Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

The Effect of Quark-antiquark Confinement on the Deflection Angle by the NED Black Hole

Published 11 Mar 2024 in gr-qc | (2403.07044v1)

Abstract: In this study, we explore the influence of quark-antiquark confinement on the deflection angle within the framework of nonlinear electrodynamic (NED) black holes. To achieve this, we establish the appropriate optical spacetime metric and subsequently determine the Gaussian optical curvature. Utilizing the Gauss-Bonnet theorem, we investigate the impact of quark-antiquark confinement on the deflection angle exhibited by NED black holes. Additionally, we delve into the effects of a cold non-magnetized plasma medium and also axion-plasmon on gravitational lensing. Our findings highlight the significance of the axion-plasmon effect on the optical properties of NED black holes, particularly its influence on gravitational lensing. This exploration is particularly relevant in the context of the axion's potential role as a dark matter candidate. The multifaceted interplay between quark-antiquark confinement, nonlinear electrodynamics, and plasma dynamics provides a nuanced understanding of gravitational lensing phenomena. These insights contribute to ongoing research in dark matter studies and offer avenues for further theoretical and observational investigations in astrophysics.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (95)
  1. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc] .
  2. K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope), “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA] .
  3. R. P. Kerr, “Do Black Holes have Singularities?”   (2023), arXiv:2312.00841 [gr-qc] .
  4. R. Penrose, “Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 57–59 (1965).
  5. S. W. Hawking, “Black holes in general relativity,” Commun. Math. Phys. 25, 152–166 (1972).
  6. M. Born, “On the quantum theory of the electromagnetic field,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 143, 410–437 (1934).
  7. M. Born and L. Infeld, “Foundations of the new field theory,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 144, 425–451 (1934).
  8. W. Heisenberg and H. Euler, “Consequences of Dirac’s theory of positrons,” Z. Phys. 98, 714–732 (1936), arXiv:physics/0605038 .
  9. R. P. Mignani, V. Testa, D. Gonzalez Caniulef, R. Taverna, R. Turolla, S. Zane,  and K. Wu, “Evidence for vacuum birefringence from the first optical-polarimetry measurement of the isolated neutron star RX J1856.5−--3754,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 465, 492–500 (2017), arXiv:1610.08323 [astro-ph.HE] .
  10. E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, “Nonlinear Electrodynamics from Quantized Strings,” Phys. Lett. B 163, 123–130 (1985).
  11. N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “String theory and noncommutative geometry,” JHEP 09, 032 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9908142 .
  12. A. A. Tseytlin, “Born-Infeld action, supersymmetry and string theory,”  , 417–452 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9908105 .
  13. G. W. Gibbons and C. A. R. Herdeiro, “Born-Infeld theory and stringy causality,” Phys. Rev. D 63, 064006 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0008052 .
  14. M. Novello, Santiago E. Perez B.,  and J. Salim, “Non-linear electrodynamics and the acceleration of the universe,” Phys. Rev. D 69, 127301 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0312093 .
  15. R. Garcia-Salcedo and N. Breton, “Born-Infeld cosmologies,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15, 4341–4354 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/0004017 .
  16. M. Novello, E. Goulart, J. M. Salim,  and S. E. Perez B., “Cosmological Effects of Nonlinear Electrodynamics,” Class. Quant. Grav. 24, 3021–3036 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0610043 .
  17. S. I. Kruglov, “Universe acceleration and nonlinear electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 92, 123523 (2015), arXiv:1601.06309 [gr-qc] .
  18. A. Övgün, G. Leon, J. Magaña,  and K. Jusufi, “Falsifying cosmological models based on a non-linear electrodynamics,” Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 462 (2018), arXiv:1709.09794 [gr-qc] .
  19. A. Övgün, “Inflation and Acceleration of the Universe by Nonlinear Magnetic Monopole Fields,” Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 105 (2017), arXiv:1604.01837 [gr-qc] .
  20. G. Otalora, A. Övgün, J. Saavedra,  and N. Videla, “Inflation from a nonlinear magnetic monopole field nonminimally coupled to curvature,” JCAP 06, 003 (2018), arXiv:1803.11358 [gr-qc] .
