Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Investigating the Generalized Uncertainty Principle Effects on Hawking Radiation in Rotating Linear Dilaton Black Holes

Published 20 Apr 2024 in gr-qc | (2404.13450v1)

Abstract: The impact of the Generalized Uncertainty Principle (GUP) on Hawking particle emission in a rotating linear dilaton black hole (RLDBH) spacetime is examined in this thesis. The concerned study presents a thermal emission model for black holes (BHs) that incorporates the influence of gravitational lens particles through GUP during the quantum tunneling process. The findings suggest that with GUP support, the temperature of Hawking radiation decreases as GUP parameters increase and rises with an increasing BH mass. The thesis also delves into the repercussions of these discoveries on the information loss paradox and adjusted entropy, while also exploring the potential utilization of astrophysical data to confirm GUP effects. In conclusion, our work underscores the significant role of GUP in the thermal emission of non-asymptotically flat (NAF), stationary BHs and its capacity to shed light on the intricate relationship between astrophysics and quantum gravity.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (70)
  1. J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter, and S. W. Hawking, “The four laws of black hole mechanics,” Communications in mathematical physics, vol. 31, pp. 161–170, 1973.
  2. S. W. Hawking, “Particle creation by black holes,” Communications in mathematical physics, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 199–220, 1975.
  3. I. Sakalli and A. Ovgun, “Hawking radiation and deflection of light from rindler modified schwarzschild black hole,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 118, no. 6, p. 60006, 2017.
  4. I. Sakalli, A. Ovgun, and S. F. Mirekhtiary, “Gravitational lensing effect on the hawking radiation of dyonic black holes,” International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, vol. 11, no. 08, p. 1450074, 2014.
  5. G. Gecim and Y. Sucu, “Hawking radiation of topological massive warped-ads3 black holes via particles tunnelling,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.0290, 2014.
  6. G. Gecim and Y. Sucu, “Quantum gravity effect on the hawking radiation of spinning dilaton black hole,” Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 79, no. 10, p. 882, 2019.
  7. F. Scardigli, “Generalized uncertainty principle in quantum gravity from micro-black hole gedanken experiment,” Physics Letters B, vol. 452, no. 1-2, pp. 39–44, 1999.
  8. S. Das and E. C. Vagenas, “Universality of quantum gravity corrections,” Physical review letters, vol. 101, no. 22, p. 221301, 2008.
  9. G. Amelino-Camelia, M. Arzano, Y. Ling, and G. Mandanici, “Black-hole thermodynamics with modified dispersion relations and generalized uncertainty principles,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 23, no. 7, p. 2585, 2006.
  10. İ. Sakallı and S. Kanzi, “Physical properties of brane-world black hole solutions via a confining potential,” Annals of Physics, vol. 439, p. 168803, 2022.
  11. G. Gecim and Y. Sucu, “The gup effect on tunneling of massive vector bosons from the 2+ 1 dimensional black hole,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2018, 2018.
  12. I. Sakalli, A. Övgün, and K. Jusufi, “Gup assisted hawking radiation of rotating acoustic black holes,” Astrophysics and Space Science, vol. 361, pp. 1–7, 2016.
  13. N. Heidari, H. Hassanabadi, and H. Chen, “Quantum-corrected scattering of a schwarzschild black hole with gup effect,” Physics Letters B, vol. 838, p. 137707, 2023.
  14. B. Pourhassan, A. Övgün, and İ. Sakallı, “Pv criticality of achucarro–ortiz black hole in the presence of higher-order quantum and gup corrections,” International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, vol. 17, no. 10, p. 2050156, 2020.
  15. B. Carr, “The generalized uncertainty principle and higher dimensions: Linking black holes and elementary particles,” Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, vol. 9, p. 1008221, 2022.
  16. A. Övgün, “Entangled particles tunneling from a schwarzschild black hole immersed in an electromagnetic universe with gup,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 2919–2927, 2016.
  17. W. Javed, R. Babar, and A. Övgün, “Hawking radiation from cubic and quartic black holes via tunneling of gup corrected scalar and fermion particles,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 34, no. 09, p. 1950057, 2019.
  18. A. Baruah, A. Övgün, and A. Deshamukhya, “Quasinormal modes and bounding greybody factors of gup–corrected black holes in kalb–ramond gravity,” Annals of Physics, p. 169393, 2023.
