Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Search and Society: Reimagining Information Access for Radical Futures

Published 26 Mar 2024 in cs.IR | (2403.17901v4)

Abstract: Information retrieval (IR) research must understand and contend with the social implications of the technology it produces. Instead of adopting a reactionary strategy of trying to mitigate potential social harms from emerging technologies, the community should aim to proactively set the research agenda for the kinds of systems we should build inspired by diverse explicitly stated sociotechnical imaginaries. The sociotechnical imaginaries that underpin the design and development of information access technologies needs to be explicitly articulated, and we need to develop theories of change in context of these diverse perspectives. Our guiding future imaginaries must be informed by other academic fields, such as human-computer interaction, information sciences, media studies, design, science and technology studies, social sciences, humanities, democratic theory, and critical theory, as well as legal and policy experts, civil rights and social justice activists, and artists, among others. In this perspective paper, we motivate why the community must consider this radical shift in how we do research and what we work on, and sketch a path forward towards this transformation.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (411)
  1. Evaluation of fairness in recommender systems: A review. In International Conference on Emerging Technologies in Computer Engineering, pages 456–465. Springer, 2022.
  2. Anti-racist hci: notes on an emerging critical technical practice. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts, pages 1–12, 2022.
  3. Persistent anti-muslim bias in large language models. In Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pages 298–306, 2021.
  4. A. Adam. A feminist critique of artificial intelligence. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 2(3):355–377, 1995.
  5. A. Adam. Feminist ai projects and cyberfutures. In The Gendered Cyborg, pages 276–290. Routledge, 2013.
  6. R. Adams. Can artificial intelligence be decolonized? Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 46(1-2):176–197, 2021.
  7. T. Adorno. Negative dialectics. Routledge, 2003.
  8. T. Adorno. Minima moralia: Reflections from damaged life. Verso, 2005.
  9. G. Agamben. Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. stanford university Press, 1998.
  10. Residual mobilities: infrastructural displacement and post-colonial computing in bangladesh. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 437–446, 2015.
  11. Speculative design and heterogeneity in indigenous nation building. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, pages 895–899, 2016.
  12. M. Ali. Towards a decolonial computing. 2014.
  13. S. M. Ali. A brief introduction to decolonial computing. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students, 22(4):16–21, 2016.
  14. H. Allcott and M. Gentzkow. Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of economic perspectives, 31(2):211–236, 2017.
  15. (whose) value-sensitive design: a study of long-distance relationships in an arabic cultural context. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pages 75–84, 2011.
  16. A unifying and general account of fairness measurement in recommender systems. Information Processing & Management, 60(1):103115, 2023.
  17. Dagstuhl seminar 19461 on conversational search: seminar goals and working group outcomes. In ACM SIGIR Forum, volume 54, pages 1–11. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2021.
  18. Explainable information retrieval: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.02405, 2022.
  19. Auditing consumer-and producer-fairness in graph collaborative filtering. In European Conference on Information Retrieval, pages 33–48. Springer, 2023.
  20. C. Ang. How do big tech giants make their billions? 2022. URL https://www.visualcapitalist.com/how-big-tech-makes-their-billions-2022/.
  21. Tip of the tongue known-item retrieval: A case study in movie identification. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, 2021.
  22. Overview of the trec 2023 tip-of-the-tongue track. In Proc. Text REtrieval Conference (TREC), 2024.
  23. M. Asad. Prefigurative design as a method for research justice. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW):1–18, 2019.
  24. Creating a sociotechnical api: Designing city-scale community engagement. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pages 2295–2306, 2017.
  25. J. Auger. Speculative design: crafting the speculation. Digital Creativity, 24(1):11–35, 2013.
  26. How methods make designers. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 472–483, 2017.
  27. The search futures workshop (ecir2024), 2024. URL https://searchfutures.github.io/.
  28. Call for papers for the special track on web4good: Fates (fairness, accountability, transparency, ethics, sustainable development and healthy society), 2022. URL https://archives.iw3c2.org/www2022/cfp/special/web4good/.
  29. Ms marco: A human generated machine reading comprehension dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.09268, 2016.
  30. C. Barabas. Beyond bias: Re-imagining the terms of" ethical ai" in criminal law. Geo. JL & Mod. Critical Race Persp., 12:83, 2020.
  31. J. Bardzell and S. Bardzell. What is humanistic hci? In Humanistic HCI, pages 13–32. Springer, 2015.
  32. J. Bardzell and S. Bardzell. Humanistic hci. Interactions, 23(2):20–29, 2016a.
  33. S. Bardzell. Feminist hci: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pages 1301–1310, 2010.
  34. S. Bardzell. Utopias of participation: Feminism, design, and the futures. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 25(1):1–24, 2018.
  35. S. Bardzell and J. Bardzell. Towards a feminist hci methodology: social science, feminism, and hci. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pages 675–684, 2011.
  36. S. Bardzell and J. Bardzell. Feminist design in computing. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Gender and Sexuality Studies, pages 1–7, 2016b.
  37. Feminism and interaction design. In CHI’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–4. 2011.
  38. When not to design, build, or deploy. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pages 695–695, 2020.
  39. Malicious forces creating “perfect storm” of coronavirus disinformation. The Guardian, 24, 2020.
  40. N. Belkin and S. Robertson. Some ethical and political implications of theoretical research in information science. In Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, 1976.
  41. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big?. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, 2021.
  42. S. Benhabib. Critique, norm, and utopia: A study of the foundations of critical theory. Columbia University Press, 1986.
  43. R. Benjamin. Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new jim code. Social Forces, 2019.
  44. W. Benjamin. Reflections: Essays, aphorisms, autobiographical writings. 1978.
  45. W. Benjamin. Illuminations, volume 241. Random House Digital, Inc., 1986.
  46. N. Bernard and K. Balog. A systematic review of fairness, accountability, transparency and ethics in information retrieval. ACM Computing Surveys, 2023.
  47. Fairness in recommendation ranking through pairwise comparisons. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining, pages 2212–2220, 2019.
  48. Learning to un-rank: quantifying search exposure for users in online communities. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 267–276, 2017.
  49. Equity of attention: Amortizing individual fairness in rankings. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR ’18, pages 405–414, New York, NY, USA, 2018. ACM.
