Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Dynamical origin of neutrino masses and dark matter from a new confining sector

Published 26 Mar 2024 in hep-ph | (2403.17488v3)

Abstract: A dynamical mechanism, based on a confining non-abelian dark symmetry, which generates Majorana masses for hypercharge-less fermions, is proposed. We apply it to the inverse seesaw scenario, which allows to generate light neutrino masses from the interplay of TeV-scale Pseudo-Dirac mass terms and a small explicit breaking of lepton number. A single generation of vector-like dark quarks, transforming under a $\text{SU}(3)_\text{D}$ gauge symmetry, is coupled to a real singlet scalar, which serves as a portal between the dark quark condensate and three generations of heavy sterile neutrinos. Such a dark sector and the Standard Model (SM) are kept in thermal equilibrium with each other via sizeable Yukawa couplings to the heavy neutrinos. In this framework the lightest dark baryon, which has spin $3/2$ and is stabilized at the renormalizable level by an accidental dark baryon number symmetry, can account for the observed relic density via thermal freeze-out from annihilations into the lightest dark mesons. These mesons in turn decay to heavy neutrinos, which produce SM final states upon decay. This model may be probed by next generation neutrino telescopes via neutrino lines produced from dark matter annihilations.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (142)
  1. A. Giarnetti, J. Herrero-Garcia, S. Marciano, D. Meloni, and D. Vatsyayan, “Neutrino masses from new Weinberg-like operators: Phenomenology of TeV scalar multiplets,” arXiv:2312.13356 [hep-ph].
  2. R. N. Mohapatra and J. W. F. Valle, “Neutrino Mass and Baryon Number Nonconservation in Superstring Models,” Phys. Rev. D 34 (1986) 1642.
  3. M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia and J. W. F. Valle, “Fast Decaying Neutrinos and Observable Flavor Violation in a New Class of Majoron Models,” Phys. Lett. B 216 (1989) 360–366.
  4. Y. Cai, J. Herrero-García, M. A. Schmidt, A. Vicente, and R. R. Volkas, “From the trees to the forest: a review of radiative neutrino mass models,” Front. in Phys. 5 (2017) 63, arXiv:1706.08524 [hep-ph].
  5. P. Minkowski, “μ→e⁢γ→𝜇𝑒𝛾\mu\to e\gammaitalic_μ → italic_e italic_γ at a Rate of One Out of 109superscript10910^{9}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 9 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Muon Decays?,” Phys. Lett. B 67 (1977) 421–428.
  6. T. Yanagida, “Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos,” Conf. Proc. C 7902131 (1979) 95–99.
  7. M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, “Complex Spinors and Unified Theories,” Conf. Proc. C 790927 (1979) 315–321, arXiv:1306.4669 [hep-th].
  8. S. L. Glashow, “The Future of Elementary Particle Physics,” NATO Sci. Ser. B 61 (1980) 687.
  9. T. Yanagida, “Horizontal Symmetry and Masses of Neutrinos,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 64 (1980) 1103.
  10. R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanović, “Neutrino mass and spontaneous parity nonconservation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (Apr, 1980) 912–915. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.44.912.
  11. R. Foot, H. Lew, X. G. He, and G. C. Joshi, “Seesaw Neutrino Masses Induced by a Triplet of Leptons,” Z. Phys. C 44 (1989) 441.
  12. E. Witten, “New Issues in Manifolds of SU(3) Holonomy,” Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 79.
  13. E. Ma, “Radiative inverse seesaw mechanism for nonzero neutrino mass,” Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 013013, arXiv:0904.4450 [hep-ph].
  14. A. Ahriche, S. M. Boucenna, and S. Nasri, “Dark Radiative Inverse Seesaw Mechanism,” Phys. Rev. D 93 no. 7, (2016) 075036, arXiv:1601.04336 [hep-ph].
  15. L. Coito, C. Faubel, J. Herrero-García, A. Santamaria, and A. Titov, “Sterile neutrino portals to Majorana dark matter: effective operators and UV completions,” JHEP 08 (2022) 085, arXiv:2203.01946 [hep-ph].
