Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Enhancing Autonomous Vehicle Training with Language Model Integration and Critical Scenario Generation

Published 12 Apr 2024 in cs.RO, cs.AI, and cs.LG | (2404.08570v1)

Abstract: This paper introduces CRITICAL, a novel closed-loop framework for autonomous vehicle (AV) training and testing. CRITICAL stands out for its ability to generate diverse scenarios, focusing on critical driving situations that target specific learning and performance gaps identified in the Reinforcement Learning (RL) agent. The framework achieves this by integrating real-world traffic dynamics, driving behavior analysis, surrogate safety measures, and an optional LLM component. It is proven that the establishment of a closed feedback loop between the data generation pipeline and the training process can enhance the learning rate during training, elevate overall system performance, and augment safety resilience. Our evaluations, conducted using the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) and the HighwayEnv simulation environment, demonstrate noticeable performance improvements with the integration of critical case generation and LLM analysis, indicating CRITICAL's potential to improve the robustness of AV systems and streamline the generation of critical scenarios. This ultimately serves to hasten the development of AV agents, expand the general scope of RL training, and ameliorate validation efforts for AV safety.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (46)
  1. W. Ding, C. Xu, M. Arief, H. Lin, B. Li, and D. Zhao, “A survey on safety-critical driving scenario generation—a methodological perspective,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2023.
  2. B. R. Kiran, I. Sobh, V. Talpaert, P. Mannion, A. A. A. Sallab, S. Yogamani, and P. Pérez, “Deep reinforcement learning for autonomous driving: A survey,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 4909–4926, 2022.
  3. K. Hao, L. Liu, W. Cui, J. Zhang, S. Yan, Y. Pan, and Z. Yang, “Bridging data-driven and knowledge-driven approaches for safety-critical scenario generation in automated vehicle validation,” 2023.
  4. R. Krajewski, T. Moers, D. Nerger, and L. Eckstein, “Data-driven maneuver modeling using generative adversarial networks and variational autoencoders for safety validation of highly automated vehicles,” in 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2018, pp. 2383–2390.
  5. N. Deo and M. M. Trivedi, “Multi-modal trajectory prediction of surrounding vehicles with maneuver based lstms,” in 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).   IEEE, June 2018. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2018.8500493
  6. J.-A. Bolte, A. Bär, D. Lipinski, and T. Fingscheidt, “Towards corner case detection for autonomous driving,” 2019.
  7. T. Ponn, M. Breitfuß, X. Yu, and F. Diermeyer, “Identification of challenging highway-scenarios for the safety validation of automated vehicles based on real driving data,” in 2020 Fifteenth International Conference on Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies (EVER).   IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–10.
  8. M. Zipfl, N. Koch, and J. M. Zöllner, “A comprehensive review on ontologies for scenario-based testing in the context of autonomous driving,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10837, 2023.
  9. W. Wang and D. Zhao, “Extracting traffic primitives directly from naturalistically logged data for self-driving applications,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1223–1229, 2018.
  10. J. Fang, D. Zhou, F. Yan, T. Zhao, F. Zhang, Y. Ma, L. Wang, and R. Yang, “Augmented lidar simulator for autonomous driving,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1931–1938, 2020.
  11. T. A. Wheeler and M. J. Kochenderfer, “Factor graph scene distributions for automotive safety analysis,” in 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).   IEEE, 2016, pp. 1035–1040.
  12. W. Ding, W. Wang, and D. Zhao, “A new multi-vehicle trajectory generator to simulate vehicle-to-vehicle encounters,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.05680, 2018.
  13. F. L. David and G. Emilia, “Trustworthy autonomous vehicles,” Joint Research Centre (Seville site), Tech. Rep., 2021.
  14. L. Jain, V. Chandrasekaran, U. Jang, W. Wu, A. Lee, A. Yan, S. Chen, S. Jha, and S. A. Seshia, “Analyzing and improving neural networks by generating semantic counterexamples through differentiable rendering,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.00727, 2019.
  15. M. Abdelfattah, K. Yuan, Z. J. Wang, and R. Ward, “Towards universal physical attacks on cascaded camera-lidar 3d object detection models,” in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).   IEEE, 2021, pp. 3592–3596.
  16. M. O’Kelly, A. Sinha, H. Namkoong, R. Tedrake, and J. C. Duchi, “Scalable end-to-end autonomous vehicle testing via rare-event simulation,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 31, 2018.
  17. B. Chen, X. Chen, Q. Wu, and L. Li, “Adversarial evaluation of autonomous vehicles in lane-change scenarios,” IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 10 333–10 342, 2021.
  18. R. Krajewski, J. Bock, L. Kloeker, and L. Eckstein, “The highd dataset: A drone dataset of naturalistic vehicle trajectories on german highways for validation of highly automated driving systems,” in 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2018, pp. 2118–2125.
  19. E. Leurent, “An environment for autonomous driving decision-making,” https://github.com/eleurent/highway-env, 2018.
  20. W. X. Zhao, K. Zhou, J. Li, T. Tang, X. Wang, Y. Hou, Y. Min, B. Zhang, J. Zhang, Z. Dong, et al., “A survey of large language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.18223, 2023.
  21. H. Touvron, L. Martin, K. Stone, P. Albert, A. Almahairi, Y. Babaei, N. Bashlykov, S. Batra, P. Bhargava, S. Bhosale, et al., “Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288, 2023.