  50. Overview of the trec 2019 fair ranking track. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.11650, 2020.
  51. Overview of the trec 2020 fair ranking track. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.05135, 2021.
  52. On the orthogonality of bias and utility in ad hoc retrieval. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 1748–1752, 2021a.
  53. Exploring gender biases in information retrieval relevance judgement datasets. In Advances in Information Retrieval: 43rd European Conference on IR Research, ECIR 2021, Virtual Event, March 28–April 1, 2021, Proceedings, Part II 43, pages 216–224. Springer, 2021b.
  54. Gender fairness in information retrieval systems. In Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 3436–3439, 2022a.
  55. A light-weight strategy for restraining gender biases in neural rankers. In European Conference on Information Retrieval, pages 47–55. Springer, 2022b.
  56. De-biasing relevance judgements for fair ranking. In European Conference on Information Retrieval, pages 350–358. Springer, 2023.
  57. A. Birhane and F. Cummins. Algorithmic injustices: Towards a relational ethics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.07376, 2019.
  58. The values encoded in machine learning research. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pages 173–184, 2022.
  59. Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of" bias" in nlp. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14050, 2020.
  60. Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? debiasing word embeddings. Advances in neural information processing systems, 29, 2016.
  61. On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258, 2021.
  62. Consumer fairness in recommender systems: Contextualizing definitions and mitigations. In European Conference on Information Retrieval, pages 552–566. Springer, 2022.
  63. Consumer fairness benchmark in recommendation. In Proceedings of the 13th Italian Information Retrieval Workshop (IIR 2023). Pisa, Italy, pages 60–65, 2023.
  64. P. Brest. The power of theories of change, 2010.
  65. Queering: Liberation futures with afrofuturism. In Routledge Handbook of Social Futures, pages 260–274. Routledge, 2021.
  66. J. Browne and L. Green. The future of work is no work: A call to action for designers in the abolition of work. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts, pages 1–8, 2022.
  67. Feminist AI: Critical Perspectives on Algorithms, Data, and Intelligent Machines. Oxford University Press, 2023.
  68. R. Browne. New york times sues microsoft, chatgpt maker openai over copyright infringement. 2023. URL https://www.cnbc.com/2023/12/27/new-york-times-sues-microsoft-chatgpt-maker-openai-over-copyright-infringement.html.
  69. Report on the 1st workshop on reaching efficiency in neural information retrieval (reneuir 2022) at sigir 2022. In ACM SIGIR Forum, volume 56, pages 1–14. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2023.
  70. Balanced neighborhoods for multi-sided fairness in recommendation. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, pages 202–214, 2018.
  71. J. Butler. Gender trouble. routledge, 2002.
  72. L. Butler. Interview: Technology, capitalism, and the future of the left. Renewal: A Journal of Social Democracy, 26(1):18–31, 2018.
  73. Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases. Science, 356(6334):183–186, 2017.
  74. Fair exposure of documents in information retrieval: a community detection approach. In Circle 2020, volume 2621, 2020.
  75. I. Chios and S. Verberne. Helping results assessment by adding explainable elements to the deep relevance matching model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.05147, 2021.
  76. Bardzell’s" feminist hci" legacy: Analyzing citational patterns. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–8, 2020.
  77. Interpreting neural ranking models using grad-cam. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.05768, 2020.
  78. Palm: Scaling language modeling with pathways. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.02311, 2022.
  79. Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
  80. Goodhart’s law: Its origins, meaning and implications for monetary policy. Prepared for the Festschrift in honour of Charles Goodhart, 2001.
  81. Click models for web search. Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services, 7(3):1–115, 2015.
  82. Trends in combating fake news on social media–a survey. Journal of Information and Telecommunication, 5(2):247–266, 2021.
  83. A. M. R. Correia. Information literacy for an active and effective citizenship. In White Paper prepared for UNESCO, the US National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, and the National Forum on Information Literacy, for use at the Information Literacy Meeting of Experts, Prague, The Czech Republic, 2002.
  84. Through the looking-glass: Transparency implications and challenges in enterprise ai knowledge systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.09410, 2024.
  85. Overview of the trec 2019 deep learning track. In Proc. Text REtrieval Conference (TREC), 2020.
  86. Ms marco: Benchmarking ranking models in the large-data regime. In Proc. SIGIR. ACM, 2021.
  87. K. Crawford. The trouble with bias. In Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, invited speaker, 2017.
  88. K. Crenshaw. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine (pp. 139–168). In University of Chicago legal forum, 1989.
  89. K. W. Crenshaw. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In The public nature of private violence, pages 93–118. Routledge, 2013.
  90. B. Crick. Democracy: A very short introduction. OUP Oxford, 2002.
  91. Research frontiers in information retrieval: Report from the third strategic workshop on information retrieval in lorne (swirl 2018). In ACM SIGIR Forum, volume 52, pages 34–90. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2018.
  92. F. Cunningham. Theories of democracy: A critical introduction. Psychology Press, 2002.
  93. R. Dahl. On democracy, 2000. Yale Nota Bene, 1996.
  94. R. A. Dahl. A preface to democratic theory, volume 10. University of Chicago Press, 1956.
  95. Automated experiments on ad privacy settings: A tale of opacity, choice, and discrimination. arXiv preprint arXiv:1408.6491, 2014.
  96. W. Davis. Sarah silverman is suing openai and meta for copyright infringement. The Verge, 9:2023, 2023. URL https://www.theverge.com/2023/7/9/23788741/sarah-silverman-openai-meta-chatgpt-llama-copyright-infringement-chatbots-artificial-intelligence-ai.
  97. Fairness in recommender systems: research landscape and future directions. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, pages 1–50, 2023.
  98. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pages 4171–4186, Minneapolis, Minnesota, June 2019. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/N19-1423. URL https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N19-1423.
  99. Evaluating stochastic rankings with expected exposure. In Proc. CIKM, pages 275–284, 2020.
  100. C. D’ignazio and L. F. Klein. Data feminism. MIT press, 2020.
  101. J. P. Dimond. Feminist HCI for real: Designing technology in support of a social movement. Georgia Institute of Technology, 2012.
