Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Towards Principled Representation Learning from Videos for Reinforcement Learning

Published 20 Mar 2024 in cs.LG, cs.AI, and cs.CV | (2403.13765v1)

Abstract: We study pre-training representations for decision-making using video data, which is abundantly available for tasks such as game agents and software testing. Even though significant empirical advances have been made on this problem, a theoretical understanding remains absent. We initiate the theoretical investigation into principled approaches for representation learning and focus on learning the latent state representations of the underlying MDP using video data. We study two types of settings: one where there is iid noise in the observation, and a more challenging setting where there is also the presence of exogenous noise, which is non-iid noise that is temporally correlated, such as the motion of people or cars in the background. We study three commonly used approaches: autoencoding, temporal contrastive learning, and forward modeling. We prove upper bounds for temporal contrastive learning and forward modeling in the presence of only iid noise. We show that these approaches can learn the latent state and use it to do efficient downstream RL with polynomial sample complexity. When exogenous noise is also present, we establish a lower bound result showing that the sample complexity of learning from video data can be exponentially worse than learning from action-labeled trajectory data. This partially explains why reinforcement learning with video pre-training is hard. We evaluate these representational learning methods in two visual domains, yielding results that are consistent with our theoretical findings.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (42)
  1. Flambe: Structural complexity and representation learning of low rank mdps. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:20095–20107, 2020.
  2. Time to augment self-supervised visual representation learning. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=o8xdgmwCP8l.
  3. Video pretraining (vpt): Learning to act by watching unlabeled online videos. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:24639–24654, 2022.
  4. Information prioritization through empowerment in visual model-based rl. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.08585, 2022.
  5. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877–1901, 2020.
  6. Information-theoretic considerations in batch reinforcement learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1042–1051. PMLR, 2019.
  7. Minigrid & miniworld: Modular & customizable reinforcement learning environments for goal-oriented tasks. CoRR, abs/2306.13831, 2023.
  8. Provably efficient rl with rich observations via latent state decoding. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1665–1674. PMLR, 2019.
  9. Provably filtering exogenous distractors using multistep inverse dynamics. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=RQLLzMCefQu.
  10. Video prediction models as rewards for reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14343, 2023.
  11. Sara A Geer. Empirical Processes in M-estimation, volume 6. Cambridge university press, 2000.
  12. One-shot learning of multi-step tasks from observation via activity localization in auxiliary video. In 2019 international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pp.  7755–7761. IEEE, 2019.
  13. Byol-explore: Exploration by bootstrapped prediction. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:31855–31870, 2022.
  14. Dream to control: Learning behaviors by latent imagination. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.01603, 2019. URL https://arxiv.org/pdf/1912.01603.pdf.
  15. Mastering diverse domains through world models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.04104, 2023.
  16. Agent-controller representations: Principled offline rl with rich exogenous information. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.00164, 2022.
  17. Learning dynamics model in reinforcement learning by incorporating the long term future, 2019.
  18. Near-optimal reinforcement learning in polynomial time. Machine learning, 49:209–232, 2002.
  19. Vizdoom: A doom-based ai research platform for visual reinforcement learning. In 2016 IEEE conference on computational intelligence and games (CIG), pp.  1–8. IEEE, 2016.
  20. Guaranteed discovery of controllable latent states with multi-step inverse models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.08229, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.08229.pdf.
  21. Vx2text: End-to-end learning of video-based text generation from multimodal inputs. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  7005–7015, 2021.
  22. Discrete-valued neural communication. In M. Ranzato, A. Beygelzimer, Y. Dauphin, P.S. Liang, and J. Wortman Vaughan (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 34, pp.  2109–2121. Curran Associates, Inc., 2021. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2021/file/10907813b97e249163587e6246612e21-Paper.pdf.
  23. Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692, 2019.
  24. Representation learning with multi-step inverse kinematics: An efficient and optimal approach to rich-observation rl. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.05889, 2023.
  25. Transformers are sample-efficient world models. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=vhFu1Acb0xb.
  26. Kinematic state abstraction and provably efficient rich-observation reinforcement learning. In International conference on machine learning, pp. 6961–6971. PMLR, 2020.
  27. Near-optimal representation learning for hierarchical reinforcement learning. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018.
  28. Neural discrete representation learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.00937, 2017.
  29. Self-supervised video pretraining yields strong image representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.06433, 2022.
  30. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning, pp. 8748–8763. PMLR, 2021.
  31. A ranking game for imitation learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.03481, 2022.
  32. Joint embedding predictive architectures focus on slow features. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.10831, 2022.
  33. Unsupervised learning of video representations using lstms. In Francis Bach and David Blei (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 37 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pp.  843–852, Lille, France, 07–09 Jul 2015. PMLR. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v37/srivastava15.html.
  34. Reinforcement learning: An introduction. MIT press, 2018.
  35. Understanding self-predictive learning for reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 202 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pp.  33632–33656. PMLR, 23–29 Jul 2023. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v202/tang23d.html.
  36. Recent advances in imitation learning from observation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.13566, 2019. URL https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.13566.pdf.
  37. Representation learning for online and offline rl in low-rank mdps. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.04652, 2021.
  38. Denoised mdps: Learning world models better than the world itself. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.15477, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.15477.pdf.
  39. Vizdoom competitions: Playing doom from pixels. IEEE Transactions on Games, 11(3):248–259, 2018.
  40. Become a proficient player with limited data through watching pure videos. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
  41. Learning invariant representations for reinforcement learning without reconstruction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.10742, 2020.
  42. What makes representation learning from videos hard for control? RSS Workshop on Scaling Robot Learning, 2022. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:252635608.
Citations (1)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that forward modeling and temporal contrastive learning can efficiently learn meaningful state representations in noise-free settings with polynomial sample complexity.
  • The paper establishes that exogenous noise significantly degrades representation quality, notably impairing temporal contrastive learning compared to action-labeled data.
  • Empirical evaluations in GridWorld and ViZDoom reveal that while forward modeling shows resilience, autoencoding performs unpredictably, underscoring the need for robust learning techniques.