  22. A. Madaan, S. Zhou, U. Alon, Y. Yang, and G. Neubig, “Language models of code are few-shot commonsense learners,” 2022.
  23. B. Lester, R. Al-Rfou, and N. Constant, “The power of scale for parameter-efficient prompt tuning,” in Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.   Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic: Association for Computational Linguistics, Nov. 2021, pp. 3045–3059. [Online]. Available: https://aclanthology.org/2021.emnlp-main.243
  24. T. Kojima, S. S. Gu, M. Reid, Y. Matsuo, and Y. Iwasawa, “Large language models are zero-shot reasoners,” 2023.
  25. D. Fu, X. Li, L. Wen, M. Dou, P. Cai, B. Shi, and Y. Qiao, “Drive like a human: Rethinking autonomous driving with large language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.07162, 2023.
  26. L. Wen, D. Fu, X. Li, X. Cai, T. Ma, P. Cai, M. Dou, B. Shi, L. He, and Y. Qiao, “Dilu: A knowledge-driven approach to autonomous driving with large language models,” 2023.
  27. C. Sima, K. Renz, K. Chitta, L. Chen, H. Zhang, C. Xie, P. Luo, A. Geiger, and H. Li, “Drivelm: Driving with graph visual question answering,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.14150, 2023.
  28. J. Cai, W. Deng, H. Guang, Y. Wang, J. Li, and J. Ding, “A survey on data-driven scenario generation for automated vehicle testing,” Machines, vol. 10, no. 11, p. 1101, 2022.
  29. E. Nassif, H. Tian, E. Candela, Y. Feng, P. Angeloudis, and W. Y. Ochieng, “Safety standards for autonomous vehicles: Challenges and way forward,” in 2023 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).   IEEE, 2023, pp. 3004–3009.
  30. G. Drayson, E. Panagiotaki, D. Omeiza, and L. Kunze, “Cc-sgg: Corner case scenario generation using learned scene graphs,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.09844, 2023.
  31. M. Bevilacqua, A. Tsourdos, and A. Starr, “Particle swarm for path planning in a racing circuit simulation,” in 2017 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), 2017, pp. 1–6.
  32. X. Zhang, J. Tao, K. Tan, M. Törngren, J. M. G. Sánchez, M. R. Ramli, X. Tao, M. Gyllenhammar, F. Wotawa, N. Mohan, et al., “Finding critical scenarios for automated driving systems: A systematic literature review,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.08664, 2021.
  33. D. Zhao, H. Lam, H. Peng, S. Bao, D. J. LeBlanc, K. Nobukawa, and C. S. Pan, “Accelerated evaluation of automated vehicles safety in lane-change scenarios based on importance sampling techniques,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 18, no. 3, p. 595–607, Mar. 2017. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2016.2582208
  34. G. Li, Y. Li, S. Jha, T. Tsai, M. Sullivan, S. K. S. Hari, Z. Kalbarczyk, and R. Iyer, “Av-fuzzer: Finding safety violations in autonomous driving systems,” in 2020 IEEE 31st International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE), 2020, pp. 25–36.
  35. M. Klischat, E. I. Liu, F. Holtke, and M. Althoff, “Scenario factory: Creating safety-critical traffic scenarios for automated vehicles,” in 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2020, pp. 1–7.
  36. J. Cai, W. Deng, H. Guang, Y. Wang, J. Li, and J. Ding, “A survey on data-driven scenario generation for automated vehicle testing,” Machines, vol. 10, no. 11, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1702/10/11/1101
  37. L. Vater, M. Sonntag, J. Hiller, P. Schaudt, and L. Eckstein, “A systematic approach towards the definition of the terms edge case and corner case for automated driving,” in 2023 3rd International Conference on Electrical, Computer, Communications and Mechatronics Engineering (ICECCME).   IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–6.
  38. J. Sun, H. Zhang, H. Zhou, R. Yu, and Y. Tian, “Scenario-based test automation for highly automated vehicles: A review and paving the way for systematic safety assurance,” IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 14 088–14 103, 2021.
  39. Y. Li, “Deep reinforcement learning: An overview,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.07274, 2017.
  40. M. Kwon, S. M. Xie, K. Bullard, and D. Sadigh, “Reward design with language models,” 2023.
  41. E. Candela, Y. Feng, P. Angeloudis, and Y. Demiris, “Quantitative risk indices for autonomous vehicle training systems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.12945, 2021.
  42. L. M. Leandro Parada, Eduardo Candela and P. Angeloudis, “Safe and efficient manoeuvring for emergency vehicles in autonomous traffic using multi-agent proximal policy optimisation,” Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–29, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2023.2246586
  43. Y. Feng, S. Pickering, E. Chappell, P. Iravani, and C. Brace, “Driving style analysis by classifying real-world data with support vector clustering,” in 2018 3rd IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Engineering (ICITE), 2018, pp. 264–268.
  44. F. Kruber, J. Wurst, S. Chakraborty, and M. Botsch, “Highway traffic data: macroscopic, microscopic and criticality analysis for capturing relevant traffic scenarios and traffic modeling based on the highd data set,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.04249, 2019.
  45. H. Chase, “Langchain,” Oct. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain
  46. A. Q. Jiang, A. Sablayrolles, A. Mensch, C. Bamford, D. S. Chaplot, D. d. l. Casas, F. Bressand, G. Lengyel, G. Lample, L. Saulnier, et al., “Mistral 7b,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06825, 2023.
Citations (6)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.