General quantum-classical dynamics as measurement based feedback
Abstract: This note derives the stochastic differential equations and partial differential equation of general hybrid quantum--classical dynamics from the theory of continuous measurement and general (non-Markovian) feedback. The advantage of this approach is an explicit parameterization, without additional positivity constraints. The construction also neatly separates the different effects: how the quantum influences the classical and how the classical influences the quantum. This modular presentation gives a better intuition of what to expect from hybrid dynamics, especially when used to construct possibly fundamental theories.
- A. Tilloy and L. Diósi, Phys. Rev. D 93, 024026 (2016).
- A. Tilloy, in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1275 (IOP Publishing, 2019) p. 012006.
- I. Layton, J. Oppenheim, and Z. Weller-Davies, “A healthier semi-classical dynamics,” (2023a), arXiv:2208.11722 [quant-ph] .
- N. Gisin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1657 (1984).
- A. Barchielli and V. P. Belavkin, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 24, 1495 (1991).
- H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn, Quantum Measurement and Control (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
- J. Oppenheim, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041040 (2023).
- V. P. Belavkin and P. Staszewski, Phys. Rev. A 45, 1347 (1992).
- H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn, Phys. Rev. A 47, 642 (1993a).
- K. Jacobs and D. A. Steck, Contemporary Physics 47, 279 (2006).
- S. Attal and Y. Pautrat, Annales Henri Poincaré 7, 59 (2006).
- C. Pellegrini, The Annals of Probability 36, 2332 (2008).
- A. Tilloy, Phys. Rev. A 98, 010104 (2018).
- A. Bassi and G. Ghirardi, Phys. Rep. 379, 257 (2003).
- A. Smirne and A. Bassi, Scientific Reports 5, 12518 (2015).
- J. Oppenheim, C. Sparaciari, B. Šoda, and Z. Weller-Davies, “The two classes of hybrid classical-quantum dynamics,” (2022), arXiv:2203.01332 [quant-ph] .
- H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 548 (1993b).
- H. M. Wiseman, Phys. Rev. A 49, 2133 (1994).
- L. Diosi and N. Gisin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 4053 (1994).
- L. Diósi and A. Tilloy, Open Systems & Information Dynamics 24, 1740020 (2017).
- A. Tilloy and L. Diósi, Phys. Rev. D 96, 104045 (2017).
- L. Diósi, Phys. Rev. A 42, 5086 (1990).
- A. Tilloy and T. M. Stace, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 080402 (2019).
- W. T. Strunz, Phys. Lett. A 224, 25 (1996).
- L. Diósi and W. T. Strunz, Phys. Lett. A 235, 569 (1997).
- S. L. Adler and A. Bassi, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 40, 15083 (2007).
- J. Gambetta and H. M. Wiseman, Phys. Rev. A 68, 062104 (2003).
- H. M. Wiseman and J. M. Gambetta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 140401 (2008).
- A. Tilloy, arXiv:1702.06325 (2017).
- A. Tilloy and H. M. Wiseman, Quantum 5, 594 (2021).
- A. Grudka, J. Oppenheim, A. Russo, and M. Sajjad, “Renormalisation of postquantum-classical gravity,” (2024), arXiv:2402.17844 [hep-th] .
- J. Oppenheim and A. Russo, “Anomalous contribution to galactic rotation curves due to stochastic spacetime,” (2024), arXiv:2402.19459 [gr-qc] .
- B. Øksendal, Stochastic differential equations (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2003).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.