Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Entanglement Swapping Using Hyperentangled Pairs of Two-Level Neutral Atoms

Published 30 Mar 2024 in quant-ph | (2404.00342v1)

Abstract: Hyperentangled swapping is a quantum communication technique that involves the exchange of hyperentangled states, which are quantum states entangled in multiple degrees of freedom, to enable secure and efficient quantum information transfer. In this paper, we demonstrate schematics for the hyperentanglement swapping between separate pairs of neutral atoms through the mathematical framework of atomic Bragg diffraction, which is efficient and resistant to decoherence, yielding deterministic results with superior overall fidelity. The utilized cavities are in superposition state and interact with the incoming atoms off-resonantly. Quantum information carried by the cavities is swapped through resonant interactions with two-level auxiliary atoms. We also discuss entanglement swapping under a delayed-choice scenario and provide a schematic generalization covering multiple-qubit scenarios. Finally, we introduce specific experimental parameters to demonstrate the experimental feasibility of the scheme.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (70)
  1. Quantum computing: An entanglement measurement. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Advent Trends in Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation (ICATMRI), pages 1–6. IEEE, 2020.
  2. Advances in photonic quantum sensing. Nature Photonics, 12(12):724–733, 2018.
  3. Distributed quantum sensing using continuous-variable multipartite entanglement. Physical Review A, 97(3):032329, 2018.
  4. Quantum information or entanglement transfer between subsystems. Physical Review A, 98(6):062329, 2018.
  5. A novel algorithm based on entanglement measurement for improving speed of quantum algorithms. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci, 12(1):265–269, 2018.
  6. A novel autonomous perceptron model for pattern classification applications. Entropy, 21(8):763, 2019.
  7. Peter W Shor. Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer. SIAM review, 41(2):303–332, 1999.
  8. Long distance cavity entanglement by entanglement swapping using atomic momenta. Optics Communications, 334:290–293, 2015.
  9. Experimental entanglement swapping: entangling photons that never interacted. Physical review letters, 80(18):3891, 1998.
  10. Multiparticle generalization of entanglement swapping. Physical Review A, 57(2):822, 1998.
  11. Experimental delayed-choice entanglement swapping. Nature Physics, 8(6):479–484, 2012.
  12. Multistage entanglement swapping. Physical Review Letters, 101(8):080403, 2008.
  13. Hyperentanglement teleportation through external momenta states. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 54(23):235501, 2022.
  14. Teleportation of atomic external states on the internal degrees of freedom. Quantum Information Processing, 21(2):55, 2022.
  15. Rameez-ul Islam. Engineering entanglement in cavity quantum electrodynamical systems. PhD thesis, Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad, Pakistan, 2008.
  16. Complete and fidelity-robust hyperentangled-state analysis of photon systems with single-sided quantum-dot-cavity systems under the balance condition. Quantum Information Processing, 22(9):344, 2023.
  17. Complete hyperentangled bell state analysis assisted by hyperentanglement. Laser Physics Letters, 17(7):075203, 2020.
  18. Engineering quantum networks through bragg diffracted hyperentangled atoms. Physica Scripta, 96(12):125102, 2021.
  19. Multiple teleportation via partially entangled ghz state. Frontiers of Physics, 11:1–8, 2016.
  20. Extended entanglement to quantum networks. Optik, 124(23):5914–5917, 2013.
  21. Serge Haroche. Nobel lecture: Controlling photons in a box and exploring the quantum to classical boundary. Reviews of Modern Physics, 85(3):1083, 2013.
  22. Entanglement and the paradox of untying the defining feature from a quantum entity. Physical Review A, 100(5):052122, 2019.
  23. Quantum three-box paradox: a proposal for atom optics implementation. Quantum Information Processing, 20:1–18, 2021.
  24. Exploring wave–particle behaviors of entangled bragg diffracted neutral atoms. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 64(1), 2023.
  25. Atom optics in quantized light fields. In Quantum Optics VI: Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Quantum Optics, Rotorua, New Zealand, January 24–28, 1994, pages 87–102. Springer, 1994.
  26. Quantum logic gate operating on atomic scattering by standing wave field in bragg regime. Fortschritte der Physik: Progress of Physics, 46(4-5):417–422, 1998.
  27. Quantum non-demolition measurement of fock states via atomic scattering in bragg regime. Physics Letters A, 254(6):301–306, 1999.
  28. Engineering quantum hyperentangled states in atomic systems. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 50(21):215502, 2017.
  29. Remote state preparation through hyperentangled atomic states. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 51(7):075501, 2018.
  30. Atomic cheshire cat: untying energy levels from the de broglie motion. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 52(10):105501, 2019.
  31. Biasing a coin after the toss: asymmetric delayed choice quantum eraser via bragg regime cavity qed. Laser Physics Letters, 12(1):015203, 2014.
  32. Wheeler’s delayed-choice experiment: A proposal for the bragg-regime cavity-qed implementation. Physical Review A, 91(4):043636, 2015.
