, pp. 115011 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.115011
  45. Ivo Medeiros Varzielas and Jim Talbert “Simplified models of flavourful leptoquarks” In Eur. Phys. J. C 79.6, 2019, pp. 536 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7047-2
  46. “Charged lepton flavor violating processes and scalar leptoquark decay branching ratios in the colored Zee-Babu model” In JHEP 10, 2016, pp. 106 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2016)106
  47. “Confronting the vector leptoquark hypothesis with new low- and high-energy data” In Eur. Phys. J. C 83.2, 2023, pp. 153 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11304-5
  48. ATLAS Collaboration “The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider” In JINST 3, 2008, pp. S08003 DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08003
  49. ATLAS Collaboration “ATLAS Insertable B-Layer Technical Design Report”, ATLAS-TDR-19, 2010 URL: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1291633
  50. B. Abbott “Production and integration of the ATLAS Insertable B-Layer” In JINST 13, 2018, pp. T05008 DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/13/05/T05008
  51. G. Avoni “The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS” In JINST 13.07, 2018, pp. P07017 DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/13/07/P07017
  52. ATLAS Collaboration “Performance of the ATLAS trigger system in 2015” In Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 2017, pp. 317 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4852-3
  53. ATLAS Collaboration “The ATLAS Collaboration Software and Firmware”, ATL-SOFT-PUB-2021-001, 2021 URL: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2767187
  54. ATLAS Collaboration “Performance of electron and photon triggers in ATLAS during LHC Run 2” In Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 2020, pp. 47 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7500-2
  55. ATLAS Collaboration “Performance of the ATLAS muon triggers in Run 2” In JINST 15, 2020, pp. P09015 DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/15/09/p09015
  56. ATLAS Collaboration “ATLAS data quality operations and performance for 2015–2018 data-taking” In JINST 15, 2020, pp. P04003 DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/15/04/P04003
  57. ATLAS Collaboration “Luminosity determination in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC” In Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 2023, pp. 982 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11747-w
  58. T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P. Skands “A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1” In Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 2008, pp. 852–867 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2008.01.036
  59. NNPDF Collaboration and Richard D. Ball “Parton distributions with LHC data” In Nucl. Phys. B 867, 2013, pp. 244 DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2012.10.003
  60. ATLAS Collaboration “The Pythia 8 A3 tune description of ATLAS minimum bias and inelastic measurements incorporating the Donnachie–Landshoff diffractive model”, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-017, 2016 URL: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2206965
  61. ATLAS Collaboration “The ATLAS Simulation Infrastructure” In Eur. Phys. J. C 70, 2010, pp. 823 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1429-9
  62. S. Agostinelli “Geant4 – a simulation toolkit” In Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506, 2003, pp. 250 DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8
  63. ATLAS Collaboration “The simulation principle and performance of the ATLAS fast calorimeter simulation FastCaloSim”, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2010-013, 2010 URL: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1300517
  64. Enrico Bothmann “Event generation with Sherpa 2.2” In SciPost Phys. 7.3, 2019, pp. 034 DOI: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.7.3.034
  65. D.J. Lange “The EvtGen particle decay simulation package” In Proceedings, 7th International Conference on B physics at hadron machines (BEAUTY 2000) 462, 2001, pp. 152 DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00089-4
  66. “UFO - The Universal FeynRules Output” In Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 2012, pp. 1201–1214 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2012.01.022
  67. “FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology” In Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2014, pp. 2250–2300 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2014.04.012
  68. Juan Antoni Aguilar-Saavedra “Interpreting top-quark LHC measurements in the standard-model effective field theory”, 2018 arXiv:1802.07237 [hep-ph]
  69. “The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations” In JHEP 07, 2014, pp. 079 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079
  70. Christian Bierlich “A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3” In SciPost Phys. Codeb. 2022, 2022, pp. 8 DOI: 10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.8
  71. NNPDF Collaboration “Parton distributions from high-precision collider data” In Eur. Phys. J. C 77.10, 2017, pp. 663 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5199-5
  72. ATLAS Collaboration “ATLAS Pythia 8 tunes to 7⁢TeV7TeV7\leavevmode\nobreak\ \text{TeV}7 TeV data”, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-021, 2014 URL: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1966419
