Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Challenging Negative Gender Stereotypes: A Study on the Effectiveness of Automated Counter-Stereotypes

Published 18 Apr 2024 in cs.CL and cs.CY | (2404.11845v1)

Abstract: Gender stereotypes are pervasive beliefs about individuals based on their gender that play a significant role in shaping societal attitudes, behaviours, and even opportunities. Recognizing the negative implications of gender stereotypes, particularly in online communications, this study investigates eleven strategies to automatically counter-act and challenge these views. We present AI-generated gender-based counter-stereotypes to (self-identified) male and female study participants and ask them to assess their offensiveness, plausibility, and potential effectiveness. The strategies of counter-facts and broadening universals (i.e., stating that anyone can have a trait regardless of group membership) emerged as the most robust approaches, while humour, perspective-taking, counter-examples, and empathy for the speaker were perceived as less effective. Also, the differences in ratings were more pronounced for stereotypes about the different targets than between the genders of the raters. Alarmingly, many AI-generated counter-stereotypes were perceived as offensive and/or implausible. Our analysis and the collected dataset offer foundational insight into counter-stereotype generation, guiding future efforts to develop strategies that effectively challenge gender stereotypes in online interactions.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (28)
  1. Olaiya E Aina and Petronella A Cameron. 2011. Why does gender matter? counteracting stereotypes with young children. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 39(3):11–19.
  2. Towards countering essentialism through social bias reasoning. In Poster, Workshop on NLP for Positive Impact.
  3. Mana Ashida and Mamoru Komachi. 2022. Towards automatic generation of messages countering online hate speech and microaggressions. In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms (WOAH), pages 11–23, Seattle, Washington (Hybrid). Association for Computational Linguistics.
  4. The impact of gendered stereotypes on perceptions of violence: A commentary. Sex Roles, 81:34–43.
  5. Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science, 355(6323):389–391.
  6. Sarai Blincoe and Monica J Harris. 2009. Prejudice reduction in white students: Comparing three conceptual approaches. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 2(4):232.
  7. Donna Bobbitt-Zeher. 2011. Gender discrimination at work: Connecting gender stereotypes, institutional policies, and gender composition of workplace. Gender & Society, 25(6):764–786.
  8. STEM training and early career outcomes of female and male graduate students: Evidence from UMETRICS data linked to the 2010 census. American Economic Review, 106(5):333–338.
  9. CONAN - COunter NArratives through nichesourcing: a multilingual dataset of responses to fight online hate speech. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 2819–2829, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  10. Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112(5):1297–1338.
  11. Nilanjana Dasgupta and Anthony G Greenwald. 2001. On the malleability of automatic attitudes: combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5):800.
  12. Naomi Ellemers. 2018. Gender stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69:275–298.
  13. Sexist slurs: Reinforcing feminine stereotypes online. Sex Roles, 83(1):16–28.
  14. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. In Social Cognition, pages 162–214. Routledge.
  15. Speaking of kinds: How correcting generic statements can shape children’s concepts. Cognitive Science, 46(12):e13223.
  16. What makes a good counter-stereotype? evaluating strategies for automated responses to stereotypical text. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Influence in Conversations (SICon 2023), pages 25–38, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  17. Anna Kerkhof and Valentin Reich. 2023. Gender stereotypes in user-generated content. papers.ssrn.com.
  18. Handling and presenting harmful text in NLP research. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022, pages 497–510.
  19. Thou shalt not hate: Countering online hate speech. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, volume 13, pages 369–380.
  20. Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41):16474–16479.
  21. Countering gender-typicality in occupational choices: An information intervention targeted at adolescents. Technical report, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
  22. A benchmark dataset for learning to intervene in online hate speech. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 4755–4764, Hong Kong, China. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  23. Generating counter narratives against online hate speech: Data and strategies. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 1177–1190, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  24. Perspective taking combats automatic expressions of racial bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(6):1027.
  25. Meta-analyses of the relationship between conformity to masculine norms and mental health-related outcomes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(1):80.
  26. Natalie A Wyer. 2010. Salient egalitarian norms moderate activation of out-group approach and avoidance. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13(2):151–165.
  27. Cognitive mirage: A review of hallucinations in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.06794.
  28. Wanzheng Zhu and Suma Bhat. 2021. Generate, prune, select: A pipeline for counterspeech generation against online hate speech. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021, pages 134–149, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.