Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Gibbs-preserving operations requiring infinite amount of quantum coherence

Published 4 Apr 2024 in quant-ph and cond-mat.stat-mech | (2404.03479v3)

Abstract: Gibbs-preserving operations have been studied as one of the standard free processes in quantum thermodynamics. Although they admit a simple mathematical structure, their operational significance has been unclear due to the potential hidden cost to implement them using an operatioanlly motivated class of operations, such as thermal operations. Here, we show that this hidden cost can be infinite -- we present a family of Gibbs-preserving operations that cannot be implemented by thermal operations aided by any finite amount of quantum coherence. Our result implies that there are uncountably many Gibbs-preserving operations that require unbounded thermodynamic resources to implement, raising a question about employing Gibbs-preserving operations as available thermodynamics processes. This finding is a consequence of the general lower bounds we provide for the coherence cost of approximately implementing a certain class of Gibbs-preserving operations with a desired accuracy. We find that our lower bound is almost tight, identifying a quantity -- related to the energy change caused by the channel to implement -- as a fundamental quantifier characterizing the coherence cost for the approximate implementation of Gibbs-preserving operations.

Authors (2)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (26)
  1. M. Lostaglio, An introductory review of the resource theory approach to thermodynamics, Rep. Prog. Phys. 82, 114001 (2019).
  2. P. Faist and R. Renner, Fundamental work cost of quantum processes, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021011 (2018).
  3. X. Wang and M. M. Wilde, Resource theory of asymmetric distinguishability, Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033170 (2019).
  4. N. Shiraishi and T. Sagawa, Quantum thermodynamics of correlated-catalytic state conversion at small scale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 150502 (2021).
  5. Open quantum problems, Problem 46.
  6. J. M. Renes, Work cost of thermal operations in quantum thermodynamics, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 129, 153 (2014).
  7. B. Yadin and V. Vedral, General framework for quantum macroscopicity in terms of coherence, Phys. Rev. A 93, 022122 (2016).
  8. I. Marvian, Operational interpretation of quantum fisher information in quantum thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 190502 (2022).
  9. E. P. Wigner, Die Messung quantenmechanischer Operatoren, Zeitschrift fur Physik 133, 101 (1952).
  10. H. Araki and M. M. Yanase, Measurement of quantum mechanical operators, Phys. Rev. 120, 622 (1960).
  11. H. Tajima and H. Nagaoka, Coherence-variance uncertainty relation and coherence cost for quantum measurement under conservation laws, arXiv:1909.02904 (2019).
  12. Y. Kuramochi and H. Tajima, Wigner-araki-yanase theorem for continuous and unbounded conserved observables, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 210201 (2023).
  13. H. Emori and H. Tajima, Error and disturbance as irreversibility with applications: Unified definition, wigner–araki–yanase theorem and out-of-time-order correlator, arXiv:2309.14172 (2023).
  14. M. Ozawa, Conservative quantum computing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 057902 (2002b).
  15. H. Tajima and K. Saito, Universal limitation of quantum information recovery: symmetry versus coherence, arXiv:2103.01876 (2021).
  16. B. Eastin and E. Knill, Restrictions on transversal encoded quantum gate sets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 110502 (2009).
  17. A. Kubica and R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański, Using quantum metrological bounds in quantum error correction: A simple proof of the approximate eastin-knill theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 150503 (2021).
  18. G. Gour and R. W. Spekkens, The resource theory of quantum reference frames: manipulations and monotones, New J. Phys. 10, 033023 (2008).
  19. E. Chitambar and G. Gour, Quantum resource theories, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 025001 (2019).
  20. F. G. S. L. Brandão and M. B. Plenio, A Reversible Theory of Entanglement and its Relation to the Second Law, Commun. Math. Phys. 295, 829 (2010).
  21. F. G. S. L. Brandao and N. Datta, One-shot rates for entanglement manipulation under non-entangling maps, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 57, 1754 (2011).
  22. I. Marvian Mashhad, Symmetry, asymmetry and quantum information,  (2012).
  23. M. Keyl and R. F. Werner, Optimal cloning of pure states, testing single clones, J. Math. Phys. 40, 3283 (1999).
  24. P. Hayden and J. Preskill, Black holes as mirrors: quantum information in random subsystems, J. High Energy Phys. 2007, 120 (2007).
  25. N. Datta, Min- and max-relative entropies and a new entanglement monotone, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 55, 2816 (2009).
  26. B. Regula, Convex geometry of quantum resource quantification, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51, 045303 (2017).
Citations (5)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 1 like about this paper.