Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Search for Higgs boson pair production in the $\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}}$W$^+$W$^-$ decay mode in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

Published 14 Mar 2024 in hep-ex | (2403.09430v2)

Abstract: A search for Higgs boson pair (HH) production with one Higgs boson decaying to two bottom quarks and the other to two W bosons are presented. The search is done using proton-proton collisions data at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb${-1}$ recorded by the CMS detector at the LHC from 2016 to 2018. The final states considered include at least one leptonically decaying W boson. No evidence for the presence of a signal is observed and corresponding upper limits on the HH production cross section are derived. The limit on the inclusive cross section of the nonresonant HH production, assuming that the distributions of kinematic observables are as expected in the standard model (SM), is observed (expected) to be 14 (18) times the value predicted by the SM, at 95% confidence level. The limits on the cross section are also presented as functions of various Higgs boson coupling modifiers, and anomalous Higgs boson coupling scenarios. In addition, limits are set on the resonant HH production via spin-0 and spin-2 resonances within the mass range 250-900 GeV.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (93)
  1. ATLAS Collaboration, “Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC”, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1, 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020, arXiv:1207.7214.
  2. CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125\GeVwith the CMS experiment at the LHC”, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30, 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021, arXiv:1207.7235.
  3. CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a new boson with mass near 125\GeVin \Pp⁢\Pp\Pp\Pp\Pp\Pp collisions at s=7𝑠7\sqrt{s}=7square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 7 and 8\TeV”, JHEP 06 (2013) 081, 10.1007/jhep06(2013)081, arXiv:1303.4571.
  4. ATLAS Collaboration, “A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery”, Nature 607 (2022) 52, 10.1038/s41586-022-04893-w, arXiv:2207.00092.
  5. CMS Collaboration, “A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery”, Nature 607 (2022) 60, 10.1038/s41586-022-04892-x, arXiv:2207.00043.
  6. CMS Collaboration, “Combined measurements of Higgs boson couplings in proton–proton collisions at s=13⁢TeV𝑠13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{Te}\text{V}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 roman_Te roman_V”, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 421, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6909-y, arXiv:1809.10733.
  7. ATLAS Collaboration, “Combined measurements of Higgs boson production and decay using up to 80\fbinvof proton-proton collision data at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}=13\TeVsquare-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 collected with the ATLAS experiment”, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 012002, 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.012002, arXiv:1909.02845.
  8. S. Borowka et al., “Higgs boson pair production in gluon fusion at next-to-leading order with full top-quark mass dependence”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 012001, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.079901, arXiv:1604.06447. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 117, 079901 (2016)].
  9. J. Baglio et al., “Gluon fusion into Higgs pairs at NLO QCD and the top mass scheme”, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 459, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6973-3, arXiv:1811.05692.
  10. J. Baglio et al., “g⁢g→H⁢H→𝑔𝑔𝐻𝐻gg\to HHitalic_g italic_g → italic_H italic_H : Combined uncertainties”, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 056002, 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.056002, arXiv:2008.11626.
  11. J. Alison et al., “Higgs boson potential at colliders: Status and perspectives”, Rev. Phys. 5 (2020) 100045, 10.1016/j.revip.2020.100045, arXiv:1910.00012.
  12. F. A. Dreyer and A. Karlberg, “Vector-boson fusion Higgs pair production at N33{}^{3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTLO”, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 114016, 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.114016, arXiv:1811.07906.
  13. LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, “Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 3. Higgs properties”, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 4 (2013) 10.5170/CERN-2013-004, arXiv:1307.1347.
  14. K. Cheung, “Phenomenology of radion in Randall-Sundrum scenario”, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 056007, 10.1103/PhysRevD.63.056007, arXiv:hep-ph/0009232.
  15. G. C. Branco et al., “Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models”, Phys. Rep. 516 (2012) 1, 10.1016/j.physrep.2012.02.002, arXiv:1106.0034.
  16. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, “A Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3370, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3370, arXiv:hep-ph/9905221.
  17. W. D. Goldberger and M. B. Wise, “Modulus stabilization with bulk fields”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 4922, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4922, arXiv:hep-ph/9907447.
  18. CMS Collaboration, “The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”, JINST 3 (2008) S08004, 10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08004.
  19. CMS Collaboration, “Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}=13\TeVsquare-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 in 2015 and 2016 at CMS”, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 800, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09538-2, arXiv:2104.01927.
  20. CMS Collaboration, “CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}=13\TeVsquare-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004, 2018.
  21. CMS Collaboration, “CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}=13\TeVsquare-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002, 2019.