  16. S. D. Thomas and R.-M. Xu, “Light neutrinos from the quark condensate,” Phys. Lett. B 284 (1992) 341–346.
  17. L. E. Ibanez, F. Marchesano, and R. Rabadan, “Getting just the standard model at intersecting branes,” JHEP 11 (2001) 002, arXiv:hep-th/0105155.
  18. J. McDonald, “Nucleosynthesis bounds on small Dirac neutrino masses due to chiral symmetry breaking,” arXiv:hep-ph/9610324.
  19. H. Davoudiasl and L. L. Everett, “Implications of neutrino mass generation from QCD confinement,” Phys. Lett. B 634 (2006) 55–58, arXiv:hep-ph/0512188.
  20. A. Babič, S. Kovalenko, M. I. Krivoruchenko, and F. Šimkovic, “Quark condensate seesaw mechanism for neutrino mass,” Phys. Rev. D 103 no. 1, (2021) 015007, arXiv:1911.12189 [hep-ph].
  21. H. Davoudiasl, I. M. Lewis, and M. Sullivan, “Exploring strange origin of Dirac neutrino masses at hadron colliders,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 7, (2022) 075017, arXiv:2111.08020 [hep-ph].
  22. Fermilab Lattice, MILC, TUMQCD Collaboration, A. Bazavov et al., “Up-, down-, strange-, charm-, and bottom-quark masses from four-flavor lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 98 no. 5, (2018) 054517, arXiv:1802.04248 [hep-lat].
  23. C. Alexandrou, J. Finkenrath, L. Funcke, K. Jansen, B. Kostrzewa, F. Pittler, and C. Urbach, “Ruling Out the Massless Up-Quark Solution to the Strong 𝑪⁢𝑷𝑪𝑷\boldsymbol{CP}bold_italic_C bold_italic_P Problem by Computing the Topological Mass Contribution with Lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 no. 23, (2020) 232001, arXiv:2002.07802 [hep-lat].
  24. T. Hur, D.-W. Jung, P. Ko, and J. Y. Lee, “Electroweak symmetry breaking and cold dark matter from strongly interacting hidden sector,” Phys. Lett. B 696 (2011) 262–265, arXiv:0709.1218 [hep-ph].
  25. J. Kubo, K. S. Lim, and M. Lindner, “Electroweak Symmetry Breaking via QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 091604, arXiv:1403.4262 [hep-ph].
  26. T. Hur and P. Ko, “Scale invariant extension of the standard model with strongly interacting hidden sector,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 141802, arXiv:1103.2571 [hep-ph].
  27. J. Gluza, “On teraelectronvolt Majorana neutrinos,” Acta Phys. Polon. B 33 (2002) 1735–1746, arXiv:hep-ph/0201002.
  28. J. Kersten and A. Y. Smirnov, “Right-Handed Neutrinos at CERN LHC and the Mechanism of Neutrino Mass Generation,” Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 073005, arXiv:0705.3221 [hep-ph].
  29. M. Aoki, V. Brdar, and J. Kubo, “Heavy dark matter, neutrino masses, and Higgs naturalness from a strongly interacting hidden sector,” Phys. Rev. D 102 no. 3, (2020) 035026, arXiv:2007.04367 [hep-ph].
  30. M. Aoki, J. Kubo, and J. Yang, “Inflation and dark matter after spontaneous Planck scale generation by hidden chiral symmetry breaking,” JCAP 01 no. 01, (2022) 005, arXiv:2109.04814 [hep-ph].
  31. I. Brivio and M. Trott, “Radiatively Generating the Higgs Potential and Electroweak Scale via the Seesaw Mechanism,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 no. 14, (2017) 141801, arXiv:1703.10924 [hep-ph].
