Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Spatial resolution of dijet photoproduction in near-encounter ultraperipheral nuclear collisions

Published 15 Apr 2024 in hep-ph | (2404.09731v2)

Abstract: We present next-to-leading order perturbative QCD predictions for inclusive dijet photoproduction in ultra-peripheral nucleus-nucleus collisions (UPCs) within the impact-parameter dependent equivalent photon approximation. Taking into account the finite size of both the photon-emitting and the target nucleus, we show that this process is sensitive to the transverse-plane geometry of the UPC events. We show that this leads to a sizeable, 20-40% effect for large values of the $z_\gamma$ variable in the dijet photoproduction cross section in lead-lead UPCs at 5.02 TeV compared to the widely-used pointlike approximation where the nuclear radius is accounted for only as a sharp cut-off in the photon flux calculation. This resolution of the spatial degrees of freedom is a result of having high-transverse-momentum jets in the final state, which at the large-$z_\gamma$ kinematics requires a highly energetic photon in the initial state, thus biasing the collisions to small impact-parameter ''near-encounter'' configurations. We further discuss the role of the forward-neutron event-class selection in isolating the photonuclear cross section in the nucleus-nucleus collisions, and employ the needed electromagnetic breakup survival factor in our predictions.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (38)
  1. C. A. Bertulani, S. R. Klein, and J. Nystrand, Physics of ultra-peripheral nuclear collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 55, 271 (2005), arXiv:nucl-ex/0502005 .
  2. A. J. Baltz, The Physics of Ultraperipheral Collisions at the LHC, Phys. Rept. 458, 1 (2008), arXiv:0706.3356 [nucl-ex] .
  3. E. Fermi, On the Theory of the impact between atoms and electrically charged particles, Z. Phys. 29, 315 (1924).
  4. C. F. von Weizsacker, Radiation emitted in collisions of very fast electrons, Z. Phys. 88, 612 (1934).
  5. E. J. Williams, Nature of the high-energy particles of penetrating radiation and status of ionization and radiation formulae, Phys. Rev. 45, 729 (1934).
  6. M. Strikman, R. Vogt, and S. N. White, Probing small x parton densities in ultraperipheral AA and pA collisions at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 082001 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0508296 .
  7. V. Guzey and M. Klasen, Inclusive dijet photoproduction in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions at the CERN Large Hadron Collider in next-to-leading order QCD, Phys. Rev. C 99, 065202 (2019a), arXiv:1811.10236 [hep-ph] .
  8. V. Guzey and M. Klasen, Constraints on nuclear parton distributions from dijet photoproduction at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 396 (2019b), arXiv:1902.05126 [hep-ph] .
  9. ATLAS collaboration, Photo-nuclear dijet production in ultra-peripheral Pb+Pb collisions (2017), ATLAS-CONF-2017-011.
  10. ATLAS collaboration, Photo-nuclear jet production in ultra-peripheral Pb+Pb collisions at sNN=5.02subscript𝑠NN5.02\sqrt{s}_{\text{NN}}=5.02square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT NN end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector (2022), ATLAS-CONF-2022-021.
  11. M. Klasen and H. Paukkunen, Nuclear PDFs After the First Decade of LHC Data, arXiv:2311.00450 [hep-ph] (2023).
  12. V. Guzey and M. Klasen, Diffractive dijet photoproduction in ultraperipheral collisions at the LHC in next-to-leading order QCD, JHEP 04, 158, arXiv:1603.06055 [hep-ph] .
  13. I. Helenius and C. O. Rasmussen, Hard diffraction in photoproduction with Pythia 8, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 413 (2019), arXiv:1901.05261 [hep-ph] .
  14. N. Baron and G. Baur, Photon - hadron interactions in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 48, 1999 (1993).
  15. A. J. Baltz, S. R. Klein, and J. Nystrand, Coherent vector meson photoproduction with nuclear breakup in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 012301 (2002), arXiv:nucl-th/0205031 .