  22. ATLAS Collaboration, “Constraints on the Higgs boson self-coupling from single- and double-Higgs production with the ATLAS detector using pp collisions at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}=13\TeVsquare-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, Phys. Lett. B 843 (2023) 137745, 10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137745, arXiv:2211.01216.
  23. ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for non-resonant Higgs boson pair production in the \PQb⁢\PQb⁢\Pell⁢\Pell⁢\PGn⁢\PGn\PQb\PQb\Pell\Pell\PGn\PGn\PQb\PQb\Pell\Pell\PGn\PGn final state with the ATLAS detector in \Pp⁢\Pp\Pp\Pp\Pp\Pp collisions at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}=13\TeVsquare-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, Phys. Lett. B 801 (2020) 135145, 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.135145, arXiv:1908.06765.
  24. CMS Collaboration, “Search for resonant and non-resonant Higgs boson pair production in the \PQb⁢\PAQb⁢\Pell⁢\PGn⁢\Pell⁢\PGn\PQb\PAQb\Pell\PGn\Pell\PGn\PQb\PAQb\Pell\PGn\Pell\PGn final state in proton-proton collisions at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}=13\TeVsquare-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, JHEP 01 (2018) 054, 10.1007/JHEP01(2018)054, arXiv:1708.04188.
  25. E. Bols et al., “Jet flavour classification using DeepJet”, JINST 15 (2020) P12012, 10.1088/1748-0221/15/12/P12012, arXiv:2008.10519.
  26. HEPData record for this analysis, 2024. 10.17182/hepdata.149576.
  27. CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}=13\TeVsquare-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, JINST 15 (2020) P10017, 10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/P10017, arXiv:2006.10165.
  28. CMS Collaboration, “The CMS trigger system”, JINST 12 (2017) P01020, 10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01020, arXiv:1609.02366.
  29. T. Sjöstrand et al., “An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2”, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159, 10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024, arXiv:1410.3012.
  30. CMS Collaboration, “Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements”, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 155, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-3988-x, arXiv:1512.00815.
  31. CMS Collaboration, “Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS \PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements”, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 4, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7499-4, arXiv:1903.12179.
  32. NNPDF Collaboration, “Parton distributions with QED corrections”, Nucl. Phys. B 877 (2013) 290, 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2013.10.010, arXiv:1308.0598.
  33. NNPDF Collaboration, “Parton distributions for the LHC Run II”, JHEP 04 (2015) 040, 10.1007/JHEP04(2015)040, arXiv:1410.8849.
  34. NNPDF Collaboration, “Parton distributions from high-precision collider data”, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 663, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5199-5, arXiv:1706.00428.
  35. J. Alwall et al., “The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations”, JHEP 07 (2014) 079, 10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079, arXiv:1405.0301.
  36. J. Alwall et al., “Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions”, Eur. Phys. J. C 53 (2007) 473, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0490-5, arXiv:0706.2569.
  37. R. Frederix and S. Frixione, “Merging meets matching in MC@NLO”, JHEP 12 (2012) 061, 10.1007/JHEP12(2012)061, arXiv:1209.6215.
  38. P. Nason, “A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms”, JHEP 11 (2004) 040, 10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146.
  39. S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari, “Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method”, JHEP 11 (2007) 070, 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070, arXiv:0709.2092.
  40. S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, “A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX”, JHEP 06 (2010) 043, 10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043, arXiv:1002.2581.
  41. GEANT4 Collaboration, “\GEANTfour—a simulation toolkit”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506 (2003) 250, 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8.
  42. G. Heinrich et al., “Probing the trilinear higgs boson coupling in di-Higgs production at NLO QCD including parton shower effects”, JHEP 06 (2019) 066, 10.1007/jhep06(2019)066, arXiv:1903.08137.
  43. M. Grazzini et al., “Higgs boson pair production at NNLO with top quark mass effects”, JHEP 05 (2018) 059, 10.1007/JHEP05(2018)059, arXiv:1803.02463.
  44. K. Ehatäht and C. Veelken, “Stitching Monte Carlo samples”, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 484, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10407-9, arXiv:2106.04360.
  45. K. Melnikov and F. Petriello, “Electroweak gauge boson production at hadron colliders through O(αs2superscriptsubscript𝛼𝑠2\alpha_{s}^{2}italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT)”, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 114017, 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.114017, arXiv:hep-ph/0609070.
  46. M. Czakon and A. Mitov, “Top++: A program for the calculation of the top-pair cross section at hadron colliders”, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2930, 10.1016/j.cpc.2014.06.021, arXiv:1112.5675.