  21. H. B. Benaoum and A. Ovgun, “Matter-antimatter asymmetry induced by non-linear electrodynamics,” Class. Quant. Grav. 38, 135019 (2021), arXiv:2105.07695 [gr-qc] .
  22. H. B. Benaoum, G. Leon, A. Ovgun,  and H. Quevedo, “Inflation driven by non-linear electrodynamics,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 367 (2023), arXiv:2206.13157 [gr-qc] .
  23. Sean A. Hayward, “Formation and evaporation of regular black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 031103 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0506126 .
  24. Eloy Ayon-Beato and Alberto Garcia, “Nonsingular charged black hole solution for nonlinear source,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 31, 629–633 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9911084 .
  25. I. Dymnikova, “Vacuum nonsingular black hole,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 24, 235–242 (1992).
  26. Valeri P. Frolov, “Notes on nonsingular models of black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 94, 104056 (2016), arXiv:1609.01758 [gr-qc] .
  27. Kirill A. Bronnikov, “Regular magnetic black holes and monopoles from nonlinear electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 63, 044005 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0006014 .
  28. K. A. Bronnikov and J. C. Fabris, “Regular phantom black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 251101 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0511109 .
  29. Meng-Sen Ma, “Magnetically charged regular black hole in a model of nonlinear electrodynamics,” Annals Phys. 362, 529–537 (2015), arXiv:1509.05580 [gr-qc] .
  30. J. R. Nascimento, G. J. Olmo, P. J. Porfírio, A. Yu. Petrov,  and A. R. Soares, “Nonlinear σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ-models in the Eddington-inspired Born-Infeld Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 101, 064043 (2020a), arXiv:1912.10779 [hep-th] .
  31. W. Javed, M. Atique,  and A. Övgün, “Effects of electric and magnetic charges on weak deflection angle and bounding greybody of black holes in nonlinear electrodynamics,” New Astron. 104, 102064 (2023).
  32. E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, T. Kinoshita, K. D. Lane,  and T-M Yan, “Charmonium: the model,” Physical review D 17, 3090 (1978).
  33. A. Einstein and F. A. Davis, The principle of relativity (Courier Corporation, 2013).
  34. K. Jusufi and A. Övgün, “Gravitational Lensing by Rotating Wormholes,” Phys. Rev. D 97, 024042 (2018), arXiv:1708.06725 [gr-qc] .
  35. M. Bartelmann, “Gravitational lensing,” Classical and Quantum Gravity 27, 233001 (2010).
  36. K. Jusufi, A. Övgün, A. Banerjee,  and I. Sakallı, “Gravitational lensing by wormholes supported by electromagnetic, scalar, and quantum effects,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus 134, 428 (2019), arXiv:1802.07680 [gr-qc] .
  37. M. Mangut, H. Gürsel, S. Kanzi,  and İ. Sakallı, “Probing the Lorentz Invariance Violation via Gravitational Lensing and Analytical Eigenmodes of Perturbed Slowly Rotating Bumblebee Black Holes,” Universe 9, 225 (2023), arXiv:2305.10815 [gr-qc] .
  38. F. Atamurotov, I. Hussain, G. Mustafa,  and A. Övgün, “Weak deflection angle and shadow cast by the charged-Kiselev black hole with cloud of strings in plasma*,” Chin. Phys. C 47, 025102 (2023).
  39. A. Abdujabbarov, B. Ahmedov, N. Dadhich,  and F. Atamurotov, “Optical properties of a braneworld black hole: Gravitational lensing and retrolensing,” Phys. Rev. D 96, 084017 (2017).
  40. F. Atamurotov, S. Shaymatov, P. Sheoran,  and S. Siwach, “Charged black hole in 4D Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity: particle motion, plasma effect on weak gravitational lensing and centre-of-mass energy,” JCAP 08, 045 (2021a), arXiv:2105.02214 [gr-qc] .
  41. F. Atamurotov, A. Abdujabbarov,  and W. Han, “Effect of plasma on gravitational lensing by a Schwarzschild black hole immersed in perfect fluid dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 104, 084015 (2021b).
  42. F. Atamurotov, A. Abdujabbarov,  and J. Rayimbaev, “Weak gravitational lensing Schwarzschild-MOG black hole in plasma,” Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 118 (2021c).
