Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Thinking inside the bounds: Improved error distributions for indifference point data analysis and simulation via beta regression using common discounting functions

Published 27 Apr 2024 in stat.ME | (2404.18000v2)

Abstract: Standard nonlinear regression is commonly used when modeling indifference points due to its ability to closely follow observed data, resulting in a good model fit. However, standard nonlinear regression currently lacks a reasonable distribution-based framework for indifference points, which limits its ability to adequately describe the inherent variability in the data. Software commonly assumes data follow a normal distribution with constant variance. However, typical indifference points do not follow a normal distribution or exhibit constant variance. To address these limitations, this paper introduces a class of nonlinear beta regression models that offers excellent fit to discounting data and enhances simulation-based approaches. This beta regression model can accommodate popular discounting functions. This work proposes three specific advances. First, our model automatically captures non-constant variance as a function of delay. Second, our model improves simulation-based approaches since it obeys the natural boundaries of observable data, unlike the ordinary assumption of normal residuals and constant variance. Finally, we introduce a scale-location-truncation trick that allows beta regression to accommodate observed values of zero and one. A comparison between beta regression and standard nonlinear regression reveals close agreement in the estimated discounting rate k obtained from both methods.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (11)
  1. Nonlinear regression analysis and its applications. Wiley, 1988.
  2. On the appropriate measure to estimate hyperbolic discounting rate (k) using the method of least squares. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 44(4):667–682, 2021.
  3. Excessive discounting of delayed reinforcers as a trans-disease process: Update on the state of the science. Current Opinion in Psychology, 30:59–64, 2019.
  4. F. Cribari-Neto and A. Zeileis. Beta regression in r. Journal of statistical software, 34:1–24, 2010.
  5. Beta regression model nonlinear in the parameters with additive measurement errors in variables. Plos one, 16(7):e0254103, 2021.
  6. S. Ferrari and F. Cribari-Neto. Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions. Journal of applied statistics, 31(7):799–815, 2004.
  7. The effects of extended-release injectable naltrexone and incentives for opiate abstinence in heroin-dependent adults in a model therapeutic workplace: A randomized trial. Drug and alcohol dependence, 197:220–227, 2019.
  8. An algorithm for identifying nonsystematic delay-discounting data. Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 16(3):264, 2008.
  9. F. Liu and Y. Kong. Zoib: an r package for bayesian inference for beta regression and zero/one inflated beta regression. R J., 7(2):34, 2015.
  10. J. E. Mazur. An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. Quantitative analyses of behavior, 5:55–73, 1987.
  11. M. Smithson and J. Verkuilen. A better lemon squeezer? maximum-likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables. Psychological methods, 11(1):54, 2006.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.