  19. İ. Sakallı and S. Kanzi, “Topical review: greybody factors and quasinormal modes for black holes invarious theories-fingerprints of invisibles,” Turkish Journal of Physics, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 51–103, 2022.
  20. P. Chen, Y. C. Ong, and D.-h. Yeom, “Black hole remnants and the information loss paradox,” Physics reports, vol. 603, pp. 1–45, 2015.
  21. S. B. Giddings, “Black hole information, unitarity, and nonlocality,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, no. 10, p. 106005, 2006.
  22. J. Preskill, “Do black holes destroy information,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Black Holes, Membranes, Wormholes and Superstrings, S. Kalara and DV Nanopoulos, eds.(World Scientific, Singapore, 1993) pp.   World Scientific, 1992, pp. 22–39.
  23. R. Gambini, R. A. Porto, and J. Pullin, “Realistic clocks, universal decoherence, and the black hole information paradox,” Physical review letters, vol. 93, no. 24, p. 240401, 2004.
  24. L. J. Garay, “Quantum gravity and minimum length,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 10, no. 02, pp. 145–165, 1995.
  25. S. Dengiz, “Note on soft photons and faddeev–jackiw symplectic reduction of quantum electrodynamics in the eikonal limit,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 33, no. 25, p. 1830020, 2018.
  26. B. Pourhassan, X. Shi, S. S. Wani, S. A. Khawari, F. Kazemian, I. S. Sakalli, N. A. Shah, and F. Mir, “Information theoretical approach to detecting quantum gravitational corrections,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.12878, 2023.
  27. G. Clement, D. Gal’tsov, and C. Leygnac, “Linear dilaton black holes,” Physical Review D, vol. 67, no. 2, p. 024012, 2003.
  28. G. Tokgoz and I. Sakallı, “Stationary scalar clouds around maximally rotating linear dilaton black holes,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 34, no. 12, p. 125007, 2017.
  29. I. Sakallı, “Analytical solutions in rotating linear dilaton black holes: resonant frequencies, quantization, greybody factor, and hawking radiation,” Physical Review D, vol. 94, no. 8, p. 084040, 2016.
  30. E. Berti, E. Barausse, V. Cardoso, L. Gualtieri, P. Pani, U. Sperhake, L. C. Stein, N. Wex, K. Yagi, T. Baker et al., “Testing general relativity with present and future astrophysical observations,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 32, no. 24, p. 243001, 2015.
  31. G. Nashed and K. Bamba, “Slow kerr-nut solution within the context of dynamically modified gravity through chern-simons theory,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06487, 2023.
  32. T. Damour, G. Gibbons, and C. Gundlach, “Dark matter, time-varying g, and a dilaton field,” Physical review letters, vol. 64, no. 2, p. 123, 1990.
  33. F. S. Guzman, T. Matos, and H. Villegas-Brena, “Scalar dark matter in spiral galaxies,” arXiv preprint astro-ph/9811143, 1998.
  34. J. Einasto, “Dark matter,” arXiv preprint arXiv:0901.0632, 2009.
  35. E. Oks, “Review of latest advances on dark matter from the viewpoint of the occam razor principle,” New Astronomy Reviews, p. 101673, 2023.
  36. S. V. Ketova and R. Ishikawaa, “Formation of primordial black holes after inflation in supergravity,” 2021.
  37. M. De Laurentis, I. De Martino, and R. Della Monica, “The galactic center as a laboratory for theories of gravity and dark matter,” Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 86, no. 10, p. 104901, 2023.
  38. M. K. Parikh and F. Wilczek, “Hawking radiation as tunneling,” Physical review letters, vol. 85, no. 24, p. 5042, 2000.
  39. S. W. Hawking, “Black holes and thermodynamics,” Physical Review D, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 191, 1976.
  40. B. S. DeWitt, “Quantum gravity: the new synthesis,” in General relativity, 1979.
  41. S.-W. Wei and Y.-X. Liu, “Observing the shadow of einstein-maxwell-dilaton-axion black hole,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2013, no. 11, p. 063, 2013.
  42. S. Hawking, C. Hunter, and D. N. Page, “Nut charge, anti–de sitter space, and entropy,” Physical Review D, vol. 59, no. 4, p. 044033, 1999.
  43. J. D. Brown and J. W. York Jr, “Quasilocal energy and conserved charges derived from the gravitational action,” Physical Review D, vol. 47, no. 4, p. 1407, 1993.
  44. I. Sakalli, “Quantization of rotating linear dilaton black holes,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 75, no. 4, p. 144, 2015.
  45. S. Carlip, “Logarithmic corrections to black hole entropy, from the cardy formula,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 17, no. 20, p. 4175, 2000.
  46. S. A. Hayward, “Unified first law of black-hole dynamics and relativistic thermodynamics,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 15, no. 10, p. 3147, 1998.
