Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Interpreting What Typical Fault Signals Look Like via Prototype-matching

Published 11 Mar 2024 in cs.LG and cs.AI | (2403.07033v1)

Abstract: Neural networks, with powerful nonlinear mapping and classification capabilities, are widely applied in mechanical fault diagnosis to ensure safety. However, being typical black-box models, their application is limited in high-reliability-required scenarios. To understand the classification logic and explain what typical fault signals look like, the prototype matching network (PMN) is proposed by combining the human-inherent prototype-matching with autoencoder (AE). The PMN matches AE-extracted feature with each prototype and selects the most similar prototype as the prediction result. It has three interpreting paths on classification logic, fault prototypes, and matching contributions. Conventional diagnosis and domain generalization experiments demonstrate its competitive diagnostic performance and distinguished advantages in representation learning. Besides, the learned typical fault signals (i.e., sample-level prototypes) showcase the ability for denoising and extracting subtle key features that experts find challenging to capture. This ability broadens human understanding and provides a promising solution from interpretability research to AI-for-Science.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (30)
  1. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106587.
  2. doi:10.1016/j.isatra.2020.08.010.
  3. doi:10.1073/pnas.2106598119.
  4. doi:10.1109/TII.2021.3125385.
  5. doi:10.1109/TII.2021.3126111.
  6. doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2021.06.030.
  7. doi:10.1145/3546577.
  8. doi:10.1109/TETCI.2021.3100641.
  9. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107327.
  10. doi:10.1109/JSEN.2019.2958787.
  11. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110952.
  12. doi:10.1109/TIM.2022.3169528.
  13. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.05.027.
  14. doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11771.
  15. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2020.103331.
  16. doi:10.1007/s10845-021-01904-x.
  17. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109120.
  18. doi:10.1109/TII.2022.3154486.
  19. doi:10.1007/s10846-023-02025-8.
  20. doi:10.1007/s10845-020-01709-4.
  21. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2022.101815.
  22. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113065.
  23. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2023.126656.
  24. doi:10.1007/s10845-023-02237-7.
  25. doi:10.1109/TIM.2022.3222494.
  26. doi:10.1007/s10845-023-02123-2.
  27. doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2023.109749.
  28. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2023.111093.
  29. doi:10.1109/TMECH.2021.3058061.
  30. doi:10.1109/ICCV.2017.74.
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (3)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.