  102. Hollaback! the role of storytelling online in a social movement organization. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pages 477–490, 2013.
  103. K. Dinnissen and C. Bauer. Fairness in music recommender systems: A stakeholder-centered mini review. Frontiers in big Data, 5:913608, 2022.
  104. V. Do and N. Usunier. Optimizing generalized gini indices for fairness in rankings. In Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 737–747, 2022.
  105. Measuring the carbon intensity of ai in cloud instances. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, pages 1877–1894, 2022.
  106. J. Doubek. How disinformation and distortions on social media affected elections worldwide. Retrieved March, 24:2019, 2017.
  107. P. Dourish. Hci and environmental sustainability: the politics of design and the design of politics. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on designing interactive systems, pages 1–10, 2010.
  108. P. Dourish and S. D. Mainwaring. Ubicomp’s colonial impulse. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM conference on ubiquitous computing, pages 133–142, 2012.
  109. J. S. Dryzek and P. Dunleavy. Theories of the democratic state. Springer, 2009.
  110. J. Dunn. Democracy: The unfinished journey. 1995.
  111. E. Dussel. Ethics of liberation: In the age of globalization and exclusion. Duke University Press, 2013.
  112. J. Dzieza. Ai is a lot of work. The Verge, 20:2023, 2023. URL https://www.theverge.com/features/23764584/ai-artificial-intelligence-data-notation-labor-scale-surge-remotasks-openai-chatbots.
  113. C. C. Earl. Towards an abolitionist ai: the role of historically black colleges and universities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.02011, 2021.
  114. Heteromation, and other stories of computing and capitalism. MIT Press, 2017.
  115. Matching consumer fairness objectives & strategies for recsys. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.02662, 2022.
  116. All the cool kids, how do they fit in?: Popularity and demographic biases in recommender evaluation and effectiveness. In Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency, pages 172–186. PMLR, 2018a.
  117. Exploring author gender in book rating and recommendation. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on recommender systems, pages 242–250, 2018b.
  118. Fairness and discrimination in retrieval and recommendation. In Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 1403–1404, 2019.
  119. Fairness and discrimination in information access systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.05779, 2021.
  120. Overview of the trec 2022 fair ranking track. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.05558, 2023.
  121. Pygmalion displacement: When humanising ai dehumanises women. SocArXiv. February, 11, 2023.
  122. Pre-training methods in information retrieval. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval, 16(3):178–317, 2022.
  123. Fairness of machine learning in search engines. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, pages 5132–5135, 2022.
  124. F. Fanon. The wretched of the earth. New York: Grover, 2004, 62, 1963.
  125. A. Feenberg. Transforming technology: A critical theory revisited. Oxford University Press, 2002.
  126. A. Feenberg et al. Critical theory of technology, volume 5. Oxford University Press New York, 1991.
  127. " grand visions" for post-capitalist human-computer interaction. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–8, 2018.
  128. Embodying values in technology: Theory and practice. In Information Technology and Moral Philosophy, pages 322–353. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
  129. Cdc museum covid-19 timeline. 2022, 2022.
  130. M. Foucault. Discipline and punish. In Social Theory Re-Wired, pages 291–299. Routledge, 2023.
  131. S. Fox and C. Le Dantec. Community historians: scaffolding community engagement through culture and heritage. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems, pages 785–794, 2014.
  132. N. Fraser. Unruly practices: Power, discourse, and gender in contemporary social theory. U of Minnesota Press, 1989.
  133. P. Freire. Pedagogy of the oppressed. In Toward a sociology of education, pages 374–386. Routledge, 2020.
  134. M. Fricker. Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press, 2007.
  135. B. Friedan. The feminine mystique. WW Norton & Company, 2010.
  136. B. Friedman and P. H. Kahn Jr. Human values, ethics, and design. In The human-computer interaction handbook, pages 1267–1292. CRC press, 2007.
  137. B. Friedman and H. Nissenbaum. Bias in computer systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 14(3):330–347, 1996.
  138. I. Gabriel. Artificial intelligence, values, and alignment. Minds and machines, 30(3):411–437, 2020.
  139. I. Gabriel and V. Ghazavi. The challenge of value alignment: From fairer algorithms to ai safety. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.06060, 2021.
  140. R. Gao. Toward a fairer information retrieval system. PhD thesis, Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, School of Graduate Studies, 2021.
  141. R. Gao and C. Shah. Counteracting bias and increasing fairness in search and recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pages 745–747, 2020.
  142. Fair: Fairness-aware information retrieval evaluation. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 73(10):1461–1473, 2022.
  143. A framework for exploring the consequences of ai-mediated enterprise knowledge access and identifying risks to workers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.10076, 2023.
  144. T. Gebru and É. P. Torres. Eugenics and the promise of utopia through artificial general intelligence. First Monday, 2023.
  145. Measuring fairness of rankings under noisy sensitive information. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pages 2263–2279, 2022.
  146. T. Gillespie. Algorithmically recognizable: Santorum’s google problem, and google’s santorum problem. In The Social Power of Algorithms, pages 63–80. Routledge, 2019.
  147. A. Giridharadas. How america’s elites lost their grip. Time Magazine, 2019a.
  148. A. Giridharadas. Winners take all: The elite charade of changing the world. Vintage, 2019b.
  149. N. Goharian and H. Bast. Report on women in ir (wir 2021) at sigir 2021. In ACM SIGIR Forum, volume 55, pages 1–3. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2022.
  150. Women and disparities in leadership and wages. In ACM SIGIR Forum, volume 54, pages 1–3. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2021.
  151. Report on the sigir 2022 session on women in ir (wir). In ACM SIGIR Forum, volume 56, pages 1–2. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2023.
  152. S. Goldstein. Informed Societies. facet publishing, 2020.
  153. M. Golebiewski and D. Boyd. Data voids: Where missing data can easily be exploited. 2019.
  154. H. Gonen and Y. Goldberg. Lipstick on a pig: Debiasing methods cover up systematic gender biases in word embeddings but do not remove them. In Proc. NAACL, pages 609–614, 2019.
  155. M. González. A better-informed society is a freer society. 2021. URL https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/better-informed-society-freer-society.