  73. “Top++: A program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders” In Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2014, pp. 2930 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2014.06.021
  74. Ilaria Brivio, Yun Jiang and Michael Trott “The SMEFTsim package, theory and tools” In JHEP 12, 2017, pp. 070 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP12(2017)070
  75. Ilaria Brivio “SMEFTsim 3.0 — a practical guide” In JHEP 04, 2021, pp. 073 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2021)073
  76. M. Bähr “Herwig++ physics and manual” In Eur. Phys. J. C 58, 2008, pp. 639 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0798-9
  77. Johannes Bellm “Herwig 7.0/Herwig++ 3.0 release note” In Eur. Phys. J. C 76.4, 2016, pp. 196 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4018-8
  78. NNPDF Collaboration and Richard D. Ball “Parton distributions for the LHC run II” In JHEP 04, 2015, pp. 040 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2015)040
  79. Bastian Diaz, Martin Schmaltz and Yi-Ming Zhong “The leptoquark hunter’s guide: Pair production” In JHEP 10, 2017, pp. 097 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2017)097
  80. Stefano Frixione, Giovanni Ridolfi and Paolo Nason “A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction” In JHEP 09, 2007, pp. 126 DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/126
  81. Paolo Nason “A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms” In JHEP 11, 2004, pp. 040 DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040
  82. Stefano Frixione, Paolo Nason and Carlo Oleari “Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method” In JHEP 11, 2007, pp. 070 DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070
  83. “A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX” In JHEP 06, 2010, pp. 043 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043
  84. ATLAS Collaboration “Improvements in t⁢t¯𝑡¯𝑡t\bar{t}italic_t over¯ start_ARG italic_t end_ARG modelling using NLO+PS Monte Carlo generators for Run 2”, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2018-009, 2018 URL: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2630327
  85. “An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2” In Comput. Phys. Commun. 191, 2015, pp. 159 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024
  86. Rikkert Frederix, Emanuele Re and Paolo Torrielli “Single-top t𝑡titalic_t-channel hadroproduction in the four-flavour scheme with POWHEG and aMC@NLO” In JHEP 09, 2012, pp. 130 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP09(2012)130
  87. “NLO single-top production matched with shower in POWHEG: s𝑠sitalic_s- and t𝑡titalic_t-channel contributions” In JHEP 09, 2009, pp. 111 DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2009/09/111
  88. “Single-top hadroproduction in association with a W𝑊Witalic_W boson” In JHEP 07, 2008, pp. 029 DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/07/029
  89. “Angular correlations of lepton pairs from vector boson and top quark decays in Monte Carlo simulations” In JHEP 04, 2007, pp. 081 DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/04/081
  90. “Automatic spin-entangled decays of heavy resonances in Monte Carlo simulations” In JHEP 03, 2013, pp. 015 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP03(2013)015
  91. “Comix, a new matrix element generator” In JHEP 12, 2008, pp. 039 DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/12/039
  92. “A parton shower algorithm based on Catani–Seymour dipole factorisation” In JHEP 03, 2008, pp. 038 DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/03/038
  93. “OpenLoops 2” In Eur. Phys. J. C 79.10, 2019, pp. 866 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7306-2
  94. Fabio Cascioli, Philipp Maierhöfer and Stefano Pozzorini “Scattering Amplitudes with Open Loops” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 2012, pp. 111601 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.111601
  95. Ansgar Denner, Stefan Dittmaier and Lars Hofer “Collier: A fortran-based complex one-loop library in extended regularizations” In Comput. Phys. Commun. 212, 2017, pp. 220–238 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2016.10.013
  96. “NLO QCD+EW predictions for V + jets including off-shell vector-boson decays and multijet merging” In JHEP 04, 2016, pp. 021 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2016)021
  97. Rikkert Frederix, Davide Pagani and Marco Zaro “Large NLO corrections in t⁢t¯⁢W±𝑡¯𝑡superscript𝑊plus-or-minust\bar{t}W^{\pm}italic_t over¯ start_ARG italic_t end_ARG italic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and t⁢t¯⁢t⁢t¯𝑡¯𝑡𝑡¯𝑡t\bar{t}t\bar{t}italic_t over¯ start_ARG italic_t end_ARG italic_t over¯ start_ARG italic_t end_ARG hadroproduction from supposedly subleading EW contributions” In JHEP 02, 2018, pp. 031 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP02(2018)031
  98. “On improving NLO merging for t⁢t¯⁢Wt¯tW\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{W}roman_t over¯ start_ARG roman_t end_ARG roman_W production” In JHEP 11, 2021, pp. 029 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP11(2021)029
  99. “Higgs boson production in association with top quarks in the POWHEG BOX” In Phys. Rev. D 91.9, 2015, pp. 094003 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.094003
  100. D. Florian “Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector”, 2016 DOI: 10.23731/CYRM-2017-002
  101. “QCD matrix elements + parton showers. The NLO case” In JHEP 04, 2013, pp. 027 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2013)027
