Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Conditional Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model for Ground-roll Attenuation

Published 27 Mar 2024 in physics.geo-ph | (2403.18224v1)

Abstract: Ground-roll attenuation is a challenging seismic processing task in land seismic survey. The ground-roll coherent noise with low frequency and high amplitude seriously contaminate the valuable reflection events, corrupting the quality of seismic data. The transform-based filtering methods leverage the distinct characteristics of the ground roll and seismic reflections within the transform domain to attenuate the ground-roll noise. However, the ground roll and seismic reflections often share overlaps in the transform domain, making it challenging to remove ground-roll noise without also attenuating useful reflections. We propose to apply a conditional diffusion denoising probabilistic model (c-DDPM) to attenuate the ground-roll noise and recover the reflections efficiently. We prepare the training dataset by using the finite-difference modelling method and the convolution modelling method. After the training process, the c-DDPM can generate the clean data given the seismic data as condition. The ground roll obtained by subtracting the clean data from the seismic data might contain some residual reflection energy. Thus, we further improve the c-DDPM to allow for generating the clean data and ground roll simultaneously. We then demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of our proposed method by using the synthetic data and the field data. The methods based on the local time-frequency (LTF) transform and U-Net are also applied to these two examples for comparing with our proposed method. The test results show that the proposed method perform better in attenuating the ground-roll noise from the seismic data than the LTF and U-Net methods.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (40)
  1. G. Beresford-Smith and R. N. Rango, “Dispersive noise removal in tx space: Application to arctic data,” Geophysics, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 346–358, 1988.
  2. R. Saatcilar and N. Canitez, “A method of ground-roll elimination,” Geophysics, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 894–902, 1988.
  3. X. Liu, “Ground roll suppression using the karhunen-loeve transform,” Geophysics, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 564–566, 1999.
  4. M. J. Porsani, M. G. Silva, P. E. Melo, and B. Ursin, “Ground-roll attenuation based on svd filtering,” in SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting.   SEG, 2009, pp. SEG–2009.
  5. M. I. Al-Husseini, J. B. Glover, and B. J. Barley, “Dispersion patterns of the ground roll in eastern saudi arabia,” Geophysics, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 121–137, 1981.
  6. Y. Chen, S. Jiao, J. Ma, H. Chen, Y. Zhou, and S. Gan, “Ground-roll noise attenuation using a simple and effective approach based on local band-limited orthogonalization,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 2316–2320, 2015.
  7. S. Treitel, J. L. Shanks, and C. W. Frasier, “Some aspects of fan filtering,” Geophysics, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 789–800, 1967.
  8. G. Beresford-Smith and R. Rango, “Suppression of ground roll by windowing in two domains,” First Break, vol. 7, no. 2, 1989.
  9. Y. Liu and S. Fomel, “Seismic data analysis using local time-frequency decomposition,” Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 516–525, 2013.
  10. D. Trad, T. Ulrych, and M. Sacchi, “Latest views of the sparse radon transform,” Geophysics, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 386–399, 2003.
  11. D. C. Henley, “Coherent noise attenuation in the radial trace domain,” Geophysics, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 1408–1416, 2003.
  12. A. J. Deighan and D. R. Watts, “Ground-roll suppression using the wavelet transform,” Geophysics, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 1896–1903, 1997.
  13. R. Zhang and T. J. Ulrych, “Physical wavelet frame denoising,” Geophysics, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 225–231, 2003.
  14. J. Gilles, “Empirical wavelet transform,” IEEE transactions on signal processing, vol. 61, no. 16, pp. 3999–4010, 2013.
  15. R. G. Stockwell, L. Mansinha, and R. Lowe, “Localization of the complex spectrum: the s transform,” IEEE transactions on signal processing, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 998–1001, 1996.
  16. R. Askari and H. R. Siahkoohi, “Ground roll attenuation using the s and x-f-k transforms,” Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 105–114, 2008.
  17. I. Jones and S. Levy, “Signal-to-noise ratio enhancement in multichannel seismic data via the karhunen-loeve transform,” Geophysical prospecting, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 12–32, 1987.