  43. S. Vagnozzi et al., “Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Telescope image of Sagittarius A,” Class. Quant. Grav. 40, 165007 (2023), arXiv:2205.07787 [gr-qc] .
  44. S. Vagnozzi and L. Visinelli, “Hunting for extra dimensions in the shadow of M87*,” Phys. Rev. D 100, 024020 (2019), arXiv:1905.12421 [gr-qc] .
  45. A. Allahyari, M. Khodadi, S. Vagnozzi,  and D. F. Mota, “Magnetically charged black holes from non-linear electrodynamics and the Event Horizon Telescope,” JCAP 02, 003 (2020), arXiv:1912.08231 [gr-qc] .
  46. M. Khodadi, A. Allahyari, S. Vagnozzi,  and D. F. Mota, “Black holes with scalar hair in light of the Event Horizon Telescope,” JCAP 09, 026 (2020), arXiv:2005.05992 [gr-qc] .
  47. K. S. Virbhadra and G. F. R. Ellis, “Schwarzschild black hole lensing,” Phys. Rev. D 62, 084003 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9904193 .
  48. K. S. Virbhadra and G. F. R. Ellis, “Gravitational lensing by naked singularities,” Phys. Rev. D 65, 103004 (2002).
  49. K. S. Virbhadra, “Relativistic images of Schwarzschild black hole lensing,” Phys. Rev. D 79, 083004 (2009), arXiv:0810.2109 [gr-qc] .
  50. J. R. Nascimento, A. Yu. Petrov, P. J. Porfirio,  and A. R. Soares, “Gravitational lensing in black-bounce spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D 102, 044021 (2020b), arXiv:2005.13096 [gr-qc] .
  51. C. Furtado, J. R. Nascimento, A. Yu. Petrov, P. J. Porfírio,  and A. R. Soares, “Strong gravitational lensing in a spacetime with topological charge within the Eddington-inspired Born-Infeld gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 103, 044047 (2021), arXiv:2010.11452 [gr-qc] .
  52. P. Schneider, C. S. Kochanek, J. Wambsganss,  and P Schneider, “Introduction to gravitational lensing and cosmology,” Gravitational Lensing: Strong, Weak and Micro , 1–89 (2006).
  53. D. Hanson, A. Challinor,  and A. Lewis, “Weak lensing of the cmb,” General Relativity and Gravitation 42, 2197–2218 (2010).
  54. K. S. Virbhadra, D. Narasimha,  and S. M. Chitre, “Role of the scalar field in gravitational lensing,” Astron. Astrophys. 337, 1–8 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9801174 .
  55. Saas-Fee Advanced Course 33: Gravitational Lensing: Strong, Weak and Micro (2006) arXiv:astro-ph/0407232 [astro-ph] .
  56. V. Bozza, “Gravitational lensing in the strong field limit,” Physical Review D 66, 103001 (2002).
  57. X. Kuang and A. Övgün, “Strong gravitational lensing and shadow constraint from M87* of slowly rotating Kerr-like black hole,” Annals Phys. 447, 169147 (2022), arXiv:2205.11003 [gr-qc] .
  58. M. Bartelmann and P. Schneider, “Weak gravitational lensing,” Physics Reports 340, 291–472 (2001).
  59. A. Övgün, G. Gyulchev,  and K. Jusufi, “Weak Gravitational lensing by phantom black holes and phantom wormholes using the Gauss-Bonnet theorem,” Annals Phys. 406, 152–172 (2019), arXiv:1806.03719 [gr-qc] .
  60. G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan and O. Yu. Tsupko, “Gravitational lensing in a non-uniform plasma,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 404, 1790–1800 (2010), arXiv:1006.2321 [astro-ph.CO] .
  61. G. W. Gibbons and M. C. Werner, “Applications of the gauss–bonnet theorem to gravitational lensing,” Classical and Quantum Gravity 25, 235009 (2008a).
  62. A. Ovgün, K. Jusufi,  and I. Sakalli, “Gravitational lensing under the effect of Weyl and bumblebee gravities: Applications of Gauss–Bonnet theorem,” Annals Phys. 399, 193–203 (2018), arXiv:1805.09431 [gr-qc] .