  16. F. Krauss, M. Greiner, and G. Soff, Photon and gluon induced processes in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 39, 503 (1997).
  17. C. A. Bertulani and G. Baur, Electromagnetic Processes in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions, Phys. Rept. 163, 299 (1988).
  18. By using the total instead of inelastic nucleon-nucleon cross section, we are taking a probabilistic interpretation that elastic nucleon-nucleon interactions would also disintegrate the colliding nuclei.
  19. C. Patrignani et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, Chin. Phys. C 40, 100001 (2016).
  20. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, The anti-ktsubscript𝑘𝑡k_{t}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT jet clustering algorithm, JHEP 04, 063, arXiv:0802.1189 [hep-ph] .
  21. S. Frixione and G. Ridolfi, Jet photoproduction at HERA, Nucl. Phys. B 507, 315 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9707345 .
  22. A. Banfi and M. Dasgupta, Dijet rates with symmetric E(t) cuts, JHEP 01, 027, arXiv:hep-ph/0312108 .
  23. M. Gluck, E. Reya, and A. Vogt, Photonic parton distributions, Phys. Rev. D 46, 1973 (1992).
  24. T.-J. Hou et al., New CTEQ global analysis of quantum chromodynamics with high-precision data from the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 103, 014013 (2021), arXiv:1912.10053 [hep-ph] .
  25. I. Helenius, Probing nuclear PDFs with dijets in ultra-peripheral Pb+Pb collisions, PoS HardProbes2018, 118 (2018), arXiv:1811.10931 [hep-ph] .
  26. C. Bierlich et al., A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3, SciPost Phys. Codeb. 2022, 8 (2022), arXiv:2203.11601 [hep-ph] .
  27. S. Hoeche, F. Krauss, and P. Meinzinger, Resolved photons in Sherpa, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 178 (2024), arXiv:2310.18674 [hep-ph] .
  28. For example, PDFs measured in fully inclusive deep-inelastic scattering do include also a diffractive contribution.
  29. V. Guzey and M. Klasen, How large is the diffractive contribution to inclusive dijet photoproduction in ultraperipheral collisions at the LHC?, Phys. Rev. D 104, 114013 (2021), arXiv:2012.13277 [hep-ph] .
  30. N. Armesto, Nuclear shadowing, J. Phys. G 32, R367 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0604108 .
  31. L. Frankfurt, V. Guzey, and M. Strikman, Leading Twist Nuclear Shadowing Phenomena in Hard Processes with Nuclei, Phys. Rept. 512, 255 (2012), arXiv:1106.2091 [hep-ph] .
  32. K. J. Eskola, H. Paukkunen, and C. A. Salgado, EPS09: A New Generation of NLO and LO Nuclear Parton Distribution Functions, JHEP 04, 065, arXiv:0902.4154 [hep-ph] .
  33. A. Adeluyi and C. Bertulani, Gluon distributions in nuclei probed at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C 84, 024916 (2011), arXiv:1104.4287 [nucl-th] .
  34. M. Burkardt, Impact parameter dependent parton distributions and off forward parton distributions for zeta —>>> 0, Phys. Rev. D 62, 071503 (2000), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 66, 119903 (2002)], arXiv:hep-ph/0005108 .
  35. M. Burkardt, Impact parameter space interpretation for generalized parton distributions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 18, 173 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0207047 .
  36. L. C. Maximon and R. A. Schrack, The form factor of the Fermi model spatial distribution, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. B 70, 10.6028/jres.070b.007 (1966).
  37. M. Diehl, R. Nagar, and F. J. Tackmann, ChiliPDF: Chebyshev interpolation for parton distributions, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 257 (2022), arXiv:2112.09703 [hep-ph] .
  38. J.-P. Berrut and L. N. Trefethen, Barycentric Lagrange Interpolation, SIAM Review 46, 501 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036144502417715 .
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 2 likes about this paper.