Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Effect of Light Nuclei on Chemical Freeze-out Parameters at RHIC Energies

Published 25 Mar 2024 in nucl-th, hep-ph, and nucl-ex | (2403.16548v3)

Abstract: In this study, the chemical freeze-out of hadrons, including light-and strange-flavor particles and light nuclei, produced in Au+Au collisions at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC), was investigated. Using the thermal-FIST thermodynamic statistical model, we analyzed various particle sets: those inclusive of light nuclei, those exclusive to light nuclei, and those solely comprising light nuclei. We determined the chemical freeze-out parameters at $\sqrt{s_\text{NN}}=$ 7.7--200 GeV and four different centralities. A significant finding was the decrease in the chemical freeze-out temperature $T_{\textrm{ch}}$ with light nuclei inclusion, with an even more pronounced reduction when considering light nuclei yields exclusively. This suggests that light nuclei formation occurs at a later stage in the system's evolution at RHIC energies. We present parameterized formulas that describe the energy dependence of $T_{\textrm{ch}}$ and the baryon chemical potential $\mu_B$ for three distinct particle sets in central Au+Au collisions at RHIC energies. Our results reveal at least three distinct $T_{\textrm{ch}}$ at RHIC energies correspond to different freeze-out hypersurfaces: a light-flavor freeze-out temperature of $T_L$ = 150.2$\pm$6 MeV, a strange-flavor freeze-out temperature $T_s$ = 165.1$\pm$2.7 MeV, and a light-nuclei freeze-out temperature $T_{\textrm{ln}}$ = 141.7$\pm$1.4 MeV. Notably, at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) Pb+Pb 2.76 TeV, the expected lower freeze-out temperature for light nuclei was not observed; instead, the $T_{\textrm{ch}}$ for light nuclei was found to be approximately 10 MeV higher than that for light-flavor hadrons.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (16)
  1. P. Braun-Munzinger and J. Wambach, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1031 (2009).
  2. F. Karsch, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 62, 503 (2009).
  3. L. Adamczyk et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 032301 (2018).
  4. J. Adams et al. (STAR Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. A 757, 102 (2005).
  5. K. Adcox et al. (PHENIX Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. A 757, 184 (2005).
  6. I. Arsene et al. (BRAHMS Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. A 757, 1 (2005).
  7. B. B. Back et al. (PHOBOS Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. A 757, 28 (2005).
  8. L. Adamczyk et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 96, 044904 (2017).
  9. J. Adam et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 99, 064905 (2019).
  10. J. Adam et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 93, 024917 (2016).
  11. R. Scheibl and U. Heinz, Phys. Rev. C 59, 1585 (1999).
  12. M. I. Abdulhamid et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 202301 (2023).
  13. V. Vovchenko and H. Stoecker, Comput. Phys. Commun. 244, 295 (2019).
  14. S. S. Adler et al. (PHENIX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 69, 034909 (2004).
  15. J. Rafelski and B. Muller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1066 (1982).
  16. A. Shor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1122 (1985).

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.