  102. Jan-Christopher Winter, Frank Krauss and Gerhard Soff “A modified cluster-hadronisation model” In Eur. Phys. J. C 36, 2004, pp. 381–395 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s2004-01960-8
  103. “A critical appraisal of NLO+PS matching methods” In JHEP 09, 2012, pp. 049 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP09(2012)049
  104. “QCD Matrix Elements + Parton Showers” In JHEP 11, 2001, pp. 063 DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/11/063
  105. “QCD matrix elements and truncated showers” In JHEP 05, 2009, pp. 053 DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2009/05/053
  106. ATLAS Collaboration “Electron and photon performance measurements with the ATLAS detector using the 2015–2017 LHC proton–proton collision data” In JINST 14, 2019, pp. P12006 DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/14/12/P12006
  107. ATLAS Collaboration “Muon reconstruction and identification efficiency in ATLAS using the full Run 2 p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collision data set at s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV” In Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 2021, pp. 578 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09233-2
  108. ATLAS Collaboration “Jet reconstruction and performance using particle flow with the ATLAS Detector” In Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 2017, pp. 466 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5031-2
  109. Matteo Cacciari, Gavin P. Salam and Gregory Soyez “The anti-ktsubscript𝑘𝑡k_{t}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT jet clustering algorithm” In JHEP 04, 2008, pp. 063 DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063
  110. Matteo Cacciari, Gavin P. Salam and Gregory Soyez “FastJet user manual” In Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2012, pp. 1896 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2
  111. ATLAS Collaboration “Jet energy scale and resolution measured in proton–proton collisions at s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector” In Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 2021, pp. 689 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09402-3
  112. ATLAS Collaboration “Performance of pile-up mitigation techniques for jets in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=8⁢TeV𝑠8TeV\sqrt{s}=8\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 8 TeV using the ATLAS detector” In Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 2016, pp. 581 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4395-z
  113. ATLAS Collaboration “Selection of jets produced in 13⁢TeV13TeV13\leavevmode\nobreak\ \text{TeV}13 TeV proton–proton collisions with the ATLAS detector”, ATLAS-CONF-2015-029, 2015 URL: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2037702
  114. ATLAS Collaboration “ATLAS flavour-tagging algorithms for the LHC Run 2 p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collision dataset” In Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 2023, pp. 681 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11699-1
  115. ATLAS Collaboration “Topological cell clustering in the ATLAS calorimeters and its performance in LHC Run 1” In Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 2017, pp. 490 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5004-5
  116. “Local Hadronic Calibration”, ATL-LARG-PUB-2009-001-2, 2008 URL: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1112035
  117. ATLAS Collaboration “Reconstruction, Energy Calibration, and Identification of Hadronically Decaying Tau Leptons in the ATLAS Experiment for Run-2 of the LHC”, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-045, 2015 URL: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2064383
  118. ATLAS Collaboration “Measurement of the tau lepton reconstruction and identification performance in the ATLAS experiment using p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\leavevmode\nobreak\ \text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV”, ATLAS-CONF-2017-029, 2017 URL: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2261772
  119. ATLAS Collaboration “Identification of hadronic tau lepton decays using neural networks in the ATLAS experiment”, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2019-033, 2019 URL: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2688062
  120. ATLAS Collaboration “Electron and photon energy calibration with the ATLAS detector using 2015–2016 LHC proton–proton collision data” In JINST 14, 2019, pp. P03017 DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/14/03/P03017
  121. ATLAS Collaboration “Studies of the muon momentum calibration and performance of the ATLAS detector with p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV” In Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 2023, pp. 686 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11584-x
  122. ATLAS Collaboration “ATLAS b𝑏bitalic_b-jet identification performance and efficiency measurement with t⁢t¯𝑡¯𝑡t\bar{t}italic_t over¯ start_ARG italic_t end_ARG events in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV” In Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 2019, pp. 970 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7450-8