  32. I. Brivio and M. Trott, “Examining the neutrino option,” JHEP 02 (2019) 107, arXiv:1809.03450 [hep-ph].
  33. G. B. Gelmini and M. Roncadelli, “Left-Handed Neutrino Mass Scale and Spontaneously Broken Lepton Number,” Phys. Lett. B 99 (1981) 411–415.
  34. Y. Chikashige, R. N. Mohapatra, and R. D. Peccei, “Are There Real Goldstone Bosons Associated with Broken Lepton Number?,” Phys. Lett. B 98 (1981) 265–268.
  35. A. Mitridate, M. Redi, J. Smirnov, and A. Strumia, “Dark Matter as a weakly coupled Dark Baryon,” JHEP 10 (2017) 210, arXiv:1707.05380 [hep-ph].
  36. E. K. Akhmedov, M. Lindner, E. Schnapka, and J. W. F. Valle, “Left-right symmetry breaking in NJL approach,” Phys. Lett. B 368 (1996) 270–280, arXiv:hep-ph/9507275.
  37. E. K. Akhmedov, M. Lindner, E. Schnapka, and J. W. F. Valle, “Dynamical left-right symmetry breaking,” Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 2752–2780, arXiv:hep-ph/9509255.
  38. M. Malinsky, J. C. Romao, and J. W. F. Valle, “Novel supersymmetric SO(10) seesaw mechanism,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 161801, arXiv:hep-ph/0506296.
  39. J. R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin, and F. Riva, “Strong Electroweak Phase Transitions in the Standard Model with a Singlet,” Nucl. Phys. B 854 (2012) 592–630, arXiv:1107.5441 [hep-ph].
  40. G. Lazarides, Q. Shafi, and C. Wetterich, “Proton Lifetime and Fermion Masses in an SO(10) Model,” Nucl. Phys. B 181 (1981) 287–300.
  41. J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, “Neutrino Masses in SU(2) x U(1) Theories,” Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2227.
  42. R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, “Neutrino Masses and Mixings in Gauge Models with Spontaneous Parity Violation,” Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 165.
  43. T. P. Cheng and L.-F. Li, “Neutrino masses, mixings, and oscillations in su(2) x u(1) models of electroweak interactions,” Phys. Rev. D 22 (Dec, 1980) 2860–2868. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.22.2860.
  44. C. Wetterich, “Neutrino Masses and the Scale of B-L Violation,” Nucl. Phys. B 187 (1981) 343–375.
  45. E. Ma, “Naturally small seesaw neutrino mass with no new physics beyond the TeV scale,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 2502–2504, arXiv:hep-ph/0011121.
  46. S. M. Davidson and H. E. Logan, “Dirac neutrinos from a second Higgs doublet,” Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 095008, arXiv:0906.3335 [hep-ph].
  47. S. Centelles Chuliá, R. Srivastava, and A. Vicente, “The inverse seesaw family: Dirac and Majorana,” JHEP 03 (2021) 248, arXiv:2011.06609 [hep-ph].
  48. A. Francis, R. J. Hudspith, R. Lewis, and S. Tulin, “Dark Matter from Strong Dynamics: The Minimal Theory of Dark Baryons,” JHEP 12 (2018) 118, arXiv:1809.09117 [hep-ph].
  49. M. Della Morte, B. Jäger, F. Sannino, J. T. Tsang, and F. P. G. Ziegler, “Spectrum of QCD with one flavor: A window for supersymmetric dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 11, (2023) 114506, arXiv:2302.10514 [hep-lat].
  50. M. Gell-Mann, R. J. Oakes, and B. Renner, “Behavior of current divergences under SU(3) x SU(3),” Phys. Rev. 175 (1968) 2195–2199.
  51. T. Hambye, M. Hufnagel, and M. Lucca, “Cosmological constraints on the decay of heavy relics into neutrinos,” JCAP 05 no. 05, (2022) 033, arXiv:2112.09137 [hep-ph].
  52. O. Antipin, M. Redi, A. Strumia, and E. Vigiani, “Accidental Composite Dark Matter,” JHEP 07 (2015) 039, arXiv:1503.08749 [hep-ph].