Towards Principled Representation Learning from Videos for Reinforcement Learning

Introduction

The advent and subsequent success of representation learning from large offline datasets have significantly advanced the fields of NLP, computer vision, and, increasingly, reinforcement learning (RL). Especially in RL, the strategy to learn meaningful and compact representations from videos—abundant in domains like gaming and software testing—promises a leap in the efficiency of developing RL agents. This paper undertakes a foundational study to assess the efficacy and theoretical underpinnings of learning latent state representations from video data for decision-making tasks in RL.

The Exogenous Block MDP Framework

The core theoretical framework utilized in this paper is that of Exogenous Block Markov Decision Processes (Ex-Block MDPs). In contrast to classical Block MDPs which assume a latent state space that fully accounts for the dynamics of the environment, Ex-Block MDPs introduce an additional layer of complexity with exogenous noise. This noise, which evolves independently of the agent's actions, captures temporally correlated, non-task-relevant variations in observations, akin to background movements or changes in a video unlikely to affect the optimal policy in a decision-making problem.

Representation Learning Approaches from Videos

Three primary methods for learning representations from video data without action labels are examined:

  1. Autoencoding, which aims to reconstruct the original observation from its latent representation.
  2. Forward Modeling, which predicts future observations based on the current latent state and optional action inputs.
  3. Temporal Contrastive Learning, which determines if two observations are temporally adjacent or not, aiming to learn representations that are invariant to non-essential changes.

Main Theoretical Contributions

The main theoretical contributions can be outlined as follows:

  • The demonstration that in the absence of exogenous noise, both forward modeling and temporal contrastive learning methods can learn meaningful state representations enabling efficient downstream RL, with polynomial sample complexity.
  • Establishment of a lower bound showcasing that in the presence of exogenous noise, the efficacy of learning representations from videos deteriorates significantly compared to when action-labeled trajectory data is available, thereby highlighting an intrinsic complexity due to exogenous noise.

Empirical Validation

To validate the theoretical findings, the paper employs two visual domains: GridWorld and ViZDoom (in two settings). Empirical results corroborate the theoretical insights, showcasing that while both forward modeling and temporal contrastive learning exhibit robust performance in noise-free settings, the inclusion of exogenous noise significantly impairs the performance of temporal contrastive learning. Furthermore, autoencoding's performance remains unpredictable, underscoring the need for theoretical exploration. Interestingly, the performance degradation is less pronounced for forward modeling, suggesting a degree of resilience to exogenous noise, albeit it too falters as the intensity of the noise increases.

Implications and Future Directions

These findings underscore several key implications and avenues for future exploration:

  • The need for new methodologies or enhancements to existing ones that can effectively mitigate the adverse impacts of exogenous noise while learning from video data.
  • Exploration into theoretical guarantees for autoencoder-based methods and strategic incorporation of actions within video-based representation learning frameworks to possibly counteract the challenges posed by exogenous noise.
  • Examination of alternative takes on defining and measuring exogenous noise might illuminate pathways to representation learning methodologies robust against a broader spectrum of noise types.

Importantly, this research opens up intriguing prospects for leveraging the vast reserves of unlabeled video data for reinforcement learning, subject to overcoming the theoretical and practical challenges associated with exogenous noise.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 3 tweets with 17 likes about this paper.