Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Faster Algorithms for Dual-Failure Replacement Paths

Published 22 Apr 2024 in cs.DS | (2404.13907v1)

Abstract: Given a simple weighted directed graph $G = (V, E, \omega)$ on $n$ vertices as well as two designated terminals $s, t\in V$, our goal is to compute the shortest path from $s$ to $t$ avoiding any pair of presumably failed edges $f_1, f_2\in E$, which is a natural generalization of the classical replacement path problem which considers single edge failures only. This dual failure replacement paths problem was recently studied by Vassilevska Williams, Woldeghebriel and Xu [FOCS 2022] who designed a cubic time algorithm for general weighted digraphs which is conditionally optimal; in the same paper, for unweighted graphs where $\omega \equiv 1$, the authors presented an algebraic algorithm with runtime $\tilde{O}(n{2.9146})$, as well as a conditional lower bound of $n{8/3-o(1)}$ against combinatorial algorithms. However, it was unknown in their work whether fast matrix multiplication is necessary for a subcubic runtime in unweighted digraphs. As our primary result, we present the first truly subcubic combinatorial algorithm for dual failure replacement paths in unweighted digraphs. Our runtime is $\tilde{O}(n{3-1/18})$. Besides, we also study algebraic algorithms for digraphs with small integer edge weights from ${-M, -M+1, \cdots, M-1, M}$. As our secondary result, we obtained a runtime of $\tilde{O}(Mn{2.8716})$, which is faster than the previous bound of $\tilde{O}(M{2/3}n{2.9144} + Mn{2.8716})$ from [Vassilevska Williams, Woldeghebriela and Xu, 2022].

Citations (2)

Summary

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.