Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Assessing the Risk of Proliferation via Fissile Material Breeding in ARC-class Fusion Power Plants

Published 18 Apr 2024 in physics.soc-ph and physics.plasm-ph | (2404.12451v2)

Abstract: Construction of a nuclear weapon requires access to kilogram-scale quantities of fissile material, which can be bred from fertile material like U-238 and Th-232 via neutron capture. Future fusion power plants, with total neutron source rates in excess of $10{20}$ n/s, could breed weapons-relevant quantities of fissile material on short timescales, posing a breakout proliferation risk. The ARC-class fusion reactor design is characterized by demountable high temperature superconducting magnets, a FLiBe liquid immersion blanket, and a relatively small size ($\sim$ 4 m major radius, $\sim$ 1 m minor radius). We use the open-source Monte Carlo neutronics code OpenMC to perform self-consistent time-dependent simulations of a representative ARC-class blanket to assess the feasibility of a fissile breeding breakout scenario. We find that a significant quantity of fissile material can be bred in less than six months of full power operation for initial fertile inventories ranging from 5 to 50 metric tons, representing a non-negligible proliferation risk. We further study the feasibility of this scenario by examining other consequences of fissile breeding such as reduced tritium breeding ratio, extra heat from fission and decay heat, isotopic purity of bred material, and self-protection time of irradiated blanket material. We also examine the impact of Li-6 enrichment on fissile breeding and find that it substantially reduces breeding rate, motivating its use as a proliferation resistance tool.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (64)
  1. ARC: A compact, high-field, fusion nuclear science facility and demonstration power plant with demountable magnets. Fusion Engineering and Design, 100:378–405, 2015.
  2. Conceptual design study for heat exhaust management in the ARC fusion pilot plant. Fusion Engineering and Design, 137:221–242, 2018.
  3. Radiative pulsed l-mode operation in ARC-class reactors. Nuclear Fusion, 62(12):126036, Oct. 2022.
  4. Openmc: A state-of-the-art monte carlo code for research and development. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 82:90–97, 2015. Joint International Conference on Supercomputing in Nuclear Applications and Monte Carlo 2013, SNA + MC 2013. Pluri- and Trans-disciplinarity, Towards New Modeling and Numerical Simulation Paradigms.
  5. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Policy statement on the regulation of advanced reactors. Federal Register, Vol. 73, No. 199, p. 60612, Oct. 2018.
  6. IAEA Safeguards Glossary. Number 3 in International Nuclear Verification Series. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2022.
  7. IAEA “significant quantity” values: time for a closer look? The Nonproliferation Review, 5–6(23), Aug. 2016.
  8. Gregory Jones. Reactor-grade plutonium and nuclear weapons: ending the debate. The Nonproliferation Review, 1–2(26), May 2019.
  9. Bruce Goodwin. Nuclear weapons technology 101 for policy wonks. Technical report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 2021.
  10. Physics and technology considerations for the deuterium–tritium fuel cycle and conditions for tritium fuel self sufficiency. Nuclear Fusion, 61(1):013001, 2020.
  11. Modeling and analysis of the tritium fuel cycle for ARC-and STEP-class DT fusion power plants.
  12. Analyzing the nuclear weapons proliferation risk posed by a mature fusion technology and economy. Energies, 16(3):1123, 2023.
  13. Tritium resources available for fusion reactors. Nuclear Fusion, 58(2):026010, Dec. 2017.
  14. Fusion energy and nonproliferation workshop summary report. Technical report, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, 2023.
  15. Fusion-fission hybrid design with analysis of direct enrichment and non-proliferation features (the solase-h study). Nuclear Engineering and Design, 63(2):357–374, 1981.
  16. Fusion breeder with enhanced safeguarding capabilities against nuclear weapon proliferation. Energy Conversion and Management, 39(9):899–909, 1998.
  17. Neutronic analysis of a thorium fusion breeder with enhanced protection against nuclear weapon proliferation. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 26(1):13–27, 1999.
  18. Neutronic performance of proliferation hardened thorium fusion breeders. Fusion Engineering and Design, 54(1):63–77, 2001.
  19. On the proliferation issues of a fusion fission fuel factory using a molten salt. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 240(10):2988–2993, Oct 2010.
  20. A passively proliferation-proof fusion power plant. Fusion Science and Technology, 44(2):289–293, 2003.
  21. E.T. Cheng. Performance characteristics of actinide-burning fusion power plants. Fusion Science and Technology, 47(4):1219–1223, May 2005.
  22. Creating suns on earth: Iter, life, and the policy and nonproliferation implications of nuclear fusion energy. Nonproliferation Review, 17(2):323–346, 2010.
  23. Possible proliferation risks of future tokamak reactors. In 51st Annual INMM Meeting, July 2010.
  24. Strong neutron sources - how to cope with weapon material production capabilities of fusion and spallation neutron sources? In 7th INMM/Esarda Workshop, 2011.
  25. Proliferation risks of magnetic fusion energy: clandestine production, covert production and breakout. Nuclear Fusion, 52(4):043004, 2012.
  26. MCNP® Code Version 6.3.0 Theory & User Manual. Technical Report LA-UR-22-30006, Rev. 1, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA, Sep. 2022.