  156. C. A. E. Goodhart. Problems of monetary management: The UK experience. In Papers in Monetary Economics, volume 1. Reserve Bank of Australia, 1975.
  157. Making the v in vqa matter: Elevating the role of image understanding in visual question answering. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 6904–6913, 2017.
  158. M. L. Gray and S. Suri. The humans working behind the ai curtain. Harvard Business Review, 9(1):2–5, 2017. URL https://hbr.org/2017/01/the-humans-working-behind-the-ai-curtain.
  159. M. L. Gray and S. Suri. Ghost work: How to stop Silicon Valley from building a new global underclass. Eamon Dolan Books, 2019.
  160. B. Green. Data science as political action: Grounding data science in a politics of justice. Journal of Social Computing, 2(3):249–265, 2021.
  161. Better, nicer, clearer, fairer: A critical assessment of the movement for ethical artificial intelligence and machine learning. 2019.
  162. J. Grimmelmann. The google dilemma. NYL Sch. L. Rev., 53:939, 2008.
  163. A survey on automated fact-checking. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 10:178–206, 2022.
  164. S. Guttenberg. Is spotify unfair to musicians?, 2012. URL https://www.cnet.com/tech/home-entertainment/is-spotify-unfair-to-musicians/.
  165. K. Guyan. Queer data. 2022.
  166. J. Habermas and T. McCarthy. Reason and the rationalization of society. (No Title), 1984.
  167. M. Haiven. Crises of imagination, crises of power: Capitalism, creativity and the commons. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2014.
  168. B. Hallinan and T. Striphas. Recommended for you: The netflix prize and the production of algorithmic culture. New media & society, 18(1):117–137, 2016.
  169. Axiomatic explanations for visual search, retrieval, and similarity learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.00370, 2021.
  170. D. Haraway. A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In The transgender studies reader, pages 103–118. Routledge, 2013.
  171. D. Held. Models of democracy. Polity, 2006.
  172. Gender and the culture of computing in applied it education. In Encyclopedia of gender and information technology, pages 474–481. IGI Global, 2006.
  173. Fairness of exposure in light of incomplete exposure estimation. In Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 759–769, 2022.
  174. S. Higgins and L. Gregory. Information literacy and social justice: Radical professional praxis. Library Juice Press, 2013.
  175. T. Hollanek. Ai transparency: a matter of reconciling design with critique. Ai & Society, 38(5):2071–2079, 2023.
  176. A. Honneth. The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. MIT press, 1996.
  177. A. Honneth. Das recht der freiheit: Grundriß einer demokratischen sittlichkeit. Suhrkamp Verlag, 2011.
  178. M. Horkheimer. Critical theory: Selected essays, volume 1. A&C Black, 1972.
  179. Dialectic of enlightenment. Stanford University Press, 2002.
  180. K. Hoskin. The ‘awful’ idea of accountability: Inscribing people into the measurement of objects. In R. Munro and J. Mouritsen, editors, Accountability: Power, ethos and technologies of managing. International Thompson Business Press, London, 1996.
  181. Goodhart’s law applies to nlp’s explanation benchmarks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.14272, 2023.
  182. Ameliorating algorithmic bias, or why explainable ai needs feminist philosophy. Feminist Philosophy Quarterly, 8(3/4), 2022.
  183. R. Hubbard. Science, facts, and feminism. Women, science, and technology: A reader in feminist science studies, pages 148–154, 2001.
  184. C. C. IPCC et al. The physical science basis, the working group i contribution to the un ipcc’s fifth assessment report (wg1 ar5), 2013.
  185. L. Irani. “design thinking”: Defending silicon valley at the apex of global labor hierarchies. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, 4(1):1–19, 2018.
  186. Postcolonial computing: a lens on design and development. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pages 1311–1320, 2010.
  187. Stories we tell about labor: Turkopticon and the trouble with" design". In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pages 4573–4586, 2016.
  188. A. Z. Jacobs and H. Wallach. Measurement and fairness. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, pages 375–385, 2021.
  189. Colbert-fairprf: Towards fair pseudo-relevance feedback in dense retrieval. In European Conference on Information Retrieval, pages 457–465. Springer, 2023.
  190. F. Jameson. Future city. New left review, 21:65, 2003.
  191. S. Jasanoff and S.-H. Kim. Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the united states and south korea. Minerva, 47:119–146, 2009.
  192. S. Jasanoff and S.-H. Kim. Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. University of Chicago Press, 2015.
  193. Mining search and browse logs for web search: A survey. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 4(4):1–37, 2013.
  194. The global landscape of ai ethics guidelines. Nature machine intelligence, 1(9):389–399, 2019.
  195. J. A. Johnson. From open data to information justice. Ethics and Information Technology, 16:263–274, 2014.
  196. We tell these stories to survive: Towards abolition in computer science education. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 21:290–308, 2021.
  197. E. Jones-Imhotep. The ghost factories: histories of automata and artificial life. History and technology, 36(1):3–29, 2020.
  198. Triviaqa: A large scale distantly supervised challenge dataset for reading comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.03551, 2017.
  199. M. Kaba. We do this’ til we free us: Abolitionist organizing and transforming justice, volume 1. Haymarket Books, 2021.
  200. P. Kalluri et al. Don’t ask if artificial intelligence is good or fair, ask how it shifts power. Nature, 583(7815):169–169, 2020.
  201. Opportunities and challenges for artificial intelligence in india. In Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pages 164–170, 2018.
  202. Avoiding an oppressive future of machine learning: A design theory for emancipatory assistants. Mis Quarterly, 45(1):371–396, 2021.
  203. S. Kanjilal. The digital life of caste: Affect, synesthesia and the social body online. Feminist Media Studies, pages 1–16, 2023.
  204. A. Kasirzadeh and I. Gabriel. In conversation with artificial intelligence: aligning language models with human values. Philosophy & Technology, 36(2):1–24, 2023.
  205. A. Kata. A postmodern pandora’s box: anti-vaccination misinformation on the internet. Vaccine, 28(7):1709–1716, 2010.
  206. Unequal representation and gender stereotypes in image search results for occupations. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 3819–3828, 2015.