  47. K. Nozari and A. Etemadi, “Minimal length, maximal momentum, and hilbert space representation of quantum mechanics,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, no. 10, p. 104029, 2012.
  48. P. Pedram, “New approach to nonperturbative quantum mechanics with minimal length uncertainty,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, no. 2, p. 024016, 2012.
  49. S. Das and S. Pramanik, “Path integral for nonrelativistic generalized uncertainty principle corrected hamiltonian,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, no. 8, p. 085004, 2012.
  50. P. Bosso, G. G. Luciano, L. Petruzziello, and F. Wagner, “30 years in: Quo vadis generalized uncertainty principle?” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16193, 2023.
  51. E. Sucu and İ. Sakallı, “Gup-reinforced hawking radiation in rotating linear dilaton black hole spacetime,” Physica Scripta, vol. 98, no. 10, p. 105201, 2023.
  52. R. Brustein and J. Kupferman, “Black hole entropy divergence and the uncertainty principle,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, no. 12, p. 124014, 2011.
  53. H. Zhao, G. Li, and L. Zhang, “Generalized uncertainty principle and entropy of three-dimensional rotating acoustic black hole,” Physics Letters A, vol. 376, no. 35, pp. 2348–2351, 2012.
  54. A. F. Ali, S. Das, and E. C. Vagenas, “Discreteness of space from the generalized uncertainty principle,” Physics Letters B, vol. 678, no. 5, pp. 497–499, 2009.
  55. R.-G. Cai, L.-M. Cao, and Y.-P. Hu, “Corrected entropy-area relation and modified friedmann equations,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 08, p. 090, 2008.
  56. B. Carr, J. Mureika, and P. Nicolini, “Sub-planckian black holes and the generalized uncertainty principle,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, no. 7, pp. 1–24, 2015.
  57. G. Gecim, Y. Sucu et al., “Quantum gravity effect on the tunneling particles from 2+ 1-dimensional new-type black hole,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2018, 2018.
  58. J. M. Bardeen and J. A. Petterson, “The lense-thirring effect and accretion disks around kerr black holes,” Astrophysical Journal Letters v. 195, p. L65, vol. 195, p. L65, 1975.
  59. V. Todorinov, P. Bosso, and S. Das, “Relativistic generalized uncertainty principle,” Annals of Physics, vol. 405, pp. 92–100, 2019.
  60. K. Jusufi and A. F. Ali, “Generalized uncertainty principle from the regularized self-energy,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.07198, 2023.
  61. A. Övgün and K. Jusufi, “Massive vector particles tunneling from noncommutative charged black holes and their gup-corrected thermodynamics,” The European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 131, no. 5, p. 177, 2016.
  62. F. Mirekhtiary and I. Sakalli, “Hawking radiation of relativistic particles from black strings,” Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, vol. 198, pp. 455–462, 2019.
  63. M. Anacleto, F. Brito, and E. Passos, “Quantum-corrected self-dual black hole entropy in tunneling formalism with gup,” Physics Letters B, vol. 749, pp. 181–186, 2015.
  64. M. Anacleto, F. Brito, G. Luna, E. Passos, and J. Spinelly, “Quantum-corrected finite entropy of noncommutative acoustic black holes,” Annals of Physics, vol. 362, pp. 436–448, 2015.
  65. D.-J. Qi, L. Liu, and S.-X. Liu, “Quantum tunneling and remnant from a quantum-modified schwarzschild space–time close to planck scale,” Canadian Journal of Physics, vol. 97, no. 9, pp. 1012–1018, 2019.
  66. F. Di Filippo, N. Ogawa, S. Mukohyama, and T. Waki, “Soft hair, dressed coordinates and information loss paradox,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.15800, 2023.
  67. I. Sakallı, M. Halilsoy, and H. Pasaoglu, “Entropy conservation of linear dilaton black holes in quantum corrected hawking radiation,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 3212–3224, 2011.
  68. Z. Z. Ma, “Hawking temperature of kerr–newman–ads black hole from tunneling,” Physics letters B, vol. 666, no. 4, pp. 376–381, 2008.
  69. M. Faizal and M. M. Khalil, “Gup-corrected thermodynamics for all black objects and the existence of remnants,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 30, no. 22, p. 1550144, 2015.
  70. P. Amaro-Seoane, H. Audley, S. Babak, J. Baker, E. Barausse, P. Bender, E. Berti, P. Binetruy, M. Born, D. Bortoluzzi et al., “Laser interferometer space antenna,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.00786, 2017.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Authors (1)

  1. Erdem Sucu 

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 4 likes about this paper.

Sign Up for Free