  53. R. Garani, M. Redi, and A. Tesi, “Dark QCD matters,” JHEP 12 (2021) 139, arXiv:2105.03429 [hep-ph].
  54. W. Ochs, “The Status of Glueballs,” J. Phys. G 40 (2013) 043001, arXiv:1301.5183 [hep-ph].
  55. T. Cohen, F. J. Llanes-Estrada, J. R. Pelaez, and J. Ruiz de Elvira, “Nonordinary light meson couplings and the 1/Nc1subscript𝑁𝑐1/N_{c}1 / italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT expansion,” Phys. Rev. D 90 no. 3, (2014) 036003, arXiv:1405.4831 [hep-ph].
  56. D. Buttazzo, L. Di Luzio, G. Landini, A. Strumia, and D. Teresi, “Dark Matter from self-dual gauge/Higgs dynamics,” JHEP 10 (2019) 067, arXiv:1907.11228 [hep-ph].
  57. G. Landini and J.-W. Wang, “Dark Matter in scalar Sp(𝒩𝒩\mathcal{N}caligraphic_N) gauge dynamics,” JHEP 06 (2020) 167, arXiv:2004.03299 [hep-ph].
  58. C. Gross, S. Karamitsos, G. Landini, and A. Strumia, “Gravitational Vector Dark Matter,” JHEP 03 (2021) 174, arXiv:2012.12087 [hep-ph].
  59. R. Contino, A. Mitridate, A. Podo, and M. Redi, “Gluequark Dark Matter,” JHEP 02 (2019) 187, arXiv:1811.06975 [hep-ph].
  60. G. F. Giudice, E. W. Kolb, and A. Riotto, “Largest temperature of the radiation era and its cosmological implications,” Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 023508, arXiv:hep-ph/0005123.
  61. E. W. Kolb, A. Notari, and A. Riotto, “On the reheating stage after inflation,” Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 123505, arXiv:hep-ph/0307241.
  62. C. Gross, A. Mitridate, M. Redi, J. Smirnov, and A. Strumia, “Cosmological Abundance of Colored Relics,” Phys. Rev. D 99 no. 1, (2019) 016024, arXiv:1811.08418 [hep-ph].
  63. G. Steigman, B. Dasgupta, and J. F. Beacom, “Precise Relic WIMP Abundance and its Impact on Searches for Dark Matter Annihilation,” Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 023506, arXiv:1204.3622 [hep-ph].
  64. J. M. Cline, Z. Liu, G. D. Moore, and W. Xue, “Composite strongly interacting dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 90 no. 1, (2014) 015023, arXiv:1312.3325 [hep-ph].
  65. A. Borriello and P. Salucci, “The Dark matter distribution in disk galaxies,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 323 (2001) 285, arXiv:astro-ph/0001082.
  66. F. Donato, G. Gentile, P. Salucci, C. Frigerio Martins, M. I. Wilkinson, G. Gilmore, E. K. Grebel, A. Koch, and R. Wyse, “A constant dark matter halo surface density in galaxies,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 397 no. 3, (Aug., 2009) 1169–1176, arXiv:0904.4054 [astro-ph.CO].
  67. W. J. G. de Blok, “The Core-Cusp Problem,” Advances in Astronomy 2010 (Jan., 2010) 789293, arXiv:0910.3538 [astro-ph.CO].
  68. W. J. G. de Blok and A. Bosma, “High-resolution rotation curves of low surface brightness galaxies,” Astron. Astrophys. 385 (2002) 816, arXiv:astro-ph/0201276.
  69. M. Boylan-Kolchin, J. S. Bullock, and M. Kaplinghat, “Too big to fail? The puzzling darkness of massive Milky Way subhaloes,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 415 no. 1, (July, 2011) L40–L44, arXiv:1103.0007 [astro-ph.CO].
  70. M. Boylan-Kolchin, J. S. Bullock, and M. Kaplinghat, “The Milky Way’s bright satellites as an apparent failure of ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_ΛCDM,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 422 no. 2, (May, 2012) 1203–1218, arXiv:1111.2048 [astro-ph.CO].