  207. J. Keane. The life and death of democracy. Simon and Schuster, 2009.
  208. Human-computer insurrection: Notes on an anarchist hci. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pages 1–13, 2019.
  209. Introduction: Queer ai. In Queer Reflections on AI, pages 1–19. Routledge, 2024.
  210. M. Kobayashi. Opportunities for women, minorities in information retrieval. Communications of the ACM, 60(11):10–11, 2017.
  211. Practical guide to controlled experiments on the web: listen to your customers not to the hippo. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 959–967, 2007.
  212. Online experimentation at microsoft. Data Mining Case Studies, 11(2009):39, 2009.
  213. Trustworthy online controlled experiments: A practical guide to a/b testing. Cambridge University Press, 2020.
  214. W. K. Kolmar and F. Bartkowski. Feminist theory: A reader. 1999.
  215. Do perceived gender biases in retrieval results affect relevance judgements? In International Workshop on Algorithmic Bias in Search and Recommendation, pages 104–116. Springer, 2022.
  216. Grep-biasir: A dataset for investigating gender representation bias in information retrieval results. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, pages 444–448, 2023.
  217. Quantifying search bias: Investigating sources of bias for political searches in social media. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing, pages 417–432, 2017.
  218. S. Kumar and N. Shah. False information on web and social media: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.08559, 2018.
  219. M. Kwet. A digital tech deal: Digital socialism, decolonization, and reparations for a sustainable global economy. Global Information Society Watch (https://www. giswatch. org/node/6225), 2020.
  220. Natural questions: a benchmark for question answering research. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 7:453–466, 2019.
  221. K. Lawler. Ai already is making its mark in hollywood. USA Today, pages 01D–01D, 2023.
  222. U. K. Le Guin. The Wave in the Mind: Talks and Essays on the Writer, the Reader, and the Imagination. Shambhala Publications, 2004.
  223. Ethical data curation for ai: An approach based on feminist epistemology and critical theories of race. In Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pages 695–703, 2021.
  224. J. Lehman. A brief explanation of the overton window. Mackinac Center for Public Policy, 2014.
  225. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:9459–9474, 2020.
  226. Exposing query identification for search transparency. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022, pages 3662–3672, 2022.
  227. Tutorial on fairness of machine learning in recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 44th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, pages 2654–2657, 2021.
  228. Fairness in recommendation: Foundations, methods, and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 14(5):1–48, 2023.
  229. Holistic evaluation of language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.09110, 2022.
  230. Xglue: A new benchmark dataset for cross-lingual pre-training, understanding and generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.01401, 2020.
  231. Ai transparency in the age of llms: A human-centered research roadmap. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.01941, 2023.
  232. A. Light. Hci as heterodoxy: Technologies of identity and the queering of interaction with computers. Interacting with computers, 23(5):430–438, 2011.
  233. Pretrained transformers for text ranking: Bert and beyond. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.06467, 2020.
  234. Significant improvements over the state of the art? a case study of the ms marco document ranking leaderboard. In Proc. SIGIR, pages 2283–2287. ACM, 2021.
  235. Fostering coopetition while plugging leaks: The design and implementation of the ms marco leaderboards. In Proc. SIGIR, 2022.
  236. Fairness-aware group recommendation with pareto-efficiency. In RecSys, pages 107–115. ACM, 2017.
  237. C. Linehan and B. Kirman. Never mind the bollocks, i wanna be anarchi: a manifesto for punk hci. In CHI’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 741–748. 2014.
  238. A. Lipani. On Biases in Information retrieval models and evaluation. PhD thesis, TU Wien, 2018.
  239. Mitigating sensitive data exposure with adversarial learning for fairness recommendation systems. Neural Computing and Applications, 34(20):18097–18111, 2022.
  240. H. E. Longino. Can there be a feminist science? Hypatia, 2(3):51–64, 1987.
  241. A. Mager. Algorithmic ideology: How capitalist society shapes search engines. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5):769–787, 2012.
  242. A. Mager and C. Katzenbach. Future imaginaries in the making and governing of digital technology: Multiple, contested, commodified, 2021.
  243. H. Marcuse. Eros and civilization: A philosophical inquiry into Freud. Routledge, 2012.
  244. H. Marcuse. One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Routledge, 2013.
  245. L. P. d. O. Martins. Privilege and oppression: Towards a feminist speculative design. 2014.
  246. K. Marx. The fetishism of commodities and the secret thereof. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, 1:71–83, 1867.
  247. A. H. Maslow. A dynamic theory of human motivation. 1958.
  248. L. McCall. The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of women in culture and society, 30(3):1771–1800, 2005.
  249. D. McQuillan. Anti-fascist ai. In Resisting AI, pages 135–148. Bristol University Press, 2022.
  250. Y. Mehdi. Reinventing search with a new ai-powered microsoft bing and edge, your copilot for the web, 2023. URL https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2023/02/07/reinventing-search-with-a-new-ai-powered-microsoft-bing-and-edge-your-copilot-for-the-web/.
  251. Y. Mehdi. Bringing the full power of copilot to more people and businesses, 2024. URL https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2024/01/15/bringing-the-full-power-of-copilot-to-more-people-and-businesses/.
  252. A. Mehrotra and N. Vishnoi. Fair ranking with noisy protected attributes. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:31711–31725, 2022.
  253. Auditing search engines for differential satisfaction across demographics. In Proc. WWW, pages 626–633, 2017.
  254. Towards a fair marketplace: Counterfactual evaluation of the trade-off between relevance, fairness & satisfaction in recommendation systems. In Proceedings of the 27th acm international conference on information and knowledge management, pages 2243–2251, 2018.
  255. Fairness for robust learning to rank. In Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 544–556. Springer, 2023.
  256. B. Merchant. Blood in the Machine: The Origins of the Rebellion Against Big Tech. Little, Brown, 2023.
  257. Rethinking search: making domain experts out of dilettantes. In Acm sigir forum, volume 55, pages 1–27. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2021.
  258. Studying up machine learning data: Why talk about bias when we mean power? Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(GROUP):1–14, 2022.
  259. Designing differently: Toward a methodology for an ethics of feminist technology design. 2017.
  260. B. Miller. Is technology value-neutral? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 46(1):53–80, 2021.
  261. D. Milmo. ‘impossible’ to create ai tools like chatgpt without copyrighted material, openai says. 2024. URL https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/jan/08/ai-tools-chatgpt-copyrighted-material-openai.