  63. W. Javed, I. Hussain,  and A. Övgün, “Weak deflection angle of Kazakov–Solodukhin black hole in plasma medium using Gauss–Bonnet theorem and its greybody bonding,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137, 148 (2022), arXiv:2201.09879 [gr-qc] .
  64. W. Javed, J. Abbas, Y. Kumaran,  and A. Övgün, “Weak deflection angle by asymptotically flat black holes in Horndeski theory using Gauss-Bonnet theorem,” Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 18, 2150003 (2021), arXiv:2102.02812 [gr-qc] .
  65. Y. Kumaran and A. Övgün, “Deriving weak deflection angle by black holes or wormholes using Gauss-Bonnet theorem,” Turk. J. Phys. 45, 247–267 (2021), arXiv:2111.02805 [gr-qc] .
  66. A. Övgün, Y. Kumaran, W. Javed,  and J. Abbas, “Effect of Horndeski theory on weak deflection angle using the Gauss–Bonnet theorem,” Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 19, 2250192 (2022).
  67. G. Lambiase, L. Mastrototaro, R. C. Pantig,  and A. Ovgun, “Probing Schwarzschild-like black holes in metric-affine bumblebee gravity with accretion disk, deflection angle, greybody bounds, and neutrino propagation,” JCAP 12, 026 (2023a), arXiv:2309.13594 [gr-qc] .
  68. A. Övgün, L. J. F. Sese,  and R. C. Pantig, “Constraints via the Event Horizon Telescope for Black Hole Solutions with Dark Matter under the Generalized Uncertainty Principle Minimal Length Scale Effect,” Annalen Phys. 2023, 2300390 (2023a), arXiv:2309.07442 [gr-qc] .
  69. B. Puliçe, R. C. Pantig, A. Övgün,  and D. Demir, “Constraints on charged symmergent black hole from shadow and lensing,” Class. Quant. Grav. 40, 195003 (2023), arXiv:2308.08415 [gr-qc] .
  70. G. Lambiase, R. C. Pantig, D. J. Gogoi,  and A. Övgün, “Investigating the connection between generalized uncertainty principle and asymptotically safe gravity in black hole signatures through shadow and quasinormal modes,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 679 (2023b), arXiv:2304.00183 [gr-qc] .
  71. A. Övgün, R. C. Pantig,  and Á. Rincón, “4D scale-dependent Schwarzschild-AdS/dS black holes: study of shadow and weak deflection angle and greybody bounding,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138, 192 (2023b), arXiv:2303.01696 [gr-qc] .
  72. R. C. Pantig, L. Mastrototaro, G. Lambiase,  and A. Övgün, “Shadow, lensing, quasinormal modes, greybody bounds and neutrino propagation by dyonic ModMax black holes,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 1155 (2022), arXiv:2208.06664 [gr-qc] .
  73. R. C. Pantig, A. Övgün,  and D. Demir, “Testing symmergent gravity through the shadow image and weak field photon deflection by a rotating black hole using the M87*{}^{*}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT * end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT and Sgr. A*superscriptA\hbox{A}^{*}A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT results,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 250 (2023), arXiv:2208.02969 [gr-qc] .
  74. J. Rayimbaev, R. C. Pantig, A. Övgün, A. Abdujabbarov,  and D. Demir, “Quasiperiodic oscillations, weak field lensing and shadow cast around black holes in Symmergent gravity,” Annals Phys. 454, 169335 (2023), arXiv:2206.06599 [gr-qc] .
  75. A. Uniyal, R. C. Pantig,  and A. Övgün, “Probing a non-linear electrodynamics black hole with thin accretion disk, shadow, and deflection angle with M87* and Sgr A* from EHT,” Phys. Dark Univ. 40, 101178 (2023), arXiv:2205.11072 [gr-qc] .
  76. S. H. Mazharimousavi, “Quark-antiquark confinement and nonlinear electrodynamics,” Phys. Lett. B 841, 137948 (2023), arXiv:2305.01048 [gr-qc] .