  18. R. Montagne and G. L. Vasconcelos, “Optimized suppression of coherent noise from seismic data using the karhunen-loève transform,” Physical Review E, vol. 74, no. 1, p. 016213, 2006.
  19. X. Wu, L. Liang, Y. Shi, and S. Fomel, “Faultseg3d: Using synthetic data sets to train an end-to-end convolutional neural network for 3d seismic fault segmentation,” Geophysics, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. IM35–IM45, 2019.
  20. S. Yu and J. Ma, “Deep learning for geophysics: Current and future trends,” Reviews of Geophysics, vol. 59, no. 3, p. e2021RG000742, 2021.
  21. C. Song and T. A. Alkhalifah, “Wavefield reconstruction inversion via physics-informed neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 60, pp. 1–12, 2021.
  22. Y. Li, T. Alkhalifah, and Z. Zhang, “Deep-learning assisted regularized elastic full waveform inversion using the velocity distribution information from wells,” Geophysical Journal International, vol. 226, no. 2, pp. 1322–1335, 2021.
  23. S. M. Mousavi and G. C. Beroza, “Deep-learning seismology,” Science, vol. 377, no. 6607, p. eabm4470, 2022.
  24. R. Harsuko and T. A. Alkhalifah, “Storseismic: A new paradigm in deep learning for seismic processing,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 60, pp. 1–15, 2022.
  25. H. Li, W. Yang, and X. Yong, “Deep learning for ground-roll noise attenuation,” in SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018.   Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2018, pp. 1981–1985.
  26. D. Liu, W. Chen, M. D. Sacchi, and H. Wang, “Should we have labels for deep learning ground roll attenuation?” in SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2020.   Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2020, pp. 3239–3243.
  27. C. Zhang and M. van der Baan, “Ground-roll attenuation using a dual-filter-bank convolutional neural network,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 60, pp. 1–11, 2021.
  28. N. Pham and W. Li, “Physics-constrained deep learning for ground roll attenuation,” Geophysics, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. V15–V27, 2022.
  29. L. Yang, S. Wang, X. Chen, O. M. Saad, W. Cheng, and Y. Chen, “Deep learning with fully convolutional and dense connection framework for ground roll attenuation,” Surveys in Geophysics, pp. 1–34, 2023.
  30. L. Xing, H. Lin, L. Wang, Z. Xu, H. Liu, and Q. Li, “Ground roll intelligent suppression based on spatial domain synchrosqueezing wavelet transform convolutional neural network,” Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 247–267, 2024.
  31. H. Kaur, S. Fomel, and N. Pham, “Seismic ground-roll noise attenuation using deep learning,” Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 2064–2077, 2020.
  32. Y. Yuan, X. Si, and Y. Zheng, “Ground-roll attenuation using generative adversarial networks,” Geophysics, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. WA255–WA267, 2020.
  33. D. A. Oliveira, D. G. Semin, and S. Zaytsev, “Self-supervised ground-roll noise attenuation using self-labeling and paired data synthesis,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 7147–7159, 2020.
  34. S. Liu, C. Birnie, A. Bakulin, A. Dawood, I. Silvestrov, and T. Alkhalifah, “A self-supervised scheme for ground roll suppression,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.13967, 2023.
  35. J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, “Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 33, pp. 6840–6851, 2020.
  36. R. Durall, A. Ghanim, M. R. Fernandez, N. Ettrich, and J. Keuper, “Deep diffusion models for seismic processing,” Computers & Geosciences, vol. 177, p. 105377, 2023.
  37. J. Ho and T. Salimans, “Classifier-free diffusion guidance,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.12598, 2022.
  38. C. Saharia, J. Ho, W. Chan, T. Salimans, D. J. Fleet, and M. Norouzi, “Image super-resolution via iterative refinement,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 4713–4726, 2022.
  39. A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 30, 2017.
  40. J. Song, C. Meng, and S. Ermon, “Denoising diffusion implicit models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502, 2020.
Citations (2)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.