Measuring two temperatures using a single thermometer
Abstract: We consider the question: Is it possible to measure two temperatures simultaneously using a single thermometer? Under common circumstances, where the thermometer can interact with only one bath at a time and the interaction leads to complete thermalization, this is clearly impossible because the final state of the thermometer would be independent of the temperature of the first bath. In this work, we show that this task can indeed be accomplished with the assistance of quantum control. In particular, we consider a composite particle with multiple quantum degrees of freedom (DoF) as a temperature sensor, where one of the DoF -- termed as internal DoF -- is susceptible to the local temperature, thereby functioning as a thermometer, whereas another DoF -- termed external DoF -- is quantum-controlled. We leverage the entanglement between the aforementioned DoF in a composite particle for two-temperature thermometry by preparing the external DoF in a quantum superposition, exposing the internal DoF to two local temperatures. We show that such a particle used in a Mach-Zehnder type interferometer, or a quantum switch -- which allows quantum control over the order of application of quantum channels -- can be used to estimate two temperatures simultaneously, thus affirming our main proposition. For each of these setups, we obtain the variance in the estimated temperatures through the multi-parameter Cram\'er-Rao bound, and compare their performances based on the range of total variance of the two temperatures estimated. On benchmarking all the setups based on the total variance of the estimated temperatures, we find that a quantum switch with a qudit probe outperforms other setups. On restricting our probe to be a qubit, we find that quantum switch performs equally well as a Mach-Zehnder type interferometer.
- C. Helstrom,  25, 101.
- C. W. Helstrom, Journal of Statistical Physics 1, 231 (1969).
- S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3439 (1994).
- A. S. Holevo, Statistical Structure of Quantum Theory, Vol. 67 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001).
- M. G. Paris, International Journal of Quantum Information 7, 125 (2009).
- R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański and L. Maccone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 250801 (2014).
- A. Luis, Phys. Rev. A 65, 025802 (2002).
- L. B. Ho and Y. Kondo, Journal of Mathematical Physics 62 (2021), 10.1063/5.0024555.
- S. Vinjanampathy and J. Anders, Contemporary Physics 57, 545 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1080/00107514.2016.1201896 .
- T. M. Stace, Phys. Rev. A 82, 011611 (2010).
- A. De Pasquale and T. M. Stace, Fundamental Theories of Physics 195, 503 (2018), arXiv:1807.05762 .
- A. Monras and F. Illuminati, Phys. Rev. A 83, 012315 (2011).
- J. Glatthard and L. A. Correa, Quantum 6, 705 (2022), arXiv:2203.02436 .
- S. Chessa and V. Giovannetti, Communications Physics 4, 22 (2021).
- M. Ban, Physics Letters A 403, 127383 (2021).
- D. Jia and F. Costa, Phys. Rev. A 100, 052319 (2019).
- M. J. Renner and v. Brukner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 230503 (2022).
- F. m. c. Chapeau-Blondeau, Phys. Rev. A 103, 032615 (2021).
- D. Das and S. Bandyopadhyay,  (2021), 10.1098/rspa.2022.0231.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.