  77. A. F. Zakharov, “Constraints on a charge in the Reissner-Nordström metric for the black hole at the Galactic Center,” Phys. Rev. D 90, 062007 (2014), arXiv:1407.7457 [gr-qc] .
  78. A. F. Zakharov, F. De Paolis, G. Ingrosso,  and A. A. Nucita, “Direct Measurements of Black Hole Charge with Future Astrometrical Missions,” Astron. Astrophys. 442, 795–799 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0505286 .
  79. C. W. Robson, L. Di Mauro V.,  and F. Biancalana, “Topological nature of the Hawking temperature of black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 99, 044042 (2019), arXiv:1810.09322 [gr-qc] .
  80. A. Övgün and İ. Sakallı, “Hawking Radiation via Gauss-Bonnet Theorem,” Annals Phys. 413, 168071 (2020), arXiv:1902.04465 [hep-th] .
  81. Y. Zhang, S. Wei,  and Y. Liu, “Topological approach to derive the global Hawking temperature of (massive) BTZ black hole,” Phys. Lett. B 810, 135788 (2020), arXiv:2009.07704 [gr-qc] .
  82. A. Achucarro and M. E. Ortiz, “Relating black holes in two-dimensions and three-dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D 48, 3600–3605 (1993), arXiv:hep-th/9304068 .
  83. G. W. Gibbons and M. C. Werner, “Applications of the Gauss-Bonnet theorem to gravitational lensing,” Class. Quant. Grav. 25, 235009 (2008b), arXiv:0807.0854 [gr-qc] .
  84. N. U. Molla and U. Debnath, “Gravitational Lensing of Acoustic Charged Black Holes,” Astrophys. J. 947, 14 (2023).
  85. G. W. Gibbons, “The Jacobi-metric for timelike geodesics in static spacetimes,” Class. Quant. Grav. 33, 025004 (2016), arXiv:1508.06755 [gr-qc] .
  86. S. Chanda, G. W. Gibbons,  and Pv Guha, “Jacobi-Maupertuis-Eisenhart metric and geodesic flows,” J. Math. Phys. 58, 032503 (2017), arXiv:1612.00375 [math-ph] .
  87. G. Crisnejo and E. Gallo, “Weak lensing in a plasma medium and gravitational deflection of massive particles using the Gauss-Bonnet theorem. A unified treatment,” Phys. Rev. D 97, 124016 (2018), arXiv:1804.05473 [gr-qc] .
  88. Z. Li, G. He,  and T. Zhou, “Gravitational deflection of relativistic massive particles by wormholes,” Phys. Rev. D 101, 044001 (2020), arXiv:1908.01647 [gr-qc] .
  89. P. Das, Rv Sk,  and S. Ghosh, “Motion of charged particle in Reissner–Nordström spacetime: a Jacobi-metric approach,” Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 735 (2017), arXiv:1609.04577 [gr-qc] .
  90. M. Yasir, X. Tiecheng, F. Mushtaq,  and K. Bamba, “Testing new massive conformal gravity with the light deflection by black hole,” Nucl. Phys. B 993, 116257 (2023), arXiv:2306.07925 [gr-qc] .
  91. V. Perlick, O. Yu. Tsupko,  and Gennady S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan, “Influence of a plasma on the shadow of a spherically symmetric black hole,” Phys. Rev. D 92, 104031 (2015), arXiv:1507.04217 [gr-qc] .
  92. J. T. Mendonça, J. D. Rodrigues,  and H. Terças, “Axion production in unstable magnetized plasmas,” Phys. Rev. D 101, 051701 (2020), arXiv:1901.05910 [physics.plasm-ph] .
  93. F. Wilczek, “Two Applications of Axion Electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1799 (1987).
  94. J. L. Synge, ed., Relativity: The General theory (1960).
  95. F. Atamurotov, K. Jusufi, Mv Jamil, A. Abdujabbarov,  and M. Azreg-Aïnou, “Axion-plasmon or magnetized plasma effect on an observable shadow and gravitational lensing of a Schwarzschild black hole,” Phys. Rev. D 104, 064053 (2021d), arXiv:2109.08150 [gr-qc] .
Citations (5)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to Summarize

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Authors (2)

  1. Erdem Sucu 
  2. Ali Övgün 

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up for Free