  47. CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of differential cross sections for \PZboson production in association with jets in proton-proton collisions at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}=13\TeVsquare-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 965, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6373-0, arXiv:1804.05252.
  48. CMS Collaboration, “Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector”, JINST 12 (2017) P10003, 10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/P10003, arXiv:1706.04965.
  49. CMS Collaboration, “Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid”, CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, 2015.
  50. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, “The anti-\ktjet clustering algorithm”, JHEP 04 (2008) 063, 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063, arXiv:0802.1189.
  51. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, “FastJet user manual”, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1896, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2, arXiv:1111.6097.
  52. CMS Collaboration, “Jet energy scale and resolution measurement with Run 2 legacy data collected by CMS at 13\TeV”, CMS Detector Performance Note CERN-CMS-DP-2021-033, 2021.
  53. CMS Collaboration, “Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in \Pp⁢\Pp\Pp\Pp\Pp\Pp collisions at 8\TeV”, JINST 12 (2017) P02014, 10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/P02014, arXiv:1607.03663.
  54. CMS Collaboration, “Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13\TeVdata”, JINST 15 (2020) P09018, 10.1088/1748-0221/15/09/P09018, arXiv:2003.00503.
  55. CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the DeepJet \PQbtagging algorithm using 41.9\fbinvof data from proton-proton collisions at 13\TeVwith Phase 1 CMS detector”, CMS Detector Performance Note CMS-DP-2018-058, 2018.
  56. CMS Collaboration, “A Deep Neural Network for Simultaneous Estimation of b Jet Energy and Resolution”, Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 4 (2020) 10, 10.1007/s41781-020-00041-z, arXiv:1912.06046.
  57. D. Bertolini, P. Harris, M. Low, and N. Tran, “Pileup per particle identification”, JHEP 10 (2014) 059, 10.1007/JHEP10(2014)059, arXiv:1407.6013.
  58. CMS Collaboration, “Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in \Pp⁢\Pp\Pp\Pp\Pp\Pp collisions at 13\TeV”, JINST 13 (2018) P05011, 10.1088/1748-0221/13/05/P05011, arXiv:1712.07158.
  59. M. Dasgupta, A. Fregoso, S. Marzani, and G. P. Salam, “Towards an understanding of jet substructure”, JHEP 09 (2013) 029, 10.1007/JHEP09(2013)029, arXiv:1307.0007.
  60. J. M. Butterworth, A. R. Davison, M. Rubin, and G. P. Salam, “Jet substructure as a new Higgs search channel at the LHC”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 242001, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.242001, arXiv:0802.2470.
  61. J. Thaler and K. Van Tilburg, “Identifying boosted objects with N-subjettiness”, JHEP 03 (2011) 015, 10.1007/JHEP03(2011)015, arXiv:1011.2268.
  62. CMS Collaboration, “Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at s=8⁢\TeV𝑠8\TeV\sqrt{s}=8\TeVsquare-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 8”, JINST 10 (2015) P06005, 10.1088/1748-0221/10/06/P06005, arXiv:1502.02701.
  63. CMS Collaboration, “Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”, JINST 16 (2021) P05014, 10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/P05014, arXiv:2012.06888.
  64. A. Hoecker et al., “TMVA — toolkit for multivariate data analysis”, PoS ACAT (2007) 040, 10.48550/arXiv.physics/0703039, arXiv:physics/0703039.
  65. CMS Collaboration, “Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in \Pp⁢\Pp\Pp\Pp\Pp\Pp collision events at s=7⁢\TeV𝑠7\TeV\sqrt{s}=7\TeVsquare-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 7”, JINST 7 (2012) P10002, 10.1088/1748-0221/7/10/P10002, arXiv:1206.4071.
  66. CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}=13\TeVsquare-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, JINST 13 (2018) P06015, 10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/P06015, arXiv:1804.04528.
  67. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, “The catchment area of jets”, JHEP 04 (2008) 005, 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/005, arXiv:0802.1188.
  68. M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam, “Pileup subtraction using jet areas”, Phys. Lett. B 659 (2008) 119, 10.1016/j.physletb.2007.09.077, arXiv:0707.1378.
  69. CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the Higgs boson production rate in association with top quarks in final states with electrons, muons, and hadronically decaying tau leptons at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}=13\TeVsquare-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 378, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09014-x, arXiv:2011.03652.
  70. CMS Collaboration, “Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}=13\TeVsquare-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 using the CMS detector”, JINST 14 (2019) P07004, 10.1088/1748-0221/14/07/P07004, arXiv:1903.06078.
