Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Modal Analysis of Spatiotemporal Data via Multivariate Gaussian Process Regression

Published 19 Mar 2024 in stat.ME, cs.LG, math.DS, math.SP, and stat.ML | (2403.13118v1)

Abstract: Modal analysis has become an essential tool to understand the coherent structure of complex flows. The classical modal analysis methods, such as dynamic mode decomposition (DMD) and spectral proper orthogonal decomposition (SPOD), rely on a sufficient amount of data that is regularly sampled in time. However, often one needs to deal with sparse temporally irregular data, e.g., due to experimental measurements and simulation algorithm. To overcome the limitations of data scarcity and irregular sampling, we propose a novel modal analysis technique using multi-variate Gaussian process regression (MVGPR). We first establish the connection between MVGPR and the existing modal analysis techniques, DMD and SPOD, from a linear system identification perspective. Next, leveraging this connection, we develop a MVGPR-based modal analysis technique that addresses the aforementioned limitations. The capability of MVGPR is endowed by its judiciously designed kernel structure for correlation function, that is derived from the assumed linear dynamics. Subsequently, the proposed MVGPR method is benchmarked against DMD and SPOD on a range of examples, from academic and synthesized data to unsteady airfoil aerodynamics. The results demonstrate MVGPR as a promising alternative to classical modal analysis methods, especially in the scenario of scarce and temporally irregular data.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (30)
  1. Berkooz, G., Holmes, P., and Lumley, J. L., “The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows,” Annual review of fluid mechanics, Vol. 25, No. 1, 1993, pp. 539–575.
  2. Schmidt, O. T., and Colonius, T., “Guide to spectral proper orthogonal decomposition,” AIAA journal, Vol. 58, No. 3, 2020, pp. 1023–1033.
  3. Towne, A., Schmidt, O. T., and Colonius, T., “Spectral proper orthogonal decomposition and its relationship to dynamic mode decomposition and resolvent analysis,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 847, 2018, pp. 821–867.
  4. Schmid, P. J., Li, L., Juniper, M. P., and Pust, O., “Applications of the dynamic mode decomposition,” Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2011, pp. 249–259.
  5. Brunton, S. L., Budišić, M., Kaiser, E., and Kutz, J. N., “Modern Koopman theory for dynamical systems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.12086, 2021.
  6. Taira, K., Brunton, S. L., Dawson, S. T., Rowley, C. W., Colonius, T., McKeon, B. J., Schmidt, O. T., Gordeyev, S., Theofilis, V., and Ukeiley, L. S., “Modal analysis of fluid flows: An overview,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 55, No. 12, 2017, pp. 4013–4041.
  7. Taira, K., Hemati, M. S., Brunton, S. L., Sun, Y., Duraisamy, K., Bagheri, S., Dawson, S. T., and Yeh, C.-A., “Modal analysis of fluid flows: Applications and outlook,” AIAA journal, Vol. 58, No. 3, 2020, pp. 998–1022.
  8. Tu, J. H., “Dynamic mode decomposition: Theory and applications,” Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University, 2013.
  9. Arbabi, H., and Mezić, I., “Study of dynamics in post-transient flows using Koopman mode decomposition,” Physical Review Fluids, Vol. 2, No. 12, 2017, p. 124402.
  10. Hemati, M. S., Rowley, C. W., Deem, E. A., and Cattafesta, L. N., “De-biasing the dynamic mode decomposition for applied Koopman spectral analysis of noisy datasets,” Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 31, 2017, pp. 349–368.
  11. Colbrook, M. J., and Townsend, A., “Rigorous data-driven computation of spectral properties of Koopman operators for dynamical systems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.14889, 2021.
  12. Pan, S., Arnold-Medabalimi, N., and Duraisamy, K., “Sparsity-promoting algorithms for the discovery of informative Koopman-invariant subspaces,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 917, 2021, p. A18.
  13. Takeishi, N., Kawahara, Y., Tabei, Y., and Yairi, T., “Bayesian dynamic mode decomposition.” IJCAI, 2017, pp. 2814–2821.
  14. Kawashima, T., and Hino, H., “Gaussian Process Koopman Mode Decomposition,” Neural Computation, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2023, pp. 82–103.
  15. Cardinale, C., Brunton, S., and Colonius, T., “Spectral Proper Orthogonal Decomposition via Dynamic Mode Decomposition for Non-Sequential Pairwise Data,” Bulletin of the American Physical Society, 2022.
  16. Henry de Frahan, M. T., Rood, J. S., Day, M. S., Sitaraman, H., Yellapantula, S., Perry, B. A., Grout, R. W., Almgren, A., Zhang, W., Bell, J. B., et al., “PeleC: An adaptive mesh refinement solver for compressible reacting flows,” The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2023, pp. 115–131.
  17. Sarkka, S., Solin, A., and Hartikainen, J., “Spatiotemporal learning via infinite-dimensional Bayesian filtering and smoothing: A look at Gaussian process regression through Kalman filtering,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2013, pp. 51–61.
  18. Sadagopan, A., Huang, D., Duzel, U., Martin, L. E., and Hanquist, K. M., “Assessment of high-temperature effects on hypersonic aerothermoelastic analysis using multi-fidelity multi-variate surrogates,” AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum, 2021, p. 1610.
  19. Huang, D., Sadagopan, A., Düzel, Ü., and Hanquist, K. M., “Study of fluid–thermal–structural interaction in high-temperature high-speed flow using multi-fidelity multi-variate surrogates,” Journal of Fluids and Structures, Vol. 113, 2022, p. 103682.
  20. Song, J., and Huang, D., “Modal Analysis of Spatiotemporal Data via Multi-fidelity Multi-variate Gaussian Processes,” AIAA AVIATION 2023 Forum, 2023, p. 4350.
  21. Mezić, I., “Analysis of fluid flows via spectral properties of the Koopman operator,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 45, 2013, pp. 357–378.
  22. Duke, D., Soria, J., and Honnery, D., “An error analysis of the dynamic mode decomposition,” Experiments in fluids, Vol. 52, 2012, pp. 529–542.
  23. 10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001.
  24. 10.1002/9780470770801.
  25. Parussini, L., Venturi, D., Perdikaris, P., and Karniadakis, G. E., “Multi-Fidelity Gaussian Process Regression for Prediction of Random Fields,” Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 336, 2017, pp. 36–50. 10.1016/j.jcp.2017.01.047.
  26. Alvarez, M. A., Rosasco, L., and Lawrence, N. D., “Kernels for vector-valued functions: A review,” , 2011. 10.48550/ARXIV.1106.6251.
  27. Solin, A., and Särkkä, S., “Explicit link between periodic covariance functions and state space models,” Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, PMLR, 2014, pp. 904–912.
  28. Ye, K., and Lim, L.-H., “Schubert varieties and distances between subspaces of different dimensions,” SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2016, pp. 1176–1197.
  29. Taira, K., and Colonius, T., “The immersed boundary method: a projection approach,” Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 225, No. 2, 2007, pp. 2118–2137.
  30. Colonius, T., and Taira, K., “A fast immersed boundary method using a nullspace approach and multi-domain far-field boundary conditions,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 197, No. 25-28, 2008, pp. 2131–2146.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Authors (2)

  1. Jiwoo Song 
  2. Daning Huang 

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.

Sign Up for Free