Effect of Light Nuclei on Chemical Freeze-out Parameters at RHIC Energies
Abstract: In this study, the chemical freeze-out of hadrons, including light-and strange-flavor particles and light nuclei, produced in Au+Au collisions at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC), was investigated. Using the thermal-FIST thermodynamic statistical model, we analyzed various particle sets: those inclusive of light nuclei, those exclusive to light nuclei, and those solely comprising light nuclei. We determined the chemical freeze-out parameters at $\sqrt{s_\text{NN}}=$ 7.7--200 GeV and four different centralities. A significant finding was the decrease in the chemical freeze-out temperature $T_{\textrm{ch}}$ with light nuclei inclusion, with an even more pronounced reduction when considering light nuclei yields exclusively. This suggests that light nuclei formation occurs at a later stage in the system's evolution at RHIC energies. We present parameterized formulas that describe the energy dependence of $T_{\textrm{ch}}$ and the baryon chemical potential $\mu_B$ for three distinct particle sets in central Au+Au collisions at RHIC energies. Our results reveal at least three distinct $T_{\textrm{ch}}$ at RHIC energies correspond to different freeze-out hypersurfaces: a light-flavor freeze-out temperature of $T_L$ = 150.2$\pm$6 MeV, a strange-flavor freeze-out temperature $T_s$ = 165.1$\pm$2.7 MeV, and a light-nuclei freeze-out temperature $T_{\textrm{ln}}$ = 141.7$\pm$1.4 MeV. Notably, at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) Pb+Pb 2.76 TeV, the expected lower freeze-out temperature for light nuclei was not observed; instead, the $T_{\textrm{ch}}$ for light nuclei was found to be approximately 10 MeV higher than that for light-flavor hadrons.
- P. Braun-Munzinger and J. Wambach, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1031 (2009).
- F. Karsch, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 62, 503 (2009).
- L. Adamczyk et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 032301 (2018).
- J. Adams et al. (STAR Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. A 757, 102 (2005).
- K. Adcox et al. (PHENIX Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. A 757, 184 (2005).
- I. Arsene et al. (BRAHMS Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. A 757, 1 (2005).
- B. B. Back et al. (PHOBOS Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. A 757, 28 (2005).
- L. Adamczyk et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 96, 044904 (2017).
- J. Adam et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 99, 064905 (2019).
- J. Adam et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 93, 024917 (2016).
- R. Scheibl and U. Heinz, Phys. Rev. C 59, 1585 (1999).
- M. I. Abdulhamid et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 202301 (2023).
- V. Vovchenko and H. Stoecker, Comput. Phys. Commun. 244, 295 (2019).
- S. S. Adler et al. (PHENIX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 69, 034909 (2004).
- J. Rafelski and B. Muller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1066 (1982).
- A. Shor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1122 (1985).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.