Variational design of sensory feedback for powerstroke-recovery systems
Abstract: Although the raison d'etre of the brain is the survival of the body, there are relatively few theoretical studies of closed-loop rhythmic motor control systems. In this paper we provide a unified framework, based on variational analysis, for investigating the dual goals of performance and robustness in powerstroke-recovery systems. We augment two previously published closed-loop motor control models by equipping each model with a performance measure based on the rate of progress of the system relative to a spatially extended external substrate -- such as progress relative to the ground for a locomotor task. The sensitivity measure quantifies the ability of the system to maintain performance in response to external perturbations. Motivated by a search for optimal design principles for feedback control achieving the complementary requirements of efficiency and robustness, we discuss the performance-sensitivity patterns of the systems featuring different sensory feedback architectures. In a paradigmatic half-center oscillator (HCO)-motor system, we observe that the excitation-inhibition property of feedback mechanisms determines the sensitivity pattern while the activation-inactivation property determines the performance pattern. Moreover, we show that the nonlinearity of the sigmoid activation of feedback signals allows the existence of optimal combinations of performance and sensitivity. In a detailed hindlimb locomotor system, we find that a force-dependent feedback can simultaneously optimize both performance and robustness, while length-dependent feedback variations result in significant performance-versus-sensitivity tradeoffs. Thus, this work provides an analytical framework for studying feedback control of oscillations in nonlinear dynamical systems, leading to several insights that have the potential to inform the design of control or rehabilitation systems.
- Performance/robustness tradeoff analysis of PI/PID servo and regulatory control systems. In 2010 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, pages 111–116. IEEE.
- Baylis, L. E. (1966). Living control systems. Freeman.
- The fundamental tradeoff between performance and robustness-a new perspective on loop shaping-classic control revisited part II. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 27(3):30–44.
- On the phase reduction and response dynamics of neural oscillator populations. Neural Computation, 16(4):673–715.
- Brown, T. G. (1911). The intrinsic factors in the act of progression in the mammal. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, containing papers of a biological character, 84(572):308–319.
- Brown, T. G. (1914). On the nature of the fundamental activity of the nervous centres; together with an analysis of the conditioning of rhythmic activity in progression, and a theory of the evolution of function in the nervous system. The Journal of Physiology, 48(1):18.
- Bioinspired closed-loop CPG-based control of a robot fish for obstacle avoidance and direction tracking. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 18:171–183.
- The brain has a body: adaptive behavior emerges from interactions of nervous system, body and environment. Trends in Neurosciences, 20(12):553–557.
- Eupnea, tachypnea, and autoresuscitation in a closed-loop respiratory control model. Journal of Neurophysiology, 118(4):2194–2215.
- Mathematical foundations of neuroscience, volume 35. Springer.
- Dynamics of a simple damped oscillator undergoing stick-slip vibrations. Meccanica, 34:337–347.
- Homeostasis, singularities, and networks. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 74:387–407.
- Homeostasis with multiple inputs. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 17(2):1816–1832.
- Infinitesimal homeostasis in three-node input–output networks. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 80(4):1163–1185.
- Mathematical analysis and digital simulation of the respiratory control system. Journal of Applied Physiology, 22(2):260–276.
- Serotonin modulates the central pattern generator for locomotion in the isolated lamprey spinal cord. Journal of Experimental Biology, 116(1):27–46.
- Toward combining speed, efficiency, versatility, and robustness in an autonomous quadruped. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 30(6):1427–1440.
- Phase model. Scholarpedia, 3(10):1487.
- Locomotion of protozoa. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 4(1):93–116.
- Two-stroke relaxation oscillators. Nonlinearity, 33(5):2364.
- Katz, P. S. (2023). Conclusion and perspectives: What convergent evolution of animal forms and functions says about the predictability of evolution. In Convergent Evolution: Animal Form and Function, pages 581–594. Springer.