  262. B. Mitra. Neural Methods for Effective, Efficient, and Exposure-Aware Information Retrieval. PhD thesis, UCL (University College London), 2021.
  263. B. Mitra and N. Craswell. An introduction to neural information retrieval. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval, 2018.
  264. Decolonial ai: Decolonial theory as sociotechnical foresight in artificial intelligence. Philosophy & Technology, 33:659–684, 2020.
  265. T. Monroe-White. Emancipatory data science. 2021.
  266. J. Moore. Towards a more representative politics in the ethics of computer science. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pages 414–424, 2020.
  267. Access to health information on the internet: a public health issue? Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, 58:650–658, 2012.
  268. Controlling fairness and bias in dynamic learning-to-rank. In Proceedings of the 43rd international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, pages 429–438, 2020.
  269. S. Morrison. Dark patterns, the tricks websites use to make you say yes, explained. 2021.
  270. J. Muramatsu and W. Pratt. Transparent queries: investigation users’ mental models of search engines. In Proceedings of the 24th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 217–224, 2001.
  271. S. M. Mutula. Digital divide and economic development: Case study of sub-saharan africa. The Electronic Library, 26(4):468–489, 2008.
  272. Cpfair: Personalized consumer and producer fairness re-ranking for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 770–779, 2022.
  273. Revisiting popularity and demographic biases in recommender evaluation and effectiveness. In Proc. ECIR, 2022.
  274. S. U. Noble. Algorithms of oppression. In Algorithms of oppression. New York university press, 2018.
  275. R. Nogueira and K. Cho. Passage re-ranking with BERT. CoRR, abs/1901.04085, 2019. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1901.04085.
  276. Facts-ir: fairness, accountability, confidentiality, transparency, and safety in information retrieval. In ACM SIGIR Forum, volume 53, pages 20–43. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2021.
  277. H. Oosterhuis. Computationally efficient optimization of plackett-luce ranking models for relevance and fairness. In Proc. SIGIR, 2021.
  278. OpenAI. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774, 2023.
  279. W. Oremus. Big tobacco. big pharma. big tech? 2017. URL https://slate.com/technology/2017/11/how-silicon-valley-became-big-tech.html.
  280. Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, 2022.
  281. Fairrec: Two-sided fairness for personalized recommendations in two-sided platforms. In WWW, pages 1194–1204. ACM / IW3C2, 2020.
  282. Fair ranking: a critical review, challenges, and future directions. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pages 1929–1942, 2022.
  283. Carbon emissions and large neural network training. 2021.
  284. The carbon footprint of machine learning training will plateau, then shrink. Computer, 55(7):18–28, 2022.
  285. B. Perrigo. Exclusive: Openai used kenyan workers on less than $2 per hour to make chatgpt less toxic. Last accessed, 19, 2023. URL https://time.com/6247678/openai-chatgpt-kenya-workers/.
  286. B. Pfaffenberger. Fetishised objects and humanised nature: towards an anthropology of technology. Man, pages 236–252, 1988.
  287. Postcolonial computing: A tactical survey. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 37(1):3–29, 2012.
  288. Much ado about gender: Current practices and future recommendations for appropriate gender-aware information access. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, pages 269–279, 2023.
  289. Fairness in rankings and recommendations: an overview. The VLDB Journal, pages 1–28, 2022.
  290. L. Plaugic. Spotify’s year in music shows just how little we pay artists for their music. The Verge, 2015.
  291. M.-T. Png. At the tensions of south and north: Critical roles of global south stakeholders in ai governance. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pages 1434–1445, 2022.
  292. G. Polizzi. Information literacy in the digital age: Why critical digital literacy matters for democracy. Informed Societies: Why information literacy matters for citizenship, participation and democracy, pages 1–23, 2020.
  293. Towards trustworthiness in the context of explainable search. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 2580–2584, 2021.
  294. M. Poynting and E. Rivault. 2023 confirmed as world’s hottest year on record, 2024.
  295. A human rights-based approach to responsible ai. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02667, 2022.
  296. Profairrec: Provider fairness-aware news recommendation. In Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 1164–1173, 2022.
  297. A. Raj. Fairness In Ranking In Information Access Systems. PhD thesis, Boise State University, 2022.
  298. A. Raj and M. D. Ekstrand. Comparing fair ranking metrics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.01311, 2020.
  299. A. Raj and M. D. Ekstrand. Measuring fairness in ranked results: An analytical and empirical comparison. In Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 726–736, 2022.
  300. Patterns of gender-specializing query reformulation. In Proceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 2241–2245, 2023.
  301. Know what you don’t know: Unanswerable questions for squad. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.03822, 2018.
  302. E. Ravenscraft. How to spot—and avoid—dark patterns on the web. 2020.
  303. T. Ravilochan. The blackfoot wisdom that inspired maslow’s hierarchy. Resilience. June, 18:2021, 2021.
  304. Reblog of report from Northland Poster. Attributing words, 2006. URL https://unnecessaryevils.blogspot.com/2008/11/attributing-words.html.
  305. S. T. Roberts. Behind the screen. Yale University Press, 2019.
  306. S. T. Roberts. Your ai is a human. 2021.
  307. A. Roy. War talk. South End Press, 2003.
  308. Research priorities for robust and beneficial artificial intelligence. AI magazine, 36(4):105–114, 2015.
  309. A versatile framework for evaluating ranked lists in terms of group fairness and relevance. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 2023.
  310. Re-imagining algorithmic fairness in india and beyond. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, pages 315–328, 2021.
  311. Overview of romcir 2021: workshop on reducing online misinformation through credible information retrieval. In ROMCIR 2021 CEUR Workshop Proceedings, volume 2838, 2021.
  312. Artificial intelligence (ai) ethics: A critical realist emancipatory approach. In 2023 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS), pages 1–5. IEEE, 2023.
  313. Retrieval and recommendation systems at the crossroads of artificial intelligence, ethics, and regulation. In Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 3420–3424, 2022.
  314. Designing for conversational system trustworthiness: the impact of model transparency on trust and task performance. 2022.