  71. P. D. Group, “Review of Particle Physics”, PTEP 2022 (2022) 083C01, 10.1093/ptep/ptac097.
  72. CMS Collaboration, “Identification of hadronic tau lepton decays using a deep neural network”, JINST 17 (2022) P07023, 10.1088/1748-0221/17/07/P07023, arXiv:2201.08458.
  73. CMS Collaboration, “Search for nonresonant Higgs boson pair production in final state with two bottom quarks and two tau leptons in proton-proton collisions at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}=13\TeVsquare-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, Phys. Lett. B 842 (2023) 137531, 10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137531, arXiv:2206.09401.
  74. ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, and LHC Higgs Combination Group, “Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011”, Technical Report CMS-NOTE-2011-005, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-11, 2011.
  75. A. L. Read, “Presentation of search results: the \CLstechnique”, J. Phys. G 28 (2002) 2693, 10.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313.
  76. T. Junk, “Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 434 (1999) 435, 10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00498-2, arXiv:hep-ex/9902006.
  77. P. Baldi et al., “Parameterized neural networks for high-energy physics”, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 235, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4099-4, arXiv:1601.07913.
  78. M. Erdmann, E. Geiser, Y. Rath, and M. Rieger, “Lorentz Boost Networks: Autonomous physics-inspired feature engineering”, JINST 14 (2019) P06006, 10.1088/1748-0221/14/06/p06006, arXiv:1812.09722.
  79. T. Huang et al., “Resonant di-Higgs boson production in the \PQb⁢\PAQb⁢\PW⁢\PW\PQb\PAQb\PW\PW\PQb\PAQb\PW\PW channel: Probing the electroweak phase transition at the LHC”, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 035007, 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.035007, arXiv:1701.04442.
  80. CMS Collaboration, “Evidence for associated production of a Higgs boson with a top quark pair in final states with electrons, muons, and hadronically decaying \PGt\PGt\PGt leptons at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}=13\TeVsquare-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, JHEP 08 (2018) 066, 10.1007/jhep08(2018)066, arXiv:1803.05485.
  81. L.-S. Ling et al., “NNLO QCD corrections to Higgs pair production via vector boson fusion at hadron colliders”, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 073001, 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.073001, arXiv:1401.7754.
  82. F. A. Dreyer and A. Karlberg, “Fully differential vector-boson fusion Higgs pair production at next-to-next-to-leading order”, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 074028, 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.074028, arXiv:1811.07918.
  83. B. Cabouat and T. Sjöstrand, “Some dipole shower studies”, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 226, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5645-z, arXiv:1710.00391v2.
  84. D. de Florian, I. Fabre, and J. Mazzitelli, “Higgs boson pair production at NNLO in QCD including dimension 6 operators”, JHEP 10 (2017) 215, 10.1007/JHEP10(2017)215, arXiv:1704.05700.
  85. LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, “Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector”, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 2 (2017) 10.23731/CYRM-2017-002, arXiv:1610.07922.
  86. CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}=13\TeVsquare-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, JHEP 07 (2018) 161, 10.1007/JHEP07(2018)161, arXiv:1802.02613.
  87. G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, “Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics”, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1554, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0, arXiv:1007.1727. [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 73, 2501 (2013)].
  88. CMS Collaboration, “Search for nonresonant Higgs boson pair production in final states with two bottom quarks and two photons in proton-proton collisions at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}=13\TeVsquare-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, JHEP 03 (2021) 257, 10.1007/jhep03(2021)257, arXiv:2011.12373.
  89. A. Carvalho et al., “Higgs pair production: choosing benchmarks with cluster analysis”, JHEP 04 (2016) 1, 10.1007/jhep04(2016)126, arXiv:1507.02245.
  90. M. Capozi and G. Heinrich, “Exploring anomalous couplings in Higgs boson pair production through shape analysis”, JHEP 03 (2020) 091, 10.1007/JHEP03(2020)091, arXiv:1908.08923.
  91. CMS Collaboration, “Search for a new resonance decaying into two spin-0 bosons in a final state with two photons and two bottom quarks in proton-proton collisions at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}=13\TeVsquare-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, 10, 2023. arXiv:2310.01643. Submitted to JHEP.
  92. A. Carvalho, “Gravity particles from warped extra dimensions, predictions for LHC”, 2014. arXiv:1404.0102.
  93. M. Gouzevitch et al., “Scale-invariant resonance tagging in multijet events and new physics in Higgs pair production”, JHEP 07 (2013) 148, 10.1007/JHEP07(2013)148, arXiv:1303.6636.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We found no open problems mentioned in this paper.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Authors (1)

  1. CMS Collaboration 

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 4 tweets with 12 likes about this paper.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up for Free