- Khoo, M. C. (2018). Physiological control systems: analysis, simulation, and estimation. John Wiley & Sons.
- Locomotion control of a biomimetic robotic fish based on closed loop sensory feedback CPG model. Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology, 20(2):125–137.
- Kuo, A. D. (2002). The relative roles of feedforward and feedback in the control of rhythmic movements. Motor Control, 6(2):129–145.
- Robust motion controller design for high-accuracy positioning systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 43(1):48–55.
- Robustness, flexibility, and sensitivity in a multifunctional motor control model. Biological Cybernetics, 111:25–47.
- Afferent control of locomotor CPG: insights from a simple neuromechanical model. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1198(1):21–34.
- Slack-based tunable damping leads to a trade-off between robustness and efficiency in legged locomotion. Scientific Reports, 13(1):3290.
- Voltage oscillations in the barnacle giant muscle fiber. Biophysical Journal, 35(1):193–213.
- Pearson, K. (1985). Are there central pattern generators for walking and flight in insects? In Feedback and motor control in invertebrates and vertebrates, pages 307–315. Springer.
- Prochazka, A. (1999). Quantifying proprioception. Progress in Brain Research, 123:133–142.
- Models of ensemble firing of muscle spindle afferents recorded during normal locomotion in cats. The Journal of Physiology, 507(1):277–291.
- Control of bimanual rhythmic movements: trading efficiency for robustness depending on the context. Experimental Brain Research, 187:193–205.
- Geometric singular perturbation analysis of neuronal dynamics. In Handbook of dynamical systems, volume 2, pages 93–146. Elsevier.
- Performance and robustness trade-off in disturbance observer design. In IECON 2013-39th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, pages 3681–3686. IEEE.
- Phase Response Curves in Neuroscience. Springer.
- Parallel compliance design for increasing robustness and efficiency in legged locomotion–theoretical background and applications. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 26(1):335–346.
- The significance of dynamical architecture for adaptive responses to mechanical loads during rhythmic behavior. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 38:25–51.
- Mechanisms for oscillation and frequency control in reciprocally inhibitory model neural networks. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 1:69–87.
- Pre-Bötzinger complex: a brainstem region that may generate respiratory rhythm in mammals. Science, 254(5032):726–729.
- A dynamical systems analysis of afferent control in a neuromechanical model of locomotion: I. rhythm generation. Journal of Neural Engineering, 8(6):065003.
- Phase shift between joint rotation and actuation reflects dominant forces and predicts muscle activation patterns. PNAS Nexus, 2(10):pgad298.
- Dynamics of two mutually coupled slow inhibitory neurons. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 117(1-4):241–275.
- Stability-and performance-robustness tradeoffs: Mimo mixed-μ𝜇\muitalic_μ vs complex-μ𝜇\muitalic_μ design. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control: IFAC-Affiliated Journal, 19(3):259–294.
- Shape versus timing: linear responses of a limit cycle with hard boundaries under instantaneous and static perturbation. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 20(2):701–744.
- Variational and phase response analysis for limit cycles with hard boundaries, with applications to neuromechanical control problems. Biological Cybernetics, 116(5-6):687–710.
- High-performance robust motion control of machine tools: an adaptive robust control approach and comparative experiments. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2(2):63–76.
- Biomechanical properties and a kinetic simulation model of the smooth muscle I2 in the buccal mass of Aplysia. Biological Cybernetics, 81:505–513.
- Sensitivity to control signals in triphasic rhythmic neural systems: a comparative mechanistic analysis via infinitesimal local timing response curves. Neural Computation, 35(6):1028–1085.
- Dynamical consequences of sensory feedback in a half-center oscillator coupled to a simple motor system. Biological Cybernetics, 115(2):135–160.
- A homeostasis criterion for limit cycle systems based on infinitesimal shape response curves. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 84(4):1–23.
- Phase response properties of half-center oscillators. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 35:55–74.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.