  315. N. Scientist. Covid-19: the story of a pandemic. New Scientist, 10, 2021.
  316. Bias-aware fair neural ranking for addressing stereotypical gender biases. In EDBT, pages 2–435, 2022.
  317. C. Shah and E. M. Bender. Situating search. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, pages 221–232, 2022.
  318. I. Shapiro. The state of democratic theory. Princeton University Press, 2009.
  319. Combating fake news: A survey on identification and mitigation techniques. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 10(3):1–42, 2019.
  320. Mobile phone use in australian indigenous communities: future pathways for hci4d. In Proceedings of the 26th Australian computer-human interaction conference on designing futures: the future of design, pages 480–483, 2014.
  321. K. Shetler. Ai and consent: What the sag-aftra and wga agreements tell us about the future of generative ai. 2024.
  322. Federated search. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval, 5(1):1–102, 2011.
  323. S. Shubham. Caste and the digital sphere. Shuddhashar Youth Journal, 2022.
  324. A. Singh and T. Joachims. Fairness of exposure in rankings. In KDD, pages 2219–2228. ACM, 2018.
  325. A. Singh and T. Joachims. Policy learning for fairness in ranking. In H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, A. Beygelzimer, F. d'Alché-Buc, E. Fox, and R. Garnett, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32, pages 5427–5437. Curran Associates, Inc., 2019.
  326. J. Singh and A. Anand. Interpreting search result rankings through intent modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.05190, 2018a.
  327. J. Singh and A. Anand. Posthoc interpretability of learning to rank models using secondary training data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.11330, 2018b.
  328. J. Singh and A. Anand. Exs: Explainable search using local model agnostic interpretability. In Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pages 770–773, 2019.
  329. J. J. Smith and L. Beattie. Recsys fairness metrics: Many to use but which one to choose? arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.04011, 2022.
  330. T. Smyth and J. Dimond. Anti-oppressive design. Interactions, 21(6):68–71, 2014.
  331. N. Sonboli. Controlling the Fairness/Accuracy Tradeoff in Recommender Systems. PhD thesis, University of Colorado at Boulder, 2022.
  332. The multisided complexity of fairness in recommender systems. AI magazine, 43(2):164–176, 2022.
  333. G. C. Spivak. Can the subaltern speak? In Imperialism, pages 171–219. Routledge, 2023.
  334. N. Srnicek. Platform capitalism. John Wiley & Sons, 2017.
  335. N. Srnicek and A. Williams. Inventing the future: Postcapitalism and a world without work. Verso Books, 2015.
  336. S. L. Sta. The politics question in feminist science and technology projects: the queering of infrastructure. Talk presented at the Technology and Democracy – Comparative Perspectives Conference, University of Oslo, Norway, 1997. URL http://www.drury.edu/faculty/Ess/Technology/starr.htm.
  337. Two-sided fairness for repeated matchings in two-sided markets: A case study of a ride-hailing platform. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pages 3082–3092, 2019.
  338. H. Sun. Critical design sensibility in postcolonial conditions. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research, 2013.
  339. L. Sweeney. Discrimination in online ad delivery. Communications of the ACM, 56(5):44–54, 2013.
  340. A. Swenson and C. Fernando. As social media guardrails fade and ai deepfakes go mainstream, experts warn of impact on elections, 2023. URL https://apnews.com/article/election-2024-misinformation-ai-social-media-trump-6119ee6f498db10603b3664e9ad3e87e.
  341. Commonsenseqa: A question answering challenge targeting commonsense knowledge. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.00937, 2018.
  342. Understanding the capabilities, limitations, and societal impact of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.02503, 2021.
  343. D. H. Taplin and H. Clark. Theory of change basics: A primer on theory of change. New York: Actknowledge, page 72, 2012.
  344. J. Taplin. Move fast and break things: How Facebook, Google, and Amazon have cornered culture and what it means for all of us. Pan Macmillan, 2017.
  345. A. Taylor. A historic rise in global conflict deaths suggests a violent new era. 2023. URL https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/06/29/conflict-war-deaths-global-peace-rise-casualty/.
  346. L. Taylor. Covid-19: True global death toll from pandemic is almost 15 million, says who. BMJ: British Medical Journal (Online), 377:o1144, 2022.
  347. Large language models can accurately predict searcher preferences. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.10621, 2023.
  348. R. L. Thomas and D. Uminsky. Reliance on metrics is a fundamental challenge for AI. Patterns, 3(5), 2022.
  349. Lamda: Language models for dialog applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.08239, 2022.
  350. S. Toupin. Shaping feminist artificial intelligence. New Media & Society, 26(1):580–595, 2024.
  351. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971, 2023.
  352. Guest post: How climate change misinformation spreads online, 2020.
  353. A. L. Tsing. The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton University Press, 2015.
  354. S. Turkle. Computational reticence: Why women fear the intimate machine. In Technology and women’s voices, pages 44–60. Routledge, 2004.
  355. J. Turrentine. Climate misinformation on social media is undermining climate action, 2022. URL https://www.nrdc.org/stories/climate-misinformation-social-media-undermining-climate-action.
  356. United Nations Meetings Coverage and Press Releases. With highest number of violent conflicts since second world war, united nations must rethink efforts to achieve, sustain peace, speakers tell security council. https://press.un.org/en/2023/sc15184.doc.htm, 2023.
  357. A. Urman and M. Makhortykh. The silence of the llms: Cross-lingual analysis of political bias and false information prevalence in chatgpt, google bard, and bing chat. 2023.
  358. Interrupting merit, subverting legibility: Navigating caste in ‘casteless’ worlds of computing. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–20, 2022a.
  359. Caste capital on twitter: A formal network analysis of caste relations among indian politicians. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(CSCW1):1–29, 2022b.
  360. J. Varon and P. Peña. Artificial intelligence and consent: A feminist anti-colonial critique. Internet Policy Review, 10(4):1–25, 2021.
  361. Attention is all you need. In Proc. of NeurIPS, 2017.
  362. Report on the sigir 2023 session on diversity, equity and inclusivity. In ACM SIGIR Forum, volume 57, pages 1–2. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2024.