  123. ATLAS Collaboration “Measurement of the c𝑐citalic_c-jet mistagging efficiency in t⁢t¯𝑡¯𝑡t\bar{t}italic_t over¯ start_ARG italic_t end_ARG events using p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collision data at s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV collected with the ATLAS detector” In Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 2022, pp. 95 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09843-w
  124. ATLAS Collaboration “Calibration of the light-flavour jet mistagging efficiency of the b𝑏bitalic_b-tagging algorithms with Z𝑍Zitalic_Z+jets events using 139⁢fb−1139superscriptfb1139\,\text{fb}^{-1}139 fb start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT of ATLAS proton–proton collision data at s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV” In Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 2023, pp. 728 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11736-z
  125. Nikolaos Kidonakis “Two-loop soft anomalous dimensions for single top quark associated production with a W−superscript𝑊W^{-}italic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT or H−superscript𝐻H^{-}italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT” In Phys. Rev. D 82, 2010, pp. 054018 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.054018
  126. Nikolaos Kidonakis “Top Quark Production” In Proceedings, Helmholtz International Summer School on Physics of Heavy Quarks and Hadrons (HQ 2013), pp. 139–168 DOI: 10.3204/DESY-PROC-2013-03/Kidonakis
  127. ATLAS Collaboration “Observation of four-top-quark production in the multilepton final state with the ATLAS detector” In Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 2023, pp. 496 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11573-0
  128. CMS Collaboration “Measurement of the cross section of top quark–antiquark pair production in association with a W𝑊Witalic_W boson in proton–proton collisions at s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV” In JHEP 07, 2023, pp. 219 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2023)219
  129. ATLAS Collaboration “Measurement of the total and differential cross-sections of t⁢t¯⁢W𝑡¯𝑡𝑊t\bar{t}Witalic_t over¯ start_ARG italic_t end_ARG italic_W production in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=13𝑠13\sqrt{s}=13square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”, 2024 arXiv:2401.05299 [hep-ex]
  130. ATLAS Collaboration “Search for flavor-changing neutral-current couplings between the top quark and the Z𝑍Zitalic_Z boson with proton–proton collisions at s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector” In Phys. Rev. D 108, 2023, pp. 032019 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.032019
  131. ATLAS Collaboration “Measurement of W±⁢Zsuperscript𝑊plus-or-minus𝑍W^{\pm}Zitalic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Z production cross sections and gauge boson polarisation in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector” In Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 2019, pp. 535 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7027-6
  132. ATLAS Collaboration “Evidence for the H→b⁢b¯→𝐻𝑏¯𝑏H\rightarrow b\bar{b}italic_H → italic_b over¯ start_ARG italic_b end_ARG decay with the ATLAS detector” In JHEP 12, 2017, pp. 024 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP12(2017)024
  133. ATLAS Collaboration “Measurement of the t⁢t¯⁢Z𝑡¯𝑡𝑍t\bar{t}Zitalic_t over¯ start_ARG italic_t end_ARG italic_Z and t⁢t¯⁢W𝑡¯𝑡𝑊t\bar{t}Witalic_t over¯ start_ARG italic_t end_ARG italic_W cross sections in proton–proton collisions at s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector” In Phys. Rev. D 99, 2019, pp. 072009 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.072009
  134. Jon Butterworth “PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II” In J. Phys. G 43, 2016, pp. 023001 DOI: 10.1088/0954-3899/43/2/023001
  135. Johannes Bellm “Herwig 7.1 Release Note”, 2017 arXiv:1705.06919 [hep-ph]
  136. “Parton distributions in the LHC era: MMHT 2014 PDFs” In Eur. Phys. J. C 75.5, 2015, pp. 204 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3397-6
  137. “Merging meets matching in MC@NLO” In JHEP 12, 2012, pp. 061 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP12(2012)061
  138. Keith Hamilton, Paolo Nason and Giulia Zanderighi “MINLO: multi-scale improved NLO” In JHEP 10, 2012, pp. 155 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2012)155
  139. “Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples” In Comput. Phys. Commun. 77.2, 1993, pp. 219–228 DOI: 10.1016/0010-4655(93)90005-W
  140. “The RooFit toolkit for data modeling”, 2003 arXiv:physics/0306116 [physics.data-an]
  141. “RooFit Users Manual” URL: http://roofit.sourceforge.net
  142. Alexander L. Read “Presentation of search results: the C⁢LS𝐶subscript𝐿𝑆CL_{S}italic_C italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT technique” In Advanced Statistical Techniques in Particle Physics. Proceedings, Conference, Durham, UK, March 18-22, 2002 28, 2002, pp. 2693 DOI: 10.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313
  143. “Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics” In Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 2011, pp. 1554 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0
  144. ATLAS Collaboration “ATLAS Computing Acknowledgements”, ATL-SOFT-PUB-2023-001, 2023 URL: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2869272
  145. In JHEP 02, 2010, pp. 011 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP02(2010)011
  146. In Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2013, pp. 2501 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2501-z

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 1 like about this paper.