  71. J. Miralda-Escude, “A test of the collisional dark matter hypothesis from cluster lensing,” Astrophys. J. 564 (2002) 60, arXiv:astro-ph/0002050.
  72. S. W. Randall, M. Markevitch, D. Clowe, A. H. Gonzalez, and M. Bradac, “Constraints on the Self-Interaction Cross-Section of Dark Matter from Numerical Simulations of the Merging Galaxy Cluster 1E 0657-56,” Astrophys. J. 679 (2008) 1173–1180, arXiv:0704.0261 [astro-ph].
  73. D. Pappadopulo, J. T. Ruderman, and G. Trevisan, “Dark matter freeze-out in a nonrelativistic sector,” Phys. Rev. D 94 no. 3, (2016) 035005, arXiv:1602.04219 [hep-ph].
  74. M. Farina, D. Pappadopulo, J. T. Ruderman, and G. Trevisan, “Phases of Cannibal Dark Matter,” JHEP 12 (2016) 039, arXiv:1607.03108 [hep-ph].
  75. S. Davidson, E. Nardi, and Y. Nir, “Leptogenesis,” Phys. Rept. 466 (2008) 105–177, arXiv:0802.2962 [hep-ph].
  76. G. F. Giudice, M. Peloso, A. Riotto, and I. Tkachev, “Production of massive fermions at preheating and leptogenesis,” JHEP 08 (1999) 014, arXiv:hep-ph/9905242.
  77. Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim et al., “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,” Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6, arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)].
  78. K. Agashe, P. Du, M. Ekhterachian, C. S. Fong, S. Hong, and L. Vecchi, “Natural Seesaw and Leptogenesis from Hybrid of High-Scale Type I and TeV-Scale Inverse,” JHEP 04 (2019) 029, arXiv:1812.08204 [hep-ph].
  79. A. Pilaftsis and T. E. J. Underwood, “Resonant leptogenesis,” Nucl. Phys. B 692 (2004) 303–345, arXiv:hep-ph/0309342.
  80. A. Pilaftsis, “Resonant tau-leptogenesis with observable lepton number violation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 081602, arXiv:hep-ph/0408103.
  81. A. Pilaftsis and T. E. J. Underwood, “Electroweak-scale resonant leptogenesis,” Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 113001, arXiv:hep-ph/0506107.
  82. P. D. Bolton, F. F. Deppisch, and P. S. Bhupal Dev, “Neutrinoless double beta decay versus other probes of heavy sterile neutrinos,” JHEP 03 (2020) 170, arXiv:1912.03058 [hep-ph].
  83. A. Abada, C. Biggio, F. Bonnet, M. B. Gavela, and T. Hambye, “Low energy effects of neutrino masses,” JHEP 12 (2007) 061, arXiv:0707.4058 [hep-ph].
  84. E. Fernandez-Martinez, J. Hernandez-Garcia, and J. Lopez-Pavon, “Global constraints on heavy neutrino mixing,” JHEP 08 (2016) 033, arXiv:1605.08774 [hep-ph].
  85. M. Blennow, P. Coloma, E. Fernandez-Martinez, J. Hernandez-Garcia, and J. Lopez-Pavon, “Non-Unitarity, sterile neutrinos, and Non-Standard neutrino Interactions,” JHEP 04 (2017) 153, arXiv:1609.08637 [hep-ph].
  86. S. Antusch, E. Cazzato, and O. Fischer, “Sterile neutrino searches at future e−⁢e+superscript𝑒superscript𝑒e^{-}e^{+}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p, and e−⁢psuperscript𝑒𝑝e^{-}pitalic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p colliders,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 32 no. 14, (2017) 1750078, arXiv:1612.02728 [hep-ph].
