Generation and annihilation of three dimensional magnetic nulls in extrapolated solar coronal magnetic field: Data-based Implicit Large Eddy Simulation
Abstract: Three-dimensional magnetic nulls are the points where magnetic field vanishes and are preferential sites for magnetic reconnection: a process which converts magnetic energy into heat and accelerates charged particles along with a rearrangement of magnetic field lines. In the solar corona, the reconnections manifest as coronal transients including solar flares, coronal mass ejections and coronal jets. The nulls are generally found to be collocated with complex active regions on the solar photosphere. Extrapolation of magnetic field from corresponding photospheric magnetogram indicate an abundance of these nulls in solar atmosphere. Nevertheless, their generation is still not well understood. Recently, Maurya et al. (2023) have demonstrated magnetic reconnection to be a cause for generation and annihilation of magnetic nulls through magnetohydrodynamics simulation, where the initial magnetic field is idealized to have a single radial null. This article further extends the study in a more realistic scenario where the initial magnetic field is constructed by extrapolating photospheric magnetogram data and hence, incorporates field line complexities inherent to a complex active region. For the purpose, the active region NOAA 11977 hosting a C6.6 class flare is selected. The simulation is initiated using non-force-free extrapolated magnetic field from the photospheric vector magnetogram at around 02:48:00 UT on 17 February 2014, 16 minutes before the flare peak. The generation, annihilation and dynamics of nulls are explored by a complimentary usage of trilinear null detection technique and tracing of magnetic field line dynamics. It is found that the nulls can spontaneously generate/annihilate in pairs while preserving the topological degree and can have observational implications like footpoint brightenings. Magnetic reconnection is found to be the cause of such generation and annihilation.
- Solar Phys., 297(7), 91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-022-02016-2.
- Aschwanden, M. J. (2005) Physics of the Solar Corona. An Introduction with Problems and Solutions (2nd edition). Springer Berlin, Heidelberg.
- Astrophys. J., 540(2), 1126–1142. https://doi.org/10.1086/309376.
- The Astrophysical Journal, 540(2), 1126–1142. https://doi.org/10.1086/309376.
- Science, 318(5856), 1588. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1146143.
- Astron. Astrophys., 444(3), 961–976. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20053600.
- Solar Phys., 238(2), 347–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-006-0230-2.
- American Geophysical Union (AGU). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/GM030p0001.
- Solar. Phys., 284(2), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-012-0168-5.
- Solar Phys., 282(2), 335–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-012-0150-2.
- Solar Phys., 240(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-006-0280-5.
- Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511536151.
- Solar Phys., 289(9), 3549–3578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-014-0529-3.
- Nature Communications, 14, 2107. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37888-w.
- Astrophys. J., 383, 420. https://doi.org/10.1086/170799.
- Physics of Fluids, 15(12), 3890–3893. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1624610.
- Astrophys. J., 554(1), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.1086/321377.
- Astrophys. J. Lett., 715(2), L133–L137. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/715/2/L133.
- Greene, J. M. (1992) Locating Three-Dimensional Roots by a Bisection Method. Journal of Computational Physics, 98(2), 194–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(92)90137-N.
- Physics of Plasmas, 14(8), 082107–082107. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2756751.
- Physics of Plasmas, 17(9), 092903. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3467499.
- Physics of Plasmas, 3(3), 781–791. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.871778.
- Solar Phys., 247(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-007-9090-7.
- Astrophys. J., 679(1), 848–853. https://doi.org/10.1086/587639.
- Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 72(2-3), 219–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2009.11.014.
- Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 21(12), 318. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/21/12/318.
- Nature Communications, 7, 11522. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11522.
- The Astrophysical Journal, 937(2), 93. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac8d91.
- Astrophys. J., 830(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/830/2/80.
- Astrophys. J., 899(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab9cbe.
- The Astrophysical Journal, 871(2), 209. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aafa16.
- Astrophys. J., 860(2), 128. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aac496.
- Solar Phys., 169(1), 91–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00153836.
- Longcope, D. W. (2005) Topological Methods for the Analysis of Solar Magnetic Fields. Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 2(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.12942/lrsp-2005-7.
- Solar Phys., 254(1), 51–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-008-9281-x.
- The Astrophysical Journal, 683(2), 1192–1206. https://doi.org/10.1086/589738.
- Astrophys. J., 592(1), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1086/375700.
- Journal of Turbulence, 7(15), 15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14685240500331595.
- The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 874(2), L33. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab0c5d.
- Mason, E. I., Antiochos, S. K. and Vourlidas, A. (2021) An observational study of a “rosetta stone” solar eruption. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 914(1), L8. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac0259.
- Astrophys. J., 700(1), 559–578. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/559.
- Physics of Plasmas, 30(2), 022901. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0107601.
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 503(1), 1017–1035. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab175.
- Astrophys. J., 875(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab0a0b.
- Astrophys. J., 923(2), 163. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac2e6d.
- Physics of Plasmas, 3(3), 759–770. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.871810.
- Physics of Plasmas, 14(5), 052106–052106. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2722300.
- Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 19(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-022-00032-9.
- Astrophys. J., 774(2), 154. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/774/2/154.
- Astrophys. J., 860(2), 96. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aac265.
- Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511525087.
- Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 108(A7), 1285. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009812.
- Astrophys. J., 735(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/735/1/46.
- Solar Phys., 275(1-2), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-011-9834-2.
- J. Geophys. Res., 93(A6), 5547–5557. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA093iA06p05547.
- Solar Phys., 275(1-2), 229–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-011-9842-2.
- Solar Phys., 207(2), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016295516408.
- Smolarkiewicz, P. K. (2006) Multidimensional positive definite advection transport algorithm: an overview. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 50(10), 1123–1144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.1071.
- Journal of Computational Physics, 236, 608–623. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2012.11.008.
- Advances in Space Research, 58(8), 1538–1553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.05.043.
- The Astrophysical Journal, 760(2), 101. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/760/2/101.
- Astrophys. J., 864(2), 165. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aad9f7.
- Astrophys. J. Lett., 899(1), L4. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aba69a.
- Reviews of Modern Physics, 82(1), 603–664. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.603.
- Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 8(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1088/1009-9271/8/2/01.
- Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 47(1), 291–332. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101726.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.