Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Hybrid Navigation Acceptability and Safety

Published 18 Apr 2024 in eess.SY, cs.RO, and cs.SY | (2404.11882v1)

Abstract: Autonomous vessels have emerged as a prominent and accepted solution, particularly in the naval defence sector. However, achieving full autonomy for marine vessels demands the development of robust and reliable control and guidance systems that can handle various encounters with manned and unmanned vessels while operating effectively under diverse weather and sea conditions. A significant challenge in this pursuit is ensuring the autonomous vessels' compliance with the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGs). These regulations present a formidable hurdle for the human-level understanding by autonomous systems as they were originally designed from common navigation practices created since the mid-19th century. Their ambiguous language assumes experienced sailors' interpretation and execution, and therefore demands a high-level (cognitive) understanding of language and agent intentions. These capabilities surpass the current state-of-the-art in intelligent systems. This position paper highlights the critical requirements for a trustworthy control and guidance system, exploring the complexity of adapting COLREGs for safe vessel-on-vessel encounters considering autonomous maritime technology competing and/or cooperating with manned vessels.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (12)
  1. Autonomous Collision Avoidance at Sea: A Survey. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8.
  2. A Guide to the Collision Avoidance Rules (Seventh Edition). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  3. COLREGs. 1972. Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGs). International Maritime Organization (IMO) London, UK.
  4. Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3): 319–340.
  5. Dylla, F. 2009. Qualitative Spatial Reasoning for Navigating Agents - Behavior Formalization with Qualitative Representations. In Gottfried, B.; and Aghajan, H. K., eds., Behaviour Monitoring and Interpretation - BMI - Smart Environments [an outgrow of BMI workshops], volume 3 of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 98–128. IOS Press.
  6. A hierarchical graph-based model for mobility data representation and analysis. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 141.
  7. Towards safe navigation by formalizing navigation rules. TransNav: International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 7(2): 161–168.
  8. Research on ontology-based situation understanding and decision-making approach for MASS. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, volume 929, 012029. IOP Publishing.
  9. Towards a Standard Upper Ontology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems - Volume 2001, FOIS ’01, 2–9. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 1581133774.
  10. Technology acceptance theories and factors influencing artificial Intelligence-based intelligent products. Telematics and Informatics, 47: 101324.
  11. Autonomous Ship Collision Avoidance Navigation Concepts, Technologies and Techniques. The Journal of Navigation, 61(1): 129–142.
  12. COLREGs-aware Trajectory Optimization for Autonomous Surface Vessels. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55(31): 269–274. 14th IFAC Conference on Control Applications in Marine Systems, Robotics, and Vehicles CAMS 2022.
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.