Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

A Deep Learning Framework for Disentangling Triangle Singularity and Pole-Based Enhancements

Published 27 Mar 2024 in hep-ph, hep-ex, and nucl-th | (2403.18265v3)

Abstract: Enhancements in the invariant mass distribution or scattering cross-section are usually associated with resonances. However, the nature of exotic signals found near hadron-hadron thresholds remain a puzzle today due to the presence of experimental uncertainties. In fact, a purely kinematical triangle diagram is also capable of producing similar structures, but do not correspond to any unstable quantum state. In this paper, we report for the first time, that a deep neural network can be trained to distinguish triangle singularity from pole-based enhancements with a reasonably high accuracy of discrimination between the two seemingly identical line shapes. We also identify the type of triangle enhancement that can be misidentified as a dynamic pole structure. We apply our method to confirm that the $P_\psiN(4312)+$ state is not due to a triangle singularity, but is more consistent with a pole-based interpretation, as determined solely through pure line-shape analysis. Lastly, we explain how our method can be used as a model-selection framework useful in studying other exotic hadron candidates.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (34)
  1. M. Albaladejo et al. (JPAC), Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 127, 103981 (2022), arXiv:2112.13436 [hep-ph] .
  2. T. Hyodo, Phys. Rev. C 90, 055208 (2014), arXiv:1407.2372 [hep-ph] .
  3. A. Boehnlein et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 031003 (2022), arXiv:2112.02309 [nucl-th] .
  4. J. Schmidhuber, Neural Networks 61, 85 (2015).
  5. L. D. Landau, Nucl. Phys. 13, 181 (1959).
  6. S. Coleman and R. E. Norton, Nuovo Cim. 38, 438 (1965).
  7. A. P. Szczepaniak, Phys. Lett. B 747, 410 (2015), arXiv:1501.01691 [hep-ph] .
  8. S. X. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. D 102, 074004 (2020), arXiv:1912.11830 [hep-ph] .
  9. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 072001 (2015), arXiv:1507.03414 [hep-ex] .
  10. M. Mikhasenko,   (2015), arXiv:1507.06552 [hep-ph] .
  11. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 222001 (2019), arXiv:1904.03947 [hep-ex] .
  12. S. X. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. D 103, 111503 (2021), arXiv:2103.06817 [hep-ph] .
  13. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), PTEP 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  14. LHCb Collaboration, “Observation of a narrow pentaquark state, Pc⁢(4312)+subscript𝑃𝑐superscript4312P_{c}(4312)^{+}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 4312 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, and of two-peak structure of the Pc⁢(4450)+subscript𝑃𝑐superscript4450P_{c}(4450)^{+}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 4450 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT,” HEPData (collection) (2019), https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.89271.
  15. L. M. Santos and D. L. B. Sombillo, Phys. Rev. C 108, 045204 (2023), arXiv:2308.03325 [hep-ph] .
  16. M. Kato, Annals of Physics 31, 130 (1965).
  17. R. G. Newton, Scattering Theory of Waves and Particles, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1982).
  18. W. Yamada and O. Morimatsu, Phys. Rev. C 102, 055201 (2020), arXiv:2005.07022 [hep-ph] .
  19. W. A. Yamada and O. Morimatsu, Phys. Rev. C 103, 045201 (2021), arXiv:2101.10029 [hep-ph] .
  20. J. Taylor, Scattering Theory: Quantum Theory on Nonrelativistic Collisions (Wiley, 1972).
  21. N. G. van Kampen, Phys. Rev. 89, 1072 (1953a).
  22. N. G. van Kampen, Phys. Rev. 91, 1267 (1953b).
  23. D. Morgan, Nucl. Phys. A 543, 632 (1992).
  24. D. Morgan and M. Pennington, Phys. Lett. B 258, 444 (1991).
  25. D. Morgan and M. R. Pennington, Phys. Rev. D 48, 1185 (1993).
  26. B. C. Pearce and B. F. Gibson, Phys. Rev. C 40, 902 (1989).
  27. W. R. Frazer and A. W. Hendry, Phys. Rev. 134, B1307 (1964).
  28. C. C. Aggarwal, Neural Networks and Deep Learning: A Textbook (Springer International Publishing AG, Springer Nature, 2018).
  29. D. A. O. Co, https://github.com/darwinnerco/DNN-for-TS-vs-Poles (2024).
  30. https://docs.chainer.org/en/stable/reference/optimizers.html.
  31. https://docs.chainer.org/en/stable/reference/generated/chainer.optimizers.SMORMS3.html.
  32. S. Funk, “RMSprop loses to SMORMS3-beware the epsilon!” https://sifter.org/~simon/journal/20150420.html (2015).
  33. J.-B. Cheng and Y.-R. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 100, 054002 (2019), arXiv:1905.08605 [hep-ph] .
  34. W. Zucchini, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 44, 41 (2000).
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 3 tweets with 1 like about this paper.