Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

SUBA-Jet: a new Model for Jets in Heavy Ion Collisions

Published 22 Apr 2024 in hep-ph | (2404.14579v2)

Abstract: We present a new model for jet quenching in a quark gluon plasma (QGP). The jet energy loss has two steps. The initial jet parton with a high virtuality loses energy by a perturbative vacuum parton shower modified by medium interactions until it becomes on shell. Subsequent energy loss originates from elastic and radiative collisions with the medium constituents. Coherency of the radiative collisions is achieved by starting with virtual gluons that act as field dressing of the initial jet parton. These are formed according to a Gunion-Bertsch seed. The QCD version of the LPM effect is obtained by increasing the phase of the virtual gluons through elastic scatterings with the medium. Above a phase threshold, the virtual gluons will be formed and can produce coherent radiation themselves. The model has been implemented in a Monte Carlo code and is validated by successfully reproducing the BDMPS-Z prediction for the energy spectrum of radiated gluons in a static medium. Results for the more realistic case, in which the assumptions of the BDMPS-Z approach are released, are also shown. We investigate the influence of various parameters on the energy spectrum and the transverse momentum distribution, such as the in-medium quark masses, the energy transfer in the recoil process, and the phase accumulation criteria, especially for low and intermediate energy gluons.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (25)
  1. STAR Collaboration, G. Agakishiev et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 072301.
  2. PHENIX Collaboration, A. Adare et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 162301.
  3. CMS Collaboration, V. Khachatryan et al. JHEP 04 (2017) 039.
  4. T. Matsui and H. Satz Phys. Lett. B 178 (1986) 416–422.
  5. HotQCD Collaboration, A. Bazavov et al. Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 094503.
  6. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.
  7. U. A. Wiedemann Nucl. Phys. B 588 (2000) 303–344.
  8. X.-N. Wang and X.-f. Guo Nucl. Phys. A 696 (2001) 788–832.
  9. J. F. Gunion and G. Bertsch Phys. Rev. D 25 (1982) 746.
  10. L. Landau and I. Pomeranchuk Dokl. Akad. Nauk Ser. Fiz. 92 (1953) 535–536.
  11. A. Migdal Phys. Rev. 103 (1956) 1811–1820.
  12. B. Zakharov JETP Lett. 63 (1996) 952–957.
  13. B. G. Zakharov JETP Lett. 65 (1997) 615–620.
  14. T. Renk Phys. Rev. C78 (2008) 034908.
  15. S. Floerchinger and U. A. Wiedemann Phys. Lett. B 728 (2014) 407–411.
  16. Cambridge University Press, 2, 2011.
  17. P. B. Gossiaux and J. Aichelin Phys. Rev. C 78 (2008) 014904.
  18. J.-P. Blaizot and E. Iancu Phys. Rept. 359 (2002) 355–528.
  19. M. Gyulassy and X.-n. Wang Nucl. Phys. B 420 (1994) 583–614.
  20. Editions Frontières, 1991.
  21. S. Caron-Huot and C. Gale Phys. Rev. C 82 (2010) 064902.
  22. Y. Mehtar-Tani JHEP 07 (2019) 057.
  23. S. Peigne and A. V. Smilga Phys. Usp. 52 (2009) 659–685.
  24. J. H. Isaksen and K. Tywoniuk JHEP 09 (2023) 049.
  25. Y. Mehtar-Tani and K. Tywoniuk JHEP 06 (2020) 187.
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.