  87. MEG Collaboration, A. M. Baldini et al., “Search for the lepton flavour violating decay μ+→e+⁢γ→superscript𝜇superscripte𝛾\mu^{+}\rightarrow\mathrm{e}^{+}\gammaitalic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → roman_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ with the full dataset of the MEG experiment,” Eur. Phys. J. C 76 no. 8, (2016) 434, arXiv:1605.05081 [hep-ex].
  88. MEG II Collaboration, A. M. Baldini et al., “The design of the MEG II experiment,” Eur. Phys. J. C 78 no. 5, (2018) 380, arXiv:1801.04688 [physics.ins-det].
  89. MEG II Collaboration, K. Afanaciev et al., “A search for μ+→e+⁢γ→superscript𝜇superscripte𝛾\mu^{+}\rightarrow\textrm{e}^{+}\gammaitalic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ with the first dataset of the MEG II experiment,” Eur. Phys. J. C 84 no. 3, (2024) 216, arXiv:2310.12614 [hep-ex].
  90. SINDRUM II Collaboration, C. Dohmen et al., “Test of lepton flavor conservation in mu —>>> e conversion on titanium,” Phys. Lett. B 317 (1993) 631–636.
  91. A. de Gouvea and S. Gopalakrishna, “Low-energy neutrino Majorana phases and charged-lepton electric dipole moments,” Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 093008, arXiv:hep-ph/0508148.
  92. A. Abada and T. Toma, “Electric Dipole Moments of Charged Leptons with Sterile Fermions,” JHEP 02 (2016) 174, arXiv:1511.03265 [hep-ph].
  93. ACME Collaboration, V. Andreev et al., “Improved limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron,” Nature 562 no. 7727, (2018) 355–360.
  94. A. Abada and T. Toma, “Electron electric dipole moment in Inverse Seesaw models,” JHEP 08 (2016) 079, arXiv:1605.07643 [hep-ph].
  95. Muon (g-2) Collaboration, G. W. Bennett et al., “An Improved Limit on the Muon Electric Dipole Moment,” Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 052008, arXiv:0811.1207 [hep-ex].
  96. Y. Ema, T. Gao, and M. Pospelov, “Improved Indirect Limits on Muon Electric Dipole Moment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 no. 13, (2022) 131803, arXiv:2108.05398 [hep-ph].
  97. A. Adelmann et al., “Search for a muon EDM using the frozen-spin technique,” arXiv:2102.08838 [hep-ex].
  98. M. Sakurai et al., “muEDM: Towards a Search for the Muon Electric Dipole Moment at PSI Using the Frozen-spin Technique,” JPS Conf. Proc. 37 (2022) 020604, arXiv:2201.06561 [hep-ex].
  99. muon EDM initiative Collaboration, K. S. Khaw et al., “Search for the muon electric dipole moment using frozen-spin technique at PSI,” PoS NuFact2021 (2022) 136, arXiv:2201.08729 [hep-ex].
  100. J. L. Feng, K. T. Matchev, and Y. Shadmi, “Muon dipole moment experiments: Interpretation and prospects,” eConf C010630 (2001) P307, arXiv:hep-ph/0110157.
  101. J. a. P. Pinheiro, C. A. de S. Pires, F. S. Queiroz, and Y. S. Villamizar, “Confronting the inverse seesaw mechanism with the recent muon g-2 result,” Phys. Lett. B 823 (2021) 136764, arXiv:2107.01315 [hep-ph].
  102. Muon g-2 Collaboration, B. Abi et al., “Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 no. 14, (2021) 141801, arXiv:2104.03281 [hep-ex].
  103. P. B. Denton and J. Gehrlein, “A Survey of Neutrino Flavor Models and the Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay Funnel,” arXiv:2308.09737 [hep-ph].
  104. Y. Bai, A. J. Long, and S. Lu, “Dark Quark Nuggets,” Phys. Rev. D 99 no. 5, (2019) 055047, arXiv:1810.04360 [hep-ph].
  105. V. Berezinsky, M. Kachelriess, and S. Ostapchenko, “Electroweak jet cascading in the decay of superheavy particles,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 171802, arXiv:hep-ph/0205218.
