Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Fully automated workflow for designing patient-specific orthopaedic implants: application to total knee arthroplasty

Published 22 Mar 2024 in cs.CV | (2403.15353v3)

Abstract: Background. Osteoarthritis affects about 528 million people worldwide, causing pain and stiffness in the joints. Arthroplasty is commonly performed to treat joint osteoarthritis, reducing pain and improving mobility. Nevertheless, a significant share of patients remain unsatisfied with their surgery. Personalised arthroplasty was introduced to improve surgical outcomes however current solutions require delays, making it difficult to integrate in clinical routine. We propose a fully automated workflow to design patient-specific implants for total knee arthroplasty. Methods. The proposed pipeline first uses artificial neural networks to segment the femur and tibia proximal and distal extremities. Then the full bones are reconstructed using augmented statistical shape models, combining shape and landmarks information. Finally, 77 morphological parameters are computed to design patient-specific implants. The developed workflow has been trained on 91 CT scans and evaluated on 41 CT scans, in terms of accuracy and execution time. Results. The workflow accuracy was $0.4\pm0.2mm$ for segmentation, $1.0\pm0.3mm$ for full bone reconstruction, and $2.2\pm1.5mm$ for anatomical landmarks determination. The custom implants fitted the patients' anatomy with $0.9\pm0.5mm$ accuracy. The whole process from segmentation to implants' design lasted about 15 minutes. Conclusion. The proposed workflow performs a fast and reliable personalisation of knee implants, directly from a CT image without requiring any manual intervention. It allows the establishment of a patient-specific pre-operative planning in a very short time, making it easily available for all patients. Combined with efficient implant manufacturing techniques, this solution could help answer the growing number of arthroplasties while reducing complications and improving patients' satisfaction.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (61)
  1. World Health Organisation. Osteoarthritis, 7 2023.
  2. Why personalized surgery is the future of hip and knee arthroplasty: a statement from the personalized arthroplasty society. EFORT Open Reviews, 8:874–882, 2023.
  3. Trends in arthroplasty in japan by a complete survey, 2014–2017. Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 26:812–822, 9 2021.
  4. New Zealand Orthopaedic Association. The new zealand joint registry twenty two year report (january 1999-december 2020), 2021.
  5. Patient specific instruments and patient individual implants—a narrative review. Journal of Personalized Medicine 2023, Vol. 13, Page 426, 13:426, 2023.
  6. Total knee arthroplasty in france: Male-driven rise in procedures in 2009–2019 and projections for 2050. Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research, 2022.
  7. Projections and epidemiology of primary hip and knee arthroplasty in medicare patients to 2040-2060. JBJS Open Access, 8:e22.00112, 2023.
  8. Knee surgery trends and projections in france from 2008 to 2070. Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research, 106:893–902, 9 2020.
  9. The Swedish Arthroplasty Register. Annual Report 2021. Ola Rolfson, 2021.
  10. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. American joint replacement registry: the 9th annual report on hip and knee arthroplasty, 2022.
  11. The projected volume of primary and revision total knee arthroplasty will place an immense burden on future health care systems over the next 30 years. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 29:3287–3298, 10 2021.
  12. Utilization rates of knee-arthroplasty in oecd countries. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 23:1664–1673, 2015.
  13. Lifetime medical costs of knee osteoarthritis management in the united states: Impact of extending indications for total knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Care and Research, 67:203–215, 2015.
  14. Charles Rivière and Pascal andré Vendittoli, editors. Personalized Hip and Knee Joint Replacement. Springer, Cham, 2020.
  15. Yukihide Minoda. Alignment techniques in total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Joint Surgery and Research, 1:108–116, 12 2023.
  16. Are 20arthroplasty? a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Arthroplasty, 38:594–599, 3 2023.
  17. Fulfilment of patients’ mandatory expectations are crucial for satisfaction: a study amongst 352 patients after total knee arthroplasty (tka). Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, pages 1–10, 2 2023.
  18. Overhang of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty: Risk factors and clinical consequences. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 92:1115–1121, 5 2010.
  19. Fluoroscopic analyses of cruciate-retaining and medial pivot knee implants. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH Number, 410:21, 2003.
  20. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today—has anything changed after 10 years? The Journal of Arthroplasty, 29:1774–1778, 9 2014.
  21. Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Reviews, 5:380–390, 7 2020.
  22. Personalized alignment in total knee arthroplasty: Current concepts. SICOT-J, 7, 2021.
  23. An approach to developing customized total knee replacement implants. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2017, 2017.
  24. Biomechanical and clinical effect of patient-specific or customized knee implants: A review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9:1559, 5 2020.
  25. Personalisation and customisation in total knee arthroplasty: the paradox of custom knee implants, 4 2023.
  26. Custom total knee arthroplasty, pages 255–264. Springer, Cham, 2020.
  27. Custom tka: what to expect and where do we stand today?, 12 2021.
  28. No difference in patient-reported satisfaction after 12 months between customised individually made and off-the-shelf total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 30:2948–2957, 9 2022.
