Knowledge-Based Convolutional Neural Network for the Simulation and Prediction of Two-Phase Darcy Flows
Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have gained significant prominence as a powerful tool in the field of scientific computing and simulations. Their ability to seamlessly integrate physical principles into deep learning architectures has revolutionized the approaches to solving complex problems in physics and engineering. However, a persistent challenge faced by mainstream PINNs lies in their handling of discontinuous input data, leading to inaccuracies in predictions. This study addresses these challenges by incorporating the discretized forms of the governing equations into the PINN framework. We propose to combine the power of neural networks with the dynamics imposed by the discretized differential equations. By discretizing the governing equations, the PINN learns to account for the discontinuities and accurately capture the underlying relationships between inputs and outputs, improving the accuracy compared to traditional interpolation techniques. Moreover, by leveraging the power of neural networks, the computational cost associated with numerical simulations is substantially reduced. We evaluate our model on a large-scale dataset for the prediction of pressure and saturation fields demonstrating high accuracies compared to non-physically aware models.
- M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations,” Journal of Computational physics, vol. 378, pp. 686–707, 2019.
- G. E. Karniadakis, I. G. Kevrekidis, L. Lu, P. Perdikaris, S. Wang, and L. Yang, “Physics-informed machine learning,” Nature Reviews Physics, vol. 3, no. 6, 2021.
- R. Rodriguez-Torrado, P. Ruiz, L. Cueto-Felgueroso, M. C. Green, T. Friesen, S. Matringe, and J. Togelius, “Physics-informed attention-based neural network for hyperbolic partial differential equations: application to the buckley–leverett problem,” Scientific reports, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 7557, 2022.
- S. Liu and J. H. Masliyah, “Single fluid flow in porous media,” Chemical Engineering Communications, vol. 148, no. 1, pp. 653–732, 1996.
- V. Shabro, C. Torres-Verdín, F. Javadpour, and K. Sepehrnoori, “Finite-difference approximation for fluid-flow simulation and calculation of permeability in porous media,” Transport in porous media, vol. 94, pp. 775–793, 2012.
- M. Tang, Y. Liu, and L. J. Durlofsky, “Deep-learning-based surrogate flow modeling and geological parameterization for data assimilation in 3d subsurface flow,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 376, p. 113636, 2021.
- A. e. a. Yewgat, “Imex-aunet: Deep learning proxy for multi-phase subsurface flow,” ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2022.
- Z. Zhang, “A physics-informed deep convolutional neural network for simulating and predicting transient darcy flows in heterogeneous reservoirs without labeled data,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 211, p. 110179, 2022.
- R. Xu, D. Zhang, and N. Wang, “Uncertainty quantification and inverse modeling for subsurface flow in 3d heterogeneous formations using a theory-guided convolutional encoder-decoder network,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 613, p. 128321, 2022.
- Z. Elabid, T. Chakraborty, and A. Hadid, “Knowledge-based deep learning for modeling chaotic systems,” in 2022 21st IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA). IEEE, 2022, pp. 1203–1209.
- S. Whitaker, “Flow in porous media i: A theoretical derivation of darcy’s law,” Transport in porous media, vol. 1, pp. 3–25, 1986.
- T. Narasimhan and P. Witherspoon, “An integrated finite difference method for analyzing fluid flow in porous media,” Water Resources Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 57–64, 1976.
- X. J. Zhu, “Semi-supervised learning literature survey,” 2005.
- M. Tang, Y. Liu, and L. J. Durlofsky, “A deep-learning-based surrogate model for data assimilation in dynamic subsurface flow problems,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 413, p. 109456, 2020.
- J. Stankovich and D. Lockington, “Brooks-corey and van genuchten soil-water-retention models,” Journal of Irrigation and drainage Engineering, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 1995.
- “3D simulated data of two phase flow in a porous media,” Stanford University, Accessed September 2023. [Online]. Available: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1_Zs9txwZIVKy_QRwZL-D3O0R8Cl71tA-?usp=sharing
- AD-GPRS, “Automatic differentiation general purpose research simulator (ad-gprs),” 2018.
- L. Torrey and J. Shavlik, “Transfer learning,” in Handbook of research on machine learning applications and trends: algorithms, methods, and techniques. IGI global, 2010, pp. 242–264.
- I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio, “Generative adversarial nets,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 27, 2014.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.