Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Explainable Light-Weight Deep Learning Pipeline for Improved Drought Stress Identification

Published 15 Apr 2024 in cs.CV | (2404.10073v3)

Abstract: Early identification of drought stress in crops is vital for implementing effective mitigation measures and reducing yield loss. Non-invasive imaging techniques hold immense potential by capturing subtle physiological changes in plants under water deficit. Sensor based imaging data serves as a rich source of information for machine learning and deep learning algorithms, facilitating further analysis aimed at identifying drought stress. While these approaches yield favorable results, real-time field applications requires algorithms specifically designed for the complexities of natural agricultural conditions. Our work proposes a novel deep learning framework for classifying drought stress in potato crops captured by UAVs in natural settings. The novelty lies in the synergistic combination of a pre-trained network with carefully designed custom layers. This architecture leverages feature extraction capabilities of the pre-trained network while the custom layers enable targeted dimensionality reduction and enhanced regularization, ultimately leading to improved performance. A key innovation of our work involves the integration of Gradient-Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM), an explainability technique. Grad-CAM sheds light on the internal workings of the deep learning model, typically referred to as a black box. By visualizing the focus areas of the model within the images, Grad-CAM fosters interpretability and builds trust in the decision-making process of the model. Our proposed framework achieves superior performance, particularly with the DenseNet121 pre-trained network, reaching a precision of 97% to identify the stressed class with an overall accuracy of 91%. Comparative analysis of existing state-of-the-art object detection algorithms reveals the superiority of our approach in significantly higher precision and accuracy.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (29)
  1. Stressed food - the impact of abiotic environmental stresses on crop quality. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 141(3):271–286, 2011.
  2. A review on drought stress in plants: Implications, mitigation and the role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Resources, Environment and Sustainability, 5:100032, 2021.
  3. Plant Drought Stress: Effects, Mechanisms and Management. In Eric Lichtfouse, Mireille Navarrete, Philippe Debaeke, Souchere Veronique, and Caroline Alberola, editors, Sustainable Agriculture, pages 153–188. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2009.
  4. Compton J. Tucker. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 8(2):127–150, 1979.
  5. Capturing crop adaptation to abiotic stress using image-based technologies. OPEN BIOLOGY, 12(6), 2022.
  6. Proximal methods for plant stress detection using optical sensors and machine learning. Biosensors, 10(12):193, 2020.
  7. Thermal Imaging for Plant Stress Detection and Phenotyping. Remote Sensing, 13(1):68, 2021.
  8. Low-cost chlorophyll fluorescence imaging for stress detection. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 21(6):2055, 2021.
  9. Applications of hyperspectral imaging in plant phenotyping. Trends in Plant Science, 27(3):301–315, 2022.
  10. A review of computer vision technologies for plant phenotyping. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 176:105672, 2020.
  11. A Comprehensive Review of High Throughput Phenotyping and Machine Learning for Plant Stress Phenotyping. Phenomics, 2(3):156–183, 2022.
  12. Machine learning for high-throughput stress phenotyping in plants. TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 21(2):110–124, 2016.
  13. Deep Learning for Plant Stress Phenotyping: Trends and Future Perspectives. Trends in Plant Science, 23(10):883–898, 2018.
  14. Yu Jiang and Changying Li. Convolutional Neural Networks for Image-Based High-Throughput Plant Phenotyping: A Review. Plant Phenomics, 2020, 2020.
  15. Early detection of water stress in maize based on digital images. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 140:461–468, 2017.
  16. Identification and Classification of Maize Drought Stress Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network. Symmetry, 11(2):256, 2019.
  17. Machine Learning-Based Ensemble Band Selection for Early Water Stress Identification in Groundnut Canopy Using UAV-Based Hyperspectral Imaging. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 20:1–5, 2023.
  18. Drought Stress Detection Using Low-Cost Computer Vision Systems and Machine Learning Techniques. IT Professional, 22(3):27–29, 2020.
  19. Intelligent monitoring of stress induced by water deficiency in plants using deep learning. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 70:1–13, 2021.
  20. Identifying crop water stress using deep learning models. Neural Computing and Applications, 33(10):5353–5367, 2021.
  21. Drought stress detection technique for wheat crop using machine learning. PeerJ Computer Science, 9:e1268, 2023.
  22. Hyperspectral machine-learning model for screening tea germplasm resources with drought tolerance. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 2022.
  23. Plant drought impact detection using ultra-high spatial resolution hyperspectral images and machine learning. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 102:102364, 2021.
  24. A deep learning approach for early detection of drought stress in maize using proximal scale digital images. Neural Computing and Applications, 36(4):1899–1913, 2024.
  25. Potato crop stress identification in aerial images using deep learning-based object detection. Agronomy Journal, 113:3991–4002, 2021.
  26. An explainable deep machine vision framework for plant stress phenotyping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(18):4613–4618, 2018.
  27. Usefulness of interpretability methods to explain deep learning based plant stress phenotyping, 2020. arXiv:2007.05729 [cs].
  28. A dataset of multispectral potato plants images, university of idaho. https://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/vakanski/Multispectral_Images_Dataset.html, 2021.
  29. Grad-CAM: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 618–626, 2017. ISSN: 2380-7504.
Citations (1)

Summary

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.