  106. M. Kachelriess, P. D. Serpico, and M. A. Solberg, “On the role of electroweak bremsstrahlung for indirect dark matter signatures,” Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 123533, arXiv:0911.0001 [hep-ph].
  107. P. Ciafaloni, D. Comelli, A. Riotto, F. Sala, A. Strumia, and A. Urbano, “Weak Corrections are Relevant for Dark Matter Indirect Detection,” JCAP 03 (2011) 019, arXiv:1009.0224 [hep-ph].
  108. C. El Aisati, M. Gustafsson, and T. Hambye, “New Search for Monochromatic Neutrinos from Dark Matter Decay,” Phys. Rev. D 92 no. 12, (2015) 123515, arXiv:1506.02657 [hep-ph].
  109. IceCube Collaboration, M. G. Aartsen et al., “Energy Reconstruction Methods in the IceCube Neutrino Telescope,” JINST 9 (2014) P03009, arXiv:1311.4767 [physics.ins-det].
  110. C. A. Argüelles, A. Diaz, A. Kheirandish, A. Olivares-Del-Campo, I. Safa, and A. C. Vincent, “Dark matter annihilation to neutrinos,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 93 no. 3, (2021) 035007, arXiv:1912.09486 [hep-ph].
  111. ANTARES Collaboration, S. Adrian-Martinez et al., “Search of Dark Matter Annihilation in the Galactic Centre using the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope,” JCAP 10 (2015) 068, arXiv:1505.04866 [astro-ph.HE].
  112. IceCube Collaboration, M. G. Aartsen et al., “Neutrino astronomy with the next generation IceCube Neutrino Observatory,” arXiv:1911.02561 [astro-ph.HE].
  113. IceCube Collaboration, M. G. Aartsen et al., “IceCube-Gen2: A Vision for the Future of Neutrino Astronomy in Antarctica,” arXiv:1412.5106 [astro-ph.HE].
  114. P-ONE Collaboration, M. Agostini et al., “The Pacific Ocean Neutrino Experiment,” Nature Astron. 4 no. 10, (2020) 913–915, arXiv:2005.09493 [astro-ph.HE].
  115. KM3Net Collaboration, S. Adrian-Martinez et al., “Letter of intent for KM3NeT 2.0,” J. Phys. G 43 no. 8, (2016) 084001, arXiv:1601.07459 [astro-ph.IM].
  116. KM3NeT Collaboration, S. Aiello et al., “Sensitivity of the KM3NeT/ARCA neutrino telescope to point-like neutrino sources,” Astropart. Phys. 111 (2019) 100–110, arXiv:1810.08499 [astro-ph.HE].
  117. Fermi-LAT Collaboration, M. Ackermann et al., “Searching for Dark Matter Annihilation from Milky Way Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies with Six Years of Fermi Large Area Telescope Data,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 no. 23, (2015) 231301, arXiv:1503.02641 [astro-ph.HE].
  118. H.E.S.S. Collaboration, H. Abdallah et al., “Search for dark matter annihilations towards the inner Galactic halo from 10 years of observations with H.E.S.S,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 no. 11, (2016) 111301, arXiv:1607.08142 [astro-ph.HE].
  119. F. S. Queiroz, C. E. Yaguna, and C. Weniger, “Gamma-ray Limits on Neutrino Lines,” JCAP 05 (2016) 050, arXiv:1602.05966 [hep-ph].
  120. CTA Consortium Collaboration, A. Morselli, “The Dark Matter Programme of the Cherenkov Telescope Array,” PoS ICRC2017 (2018) 921, arXiv:1709.01483 [astro-ph.IM].
  121. S. Coleman, “Why there is nothing rather than something: A theory of the cosmological constant,” Nuclear Physics B 310 no. 3, (1988) 643–668. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0550321388900971.
  122. S. B. Giddings and A. Strominger, “Loss of incoherence and determination of coupling constants in quantum gravity,” Nuclear Physics B 307 no. 4, (1988) 854–866. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0550321388901095.