  33. Generation of atomic momentum cluster and graph states via cavity qed. Quantum information processing, 12:129–148, 2013.
  34. An engineering two-mode field noon state in cavity qed. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 43(1):015501, 2009.
  35. Engineering maximally entangled n-photon noon field states using an atom interferometer based on bragg regime cavity qed. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 40(7):1359, 2007.
  36. Atomic state teleportation: from internal to external degrees of freedom. Journal of Modern Optics, 56(7):875–880, 2009.
  37. Measurement of entangled states via atomic beam deflection in bragg’s regime. Physical Review A, 70(5):052312, 2004.
  38. Engineering entanglement between external degrees of freedom of atoms via bragg scattering. Physics Letters A, 314(1-2):37–43, 2003.
  39. Generation of bell, noon and w states via atom interferometry. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 41(3):035505, 2008.
  40. Muhammad Suhail Zubairy. Quantum optics. Cambridge University Press, 1997.
  41. Asher Peres. Delayed choice for entanglement swapping. Journal of Modern Optics, 47(2-3):139–143, 2000.
  42. CC Gerry and P Knight. Introductory quantum optics cambridge univ, 2005.
  43. Exploring the quantum: atoms, cavities, and photons. Oxford university press, 2006.
  44. Reconstruction of non-classical cavity field states with snapshots of their decoherence. Nature, 455(7212):510–514, 2008.
  45. Ultrahigh finesse fabry-pérot superconducting resonator. Applied Physics Letters, 90(16), 2007.
  46. Generation of maximally entangled n-photon field w-states via cavity qed. The European Physical Journal Plus, 137(11):1–12, 2022.
  47. Graph states for quantum secret sharing. Physical Review A, 78(4):042309, 2008.
  48. Experimental entanglement of six photons in graph states. Nature physics, 3(2):91–95, 2007.
  49. Quantum aspects of evolution: a contribution towards evolutionary explorations of genotype networks via quantum walks. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 17(172):20200567, 2020.
  50. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical review, 47(10):777, 1935.
  51. John S Bell. On the einstein podolsky rosen paradox. Physics Physique Fizika, 1(3):195, 1964.
  52. Experimental realization of einstein-podolsky-rosen-bohm gedankenexperiment: A new violation of bell’s inequalities. Physical review letters, 49(2):91, 1982.
  53. Quantum computation and quantum information. Cambridge university press, 2010.
  54. Entanglement swapping between photons that have never coexisted. Physical review letters, 110(21):210403, 2013.
  55. Manipulating quantum entanglement with atoms and photons in a cavity. Reviews of Modern Physics, 73(3):565, 2001.
  56. Philip Ball. Quantum all the way: how does our classical world emerge from the counterintuitive principles of quantum theory? can we even be sure that the world doesn’t’go quantum’when no one is watching? philip ball talks to the theorists and experimentalists trying to find out. Nature, 453(7191):22–26, 2008.
  57. Observation of sub-poissonian photon statistics in a micromaser. Physical review letters, 64(23):2783, 1990.
  58. Christopher C Gerry. Proposal for a mesoscopic cavity qed realization of the greenberger-horne-zeilinger state. Physical Review A, 54(4):R2529, 1996.
  59. Pendellösung oscillations in second-order bragg scattering of atoms from a standing light wave. Quantum and Semiclassical Optics: Journal of the European Optical Society Part B, 8(3):531, 1996.
  60. High-q measurements of fused-silica microspheres in the near infrared. Optics letters, 23(4):247–249, 1998.
  61. Origin of quantum-mechanical complementarity probed by a ‘which-way’experiment in an atom interferometer. Nature, 395(6697):33–37, 1998.
  62. 102 ℏPlanck-constant-over-2-pi\hbarroman_ℏ k large area atom interferometers. Physical review letters, 107(13):130403, 2011.
  63. Three-path atom interferometry with large momentum separation. Physical Review Letters, 121(13):133201, 2018.
  64. Wheeler’s delayed-choice gedanken experiment with a single atom. Nature Physics, 11(7):539–542, 2015.
  65. Bragg scattering of slow atoms from a standing light wave. Europhysics Letters, 34(5):343, 1996.
  66. Theoretical and experimental study of the bragg scattering of atoms from a standing light wave. Physical review A, 52(5):3966, 1995.
  67. Characterization of high-finesse mirrors: Loss, phase shifts, and mode structure in an optical cavity. Physical Review A, 64(3):033804, 2001.
  68. Dynamics of single-atom motion observed in a high-finesse cavity. Physical review letters, 82(19):3791, 1999.
  69. Single slow atoms from an atomic fountain observed in a high-finesse optical cavity. Optics communications, 159(1-3):63–67, 1999.
  70. Single-atom trajectories in higher-order transverse modes of a high-finesse optical cavity. Physica Scripta, 2004(T112):7, 2004.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.