  363. P. Verdegem. Dismantling ai capitalism: the commons as an alternative to the power concentration of big tech. AI & society, pages 1–11, 2022.
  364. M. Verma and D. Ganguly. Lirme: locally interpretable ranking model explanation. In Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 1281–1284, 2019.
  365. J. Vincent. Top ai conference bans use of chatgpt and ai language tools to write academic papers. 2023. URL https://www.theverge.com/2023/1/5/23540291/chatgpt-ai-writing-tool-banned-writing-academic-icml-paper.
  366. Towards axiomatic explanations for neural ranking models. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval, pages 13–22, 2021.
  367. Conceptualising gender and it: Australians taking action in germany. Proceedings of QualIT2007-Qualitative Research in IT & IT in Qualitative Research, Wellington, New Zealand, Victoria University of Wellington, 19-20 November, 2007.
  368. E. M. Voorhees. Coopetition in ir research. In ACM SIGIR Forum, volume 54, pages 1–3. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2021.
  369. TREC: Experiment and evaluation in information retrieval, volume 63. MIT press Cambridge, 2005.
  370. J. Wajcman. Feminism confronts technology. Penn State Press, 1991.
  371. J. Wajcman. Technofeminism. cambridge: Polity. 2004.
  372. J. Wajcman. Feminist theories of technology. Cambridge journal of economics, 34(1):143–152, 2010.
  373. Glue: A multi-task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.07461, 2018.
  374. Superglue: A stickier benchmark for general-purpose language understanding systems. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019.
  375. A survey on the fairness of recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 41(3):1–43, 2023.
  376. T. Warren. Microsoft’s new copilot pro brings ai-powered office features to the rest of us, 2024. URL https://www.theverge.com/2024/1/15/24038711/microsoft-copilot-pro-office-ai-apps.
  377. C. H. Weiss. Nothing as practical as good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods, and contexts, 1:65–92, 1995.
  378. G. Wellner and T. Rothman. Feminist ai: Can we expect our ai systems to become feminist? Philosophy & Technology, 33(2):191–205, 2020.
  379. M. Whittaker. The steep cost of capture. Interactions, 28(6):50–55, 2021.
  380. D. Wickenden. A reckoning at facebook, 2018. URL https://www.newyorker.com/podcast/political-scene/a-reckoning-at-facebook.
  381. It’s about power: What ethical concerns do software engineers have, and what do they (feel they can) do about them? In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pages 467–479, 2023.
  382. Wikipedia contributors. Theory of change — Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 2013. URL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_Change.
  383. Theories of change in responsible ai. craft session at the 2023 acm conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, 2023. URL https://facctconference.org/2023/acceptedcraft#theor.
  384. The exploited labor behind artificial intelligence. Noema Magazine, 13, 2022. URL https://www.noemamag.com/the-exploited-labor-behind-artificial-intelligence/.
  385. T. Williams and K. S. Haring. No justice, no robots: From the dispositions of policing to an abolitionist robotics. In Proceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pages 566–575, 2023.
  386. H. Winschiers-Theophilus and N. J. Bidwell. Toward an afro-centric indigenous hci paradigm. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(4):243–255, 2013.
  387. P.-H. Wong. Dao, harmony and personhood: Towards a confucian ethics of technology. Philosophy & technology, 25(1):67–86, 2012.
  388. Sustainable AI: Environmental implications, challenges and opportunities. Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems, 4:795–813, 2022a.
  389. A multi-objective optimization framework for multi-stakeholder fairness-aware recommendation. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 41(2):1–29, 2022b.
  390. Joint multisided exposure fairness for recommendation. In Proc. SIGIR, 2022c.
  391. Tfrom: A two-sided fairness-aware recommendation model for both customers and providers. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 1013–1022, 2021.
  392. Fairness-aware group recommendation with pareto-efficiency. In Proceedings of the eleventh ACM conference on recommender systems, pages 107–115, 2017.
  393. Fair learning-to-rank from implicit feedback. In SIGIR, 2020.
  394. K. Yang and J. Stoyanovich. Measuring fairness in ranked outputs. In Proceedings of the 29th international conference on scientific and statistical database management, pages 1–6, 2017.
  395. Fara: Future-aware ranking algorithm for fairness optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16637, 2023.
  396. Hotpotqa: A dataset for diverse, explainable multi-hop question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.09600, 2018.
  397. A call for scholar activismm: A response to power and technology. AI Activism, 28:43, 2021.
  398. P. K. Yu. Bridging the digital divide: Equality in the information age. Cardozo Arts & Ent. LJ, 20:1, 2002.
  399. B. Zadrozny. Disinformation poses an unprecedented threat in 2024 — and the u.s. is less ready than ever, 2024. URL https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/misinformation/disinformation-unprecedented-threat-2024-election-rcna134290.
  400. Retrieval-enhanced machine learning. In Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 2875–2886, 2022.
  401. M. Zehlike and C. Castillo. Reducing disparate exposure in ranking: A learning to rank approach. In Proceedings of the web conference 2020, pages 2849–2855, 2020.
  402. Fairness in ranking: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.14000, 2021.
  403. Fairness in ranking, part i: Score-based ranking. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(6):1–36, 2022a.
  404. Fairness in ranking, part ii: Learning-to-rank and recommender systems. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(6):1–41, 2022b.
  405. Mitigating bias in search results through contextual document reranking and neutrality regularization. In Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 2532–2538, 2022.
  406. Explainable recommendation: A survey and new perspectives. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval, 14(1):1–101, 2020.
  407. X. Zhou and R. Zafarani. Fake news: A survey of research, detection methods, and opportunities. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.00315, 2, 2018.
  408. X. Zhou and R. Zafarani. A survey of fake news: Fundamental theories, detection methods, and opportunities. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 53(5):1–40, 2020.
  409. Interpretable learning-to-rank with generalized additive models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.02553, 2020.
  410. Fine-tuning language models from human preferences. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.08593, 2019.
  411. S. Zuboff. The age of surveillance capitalism. In Social Theory Re-Wired, pages 203–213. Routledge, 2023.
Citations (2)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to Summarize

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Authors (1)

  1. Bhaskar Mitra 

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 19 likes about this paper.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up for Free