  27. Nuclear fusion power for weapons purposes: An exercise in nuclear proliferation forecasting. The Nonproliferation Review, 20(3):525–544, 2013.
  28. Experience with the molten-salt reactor experiment. Nuclear Applications and Technology, 8(2):118–136, 1970.
  29. Thomas J. Dolan, editor. Molten Salt Reactors and Thorium Energy. Woodhead Publishing, 2017.
  30. Bahman Zohuri, editor. Molten Salt Reactors and Integrated Molten Salt Reactors. Academic Press, 2021.
  31. Molten salt for advanced energy applications: A review. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 169:108924, 2022.
  32. W.R. Grimes. Chemical research and development for molten-salt breeder reactors.
  33. Aggregation and data analysis of corrosion studies in molten chloride and fluoride salts. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 511:523–535, 2018.
  34. A general approach for determination of acceptable flibe impurity concentrations in fluoride-salt cooled high temperature reactors (fhrs). Nuclear Engineering and Design, 343:85–95, 2019.
  35. Jinsuo Zhang. Impurities in primary coolant salt of fhrs: Chemistry, impact, and removal methods. Energy Technology, 7(10):1900016, 2019.
  36. Fusion blankets and fluoride-salt-cooled high-temperature reactors with flibe salt coolant: common challenges, tritium control, and opportunities for synergistic development strategies between fission, fusion, and solar salt technologies. Nuclear Technology, 206(11):1778–1801, 2020.
  37. Behavior and distribution of nuclides in the fluoride volatility process of uranium containing molten salt fuel. Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, 261-262:110016, 2022.
  38. Jan Uhlíř. 8 - chemical processing of liquid fuel. In Thomas J. Dolan, editor, Molten Salt Reactors and Thorium Energy, pages 209–230. Woodhead Publishing, 2017.
  39. R B Lindauer. Processing of the MSRE flush and fuel salts.
  40. Current progress in r & d of fluoride volatility method. Procedia Chemistry, 7:110–115, 2012. ATALANTE 2012 International Conference on Nuclear Chemistry for Sustainable Fuel Cycles.
  41. Implementation, capabilities, and benchmarking of shift, a massively parallel monte carlo radiation transport code. Journal of Computational Physics, 308:239–272, 2016.
  42. AR reactor neutronics multi-code validation*. Nuclear Fusion, 62(6), Apr 2022.
  43. Development and validation of fully open-source r2s shutdown dose rate capabilities in openmc*. Nuclear Fusion, 64(5):056011, mar 2024.
  44. Depletion capabilities in the openmc monte carlo particle transport code. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 152:107989, 2021.
  45. H. Bateman. Solution of a system of differential equations occurring in the theory of radioactive transformations. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Mathematical and physical sciences, 15:423 – 427, 1910.
  46. Fispact-ii: An advanced simulation system for activation, transmutation and material modelling. Nuclear Data Sheets, 139:77–137, 2017. Special Issue on Nuclear Reaction Data.
  47. Nonproliferation and arms control assessment of weapons-usable fissile material storage and excess plutonium disposition alternatives. pages 37 – 39.
  48. Andrzej Wojciechowski. The u-232 production in thorium cycle. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 106:204–214, 2018.
  49. 1998.
  50. The potential presence and minimisation of plutonium within the irradiated beryllium in fusion power plants. Fusion Engineering and Design, 85(7):1139–1142, Dec 2010.
  51. Materion. Spec Sheet, S-65 Beryllium Grade, Rev. E, April 2018.
  52. On use of beryllium in fusion reactors: resources, impurities and necessity of detritiation after irradiation. Fusion Engineering and design, 109:480–484, 2016.
  53. Beryllium use in the advanced test reactor. Technical Report INL/CON-07,12959, Idaho National Laboratory, 2007.
  54. R. Scott Kemp. On the feasibility of safeguarding uranium mines. Nonproliferation Review, 13(2):417–425, Dec. 2006.
  55. Nonproliferation and arms control assessment of weapons-usable fissile material storage and excess plutonium disposition alternatives. Technical Report DOE/NN-0007, U.S. Department of Energy Office of Arms Control and Nonproliferation, Jan. 1997.
  56. Robert F. Goheen. Problems of proiferaiton: U.s. policy and the third world. World Politics, 35(2):194–215, Jan. 1983.
  57. Bradley A. Thayer. The causes of nuclear proliferation and the utility of the nuclear non-proliferation regime. Security Studies, 4(3):463–519, 1995.
  58. Ariel E. Levite. Never say never again: Nuclear reversal revisited. International Security, 27(3), Winter 2002/03.
  59. R. Scott Kemp. The iran nuclear deal as a case study in limiting hte proliferation potential of nuclear power. Nature Energy, 4:99–106, Feb. 2019.
  60. Technical report, International Atomic Energy Agency, 1983.
  61. IAEA Statute. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1976.
  62. The Evolution of IAEA Safeguards. Number 2 in International Nuclear Verification Series. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1998.
  63. Olli Heinonen. Iaea inspections in perspective. In Reassessing the Assumptions Driving Our Current Nuclear Nonproliferation Policies. Nonproliferation Policy Education Center, May 2012.
  64. R. Scott Kemp. Environmental detection of clandestine nuclear weapon programs. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 44(Volume 44, 2016):17–35, 2016.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 8 tweets with 39 likes about this paper.