2000 character limit reached
Virtual Foundry Graphnet for Metal Sintering Deformation Prediction
Published 17 Apr 2024 in cs.LG | (2404.11753v1)
Abstract: Metal Sintering is a necessary step for Metal Injection Molded parts and binder jet such as HP's metal 3D printer. The metal sintering process introduces large deformation varying from 25 to 50% depending on the green part porosity. In this paper, we use a graph-based deep learning approach to predict the part deformation, which can speed up the deformation simulation substantially at the voxel level. Running a well-trained Metal Sintering inferencing engine only takes a range of seconds to obtain the final sintering deformation value. The tested accuracy on example complex geometry achieves 0.7um mean deviation for a 63mm testing part.
- H. INC, “Reinvent business opportunities with digitally driven metal 3d printing for mass production hp metal jet s100 printing solution,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://h20195.www2.hp.com/v2/GetDocument.aspx?docname=4AA8-1958ENW
- A. Kumar, J. Wang, Y. Bai, S. Huxtable, and C. Williams, “Impacts of process-induced porosity on material properties of copper made by binder jetting additive manufacturing,” Materials & Design, vol. 182, p. 108001, 07 2019.
- J. Slotwinski and E. Garboczi, “Porosity of additive manufacturing parts for process monitoring.” 40th Review of Progress in Quantitative Non-Destructive Evaluation, Baltimore, MD, 2013-07-26 2013. [Online]. Available: https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/getpdf.cfm?pubid=914546https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_{p}df.cfm?pub_{i}d=914546italic_h italic_t italic_t italic_p italic_s : / / italic_t italic_s italic_a italic_p italic_p italic_s . italic_n italic_i italic_s italic_t . italic_g italic_o italic_v / italic_p italic_u italic_b italic_l italic_i italic_c italic_a italic_t italic_i italic_o italic_n / italic_g italic_e italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d italic_f . italic_c italic_f italic_m ? italic_p italic_u italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d = 914546
- [Online]. Available: https://graphics.stanford.edu/data/3Dscanrep/
- Z. Wu, S. Pan, F. Chen, G. Long, C. Zhang, and P. S. Yu, “A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 32, no. 1, p. 4–24, Jan. 2021. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2020.2978386
- J. Bruna, W. Zaremba, A. Szlam, and Y. LeCun, “Spectral networks and locally connected networks on graphs,” 2014.
- T. N. Kipf and M. Welling, “Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks,” 2017.
- J. Atwood and D. Towsley, “Diffusion-convolutional neural networks,” 2016.
- P. Veličković, G. Cucurull, A. Casanova, A. Romero, P. Liò, and Y. Bengio, “Graph attention networks,” 2018.
- A. Sanchez-Gonzalez, J. Godwin, T. Pfaff, R. Ying, J. Leskovec, and P. W. Battaglia, “Learning to simulate complex physics with graph networks,” 2020.
- A. Fuller, Z. Fan, and C. Day, “Digital twin: Enabling technology, challenges, and open research,” CoRR, vol. abs/1911.01276, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01276
- E. Glaessgen and D. Stargel, “The digital twin paradigm for future nasa and u.s. air force vehicles,” 04 2012.
- M. Mashaly, “Connecting the twins: A review on digital twin technology & its networking requirements,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 184, pp. 299–305, 2021, the 12th International Conference on Ambient Systems, Networks and Technologies (ANT) / The 4th International Conference on Emerging Data and Industry 4.0 (EDI40) / Affiliated Workshops. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050921006694
- Z. Liu, N. Meyendorf, and N. Mrad, “The role of data fusion in predictive maintenance using digital twin,” vol. 1949, 04 2018, p. 020023.
- A. M. Madni, C. C. Madni, and S. D. Lucero, “Leveraging digital twin technology in model-based systems engineering,” Systems, vol. 7, no. 1, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/7/1/7
- D. Blaine, “The micromechanical influences on the constitutive laws of sintering for continuum model /,” 01 2004.
- D. Khurana, A. Koli, K. Khatter, and S. Singh, “Natural language processing: State of the art, current trends and challenges,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 82, 07 2022.
- J. Jumper, R. Evans, A. Pritzel, T. Green, M. Figurnov, O. Ronneberger, K. Tunyasuvunakool, R. Bates, A. Žídek, A. Potapenko, A. Bridgland, C. Meyer, S. Kohl, A. Ballard, A. Cowie, B. Romera-Paredes, S. Nikolov, R. Jain, J. Adler, and D. Hassabis, “Highly accurate protein structure prediction with alphafold,” Nature, vol. 596, pp. 1–11, 07 2021.
- J. Pathak, S. Subramanian, P. Harrington, S. Raja, A. Chattopadhyay, M. Mardani, T. Kurth, D. Hall, Z. Li, K. Azizzadenesheli, P. Hassanzadeh, K. Kashinath, and A. Anandkumar, “Fourcastnet: A global data-driven high-resolution weather model using adaptive fourier neural operators,” 2022.
- S. Cuomo, V. S. di Cola, F. Giampaolo, G. Rozza, M. Raissi, and F. Piccialli, “Scientific machine learning through physics-informed neural networks: Where we are and what’s next,” 2022.
- K. Xu, W. Hu, J. Leskovec, and S. Jegelka, “How powerful are graph neural networks?” 2019.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.