Wildfire Resilient Unit Commitment under Uncertain Demand
Abstract: Public safety power shutoffs (PSPS) are a common pre-emptive measure to reduce wildfire risk due to power system equipment. System operators use PSPS to de-energize electric grid elements that are either prone to failure or located in regions at a high risk of experiencing a wildfire. Successful power system operation during PSPS involves coordination across different time scales. Adjustments to generator commitments and transmission line de-energizations occur at day-ahead intervals while adjustments to load servicing occur at hourly intervals. Generator commitments and operational decisions have to be made under uncertainty in electric grid demand and wildfire potential forecasts. This paper presents deterministic and two-stage mean-CVaR stochastic frameworks to show how the likelihood of large wildfires near transmission lines affects generator commitment and transmission line de-energization strategies. The optimal costs of commitment, operation, and lost load on the IEEE 14-bus test system are compared to the costs generated from prior optimal power shut-off (OPS) formulations. The proposed mean-CVaR stochastic program generates less total expected costs evaluated with respect to higher demand scenarios than costs generated by risk-neutral and deterministic methods.
- California Public Utilities Commission. Public Safety Power Shut- off (PSPS)/De-Energization. Accessed: Oct. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/deenergization
- “Climate Change Indicators: Wildfires.” EPA, Environmental Protection Agency, https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/climate-change-indicators-wildfires.
- “Number of Wildfires to Rise by 50 % by 2100 and Governments Are Not Prepared, Experts Warn.” UN Environment, 23 Feb. 2022, https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/press-release/number-wildfires-rise-50-2100-and-governments-are-not-prepared.
- A. Kody, R. Piansky, and D. Molzahn, “Optimizing Transmission Infrastructure Investments to Support Line De-energization for Mitigating Wildfire Ignition Risk,” in 11th Bulk Power Systems Dynamics and Control Symposium (IREP XI), Banff, Canada, July 2022.
- A. Kody, A. West, and D. Molzahn, “Sharing the Load: Considering Fairness in De-energization Scheduling to Mitigate Wildfire Ignition Risk using Rolling Optimization.” Accessed: Oct. 24, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2204.06543.pdf
- Wildland Fire Potential Index (WFPI) Fire Danger Maps and Products Page, U.S. Geological Survey. (n.d.). https://firedanger.cr.usgs.gov/apps/staticmaps
- N. Gröwe-Kuska, H. Heitsch, and W. Römisch, “Scenario reduction and scenario tree construction for power management problems,” in 2003 IEEE Bologna PowerTech - Conference Proceedings, 2003, vol. 3, pp. 152–158.
- ”Reliability Test System Grid Modernization Lab Consortium (RTS-GMLC) Transmission System Database,” Grid Modernization Lab, (2022). https://github.com/GridMod/RTS-GMLC
- S. Mohagheghi and S. Rebennack, “Optimal resilient power grid operation during the course of a progressing wildfire,” Int. J. Elect. Power Energy Syst., vol. 73, pp. 843–852, 2015.
- H. Farzin, M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, and M. Moeini-Aghtaie, “Stochastic energy management of microgrids during unscheduled islanding period,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1079–1087, Jun. 2017.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.