  123. G. Gilbert, “Wormhole-induced proton decay,” Nuclear Physics B 328 no. 1, (1989) 159–170. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0550321389900977.
  124. R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde, D. A. Linde, and L. Susskind, “Gravity and global symmetries,” Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 912–935, arXiv:hep-th/9502069.
  125. Y. Mambrini, S. Profumo, and F. S. Queiroz, “Dark Matter and Global Symmetries,” Phys. Lett. B 760 (2016) 807–815, arXiv:1508.06635 [hep-ph].
  126. M. A. G. Garcia, Y. Mambrini, K. A. Olive, and S. Verner, “Case for decaying spin- 3/2 dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 102 no. 8, (2020) 083533, arXiv:2006.03325 [hep-ph].
  127. IceCube Collaboration, M. G. Aartsen et al., “Atmospheric and astrophysical neutrinos above 1 TeV interacting in IceCube,” Phys. Rev. D 91 no. 2, (2015) 022001, arXiv:1410.1749 [astro-ph.HE].
  128. W. Rarita and J. Schwinger, “On a theory of particles with half integral spin,” Phys. Rev. 60 (1941) 61.
  129. S. Weinberg, The Quantum theory of fields. Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge University Press, 6, 2005.
  130. H. Haberzettl, “Propagation of a massive spin 3/2 particle,” arXiv:nucl-th/9812043.
  131. L. M. Nath, B. Etemadi, and J. D. Kimel, “Uniqueness of the interaction involving spin 3/2 particles,” Phys. Rev. D 3 (1971) 2153–2161.
  132. M. Benmerrouche, R. M. Davidson, and N. C. Mukhopadhyay, “Problems of Describing Spin 3/2 Baryon Resonances in the Effective Lagrangian Theory,” Phys. Rev. C 39 (1989) 2339–2348.
  133. S. Kamefuchi, L. O’Raifeartaigh, and A. Salam, “Change of variables and equivalence theorems in quantum field theories,” Nucl. Phys. 28 (1961) 529–549.
  134. S. Scherer, “Introduction to chiral perturbation theory,” Adv. Nucl. Phys. 27 (2003) 277, arXiv:hep-ph/0210398.
  135. H.-B. Tang and P. J. Ellis, “Redundance of Delta isobar parameters in effective field theories,” Phys. Lett. B 387 (1996) 9–13, arXiv:hep-ph/9606432.
  136. P. J. Ellis and H.-B. Tang, “Pion - nucleon scattering at low-energies,” Phys. Rev. C 56 (1997) 3363–3368, arXiv:hep-ph/9609459.
  137. H. Krebs, E. Epelbaum, and U. G. Meissner, “Redundancy of the off-shell parameters in chiral effective field theory with explicit spin-3/2 degrees of freedom,” Phys. Lett. B 683 (2010) 222–228, arXiv:0905.2744 [hep-th].
  138. H. P. Nilles, “Supersymmetry, Supergravity and Particle Physics,” Phys. Rept. 110 (1984) 1–162.
  139. E. Cremmer, B. Julia, J. Scherk, P. van Nieuwenhuizen, S. Ferrara, and L. Girardello, “Super-higgs effect in supergravity with general scalar interactions,” Phys. Lett. B 79 (1978) 231–234.
  140. S. Ferrara, F. Gliozzi, J. Scherk, and P. Van Nieuwenhuizen, “Matter Couplings in Supergravity Theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 117 (1976) 333.
  141. A. Das, M. Fischler, and M. Roček, “Super-higgs effect in a new class of scalar models and a model of super qed,” Phys. Rev. D 16 (Dec, 1977) 3427–3436. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.16.3427.
  142. E. Dudas, T. Gherghetta, K. Kaneta, Y. Mambrini, and K. A. Olive, “Gravitino decay in high scale supersymmetry with R -parity violation,” Phys. Rev. D 98 no. 1, (2018) 015030, arXiv:1805.07342 [hep-ph].
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 5 tweets with 3 likes about this paper.

Sign Up for Free