  29. Custom implants in tka provide no substantial benefit in terms of outcome scores, reoperation risk, or mean alignment: A systematic review. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 479:1237–1249, 2021.
  30. Custom total knee arthroplasty combined with personalised alignment grants 94 Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 31:1276–1283, 2023.
  31. Custom total knee arthroplasty facilitates restoration of constitutional coronal alignment. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 30:464–475, 2 2022.
  32. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 9351:234–241, 2015.
  33. nnu-net for the automatic knee segmentation from ct images : A comparative study with a conventional u-net model. In Ferdinando Rodriguez Y Baena and Fabio Tatti, editors, EPiC Series in Health Sciences. EasyChair, 2023.
  34. The morphological approach to segmentation: the watershed transformation, pages 433–481. CRC Press, 2018.
  35. Marching cubes: A high resolution 3d surface construction algorithm. Seminal graphics: pioneering efforts that shaped the field, pages 347–353, 7 1998.
  36. Anterior pelvic plane estimation for total hip arthroplasty using a joint ultrasound and statistical shape model based approach. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 61:195–204, 2022.
  37. On the limited memory bfgs method for large scale optimization. Mathematical Programming, 45:503–528, 1989.
  38. Statistical Models of Shape: Optimisation and Evaluation. Springer Science & Business Media, 2008. Several methods to analyze the SSM quality.
  39. Intra-observer variations of femoral bony landmarks using three different methods for the design of custom knee implant. In Ferdinando Rodriguez Y Baena and Fabio Tatti, editors, EPiC Series in Health Sciences. Easychair, 2023.
  40. Medial pivot in total knee arthroplasty: Literature review and our first experience, 1 2018.
  41. Automatic methods for characterization of sexual dimorphism of adult femora: Distal femur. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 10:447–456, 2007.
  42. Knee surgery sports traumatology i arthroscopy patellar problems factors of patellar instability: an anatomic radiographic study. Knee Surg, Sports Traumatol, 2:19–26, 1994.
  43. Sulcus depth, congruence angle, wiberg index, tt-tg distance, and cdi are strong predictors of recurrent patellar dislocation. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 31:2906–2916, 2023.
  44. Review of automated segmentation approaches for knee images, 2 2021.
  45. Cel-unet: Distance weighted maps and multi-scale pyramidal edge extraction for accurate osteoarthritic bone segmentation in ct scans. Frontiers in Signal Processing, 2:857313, 4 2022.
  46. Efficient cascaded v-net optimization for lower extremity ct segmentation validated using bone morphology assessment. Journal of Orthopaedic Research®, 40:2894–2907, 12 2022.
  47. Medical image segmentation using deep learning: A survey. IET Image Processing, 16:1243–1267, 4 2022.
  48. A robust method for automatic identification of femoral landmarks, axes, planes and bone coordinate systems using surface models. Scientific Reports, 10, 2020.
  49. Automatic assessment of lower-limb alignment from computed tomography. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 105:700–712, 5 2023.
  50. An automatic measurement system of distal femur morphological parameters using 3d slicer software. Bone, 156:116300, 3 2022.
  51. Automated anatomical landmark detection ondistal femur surface using convolutional neural network. Proceedings - International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, 2015-July:17–21, 7 2015.
  52. An automatic extraction method on medical feature points based on pointnet++ for robot-assisted knee arthroplasty. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 19:e2464, 2023.
  53. Contemporary knee arthroplasty: one fits all or time for diversity? Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 141:2185–2194, 12 2021.
  54. Relationship between the form and function of implant design in total knee replacement. Journal of Biomechanics, 119:110296, 2021.
  55. Kinematic function of knee implant designs across a range of daily activities. Journal of Orthopaedic Research®, 41:1217–1227, 6 2023.
  56. Higher use of fixed-bearing over mobile-bearing and posterior-stabilized over medial pivot designs in total knee arthroplasty (tka): a systematic comparative analysis using worldwide arthroplasty registers from england and wales, australia, norway, new zealand, germany and switzerland. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 143:1021–1029, 2 2023.
  57. Clinical radiographic outcomes and survivorship of medial pivot design total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature, 11 2022.
  58. Long-term follow-up of medial pivot total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review of the current evidence. Prosthesis, 5:622–634, 9 2023.
  59. Evidence of trochlear dysplasia in femoral component designs. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 22:2599–2607, 10 2014.
  60. Applying machine learning methods to enable automatic customisation of knee replacement implants from ct data. Scientific Reports, 13:1–9, 2 2023.
  61. 3d printing metal implants in orthopedic surgery: Methods, applications and future prospects. Journal of Orthopaedic Translation, 42:94–112, 9 2023.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.